UK, May 24, (Pal Telegraph – By Peter Eyre) Israel jointly developed South Africa’s nuclear weapons:
It was with amazement that I read the following headline in Israel’s Haaretz Newspaper: “Israel offered to sell nuclear weapons to apartheid South Africa.”
From my perspective I would say this headline should have read “Israel helped South Africa develop ten battlefield nuclear bombs.”
All of these weapons could not have been commissioned without the assistance of Israeli nuclear specialist. What is also remarkable is the fact that these weapons were extremely mobile and could be moved to any location with relative ease.
Upon reading further into this article it became apparent that the origin of this story came from the British Guardian Newspaper. It was Haaretz that also picked up on the Guardian’s comment: “claiming South Africa wanted the weapons to keep neighboring states and other enemies from attacking them.”
If you remember we at the Palestine Telegraph covered the South African “Nuke Story” back in March in a multi part series and have given reference to this international blunder many times since. My question would be why would Haaretz and the Guardian suddenly resurrect this story today? The guardian went a stage further with the following sub heading: Exclusive: Secret apartheid-era papers give first official evidence of Israeli nuclear weapons.”
Don’t you find it rather ironic that we were the only paper to release this information publically without any international recognition and yet now, suddenly, it starts to hit the headlines as an exclusive? I guess in a way it is nice to say that we at the Palestine Telegraph did have a scoop at the time and certainly now it proves the authenticity of our story.
I can distinctly remember people questioning me on the authenticity of the information that was passed onto me from a third party and also the fact that all this was done under the radar of the United Nations, the US and UK Governments. It not only proves the incredible risks that governments were prepared to take but also the corrupt way this particular episode in our sordid history was carried out. What was even more alarming was the fact that because no rigid security was imposed by the Thatcher Government (with the help of our current Prime Minister David Cameron) the three British acquired bombs were stolen.
The “Top Secret” document between Israel and the South African Government discussed the possible sale of Israeli Jericho missiles but only if they were fitted with nuclear weapons. All of this came about after secret meetings back on the 31st of March 1975. What I can actually reveal is the fact that this offer of assistance eventually turned from missile development programme into a fully fledged “Battlefield Nuclear Bomb” development programme in which Israeli experts became totally involved. Without Israel’s technical assistance South Africa could never have built the ten weapons it developed and finally test fired at Prince Edward Island, well to the south of South Africa.
The article revealed that South Africa was years from being able to build atomic weapons. A little more than two months later, on 4 June 1975, Peres and Botha met in Zurich. The Jericho project had the codename “Chalet.”
The Guardian then went on to say: Botha did not go ahead with the deal in part because of the cost. In addition, any deal would have to have had final approval by Israel's prime minister and it is uncertain it would have been forthcoming.
The article continued: South Africa eventually built its own nuclear bombs, albeit possibly with Israeli assistance. But the collaboration on military technology only grew over the following years. South Africa also provided much of the yellowcake uranium that Israel required to develop its weapons.
So let’s just pick up on that line – Albeit possibly with Israeli assistance - I can say that there was no doubt whatsoever that Israel did climb into bed with South Africa and helped them to fully develop their nuclear weapons programme which reached a successful conclusion when Israel and South Africa carried out their first and only joint nuclear test on the 22nd of September 1979. The bomb was placed onboard a moored vessel anchored off the Prince Edward Islands, well south of South Africa
The US and UK Governments were very much aware of the progress and development of the South African nuclear weapons programme and yet apparently the UN were totally blind. At one stage the UN did send an advance party down to South Africa to carryout inspections….needless to say they had dismantled and hid everything before their arrival. What is also apparent is that these same governments were fully aware and supported the South African Chemical and Biological Warfare (CBW) programme, which had earlier been created in Rhodesia and shipped lock stock and barrel down to South Africa with Thatcher’s full approval.
Now one can see the satanic dealings of these unscrupulous leaders and their respective governments who will go to any length to retain supremacy over other nations and at the same time will develop any weapon to secure that status. A typical example of the CBW programme in South Africa was the development of the so called “Black on bomb” that was being designed to specifically target the Afro genes. This weapon was never used but was intended to depopulate the blacks in Africa on a huge scale.
Perhaps we can all recall the above nuclear test which the American Government attempted to cover up under the title of the Vela Incident. The story of this can be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vela_Incident
At this stage let’s just refresh ourselves on this nuclear programme, how many weapons were made, who eventually acquired the weapons and who was possibly involved in this pathetic blunder in the history of the United Kingdom. I guess one could ask the question why suddenly is all of this coming to the surface. Is there some intention by unknown third parties to throw some mud around onto maybe Tony Blair or Gordon Brown? Or could it be some smear campaign against the new Prime Minister of the UK, David Cameron……I guess time will reveal what is going on.
It must be clearly understand that Maggie Thatcher and certain members of the Conservative were not only aware but also supported the "Black only Bomb" and were also involved in many other under the radar operations. There existed an under the table illegal arms trade which at the time amounted to around 55 million pounds (as a starter). Money would flow from government sources to the arms dealers for weapons provided to both Iran and Iraq. One can clearly see this is not only an extremely two faced approach but also a clear case of "You reap in the harvest of your own making".
