Chris Spivey website offline?

[redadare]

For those that don't know, Chris Spivey is a blogger who blogs largely on UK related issues. He documents carefully and discusses often taboo subjects like politicians and child porn/paedophilia. He does not pull any punches and uses frequent expletives which (ihmo) make his posts quite funny as well as serious.

He was arrested recently on a trumped up "harassment" allegations, computers removed and he was held without being charged. This was after a clinical dissection of the Lee Rigby "beheading". There was some heated debate elsewhere on this board about his treatment of the members of the "Rigby family". Whatever your views on this, his arguments were well made and well documented and (again imho) clearly made the Lee Rigby beheading a false flag.

Ater a complete assasination job on a more recent beheading, the video allegedly showing the beheading of James Foley, his site now seems to be offline.

Maybe two beheadings being designed to whip up more Islamophobia being completely trashed, was too much for the NWO to stomach.

Does anyone know anything about his site and Chris Spivey?

[Whitehall_Bin_Men]

Seems fine to me http://www.chrisspivey.org

[redadare]

Well its definately blocked to me. Even tried pinging it with no success.

Any ideas out there?

[Whitehall_Bin_Men]

Sounds to me like may be some sort of IP specific block in place?
Can you view latest version in various caches Google Yahoo etc?
How does that work??
Hacking?
Cyberwar?

[ian neal]

Seems to be working OK now

This recent post


"* me, what a day!

My email account has been hacked which led to various other accounts of mine having the password changed, including my Facebook.

Fortunately I have managed to regain control of everything except the email account which could take up to 72 hours to be returned to me.

Quite * why it takes so long is beyond me, but there ya go.

Course, you have to question whether the fact that the wholly corrupt police stole two of my computers – and still have them – has anything to do with this hacking… Especially when you take into consideration that I have never ever been hacked before.

One thing is for * sure, we are without a shadow of doubt now living in a police state and that has got to change… The corrupt police have to go, along with the government & parasitic, insidious, perverted, good for * all royal family.

After all, what is happening to me at the moment could just as easily be happening to any of you should you ever ever have the misfortune to fall under the Gestapo’s beady eye.

I mean, there can be little doubt that they are after trying to silence me.

Indeed, I know for a fact that they are.

Course, that fact should also become obvious to all of you when you consider the following:

I was illegally arrested on SUSPICION of harassment (a misdemeanor) by 4 thugs at 1.30 AM in the morning, which involved them terrorizing my daughter and her two friends. The filth continually tried to bait me while conducting an illegal, half-hearted search of my property without a search warrant. That is to say half-hearted except in the case of my daughters bedroom where my 1 year old grandson was sleeping, which the moronic thugs went through with a fine tooth comb.
They then did an hour and a half search in the living room – which I was not allowed to witness - yet they missed a laptop under the coffee table and a hard-drive in the corner cupboard. Therefore, you can only guess at what they were doing in there for an hour and a half, other than unplugging and stealing my two computers of course… Planting a bug maybe? It does not take more than 10 minutes to unplug two computers even for the mindless, moronic robo-thugs.
Having finger tipped searched my daughters bedroom and spent an hour and a half doing * knows what in my front room, they took me and the 2 computers away without them so much as setting foot in my bedroom, the bathroom, the kitchen or the hallway storage cupboard… Go figure that one out.
I was then held in a cell without being let out for a fag until 6 PM – regardless of the fact that I have smoked for 35 years and nicotine being recognized as an addictive substance.
When questioned, it was by two CID officers – remember, harassment is a misdemeanor and they would have had to have evidence to arrest me for in the first place, so why did they need to steal my computers? And since I was not ordered to remove anything from my website, Facebook or anywhere else, indicates to me that they cannot have had any evidence to come and arrest me on in the first place. Therefore it must now be a case that they can arrest a person and steal his property, without so much as a warrant, in order to try and find evidence of a crime… Do you get that? The police will arrest you for a crime that you haven’t committed in order to try and find evidence of a crime.
Number 5 is backed up by the fact that I was given bail with conditions, yet no crime or suspicion of a crime appears on the bail sheet. I have since broken those bail conditions numerous times yet not been re-arrested.
The police then maliciously reported falsehoods to the Social Services that were completely without foundation. Therefore the evil c*** could have only done so, so as to get the child snatchers involved with my grandson. The police allegations made to the SS were easily proven false and we have had no further contact with the Social Services. However, this was only because I know how the SS work and was able to stand my ground with them… Had I not, my Clayton could have been in care by now.
A woman I know of, who is investigating child trafficking was arrested 3 days after me by the Abingdon police on behalf of the Metropolitan police. I had at that time never so much as spoken to the woman although she had added me as a friend on Facebook a month or so earlier and had republished a couple of my articles on her website. However, when the Met CID interviewed her they specifically asked her if she knew me and why she was publishing my articles on her website. Now, why would the Met be so interested in me when I have never been in trouble with them and indeed, it was Greater Manchester Police who had requested Essex police to arrest me for the harassment misdemeanor?
I appeared on Jim Hussell’s ‘The Rock Show’ on the Monday following my arrest. I spoke live on air to Jim for half an hour and half an hour after that (which marked the end of the show), two Cardiff Special Branch coppers knocked on Jim’s door. It should be noted that Cardiff police do not cover Jim’s area and are in fact based an hour and a half drive from his, meaning that they must have set off to Jim’s house half an hour before he had even started to interview me. The two SB officers told Jim that if he valued his reputation then he would have nothing more to do with me. They also told him not to tell me that they had spoken to him – which he obviously ignored.
So, there is proof that 3 major police forces, the Greater Manchester police, the Metropolitan police, and the Cardiff police are all actively taking a hands on interest in my activities and prepared to go as far as to illegally arrest me, steal my property and try get my family split up, all on the basis of a suspicion of a misdemeanor – which they had not even bothered to follow standard procedure on – and without so much as a shred of evidence to warrant the arrest.
Immediately prior to my arrest it was nigh on impossible for anyone to get on this site due to the MILLIONS of DOS attacks hitting us every week. Course, the site had in fact been under constant attack since last October, which resulted in me having to change hosts twice. However, things got 10 times worse in July of this year when I released the first of my new articles on Woolwich. Indeed, that is when the attacks started in their millions and the only way of stopping them was by me upgrading to my own server which as you know is costing me nearly £270 per month. Course, having done so – meaning that they could no longer touch me with their attacks – the illegal arrest soon followed… Thus it isn’t hard to work out the connection between the two is it.
Now, I wasn’t going to mention this last one, but I think that it is only right that you should know what I am up against here. You see, I have been contacted by someone working for the government who warned me that the sniffenpissin monsters are trying to shut me down by hacking into my accounts… I kid you * not. I will also point out that apart from some of my team on here, no one else knows that I was hacked, until now of course, which gives added credibility to the info. I was also warned by this person to be very careful because I am being constantly watched. However, rather than show the whole strength of my hand, I have sent the evidence of this conversation to Wolfie, who in turn has sent it on again for safe keeping – just in case something should happen to me.

Now, they are the TRUE facts and anyone who thinks that they are fair enough wants to have a serious * word with themselves.

After all, I have done nothing wrong other than to tell the truth – a major crime in these dangerous times – about our corrupt, child raping government, who have the bare faced * cheek to criticize other countries for persecuting their dissidents.

Course, further proof of the UK being a police state became evident when the wholly corrupt Metropolitan police led by the wholly corrupt Bernard Hogan Howe – who was complicit in both the Woolwich hoax & the shooting of Mark Duggan – announced that anyone watching the Foley beheading video faced arrest, despite there being no law to prevent anyone doing so.

Moreover, the Met threatened this illegal enforcement knowing that the video was faked – thus that being the reason that they did not want anyone watching it.

After all, our corrupt government wanted to take the country to war on the strength of the fraud and obviously could not do so if the nation were to discover that the video was a fake… As has now been evidenced.

Course, that Met threat of arrest and my arrest, which was plastered all over the national and local press on the very same day that I was arrested – on SUSPICION of a misdemeanor – indicates that the government wants to send out a message to everyone, loud and clear: DO NOT QUESTION US & BELIEVE WHATEVER WE TELL YOU OR WE WILL CRUSH YOU.

[redadare]

Seems I'm blocked by someone or something. Still can't get onto the site.

But can get on using a proxy server to hide my IP address! Only problem is its a free trial and may have to buy it.

[outsider]

[redadare]

Looked everywhere for a full copy, but all I can get is the trailer.

The bar stewards have really smothered this one!

[outsider]

[outsider]

Chris has been arrested again:
http://chrisspivey.org/chris-has-been-arrested-again/

'This is a quick message to you all to let you know Chris, within the last hour has been arrested. Reports from home say the police asked to come in but had no warrant so Chris refused, they then went about breaking in the front door and back windows to get to him, unfortunately they got him and have taken him away in handcuffs.

At this point this is all the information we have.

As we get more we will let you know, in the mean time hit Facebook, twitter, emails and blogs, let every one in the AM know that yet again another one of us has been kidnapped by the state.'

This is not acceptable, get angry and make a noise.

