2nd Malaysian Airliner MH17 downed in Ukraine nr Russia

[TonyGosling]

China’s state media strongly condemns West's 'one sided accusation' over MH17 downing, Defends Russia. The Diplomat
http://thediplomat.com/2014/07/mh17-china-defends-russia-criticizes-th e-west/

As we will clearly demonstrate, the only wild conspiracy theories being pushed right now, are those coming out of the US State Department, and the government in Kiev, Ukraine, which are being repeated by CNN, BBC, FOX-NewsCorp, ABC, CBS and NBC…
http://www.phibetaiota.net/2014/07/berto-jongman-theory-of-us-ukraine- failed-false-flag-operation/

[outsider]

This post is not to offend the memory of lives lost in two anomalous mishaps involving Malaysia Airlines. This article has been written by me with information gathered mostly by David Vose.

===

The Russians have released their radar readings. Why will the US not release its own satellite imagery of these events? They certainly have these.

Instead, the USG wants to sell us primitive drawings of the event made on a 4-year old Google Map and to broadcast discredited YouTube footage (created several hours before the missile attack) and from Social Media posts of alleged separatists, bragging about the shoot-down.

To watch the exchange, here between AP Reporter, Matt Lee and the State Department Deputy, Marie Harf is to watch a snarky, prevaricating government official exude toxic deceit, as he traps her into a corner, by pointing out that the only evidence being offered by the US Government for its claims derive from Social Media posts.

After bluffing for a while, she finally shoots back that she "doesn't have the clearance to de-classify" the US satellite images, which the journalist believes it is everybody's right to see, in a circumstance of a shoot-down of a civilian airliner.

And what of the numerous reports, from completely separate sources, that bodies found in the wreckage of the purported Flight MH17, were already heavily decomposed and drained of blood, within one day of the crash, with many showing evidence of having been tortured?

Several other details shown in this clip point to the the scene of the crash as being heavily tampered, with invalid passports neatly piled together with their boarding passes, showing no sign of a 33,000-foot impact or fire of any kind, let alone human use. Many were invalid, clipped or hole-punched and would not have been admissible for boarding the plane.

More importantly, the plane, itself shows evidence of not being the designated plane on more than one count. The ID for the plane scheduled for Flight MH 17 was 9M-MRD.

However, a photo published by the Daily Mail, taken by a passenger about to board, shows its ID to be 9M-MRC. The ID of the plane used in MH 370 was 9M-MRO. It would not be very difficult to paint out an "O" into a "C"...

Another oddity is the fact that according to a FlightRadar24.com live flight tracker, in a screen capture made on July 18, the day following the crash, MH 17 (9M-MRD) was shown as "canceled" on the date of the crash.

In addition, from the positioning of the window in front of the right wing and Emergency Exit - the window in the corresponding wreckage is exactly where the window was positioned on the craft of MH 370 (and in the passenger's photo).

This disparity was caught before the original photo from the scene was released publicly but we are shown here, the original photograph at the scene and the one published by the MSM, with a fake window, photoshopped in. (I wonder how this photoshop jocky feels about his or her job?)


I've said enough. Watch the clip and decide for yourself whether or not the USG's and its propaganda outlet, the mainstream media's portrayal of this event is on the up-and-up.


Video (18 and a half mins.):

MH17 Shot Down Over Ukraine is Missing Malaysian Flight 370
http://www.forbiddenknowledgetv.com/page/26571.html


- Alexandra

P.S. Please share Forbidden Knowledge TV e-mails

and videos with your friends and colleagues.

That's how we grow. Thanks.

[outsider]

Or it could be MH370's 'twin', that is photographed here at Tel Aviv; that also has the same window configuration as MH370:

http://www.bollyn.com/public/N105GT_in_TA.jpg

[scienceplease 2]

This article shows that NATO had AWACS flying over the MH17 crash zone at time of the crash.

http://m.strategic-culture.org/news/2014/07/21/mh-17-beware-of-the-cha meleon.html

[outsider]

@ scienceplease 2 : 'I think the 777 in Tel-Aviv was just used as a test rig to check the remote hijacking mechanism.

Meanwhile, to support my conjecture...

http://m.strategic-culture.org/news/2014/07/21/mh-17-beware-of-the-cha meleon.html '

I don't see how the article supports your conjecture that the Tel Aviv 'Twin' was just used to test the auto-takeover of MH370...

[scienceplease 2]

[ian neal]

http://21stcenturywire.com/2014/07/25/mh17-verdict-real-evidence-point s-to-us-kiev-cover-up-of-failed-false-flag-attack/

Comprehensive analysis

[TonyGosling]

Shocking Analysis of the ‘Shooting Down’ of Malaysian MH17
http://www.anderweltonline.com/wissenschaft-und-technik/luftfahrt-2014  /shocking-analysis-of-the-shooting-down-of-malaysian-mh17/
JULI 30, 2014

Peter Haisenko in Cockpit of Condor DC 10
By Peter Haisenko Zur deutschen Version bitte hier anklicken

The tragedy of Malaysian MH 017 continues to elude any light of clarity being cast over it. The flight recorders are in England and are evaluated. What can come of it? Maybe more than you would assume. Especially the voice recorder will be interesting when you look at the picture of a cockpit fragment. As an expert in aviation I closely looked at the images of the wreckage that are circulating on the Internet.
First, I was amazed at how few photos can be found from the wreckage with Google. All are in low resolution, except one: The fragment of the cockpit below the window on the pilots side. This image, however, is shocking. In Washington, you can now hear views expresssed of a “potentially tragic error / accident” regarding MH 017. Given this particular cockpit image it does not surprise me at all.
Entry and exit impact holes of projectiles in the cockpit area