Lets again refresh on some aspects of the above dealings:
The establishment of the South African Nuclear Industry managed to make 10 nuclear weapons without the United Nations ever finding out. Needless to say the US and UK Government certainly knew about them but not the United Nations. I find it amazing that David Cameron and others travelled to South Africa during the embargo period and not only violated international law but also violated international law in dealing with nuclear weapons that were not known to exist according to he UN. Perhaps it would be fair to suggest some other names bouncing around at the time who were also possible involved in this shonky deal. David Cameron was still rather a young research officer at the time and certainly could not have dealt with this programme by himself.
It was suggested that some key figures who may have played a major role in this corrupt, under the table deal was that of Kenneth Warren (now Sir Kenneth) and David Wiltshire, the then head of the DTI Peter Lilley, Alistair McAlpine and the shonky arms dealer himself John Bredenkamp. Many other third parties were either involved on the investment side of this deal or otherwise implicated. The extended list could include John Majors, Ken Clarke, Maggie Thatchers son Mark (now Sir Mark) etc. We must obviously include Blair, Brown and many others within the British Government ranks.
So what happened? We have already discussed that 10 battlefield bombs were made and one was test fired leaving a total of 9. Before the white government of South Africa lost power, US/UK leaders, in conjunction with their South African counterparts were very concerned that these remaining 9 could end up in the hands of the blacks. It was decided to send all 9 weapons back to Chicago in the US for de commissioning.
In the meantime the British Government (Thatcher) saw merit in maybe having a few of these weapons available on standby to use against the Iraqi’s in the event they didn’t toe the line.
This was where our Prime Minster, David Cameron came into the deal when he was sent to South Africa, in total violation of the international embargo. He with the assistance of Kenneth Warren and David Wiltshire (with US approval) they were able to secure three of the remaining 9 weapons for the UK to put into storage in Oman on standby for the Iraq War.
This deal involved more than 52 million pounds of taxpayers money to which 17.8 million pounds would be siphoned off and given to the Conservative Party Election Fund, that too this day has never been investigated, despite it being raised in the Parliament.
As I have previously explained in my many articles on this subject in March/April of this year, the weapons were moved from South Africa to Oman without any of the normal security and at the same time were stored in a private warehouse in Oman which again did not have any suitable security. These three weapons were eventually stolen by the same guy who had sold them, alias John Bredenkamp, and then sold on the black market to the highest bidder.
We should now reflect on the suicide (assassination) of dear Dr. David Kelly who simply died because he knew too much, having been personally responsible for receiving these weapons for and on behalf of the British Government.
The final straw came when the government under the command of Tony Blair, not only sexed up the Iraq Dossier (with the help of that other scumbag Alistair Campbell) but went to war under false pretences. Blair knew, Campbell knew and Brown knew the entire history of this dodgy operation.
If one can justify going to war on an assumption, when others knew much more than was first reported, then we certainly went to war with the wrong country. It became painfully clear that the three nuclear bombs had each been taken in an ambulance to another country.
As a result of this absolute farce over one million Iraq’s have been killed, including our own troops etc and more important is the fact that the US and UK governments have totally contaminated Iraq to a point that its very DNA is not under constant attack with devastating results. The same can be said for the war in Afghanistan which was all totally orchestrated by the US and UK governments.
Believe me 9/11 was a total conspiracy involving the Israeli Mossad secret service and obviously George Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Henry Kissinger and so many more….this must have involved the CIA and the Pentagon. I would also be bold enough to say that this war on terrorism is a total “False Flag” propaganda machine. It has been created in the minds of the “New World Order” so as to spread fear and Islamaphobia amongst the people in the west, whilst at the same time allowing the governments to take extra security measure with this fictitious story as a backdrop. Al Qaeda really does not exist and yes the US, UK and Israeli Governments continue to spread this fear via the media to make us all panic.
There is no enemy (terrorist) the “Axis of Evil” lies deep within the New World Order, the international bankers of Wall Street and the City of London. We have to remember that war/conflict is good for business…..it drives up the price of a barrel of oil and enhances the most lucrative business in the world…..that of arms manufacturing.
Finally we have that very sensitive topic called mass depopulation that Henry Kissinger and his gang or warp minded morons continue to promote. I am very close now to releasing the next terrible story that will bring absolute shock to everyone that chooses to read it……..my advice would be to read it only if you are concerned as to what these people are doing to the world.
This makes the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) an absolute joke when the US, UK and Coalition forces continue to use mini nukes each and everyday which you will soon learn is part of the intended plan of mass depopulation.
I am so happy that the Palestine Telegraph was the only paper to first release this nuclear story and is still the only paper that is revealing the facts behind this dark chapter in the world’s history. We do not get identified as having a scoop or an exclusive….we all basically work free of charge in the hope of bringing out truth and justice for the many millions that have and will continue to fall victim to these evil and satanic weapons.