[outsider]

Chris Spivey today on UK.Column:
http://www.ukcolumn.org/ (5 minutes in)

[TonyGosling]

Conspiracy theorist who claimed Lee Rigby murder was a hoax guilty of harassing soldier's family
http://www.essexchronicle.co.uk/Conspiracy-theorist-claimed-Lee-Rigby- murder-hoax/story-27521796-detail/story.html
By Will Watkinson | Posted: July 31, 2015
A self-styled investigative journalist who claimed that the murder of Fusilier Lee Rigby was a hoax has been found guilty of harassing the soldier's mother and sister.
Chris Spivey, 52, made a number of outlandish claims about the soldier, including that his family were involved in a conspiracy headed by M15 to incite anti-Islamic propaganda.
The court heard during the two-day trial that the former tattoo artist claimed that Fusilier Rigby did not exist and family photos had been doctored.
Today at Chelmsford Magistrates court Spivey was found guilty of two counts of harassment against Fusilier Rigby's mother Lyn Rigby and sister Sara McClure.
Spivey, from Rochford, also admitted in court that he believes a number of historical events were also hoaxes including the 9/11 attacks on the Twin Towers, the 7/7 London bombings and last month's terror attack in Tunisia, in which 30 Britons were killed.
District judge Andrew Woollard said when delivering the verdict: "He told me that there was no attack on Pearl Harbour, 9/11 did not take place, 7/7 was fiction and the killings on the beaches of Tunisia did not happen.
"I find that he is not a journalist that he's obsessed by internet research."
The court heard how Spivey published an image of Lyn Rigby and her partner being interviewed in her home, saying "how very ******* patriotic".
He also made comments about a dog tag and poppy which Lyn Rigby was wearing during the interview, published details of Lyn Rigby's address, including photographs, as well as the address of Lee Rigby's sister, Sara McClure.
Lee Rigby, 25, was brutally killed on the streets of Woolwich on May 22, 2013 by Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale who have both been jailed for life and 45 years respectively.
Prosecuting Tony Abell, said Spivey had published material which was "quite menacing and deeply unpleasant" and that his conduct had left Mrs Rigby and Miss McClure fearing for their safety.
In a statement by Lyn Rigby read out in court she said she felt "helpless" and had "cried for weeks" after he published private family photos and her home address on his website.
She said: "Suggesting Lee was someone else was heart-breaking. It felt like he was twisting the knife into us. I cried for weeks after this and I just want to be left alone."
Spivey, who denied the charges, claimed he was doing nothing more than "expressing his opinions" and he was not aware the family were checking his website until he was arrested.
He said: "I was not targeting anybody. I have never sent them any material. I did not know they was looking at my website.
He said of the Lee Rigby murder hoax: "It's solely my opinion. I don't ask anyone to take my word for it.
"I have freedom of speech."
Defending Spivey, Muhammad Bashir, said: "This is not about whether or not he is correct. (By convicting Spivey) we would be limiting his freedom of expression. It might not be palatable to all people. Some people like dramas some don't, some people like comedies and some don't."
Chief Crown Prosecutor for CPS East of England, Jenny Hopkins said: "Mr Spivey posted a number of comments on social media about the murder of Fusilier Rigby which were very upsetting to his family and friends.
"People can and do post all kinds of comments on social media and are not prosecuted for them, but in this case we were satisfied that the posts crossed the line into criminal behaviour targeted at the Rigby family.
"The prosecution's case was that the combination of the postings, containing a mixture of grossly offensive remarks about the Rigby family, upsetting assertions surrounding the murder, and the publication of details of two of the family's homes, could not be justified under freedom of speech."
He also said "he did not know" if the 25-year-old was a rapist after an article emerged on Facebook suggesting that he was after his death.
Mr Spivey was convicted of harassment of Mrs Rigby and Ms McClure and also of two charges of sending a message by means of a public electronic communications network that was grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character.
Ms Hopkins added: "Everyone should be able to go about their daily lives free from harassment caused by someone deliberately making grossly offensive messages about them on social media.
"We take allegations of this kind very seriously, especially where there is evidence of a course of conduct which causes fear or distress to someone, and which in this case made the victims feel unsafe in their own homes."
Spivey has been ordered to remove all references to Lee and Lyn Rigby from his website as well as references to the Woolwich attacks.
Sentencing has been adjourned to August 27.

[outsider]

I'd be very surprised if he said Pearl Harbour never happened; he probably said it was not a surprise attack so far as Roosevelt & Co. were concerned.

Anyhow, he has now closed down his website, and Facebook, as of today. Website is still up as of now, but he has announced it will all be deleted.