Source for all photos: Internet
I recommend to click on the little picture to the right. You can download this photo as a PDF in good resolution. This is necessary, because that will allow you understand what I am describing here. The facts speak clear and loud and are beyond the realm of speculation: The cockpit shows traces of shelling! You can see the entry and exit holes. The edge of a portion of the holes is bent inwards. These are the smaller holes, round and clean, showing the entry points most likeley that of a 30 millimeter caliber projectile. The edge of the other, the larger and slightly frayed exit holes showing shreds of metal pointing produced by the same caliber projectiles. Moreover, it is evident that at these exit holes of the outer layer of the double aluminum reinforced structure are shredded or bent – outwardly! Furthermore, minor cuts can be seen, all bent outward, which indicate that shrapnel had forcefull exited through the outer skin from the inside of the cockpit. The open rivets are are also bent outward.
In sifting through the available images one thing stands out: All wreckage of the sections behind the cockpit are largely intact, except for the fact that only fragments of the aircraft remained . Only the cockpit part shows these peculiar marks of destruction. This leaves the examiner with an important clue. This aircraft was not hit by a missile in the central portion. The destruction is limited to the cockpit area. Now you have to factor in that this part is constructed of specially reinforced material. This is on account of the nose of any aircraft having to withstand the impact of a large bird at high speeds. You can see in the photo, that in this area significantly stronger aluminum alloys were being installed than in the remainder of the outer skin of the fuselage. One remembers the crash of Pan Am over Lockerbie. It was a large segment of the cockpit that due to the special architecture survived the crash in one piece. In the case of flight MH 017 it becomes abundantly clear that there also an explosion took place inside the aircraft.
Tank destroying mix of amunititon

Bullet holes in the outer skin
So what could have happened? Russia recently published radar recordings, that confirm at least one Ukrainian SU 25 in close proximity to MH 017. This corresponds with the statement of the now missing Spanish controller ‘Carlos’ that has seen two Ukrainian fighter aircraft in the immediate vicinity of MH 017. If we now consider the armament of a typical SU 25 we learn this: It is equipped with a double-barreled 30-mm gun, type GSh-302 / AO-17A, equipped with: a 250 round magazine of anti-tank incendiary shells and splinter-explosive shells (dum-dum), arranged in alternating order. The cockpit of the MH 017 has evidently been fired at from both sides: the entry and exit holes are found on the same fragment of it’s cockpit segment!
Now just consider what happens when a series of anti-tank incendiary shells and splinter-explosive shells hit the cockpit. These are after all designed to destroy a modern tank. The anti-tank incendiary shells partially traversed the cockpit and exited on the other side in a slightly deformed shape. (Aviation forensic experts could possibly find them on the ground presumably controlled by the Kiev Ukrainian military; the translator). After all, their impact is designed to penetrate the solid armor of a tank. Also, the splinter-explosive shells will, due to their numerous impacts too cause massive explosions inside the cockpit, since they are designed to do this. Given the rapid firing sequence of the GSh-302 cannon, it will cause a rapid succession of explosions within the cockpit area in a very short time. Remeber each of these is sufficient to destroy a tank.
What “mistake” was actually being committed – and by whom?

Graze on the wing
Because the interior of a commercial aircraft is a hermetically sealed pressurized chamber, the explosions will, in split second, increase the pressure inside the cabin to extreme levels or breaking point. An aircraft is not equipped for this, it will burst like a balloon. This explains a coherent scenario. The largely intact fragments of the rear sections broke in mid air at the weaker points of contstruction most likely under extreme internal air pressure. The images of the widely scattered field of debris and the brutally damaged segment of cockpit fit like hand in glove. Furthermore, a wing segment shows traces of a grazing shot, which in direct extension leads to the cockpit. Interestingly, I found that both the high-resolution photo of the fragment of bullet riddled cockpit as well as the segment of grazed wing have in the meantime disappeared from Google Images. One can find virtually no more pictures of the wreckage, except the well known smoking ruins.
If you listen to the voices from Washington now who speak of a “potentially tragic error / accident”, all that remains is the question of what might have been the nature of this “mistake” perpetrated here. I am not given to hover long in the realm of speculation, but would like to invite others to consider the following : The MH 017 looked similar in it’s tricolor design to that that of the Russian President’s plane. The plane with Presdient Putin on board was at the same time ”near” Malaysia MH 017. In aviation circles “close” would be considered to be anywhere between 150 to 200 miles. Also, in this context we might consider the deposition of Ms. Tymoshenko, who wanted to shoot Presdient Putin with a Kalashnikov.
But that this remains pure speculation. The shelling of the cockpit of air Malaysia MH 017, however, is definitely not.

[outsider]

Military leadership DNR stated that Ukrainian junta prepares monstrous attacks:
http://dnr.today/news/voennoe-rukovodstvo-dnr-zayavilo-o-tom-chto-ukra inskaya-xunta-gotovit-chudovishhnye-terakty/

At today's briefing, the Acting Prime Minister Vladimir Antyufeeva DNI and Defense Minister Igor Strelkov DNI was a message about the upcoming Ukrainian military provocations.