Stay tuned for the big one that will be out over the next week hopefully. This will consist of a legal War Crimes Complaint that has already been filed in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. It will contain evidence beyond a shadow of doubt. One senior US lawyer has called the work outstanding and extremely convincing but will it end up in the court system?……most probably not….. One can only try
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Wed May 26, 2010 9:45 pm Post subject:
US/UK Governments involved in Israel-SA Nuke deal
Wednesday, 26 May 2010 12:30 Added by PT Editor maysaa jarour
May 26, 2010 (Pal Telegraph, by Peter Eyre) -
Maybe we can all recall the Shakespearean play “The Merchant of Venice” when the wealthy Jewish money lender Shylock offered to loan money to his Christian rival Antonio. The price of default for non payment of the loan was a pound of flesh from Antonio. The whole affair ends up in court and the verdict is that Shylock can have his pound of flesh but must not spill any blood and can only take exactly one pound of flesh and no more.
Shylock, realising this is impossible, recants and simply requests 9,000 ducats. Portia then reveals that Shylock is himself guilty of a crime; namely, conspiring to kill another citizen, i.e. Antonio. As punishment, the Duke and Antonio decide that Shylock must give half his belongings to the court; keep the other half for himself and promise to give all his remaining belongings to his daughter and son-in-law (Lorenzo) upon his death; and become a Christian. With no other choice, Shylock agrees.
I guess by now you will be scratching your head and say what is this all about? The answer is very simple when you start carrying out illegal under the table deals, all in the name of money, the final result will always come back to haunt you……this next story paints a very clear picture as to “what goes around comes around.”
Greed of any nations always allows the impossible to happen especially when any nation is prepared to sell Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) or Chemical and Biological Warfare (CBW) at a price. It is very clear that some of these nations are prepared to sell their dying grandmother.
Lately we have seen all the mud flying around regarding the fact that Israel may have been involved in a nuclear deal with South Africa back in the 70’s but what this article by the Guardian falls short of and does not reveal is the fact that Israel certainly was involved in South Africa as well as other under the table deals after this date. I would even go as far as saying that the Israel version of nuclear weapons development, which they claim was there own doing, was in actual fact a joint venture with South Africa.
Israel did not have any territory suitable for carrying out a nuclear test programme but South Africa did. On the other hand South Africa did not have all the technology to accomplish their own deterrent and desperately needed the Israelis to come onboard to jointly develop, test fire and commission a nuclear bomb….which they did.
So how can all of this relate to Shakespeare’s wonderful play and is the final outcome similar to what happened to that greedy Jewish money lender Shylock?
It may also be worth covering in this letter another incident whereby Israel again did a nuclear deal with another country which really didn’t make sense considering Israel’s long standing hatred of anything Islamic. We will cover this part of the story after reviewing the South African blunder.
Let’s just recall the headlines from The Guardian yesterday - Revealed: how Israel offered to sell South Africa nuclear weapons. Again I repeat the term offered is no longer applicable as Israel did become involved in a joint venture with South Africa to not only assist them in illegally (under the UN embargo rules) creating their own nuclear weapons programme but also allowed Israel to test their own creation and establish what is now recognised as a substantial nuclear arsenal.
This Israeli – South African Joint Venture reached a successful conclusion when they jointly carried out their first and only nuclear test on the 22nd of September 1979. The bomb was placed onboard a moored vessel anchored off the Prince Edward Islands, well south of South Africa.
It is also evident that both the US and UK Government were fully aware of this programme and did at a later date become totally involved in resolving what to do with the remaining nine “Battlefield Ready Nuclear Bombs” before black power took over South Africa.
It was interesting to note that after this initial successful test, the US satellites detected a double flash associated with such a test explosion. The US tried desperately to cover up this nuclear explosion by putting out a story that it was possibly a meteorite coming down to earth. Of course this is far from the truth….especially when the Los Alamos nuclear facility in the US also picked up this test/data and distributed a secret memo around its own staff members explaining what had just occurred.
What is even more incredible is that it would be some ten years later before anyone was in a position to secretly remove the South African nuclear arsenal before the change of government. Remember all of this was under the table and not known by the United Nations (or so we are led to believe) who had imposed the embargo.
We again come back to the Maggie Thatcher manipulation of the above when she sent her apron string messenger, David Cameron, with the others I mentioned in my previous article, down to South Africa for an all expenses paid jolly.
That trip was fully financed by ARMSCOR and took place 1989. It included a trip to Pelindarba, the nuclear facility and where the nine remaining weapons were stored. It was after this trip that six of the nine were shipped directly to Chicago and the remaining three were eventually shipped from Durban to Oman in a very insecure manner, stored insecurely in Oman and then very cleverly stolen by the arms dealer who sold them.
As a direct result of this gross neglect by Margaret Thatcher, John Major,, David Cameron, Kenneth Warren, David Wiltshire, Peter Lilley and so many other high profile people such as Kenneth Clark, Lord MacAlpine etc we created a major security problem for the West and Israel by not knowing who had now got the missing weapons. Equally so the Labour Party were also implicated in this issue namely Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, Alastair Campbell and so many more.
It must be clearly understood that this entire fiasco all started off with Israeli selling its technology and for the West in general also watching this happen and at the same time allowing their palms to be tarnished with blood money. The final outcome resulted in a war with the wrong country and the nuclear threat still looming over our heads, not knowing who has the weapons now!!
Maybe as last we can see the story of Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice coming out here and that the evil man Shylock is in actual fact the State of Israel itself.
This now leads to the other more recent story concerning Israel’s involvement with Pakistan in the development of their nuclear programme. We can also see the same countries involved i.e. Israel and South Africa. So let’s just take a minute to run over events that have happened.
Back in 2004 the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) told the world it was monitoring scrap that had been taken from Iraqi military and Industrial sites and then transported by truck to Jordan.This was all under the eye of the American occupational forces and could easily find its way into the international underground market for nuclear components and be sold to countries seeking their own nuclear-weapons projects.
In addition to the above story was another article that appeared in the Los Angeles Times which drew attention to a guy called Asher Karni, an Israeli businessman, living in South Africa, who was arrested at Denver Airport. He was charged with attempting to sell parts of nuclear weapons to a businessman in Pakistan called Humahyn Khan. According to the report this could have been a big deal to export hundreds of electrical components that were normally destined for the medical market and making them available as possible components for nuclear weapons.
The components were triggered spark gaps and are used in the medical profession for breaking up kidney stones and emit an electrical charge that could be adapted for nuclear weapons. Humahyn Khan was engaged in purchasing material for the Pakistan nuclear programme in 1975. He was also involved with former Nazi and big-time nuclear parts dealer Alfred Hempel who also spread such components all over the world via a network of secret agents. Now one can possible see the implications and involvement with Israel and possibly Mossad.
The goods would be purchased directly from a major US electronic firm. Karni was unable to purchase the parts directly and so persuaded a New Jersey firm to buy the switches, based on the fact they were being used in a South African hospital and renamed them to avoid export control etc.The parts were then sent via Dubai and then onto Islamabad and Humayun Khan whose company was listed as a lithograph company and then possibly linked to a political party involved in the control of Pakistan Kashmir.
Again we see a connection between Shylock and these unscrupulous dealers who will not stop at anything in order to acquire their own wealth. The next big story is about to explode over the newspapers of the world regarding the horrendous war crimes currently being carried out on a huge scale.
Before finally closing we have to fully understand that all of these goings on are all under the spyglass of CIA, MI5 and Mossad who have infiltrated almost every media and NGO in the world. As we have seen, from this sudden outburst from the Guardian, there may be some sinister plan to upset the balance of power in this country.
We also see on a regular basis these organisations creating their diversionary “False Flag” operations to take the focus away from some other issue….typically such incidents as the so called Detroit Airliner incident and the more recent New York Times Square attempted bombing are now become so routine and boring….its time they got rid of these wet behind the ears agents and started using some more mature experienced operatives.
If one can truly appreciate the magnitude of what has happened over the last decade or so it is extremely hard to come to terms with the fact that the US lost three nuclear weapons and the UK another three. We know that since this time North Korea has carried out two nuclear explosions which for sure consisted of one of the stolen US SRAM weapons and the other, one of the British (South African) nuclear bombs. All of this gave huge sums of money to a small amount of people namely the arms dealer himself John Bredekamp (a Rhodesian of Jewish decent), David Cameron’s, Thatcher’s and John Major’s Tory Party funds, Tony Blair etc etc
I would like to thank Shakespeare for having a clear understanding as to what constituted evil and having the brilliant mind to put it into such romantic words. Let’s again recall those powerful words from Julius Caesar “To be or not to be, that is the question, the evil that men do lives after them, so let it be”
This week, newspapers around the world received reports and signed documents from South Africa. The reports said that, in 1975, Israel agreed to sell South Africa nuclear weapons. South Africa then released an arms agreement signed by current Israeli President Shimon Peres. This is the document “heard round the world.”
Meetings being held in New York to set up a conference for 2012 to guarantee that the Middle East is nuclear free. Israel has been informed that it will not be able to hide behind denials and that the nuclear arsenal put on the sale block by Israel in 1975 and nobody knows how many times since, has to go. When Israel was finally caught, it changed at least one part of a game, but the game will go on. South Africa’s willingness to come forward has shocked the world only because of the selfless honesty of the act, something unseen, something clean and decent. Imagine, the fall of Israel at the hands of an innocent.
[]
PERES SIGNATURE ON THE ILLEGAL AGREEMENT
What does it mean? Neither South Africa nor Israel are admitting that the nukes were delivered. General beliefs are that they were, a real shock to Nelson Mandela when he took office, from prisoner of apartheid to commander of a nuclear power. What is proven by this is that Israel was, even 35 years ago, a nuclear state, in direct violation of numerous international treaties. It also proves that Israel offered nukes to South Africa, a rogue nation under sanctions that covered not only any weapons but trade as well. This made Israel a criminal state and Mr. Peres a war criminal.