Igor Gunmen told that punitive Ukrainian troops are preparing a major provocation, which aims DNR listing as a terrorist organization, as well as massive destruction of the civilian population.
At this time, the idea is so monstrous that it is hard to believe. Lies in the Ukrainian media and shameless phantasmagoric. For the enemy there is nothing sacred, no moral constraints.

"According to the data we obtained and confirmed for three nights on the territory of the airfield Kramatorsk delivered three products - three missiles" Point Y ", ready to launch. The aim of treatment facilities are in Donetsk and Lugansk, which contained 120 tons and 160 tons of chlorine, respectively. Substitute goal is ammonia storage plant Styrene Gorlovka "- said Igor Shooters.

Defense Minister further said that the enemy is planning a pre-company disinformation to shift responsibility for the catastrophic consequences of terrorist attacks on the forces of the People's Militia.

"The consequences can be just horrific. Depending on the wind rose under the influence of chlorine will be affecting the territory of Donetsk to Volnovakha with the complete defeat of all living things. Victims may be tens of thousands "- said Igor Shooters.

"I hope that our application will exclude such barbaric punitive operation. Militia DNR produces no terrorist acts nor the Ukrainian population, with a population of no DNR or even enemy forces ", - assured Igor Shooters.'

Looks like the Ukrainians are planning to hit chlorine and/or ammonia plants, and blame the Separatists. The translation is Google.

[outsider]

Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS):

Obama Should Release Ukraine Evidence:
http://consortiumnews.com/2014/07/29/obama-should-release-ukraine-evid ence/

'..With the shoot-down of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 over Ukraine turning a local civil war into a U.S. confrontation with Russia, U.S. intelligence veterans urge President Obama to release what evidence he has about the tragedy and silence the hyperbole.

MEMORANDUM FOR: The President

FROM: Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS)

SUBJECT: Intelligence on Shoot-Down of Malaysian Plane

Executive Summary

U.S.–Russian tensions are building in a precarious way over Ukraine, and we are far from certain that your advisers fully appreciate the danger of escalation. The New York Times and other media outlets are treating sensitive issues in dispute as flat-fact, taking their cue from U.S. government sources.

Twelve days after the shoot-down of Malaysian Airlines Flight 17, your administration still has issued no coordinated intelligence assessment summarizing what evidence exists to determine who was responsible – much less to convincingly support repeated claims that the plane was downed by a Russian-supplied missile in the hands of Ukrainian separatists...'

'Prepared by VIPS Steering Group

William Binney, former Technical Director, World Geopolitical & Military Analysis, NSA; co-founder, SIGINT Automation Research Center (ret.)

Larry Johnson, CIA & State Department (ret.)

Edward Loomis, NSA, Cryptologic Computer Scientist (ret.)

David MacMichael, National Intelligence Council (ret.)

Ray McGovern, former US Army infantry/intelligence officer & CIA analyst (ret.)

Elizabeth Murray, Deputy National Intelligence Officer for Middle East (ret.)

Coleen Rowley, Division Counsel & Special Agent, FBI (ret.)

Peter Van Buren, U.S. Department of State, Foreign Service Officer (ret.)

Ann Wright, Col., US Army (ret.); Foreign Service Officer (resigned)'.

[TonyGosling]

Higher up the food chain than Malaysian:
British Airways stopped flying over Eastern Ukraine in March
http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/aug/01/british-airways-stoppe d-flights-ukraine-march-mh17
http://gu.com/p/4vdf9/tw

[insidejob]

Global Research
http://www.globalresearch.ca/support-mh17-truth-osce-monitors-identify -shrapnel-like-holes-indicating-shelling-no-firm-evidence-of-a-missile -attack/5394324
“Support MH17 Truth”: OSCE Monitors Identify “Shrapnel and Machine Gun-Like Holes” indicating Shelling. No Evidence of a Missile Attack. Shot Down by a Military Aircraft?


MALAY ONLINE
http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/mh17-investigators- say-machine-gun-like-holes-on-wreckage-suggest-missile-f#sthash.ylGno5 W4.dpuf

MH17 investigators say ‘machine gun-like’ holes on wreckage suggest missile fire

KUALA LUMPUR, July 25 — Shrapnel-like holes resembling machine-gun shots have been detected on the wrecked fuselage of the Malaysia Airlines plane recovered from its Ukraine crash site, which official investigators say strongly point to the use of a missile to bring down Flight MH17.

However, the team of international investigators with the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) are uncertain if the missile used was fired from the ground as US military experts have previously suggested, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported.

[outsider]

[outsider]

Kiev used ballistic missiles in E.Ukraine - NATO confirms to DW:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wwwRfoe8eM&feature=em-uploademail

Short RT video clip

[TonyGosling]

OSCE (= NATO) arrive at the scene of the crash (controlled by E or W Ukraine now?) and the likely perpetrators (Kiev coup backers) get their hands on the evidence - Is the fix... and more pain for the families... about to begin?

MH17 investigators reach crash site two weeks after plane brought down
Convoy arrives in east Ukraine, with officials cordoning off zone as they search for bodies still believed to be missing
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/aug/01/mh17-investigators-reach- crash-site-ukraine-search-bodies
Shaun Walker in Kiev - The Guardian, Friday 1 August 2014 19.51 BST
A large team of international investigators reached the crash site of Malaysian Airlines MH17 for the first time on Friday, more than two weeks after the plane was brought down over eastern Ukraine, killing all 298 people on board.
A column of 101 people, including 21 observers from the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), 51 Dutch and 21 Australian police and investigators arrived at the site in more than a dozen vehicles and began trawling the fields around the crash site for human remains, debris and evidence....