More than that, it makes any aid America gives Israel illegal. If Israel is nuclear, which is now official, and in violation of international treaties, just as with Iraq and Iran, then America has to demand inspections and disarmament. There is no choice. This is the law. Law for Iran, law for Iraq is also law for Israel. Israel has expected this day for years. The US can’t give or sell arms to any country with an illegal nuclear arsenal. Worse than this, we are sworn to defend the world from any nation that would spread nuclear weapons, a charge made by the South African government, one that has been made before, but can no longer be ignored.
THE ZIONIST HISTORY OF NUCLEAR DECEIT
How did Russia get the bomb? Americans gave Russia the nuclear secrets, not just Americans but Zionists, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, Morris Cohen, Martin Sobell, David Greenglass, Klaus Fuchs and Harry Gold. This was a couple of years before the establishment of the State of Israel or we would have called them all Israeli-Americans. They believed that America couldn’t be trusted and that infamous mass murderer Josef Stalin could. From this point on, spying against America, everything from secret weapons to defense plans, everything America depended on to stay safe was stolen and sold to Russia, China or North Korea by spy organizations run out of Israel.
The Rosenbergs died, excuted for their crimes. They were communists and believed in what they were doing. Today this isn’t the case. America’s military secrets are being peddled around the world for money, to keep the world on edge and has built Israel into a military superpower based on stolen American technology and, we are told, a nuclear arsenal built from stolen American designs and fueled with 2.5 tons of “misplaced” plutonium, one of the great secrets of our era.
Today these famed nuclear spies, the ones who brought about the Korea War and more, would be sitting in Tel Aviv doing TV interviews with the famed “dancing Israeli” film crew tasked by the Mossad with filming the 9/11 attacks. Israel has no extradition. 40,000 Americans died in Korea. Can we call that a holocaust too? Without our spies, Korea would never have happened, there would have been no Soviet bomb, no Berlin airlift and maybe no Cold War. These few, these Zionists from among the “chosen” helped build the world we knew, built with deceit, built with betrayal and are building it still, building it until the last American is under the dirt.
PEDDLING NUKES LIKE PARTY FAVORS, BUT WHO HELPED BUILD THEM?
America’s nuclear program, Livermore Labs, Oak Ridge, Hanford, Rocky Flats, Fernald, Pantax, Portsmouth, Mound, Pinellas, Savannah River, Sandia Labs, Los Alamos and more, needed to enrich uranium, design and fabricate nuclear weapons is vast, covering enough area to encompass some states. Tens of thousands of employees, hundreds of billions of dollars and physical facilities so large they could be seen from the moon are involved. Yet, by 1975, not only was Israel armed to the teeth with nukes, a tiny country, but had so many they could sell them on the open market like gumdrops.
The only possible answer was that America was supplying Israel with weapons grade fissionable material, plutonium or uranium 235. A number of investigators and whistleblowers have tracked these shipments to NUMEC in Pennsylvania and to France. I have spoken with some who were involved in the investigation. No report has been made. Everyone involved has been discredited or silenced. Is it a rumor or did Israel kill the Kennedys for trying to create a “nuclear free” Middle East? As this is the only very strong motivation for the assassinations that has never been made into a movie or filmed in a TV series or documentary, I am putting my money on this. John F. Kennedy may have signed his own death warrant when he sent the final demand to Israeli President David ben Gurion on July 5, 1963 demanding inspection of the Dimona nuclear facility. Ben Gurion resigned rather than receive the letter and before a new demand could reach Tel Aviv, Kennedy was dead.
NO SCIENCE NEEDED, JUST STEAL IT
The world is a funny place. With 95% of the worlds weapons design and development being done in the US, why is it that American technologies show up in enemy hands continually? Could the long history of Israeli spying against the US be involved?
Case in point, the JA 10 Strike Fighter; Designed to go toe to toe with the F 16 at a third the cost, the Chinese JA 10 is a bargain. Problem is, it is also largely American. Is America upset that their design and avionics are showing up in Iran? Why has China built a plant to construct this advanced fighter in Paksitan, a fighter that is the result of a joint project between the governments of Israel and China?
Are you confused? You are supposed to be. With Russia building a plant in India to produce a new stealth fighter based on the stolen plans of the F 22 Raptor, why shouldn’t Paksitan be producing their version of the F-16? What do these two enemies have in common? “Their planes are largely American designs, designs stolen by spies, and distributed by Israel, even to Pakistan, Israel’s sworn enemy.
Every advanced technology given by the US to Israel is reverse engineered and peddled to Venezuela, North Korea, China or the highest bidder. Any technology not offered is stolen. The game? Just as with peddling nukes to South Africa back in 1975, it is all about business.
REALITIES OF THE ARMS BUSINESS, LIES AND COVER
Were it not for Israels power at media manipulation, there would be little outstanding about them. Watching, in recent weeks, Israel drop news stories about how they are accused of sinking the BP oil platform in the Gulf of Mexico or attacking South Korea is amusing. Israel has even planted stories that they caused the recent earthquakes in Haiti. Why spread these crazy “Men in Black” rumors, more “men from Mars” than reality?
The game is called “poisoning the story.” The real thing Israel is hiding is that it has been selling weapons to North Korea, including highly advanced Germany built diesel/electric submarines that, in some situations, are more advanced than Americas nuclear fleet. Because of the holocaust, Israel can buy anything. Peddling missile guidance systems or submarines to North Korea is simply business. If they don’t do it, the French surely will and probably have.