[Whitehall_Bin_Men]

After initial media hype blaming separatists, evidence suggests Kiev SU25 fighters shot down Malaysian Airlines MH17 http://t.co/vITPRzk5Ty

[TonyGosling]

Malaysian Air Probes Are Led By Perpetrators Of The Lockerbie Cover-up
http://www.rense.com/general96/malayperp.html

[outsider]

This 'Yoichi Shimatsu' seems disinfo to me. He mixes up known facts with fancy theories, which he puts forth as the truth with no evidence. For instance, he claims 'Immediately after the air crash, rebel commander Col. Igor Girkin, whose nom de guerre is Colonel Strelkov (translated as “Shooter”) said that his fighters had downed the aircraft..': only problem there is he said that the day BEFORE the attack, and was referring to a different shootdown; the tape was a forgery of 3 or 4 different segments put together, and was analysed as fake by Russian expert.
He ASSUMES the already dead before the shootdown 'passengers' were contaminated by a pandemic bio-warfare agent; however, there is another possibility, that some were passengers from MH370. And IF the cadavers were contaminated by a deadly pandemic agent, why haven't the Ukrainians come down with it? Obviously, some of the cadavers would have been torn apart, releasing the agent.
And the change of course due to electronic highjacking? Hasn't he heard that an Indian Airlines pilot flying quite close to MH17 heard Ukrainian Air Traffic Control order the change of course?
And that the plane wreckage had a completely different window structure to the REAL MH17, but just like MH370 and it's twin in Tel Aviv.

It would be interesting to know if any of the 'long dead' cadavers were found in seats (some bodies were found in their seats) and also if the Separatists or Russians took DNA samples from all the bodies, as well as detailed photos.

[outsider]

Here are two good videos on MH17/MH370:

Breaking! Proof MH17 Shot Down by Ukraine Fighter Jets AND MH17 = MH370 (6 mins):
http://www.forbiddenknowledgetv.com/videos/911--false-flags/breaking-p roof-mh17-shot-down-by-ukraine-fighter-jets.html

and 'Breaking! Proof MH17 Shot Down by Ukraine Fighter Jets AND MH17 = MH370 (75 mins):
http://www.forbiddenknowledgetv.com/videos/911--false-flags/breaking-p roof-mh17-shot-down-by-ukraine-fighter-jets.html

The first is pretty convincing evidence the plane was shot down by planes (apparently it's hard to find this picture on a google search now) and the second is pretty good evidence the 'relatives' shown are 'crisis actors'.

[outsider]

Over 400 Ukrainian soldiers flee to Russia, ask for refuge:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-OsrCkXTNY&feature=em-uploademail

Three and a half min. video from RT: 438 soldiers defect from Ukraine army.

[outsider]

RAW: Hospital almost destroyed after heavy fighting in Lugansk, E.Ukraine:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1J2lrKDWzQ&feature=em-uploademail

Hardly a 'coincidence' that US-backed regimes or groups (Israel, Ukraine, ISIL, 'Al-CIA-dah' etc commit War Crimes with impunity: watch the US (and probably the UK) veto any 'UN' Security Council Resolution dealing harshly with these crimes.

They of course have a long history of backing (and training, arming and supporting in every way) such evil regimes and groups, like Gladio, Greek Colonels, Latin American Juntas, South Vietnam, ISIL/ISIS, 'Contras' etc. etc.

[TonyGosling]

Israel Charged with War Crimes and Genocide. Complete Judgment of Kuala Lumpur Tribunal
The Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission (KLWCC) versus the State of Israel
By Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal
Global Research, July 26, 2014
http://www.globalresearch.ca/israel-charged-with-war-crimes-and-genoci de-complete-judgment-of-kl-tribunal/5359433


This text was first published by GR in November 2013. In the light of recent events, it is important to review the record of Israel’s crimes against humanity.

The Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission (KLWCC) versus the State of Israel

The proceedings directed against the State of Israel were led by the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission (KLWCC)

Members of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission (KLWCC) are:

Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad (Chairman), Prof. Michel Chossudovsky, Dr. Denis Halliday, Mr. Musa Ismail, Dr. Zulaiha Ismail, Dr. Yaacob Merican, Dr. Hans von Sponeck.

Working in liaison with their Malaysian counterparts, commissioners Dr. Denis Halliday, former Assistant Secretary General of the United Nations and Prof. Michel Chossudovsky, Director of the Centre for Research on Globalization were present in Kuala Lumpur throughout the proceedings.

This important judicial process has received very little coverage in the Western media. Global Research has published several reports following this historic judgment against the State of Israel.

“The perpetrators [State of Israel] had committed acts against the Palestinians, with intent to kill, cause serious bodily or mental harms and deliberately inflict conditions of life calculated to bring about the physical destruction of the Palestinians as a whole or in part.”

“The Tribunal recommends to the War Crimes Commission to give the widest international publicity to this conviction and grant of reparations, as these are universal crimes for which there is a responsibility upon nations to institute prosecutions.

The Tribunal deplores the failure of international institutions to punish the State of Israel for its crimes and its total lack of respect of International Law and the institutions of the United Nations.”



THE KUALA LUMPUR WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL
20 – 25 NOVEMBER 2013
Case No. 3 – CHG – 2013

The Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission
Against
Amos Yaron
Case No. 4 – CHG – 2013

The Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission
Against
The State of Israel

..

The Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal (Tribunal) reconvened on 20 November 2013 to hear two charges against Amos Yaron (first Defendant) and the State of Israel (second Defendant). The first Defendant was charged with war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide, whilst the second Defendant was charged with the crime of genocide and war crimes.

The charge against the first Defendant is as follows –

“The Defendant Amos Yaron perpetrated War Crimes, Crimes Against Humanity, and Genocide in his capacity as the Commanding Israeli General in military control of the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps in Israeli occupied Lebanon in September of 1982 when he knowingly facilitated and permitted the large-scale Massacre of the Residents of those two camps in violation of the Hague Regulations on Land Warfare of 1907; the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949; the 1948 Genocide Convention; the Nuremberg Charter (1945), the Nuremberg Judgment (1946), and the Nuremberg Principles (1950); customary international law, jus cogens, the Laws of War, and International Humanitarian Law”

The charge against the second Defendant [State of Israel] is as follows –

“From 1948 and continuing to date the State of Israel (hereafter ‘the Defendant’) carried out against the Palestinian people a series of acts namely killing, causing serious bodily harm and deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about physical destruction.

The conduct of the Defendant was carried out with the intention of destroying in whole or in part the Palestinian people. These acts were carried out as part of a manifest pattern of similar conduct against the Palestinian people.

These acts were carried out by the Defendant through the instrumentality of its representatives and agents including those listed in Appendices 1 and 2.

Such conduct constitutes the Crime of Genocide under international law including the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide 1948 (‘the Genocide Convention’) in particular Article II and punishable under Article III of the said Convention.

It also constitutes the crime of genocide as stipulated in Article 10 of the Charter of the Kuala Lumpur Foundation to Criminalise War.

Such conduct by the Defendant as an occupying power also violates customary international law as embodied in the Hague Convention of 1907 Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land, and the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949.

Such conduct also constitutes War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity under international law.”

The charges (together with the particulars of the charges) had been duly served on the Defendants, and were read in open court by the Registrar as these proceedings commenced.

Neither Defendant was present in these proceedings, but both were represented by the Amicus Curiae-Defence Team.

Read Complete Judgment (pdf)

Selected Excerpts

2 Prosecution’s Case

The Prosecution’s case against the first Defendant is that the first Defendant had committed War Crimes, Crimes Against Humanity, and Genocide in his capacity as the Commanding Israeli General in military control of the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps in Israeli-occupied Lebanon in September of 1982 when he knowingly facilitated and permitted the large-scale Massacre of the Residents of those two camps. These crimes were in violation of, inter alia, the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949, the 1948 Genocide Convention, jus cogens, International Humanitarian Law; and Articles 9, 10, and 11 of the Charter of the Kuala Lumpur Foundation to Criminalise War.

The Prosecution’s case against the second Defendant is that from 1948 and continuing to date the State of Israel had systematically carried out against the Palestinian people a series of acts namely killing, causing serious bodily harm and deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about physical destruction – with the intention of destroying in whole or in part the Palestinian people.

These acts constitute the Crime of Genocide under international law including the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide 1948 (‘the Genocide Convention’) in particular Article II and punishable under Article III of the said Convention. It also constitutes the crime of genocide as stipulated in Article 10 of the Charter of the Kuala Lumpur Foundation to Criminalise War.

In his opening statement, the Chief Prosecutor Prof Gurdial Singh said that the Prosecution will adduce evidence to prove the counts in the indictment through oral and written testimonies of victims, witnesses, historical records, narrative in books and authoritative commentaries, resolutions of the United Nations and reports of international bodies.

6. The Defence case

Mr. Jason Kay Kit Leon of the Amicus Curiae-Defence Team submitted that in the charges against the two Defendants, the Prosecution had listed war crimes, crimes against humanity and crimes against peace. Apparently the Prosecution had abandoned these charges, concentrating only on genocide.

He said that the offence of genocide is defined in Article 2 of the Genocide Convention 1948, whilst the OED defines it simply as “the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular nation or ethnic group”.

He submitted that the charge of genocide is unique; it means that you don’t like a group, you kill them; you kill them in a grand manner. Genocide means that at the end of the act, you have a lesser number of victims than before the genocide started.

He further submitted that when one talks of “massive killing”, it is many hundreds of thousands to millions of people. To suggest that an isolated event, the unfortunate murder of 3,000 people (Sabra and Shatila) is the same as massive killing is almost disrespectful of the true horror of massive killing (as in Rwanda, where 800,000 people were killed in 100 days).

With regard to the Kahan Report, the Amicus Curiae-Defence Team said that it also identified other people as being responsible, with two other names other than Yaron still alive. The question is why only Yaron was charged? Why was Defence Minister Ariel Sharon spared?

He also submitted that the PLO had repeatedly violated the July 1981 cease-fire agreement. By June 1982, when the IDF went into Lebanon, the PLO had made life in northern Israel intolerable through its repeated shelling of Israeli towns.

On Cast Lead, the Amicus Curiae-Defence Team submitted that the IDF had come out with two reports. The point is if you are going to kill people nilly willy, you do not report it.