THE “MEN IN BLACK” SYNDROME
Whenever an embarassing news story gets “too close for comfort,” our friends, sometimes the Israelis, sometimes the CIA, embellish it a bit. What reporter will look into a story with two paragraphs of “alien abduction” and “anal probe” added on. Thus, Israel is getting miles of cover for making fun of accusations that they sank the South Korean naval vessel. They didn’t do it, they just supplied the weapons.
The only reason Israel is on our radar is that their “games” played on the American stage with their puppet networks like Fox News and their political hacks, McCain, Lieberman, Palin, Pelosi, Waxman, Schumer and so many more, countless more, are ready to send a generation of American kids to war against Iran on the word of a proven liar, Israel, proven liar over peddling nukes, proven liar over Palestinian settlements, proven liar over Iraq’s nuke program lies told and retold by the master storytellers who daily reinvent themselves as victims. Not a single word can be believed, not one terrorist attack, not one “rock throwing incident,” nothing. So many lies pour out of Israel that a gem of truth would die of shame.
Is Israel doing anything others wouldn’t? Think about it. France, Switzerland, Sweden, Russia, China, Romania, Germany, all selling weapons to every country on earth. This isn’t a moral business. Billions a year are paid in bribes to government officials around the world. Nearly every country on earth would rather have a missile defense system than schools and hospitals for their children. The arms industry has been around forever, sucking the life out of the world. There is nothing new except our level of hypocrisy.
ARE THERE REAL LAWS AND WHAT IS THE U.S. OBLIGATED TO DO?
Whatever international law is on the books, it is generally dependent on the ability to enforce it through conflict. Thus, international tribunals are ineviably called “victor’s justice.” American law is something different. If Israel has nukes, we have legal obligations in accordance with treaty that change our relationship. This is why the “ignore the nukes” game that Helen Thomas has been playing with Washington’s spineless “elite” for years has been so important. “Queen of the White House press corps” for decades, Thomas recognized the duplicity and threat that may have brought down John Kennedy and ended an American rebirth of freedom.
The America nobody wants to live in but everyone wants to immigrate to, legally or not, is not what the constitution mandates, the people want nor what it was on its way to becoming. Everyone agrees on this part. We were hijacked back in November 1963. Every day since then has been something from an “alternative universe.”
Thus, we are back at June 5, 1963 again but with no John Kennedy around. The letter to Netanyahu won’t be written. The inspections won’t be demanded. America has everything in place to secure Israel, to press for a settlement of the Palestinian issue, a realistic one involving sacrifice on the part of every country in the region including the oil drenched Arabs that Israel enjoys parading in front of us. Nearly 2 decades of wars, occupation, “no fly zones” and our utterly transparent phony “war on terror” could, with honesty, diplomacy and good will, be directed into sustainable regional economic partnerships capable of ending extremism and ignorance.
Admissions of culpability by everyone involved, including both India and Paksitan, our drug dealing CIA along with Britains MI-6 and the oil company thieves proping up the corrupt states, have to hit the table. Without Chinese oil money and American and Israeli games, Iran would have been a democracy years ago. Similarly, raping Africa of its resources has cost the lives of millions and everyone is involved.
WHY ISREAL, WHY TODAY?
Israel has made a laughing stock of America, robbing America blind while living off our welfare. Israel is the consumate “welfare Cadillac state.”
They cash their ADC check while their kids rob banks, sell drugs and work to turn America into a hell on earth. They do the classic “step n’ fetchit” when we are looking, “poor Israel” the vicim of the holocaust, surrounded by enemies, then peddle hi-tech weapons to North Korea. The “tough love” talk we should have given Israel in 1948 when their public relations games started is 62 years late. When they started ethnically cleansing Palestinian villages and calling it “terrorist attacks” we needed to speak up. Now the baby is all grown up, almost a man, and we have become senile and toothless.
Israel may be a friend, someday, but not now. Did we make them what they are by being bad parents?
UK, March 1, 2010 (Pal Telegraph) -When one reads about the pressure that the US and UK Governments put on such countries as Iran and North Korea I find it hard to believe that they themselves are so negligent in taking care of their own weapons. I also find it so hard to believe that they have such high moral standards when trying to stop Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) but are prepared to use such evil weapons themselves.
Readers may find it incredible to know that as a result of their gross neglect three US nuclear missiles went missing without trace and have now ended up in the hands of someone else which now adds concern as to how such an event could ever happen.
The story doesn't stop there because three nuclear weapons that should have gone to the US for decommissioning were purchased in a very shady way by the British Government and they also went missing without trace and have also ended up in the hands of someone else.
You might ask how come we never knew about these two incidents and why was it kept so secret? I can also tell you that much more went on and the United Nations were never informed. So who was involved in this pathetic fiasco and why was it kept so secret? Could it be that shonky deals went on under the table and some political parties or individuals had their palms brushed with gold?