On the issue of the wall, the Amicus Curiae-Defence Team submitted that the primary consideration is one of security of the Israeli settlers. The State of Israel has a duty to defend their lives, safety and well-being.

On the issue of checkpoints, the Amicus Curiae-Defence Team said countries have a right to immigration laws. With regard to Plan Dalet, the Amicus Curiae-Defence Team said that it is subject to divergent opinions, with historians on one side asserting that it was entirely defensive, while other historians assert that the plan aimed at an ethnic cleansing.

4. Prosecution’s closing submission

In his closing submission, the Chief Prosecutor said that he had called 11 witnesses (some of whom had testified through Skype), tendered 15 exhibits and furnished several documents and reports to the Tribunal during the course of the proceedings.

He urged the Tribunal to bear in mind that this is a Tribunal of Conscience and the case before it is an extraordinary case, which Winston Churchill used to call as a “crime without a name”.

He said that the Prosecution had provided evidence of facts which, examined as a whole, will show that the perpetrators had committed acts against the Palestinians, with intent to kill, cause serious bodily or mental harms and deliberately inflict conditions of life calculated to bring about the physical destruction of the Palestinians as a whole or in part.

From the testimony of Prof Pappe (PW8) the Prosecution had shown that before 1948, before UN Resolution 47, there was already a plan in place to take over the Palestinian territory, and this plan would be activated the moment the British relinquished its mandate over the territory.

At that point in time, the Palestinians were on 94% of the land, with the Jewish population settling over a mere 6% of the land. Under the UN partition plan, more than 50% of the land was to be given to the Jews.

Plan Dalet might not legally be genocidal in form at its inception, but as it took shape the ethnic cleansing metamorphised into killing, massacre and creating impossible conditions for life for the Palestinians – either they leave or they die. The Prosecution submits this is genocide within the meaning of Article 2 of the Genocide Convention.

On Sabra and Shatila, prosecution witnesses (PW1 and PW6) had testified that the Palestinian refugees in those camps had been killed by the Phalangists, aided and abetted by the Israelis who were in complete control of the two camps.

According to the Kahan Report, all of Beirut was under Israeli control, and there was clear symbiotic relationship between Israel and the Christian forces (the Lebanese Maronite Christian militia or the Phalangists or Keta’ib).

On Operation Cast Lead in 2008, the Chief Prosecutor said that the Israeli Defence Force had used all kinds of weapons, including white phosphorus – which is an incendiary weapon. The use of incendiary weapons is prohibited under Protocal III on the Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Incendiary Weapons.

As a result of the Israeli occupation of Gaza, nowhere in Gaza is safe for civilians. 1.5 million Palestinians are now trapped in despair, their fragile economy ruined. Under the Dahiya Doctrine (October 2008), the complete destruction of Gaza is the ultimate objective, the whole place must be flattened.

The Prosecution submits that the cumulative effect of the actions taken by the Israeli government, as shown by the Prosecution witnesses and the several documents tendered to the Tribunal, have shown beyond reasonable doubt that Israel is guilty of the crime of genocide under the Genocide Convention and the Charter of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission (The Charter).

Co-Prosecutor Tan Sri Abdul Aziz, submitting on the first charge against Amos Yaron, said that Amos Yaron was the commanding officer in charge of the Israeli Defence Force, in charge of the area of Beirut, and camps Sabra and Shatila. He said there were two issues which he has to deal with – first, whether or not there was a large scale massacre of the 10 residents of the two camps, and second, whether or not Amos Yaron facilitated and permitted such massacre, in violation of international law and Articles 9, 10 and 11 of the Charter?

On the first issue, he submitted there was a large scale massacre, as testified by PW1. She was there, and she saw the massacre with her own eyes. There was corrobating testimony by PW6, and further acknowledged in the Kahan Report.

On the second issue, Amos Yaron was in charge, to ensure that there would be peace and law and order. The Kahan Report itself concluded that anybody who knew about Lebanon would know that by releasing the Phalangists into Beirut, there would be massacre. Surely, Amos Yaron, the General in charge, must have known that by allowing the Phalangists to go into the two camps, the massacre would take place. But he decided to do nothing.

He received the reports of the killing of women and children, but he did not check the report. He did not pass the report to his superiors. The co-prosecutor submits that by ignoring all this despite knowing the circumstances, he himself had the intention of causing the death of the people in the two camps.

10.3 Commission’s Register of War Criminals

Further, under Article 35 of the same Chapter, this Tribunal recommends to the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission that the names of the two convicted parties herein be entered and included in the Commission’s Register of War Criminals and be publicised accordingly.

10.4 The Tribunal recommends to the War Crimes Commission to give the widest international publicity to this conviction and grant of reparations, as these are universal crimes for which there is a responsibility upon nations to institute prosecutions.

10.5 The Tribunal deplores the failure of international institutions to punish the State of Israel for its crimes and its total lack of respect of International Law and the institutions of the United Nations. It urges the Commission to use all means to publicise this judgement and in particular with respect to the Parliaments and Legislative Assemblies of the major powers such as members of the G8 and to urge these countries to intervene and put an end to the colonialist and racist policies of the State of Israel and its supporters.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/israel-charged-with-war-crimes-and-genoci de-complete-judgment-of-kl-tribunal/5359433

Read Complete Judgment (pdf)
http://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/KLJUDGMENT.pdf

[TonyGosling]

Flight MH370
Malaysian Airlines $138m losses since first disappearance

Former PM Mahathir Mohamad (1981 - 2003) only head of state to call 9-11 an inside job
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/missing-mh370-cia-withholding-information-abo ut-flight-disappearance-says-ex-malysia-pm-1449073

Twin jet in Tel Aviv
http://rense.com/general96/role.html

Seattle-based Boeing assembles aircraft in pairs as its standard practice, but the question is how one jet was leased by Malaysia’s national carrier while the matching plane was secretly turned over to the Israeli government without a purchase order from state-run El Al airlines.