I am sure that by now your eyes are glued to this article just waiting to hear how such an event could every happen, who was implicated and who benefited from this sordid deal. One thing I can say is that you can be rest assured that no one really knows where they are now or who could use them and because of this any action taken by the west without due consideration could prove to be a catastrophic mistake.
Let's go back in time during the period when SRAM Nuclear Missiles were fully developed and ready to be used. This missile in actual fact became fairly unstable under certain conditions and eventually were pulled out of service (or so we thought). So let's take a look at this terrible weapon and fully understand it background and how many of these could be carried aboard a B52 Bomber.
The SRAM (short range attack missile, AGM 69A). The air-surface missile at the time of going missing contained a Plutonium Warhead W69M (200KT thermo-nuclear). The AGM69A missile was first manufactured in 1971 - 1976 and around 1,500 were produced. There were retired over a period of time between 1991 - 1994 although there were initially removed from active service in 1990 due to fire safety concerns. This concern however did not stop the continued operational usage.
Unknown to the United Nations and many other countries the US were playing a cat and mouse game with Iraq during Gulf War 1 and it was on President George H.W. Bush's watch that things went terribly wrong during one of his major bluffs!
He had authorized a B52 Bomber to depart its Saudi Arabian Air Base loaded with SRAM Nuclear Missiles and position overhead Baghdad. We were led to believe that this aircraft only had three missiles onboard; despite the fact it could carry twenty missiles. The idea Bush had in mind was to threaten Saddam with these nuclear weapons unless he toed the line.
The B52 with a registration number of 59-2593 suddenly encountered a major electrical problem which could have been catastrophic. The aircraft commander was instructed to head south as he continued to attempt to sort out the problem.
The aircraft eventually was instructed to head for Diego Garcia in the north of the Indian Ocean. Well into this flight things started to become more critical and the crew were very much aware of their cargo of potentially unstable weapons.
The decision was made to jettison the weapons off the coast of Somalia in relative shallow water (one would assume for possible later recovery), and then proceeded on to land at Diego Garcia. The onboard electrical system had obviously become extremely critical resulting in the aircraft loosing power to its eight engines as it attempted to get back to Diego Garcia. The aircraft started to loose height and prior to arriving at the field some crew members ejected. The aircraft by this time had dropped to below its safe ejection height and the remainder of the crew ejected but failed to deploy their chutes and consequently died. The aircraft crashed into the sea 15 nautical miles north of the field on the 3rd of February 1991.
Dick Cheney was US Secretary of Defense and did not take any immediate action to recover these weapons from off the coast of Somalia at the time and consequently they were recovered by another shonky organization in May 19991 who were supposed to be a deep sea diving/ treasure salvage team who were working in the offshore Somalia area. This diving company was operating out of the Seychelles and apparently was a cover up for a South African arms smuggling operation into Somalia. The apartheid-era South African military were sending packages of conventional arms destined for groups in Somalia, and dropping them in shallow water. The divers couldn't find these packages and had to broaden their search and accidently then came across the SRAMs. They allegedly relayed their serial numbers via the UK to a retired senior officer in the USAF to find out what they were. The news from the senior officer was that these were nuclear munitions from the B-52. I should point out at this stage that the South African arms dealer was also involved in the missing UK nuclear weapons which we shall address in Part 2 of this series.
The group communicated with South Africa's defense minister, Magnus Malan who was notoriously known for his under the table arms dealings. He met the group in South Africa but told them that the deal was off as he had just been fired by De Klerk. The trail of these weapons then faded into obscurity and no one really knows there final destination. There was talk of North Korea, Iran, Syria and Iraq but we may never know. What is fact is that at one stage some nuclear weapons did end up in Iraq(US or British)but were then relocated. I feel that in actual fact one did make it to North Korea and was detonated in one of their first tests. The second test in North Korea was totally different and could have been one of the UK's missing weapons. Should this be the case then we still have two US missiles missing and possibly two UK bombs but that's another story.
There is one thing for sure that almost certainly happened and that is that the South African arms dealer ended up with much gold in his vault and other persons in the US and UK would have also had their palms brushed. Certainly in the UK senior and junior political figures became involved in both the Conservation and Labour Parties and much money to this day has not been accounted for. The greatest concern out of all of this gross neglect by the US and UK governments is one simple question.......who has got these weapons now? That is why the US, UK and dear old Israel had better watch their step when making bold threats to other countries as they may well get a very nice surprise!!......oh and please be careful when you place your vote this year as two of the two current leaders have an awful lot of secrets they don't want you to know......especially in their very secretive donations file! keep watching this space for more riveting news!
Peter Eyre - Middle East Consultant - 28/2/2010
The US and UK lost three nuclear weapons each - Part 2
Thursday, 04 March 2010 06:36 Hits: 1679
UK, March 4, 2010 (Pal Telegraph) - What went missing on Prime Minister Thatcher's Watch?
As we discussed in Part 1 three nuclear weapons went missing from the US and now our focus must turn to the three that went missing from under the nose of the good old Brits. Don't you think it is ironic that over one million Iraqis may have died because of our gross neglect? Let's not also forget the thousands of troops who also died for nothing!