Flight MH017
30mm anti-tanks rounds
http://www.anderweltonline.com/wissenschaft-und-technik/luftfahrt-2014  /shocking-analysis-of-the-shooting-down-of-malaysian-mh17/

MUSIC
http://online.wsj.com/articles/attacks-spur-debate-on-antimissile-syst ems-for-passenger-jets-1406228507

[outsider]

Proof Malaysia Flight MH17 Passengers Boarded A Different Plane!?:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Q1JQFA4PQ0

It's useful to have various conflicting videos and articles up, so that we can compare and judge for ourselves what seems to be the case:

8 Signs That Prove MH17 and MH370 Were The Same Planes! Conspiracy Alert!:
http://www.parhlo.com/8-signs-prove-mh17-mh370-planes-conspiracy-alert  /

Window configuration of wreckage shows it was NOT MH17; but it is consistent with MH370 and it's Tel Aviv - parked twin.

[outsider]

'She May Still Be Alive!' Parents of MH17 Victim Say Her Cell Phone Ringing Through!: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDceGLPqoIc

'Published on 27 Jul 2014


http://www.undergroundworldnews.com
When George and Angela learned about the July 17 tragedy that killed 298 people, they didn’t want to lose hope as their daughter’s mobile phone rang after the crash.

“Did you see the CNN report about the mobile phones?... So we go," George said.

He might have been referring to a CNN report about relatives who called victims and received answers from strangers.

The parents decided on a dangerous journey – right to the heart of war-torn Ukraine – to the Donetsk Region where the Malaysian Airlines plane crashed. They were determined to go despite government officials in Australia, Germany and the Netherlands advising victims' families against immediately travelling to the crisis-torn country.

George believes that if his daughter was strapped in her seat when the plane crashed, this could have cushioned the impact of hitting the ground.

"Nobody speaks about survivors and there must be a reason for it. There is some evidence there are survivors still."

[outsider]

This short 16 1/2 minute video is about FAR more than MH17; it's a fantastic compendium of the Gulf of Tonkin, Reichstag Fire, Operation Himmler, Lusitania, USS Liberty, Gladio, shooting down of Iran airliner by USS Vincennes, Federal Reserve; brilliantly brought together in an easily absorbable form:

The untold story of flight MH17:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJwKK-1GuDo

[TonyGosling]

Malaysian newspapers beginning to blame NATO and Israel for the attack

Who were behind the MH17 tragedy?
Sunday, August 10, 2014
...It is now obvious that the main beneficiaries of the sad MH17 accident are not the rebels in Ukraine or the Russians but Israel and its allies. Under such circumstances, who would take the blame on the rebels for the MH17 tragedy without a grain of salt and exclude the probability of a stealthy operation by the beneficiaries?
http://www.thedailystar.net/who-were-behind-the-mh17-tragedy-36426

[TonyGosling]

yep, here we go
http://www.intellihub.com/kiev-censors-mh17-air-traffic-control-record ings/

Malaysia accuses US and EU backed Ukraine regime of MH17 shoot-down
Posted by Editor on August 9, 2014. -- WORLD AT WAR
http://4bitnews.com/world-at-war/malaysia-accuses-us-eu-backed-ukraine -regime-mh17-shoot/
A Thursday article in the New Straits Times, Malaysia’s flagship English-language newspaper, charged the US- and European-backed Ukrainian regime in Kiev with shooting down Malaysian Airlines flight MH 17 in east Ukraine last month. Given the tightly controlled character of the Malaysian media, it appears that the accusation that Kiev shot down MH17 has the full backing of the Malaysian state.
The US and European media have buried this remarkable report, which refutes the wave of allegations planted by the CIA in international media claiming that Russian president Vladimir Putin was responsible for the destruction of MH17, without presenting any evidence to back up this charge.
The New Straits Times article began, “Intelligence analysts in the United States have already concluded that Malaysia flight MH17 was shot down by an air-to-air missile, and that the Ukrainian government had had something to do with it. This corroborates an emerging theory postulated by local investigators that the Boeing 777-200 was crippled by an air-to-air missile and finished off with cannon fire from a jet that had been shadowing it as it plummeted to earth.” [CLICK]
It cited “experts who had said that the photographs of the blast fragmentation patterns on the fuselage of the airliner showed two distinct shapes—the shredding pattern associated with a warhead packed with ‘flechettes,’ and the more uniform, round-type penetration holes consistent with that of cannon rounds.” [
- See more at: http://4bitnews.com/world-at-war/malaysia-accuses-us-eu-backed-ukraine -regime-mh17-shoot/


Malaysia wants the ‘missing’ Ukrainian ATC tapes
BY HARIS HUSSAIN AND TASNIM LOKMAN - 8 AUGUST 2014 @ 8:11 AM
http://t.co/xli4vzAby4
KUALA LUMPUR: UKRAINE has denied that its State Security Service (SBU) had seized the air-to-ground transmission tapes between its air traffic controllers and Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 on the day the jetliner was shot down.

Its ambassador to Malaysia Ihor Humennyi, in an exclusive interview with the New Straits Times, said that reports alleging that the SBU had seized the recordings had not been independently verified or confirmed by Kiev.

“There is no proof or any evidence that the tapes were confiscated by the SBU.

“I only read this in the newspapers.”

Almost immediately after the shootdown, several news agencies, including the British Broadcasting Corporation, carried reports saying that Ukraine’s SBU security service had confiscated recordings of conversations between Ukrainian air traffic control officers and the crew of the doomed airliner.

If indeed the SBU had not seized the tapes, then where are the air-to-ground communications tapes between MH17 and the ATC?

When asked this, Humennyi said he did not have the answers.

Asked if the tapes had been handed over to the investigators, Humennyi said: “We don’t have any information that it had not been given to the investigation team or that it was not received by the (team of international) investigators.

Humennyi said that if a formal request was made by Malaysia or the international investigation team, Ukraine would extend its cooperation. At one point, Humennyi seemed to question the significance of the ATC tapes, saying that “it is just the same as the flight
data and cockpit voice recorders”.

Aviation experts, however, point to the recordings as being another crucial layer of evidence in piecing together the events leading up to the point of missile impact with the airliner and the massive explosive decompression and airframe break-up that followed as the Boeing 777-200 plummeted 33,000 feet to the ground, killing all 298 passengers on board.

Equally puzzling is the international investigation team’s apparent snail’s pace at requesting for the tapes from Ukrainian ATC.

Three weeks into the tragedy and the Ukrainians have yet to receive any formal request for the tapes.

Yesterday, when asked, Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail said Malaysia would make a formal request for the ATC recordings.

However, he did not commit to a definite timeline.

On suggestions that MH17 was brought down by an air-to-air missile fired from an Sukhoi Su-25 Frogfoot and finished off with cannon fire from the fighter’s internally-mounted Gsh-301 30mm cannon, Humennyi said there’s a rational explanation.

“The bulletholes these theorists said came from the fighter could have come from any 30mm weapon used by the rebels.

“They could have come from their armoured combat vehicles after the MH17 hit the ground.”

Humennyi said that the 20km by 20km area of the crash site was safe.

“The area around the crash site is completely safe as of now.”

Humennyi’s statement contradicted the reports coming in from the Royal Malaysia Police detachment on the ground in eastern Ukraine.

Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Khalid Abu Bakar said yesterday that the police team, together with the Dutch and Australian experts had to exfiltrate their forward operating base in Solidar yesterday due to the deteriorating security situation there.

Khalid said the team would move out in stages before midnight, local time.

Humennyi said the pro-Russian rebels had broken the ceasefire agreement earlier when they refused to allow the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe observers to continue investigating the wreckage after they entered the crash zone.

“The crash area was under the control of the separatists.

“They were the ones who did not allow the investigators to resume their work.

“These rebels are saying we are shooting at them but who are the ones really doing the shooting?

“It is the actions of these rebels that do not allow us to resume our investigations as they have gone against the agreement,” he said.

[outsider]

Here is the New Straights Times Online article:
US analysts conclude MH17 downed by aircraft:
http://www.nst.com.my/node/20925

But now looks like someone has been 'persuaded' otherwise:
Flight MH17 unlikely shot down by fighter jets: Hishammuddin:
http://www.nst.com.my/node/21682

Amazing what can be achieved with a few bagfuls of dosh, or a bit of blackmail.

[outsider]

Former US intelligence personnel challenge Obama to present evidence of Russian complicity in MH17 crash:
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/07/31/side-j31.html

'In a memorandum to President Barack Obama, a group called Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) has demanded that any actual evidence of Russian involvement in the downing of Malaysia flight MH17 over Ukraine is made public.

The memorandum was prepared by the VIPS Steering Group, headed by William Binney, the former Technical Director, World Geopolitical & Military Analysis of the National Security Agency and including some senior NSA, CIA, State Department and military personnel with “a cumulative total of 260 years in various parts of US intelligence.”

The analysts warn Obama that “US–Russian tensions are building in a precarious way over Ukraine, and we are far from certain that your advisers fully appreciate the danger of escalation.”

The memorandum speaks for sections of the intelligence apparatus that are concerned that the behavior of the Obama administration threatens not only to provoke war, but to discredit the American state both internationally and at home.

“Twelve days after the shoot-down of Malaysian Airlines Flight 17, your administration still has issued no coordinated intelligence assessment summarizing what evidence exists to determine who was responsible—much less to convincingly support repeated claims that the plane was downed by a Russian-supplied missile in the hands of Ukrainian separatists,” the memorandum states. “Your administration has not provided any satellite imagery showing that the separatists had such weaponry… Washington’s credibility, and your own, will continue to erode, should you be unwilling—or unable—to present more tangible evidence behind administration claims.”

The analysts say they are “troubled by the amateurish manner in which fuzzy and flimsy evidence has been served up—some of it via ‘social media’. As intelligence professionals we are embarrassed by the unprofessional use of partial intelligence information.”

The evidence released to date on MH17 “does not bear close scrutiny,” the memorandum states. “[I]t does not permit a judgment as to which side is lying about the shoot-down of Flight 17.”...'