We have to turn the clock back to 1989 when a very young, wet behind the ears, David Cameron broke the stringent embargo on South Africa and paid a quick but purposeful visit to the Deep South. He was also accompanied by another illustrious Conservative figure who had a little bit more technical know how under his belt.
So why did dear Maggie take such a risk in sending her cavalry all the way down to South Africa? Was there something big to look at? Was their an opportunity for some shonky arms dealer to make big money and in turn possible slip a few thousand in the kitty fund of the Conservative Party? You bet there was!
Ok so lets look into this cloak and dagger operation that went terrible wrong and resulted in the assassination of dear Dr. David Kelly (Oh sorry I shouldn't have let that slip out it was suicide wasn't it?). Did this implicate David Cameron and his side kick in not only breaking international law but also in high level corruption? Surely no politician would put his reputation at risk, all for the sake of party funds donation?..........you've got to be joking; they would sell their mother for much less!
What was going on in South Africa that basically became the source of going to war in Iraq and why haven't these culprits been punished and who else knew about this British monumental stuff up? Did the British Labour Party also know about this mess that Maggie Thatcher got us into?.....you bet they did......Dear Dr. Kelly also knew in great detail!
It all comes down to a nuclear weapons programme that was kept hidden from the United Nations by both the US and UK governments....starting to get the picture? The South African Government hid an awful lot of extremely nasty stuff from the
world but good old US of A and the UK knew everything....just like partners in crime.
Let's just turn the clock back a little further at the time when Rhodesia ceased to exist and became Zimbabwe. It was in Rhodesia that Chemical and Biological Weapons (CBW) were fine tuned and eventually moved lock stock and barrel to South Africa along with its team of experts.
All of this CBW transfer was under the watchful eye of the British Government who approved the transfer....needless to say the US also became tagged to this evil development.
We may find it hard to believe that way back in the 1960's the Portuguese used Chemical Warfare by poisoning water wells, drugged prisoners and threw them out of aircraft. It is also hard to believe that other evil ways were also developed in Rhodesia such as psychological warfare, covert executions, and the deployment of ingenious booby traps and toxic substances. They employed: poisonous chemicals in clothing, canned food, drinks, and aspirin; and, lethal biological agents such as cholera and anthrax to contaminate water supplies and farmland.
It was also reported in 1977 that several, 25-gallon drums of chemicals were delivered and, dried in the sun, and then ground into a powder. The noxious powder was later brushed onto the denim clothing favored by the guerrillas, mixed into processed meat such as bully beef before being repacked in new cans, or injected into bottles of alcohol with a micro-needle. In addition, several prisoners were forcibly used to determine the effects of the poisons, and their corpses were disposed of secretly.
The Rhodesians also made several attempts to disseminate lethal CBW agents, in particular Vibrio cholera and Bacillus anthracis. Rhodesian Special Air Service (SAS) also dropping anthrax spores from an aircraft near Plumtree on the Botswana border in experiments to try to kill cattle in the Gutu, Chilimanzi, Masvingo, and Mberengwa areas.
The main purpose of including this CBW programme in this nuke story is to reveal that historically the US and UK have been closely associated with WMD/CBW and willingly approved such programmes. If we can all recall the Anthrax letter scare in the US then one can see the way such practices can get out of hand and be used by some sinister groups. Again I would like to put an emphasis on the fact that the US and UK government always applied pressure on the UN in regard to Saddam's use of CBW on Iran and the Kurds when they themselves gave the Iraqi's the chemicals and know how to carry out these attacked. How two faced can you get?
We can now look at another special operation that followed on from the above transfer of CBW to South Africa with what was known as "Project Coast." This project was the development, testing, and utilization of a wide array of hard-to-trace toxic agents to assassinate enemies of the South African state but went far beyond its original intention. Some of the plans included drugging victims before tossing their bodies out of an airplane into the ocean, which was similar to the tactics used in Rhodesia.
The substances employed in the assassination program included potentially lethal chemicals such as aldicarb, brodifacum, cantharidin, colchamine, cyanide, digoxin, methanol, monensin, paraoxon, paraquat, phencyclidine, phosphide, silatrane, sodium azide, thallium, and vitamin D3; biological agents such as anthrax spores, botulinum toxin, brucella bacteria, salmonella bacteria, mamba venom, and cholera bacteria. A wide variety of foodstuffs, beverages, household items, and cigarettes were contaminated with these poisons.
Methods of delivery included turning rings, screwdrivers, walking sticks, and umbrellas into assassination devices by adding poison compartments and injectors and firing mechanisms for poisoned pellets. As we can all see the true world of James Bond really does exist. It is also interesting to note that the evil regime that existed at the time also intended to create a "Black only Bomb" which would specifically target the black populations of South Africa. This bomb would directly attack their genetics with the minimum result of making black Africans sterile etc.
Before moving onto the nuclear industry in South Africa we should also mention Dr. David Kelly British arms inspector and micro biologist, Dr. Kelly, has always been linked to the fact he knew too much about the illegal arms trade to the Middle East, including the real story about WMD in Iraq. Although the official story of his 2003 death tells a tale of suicide, many observers close to the case claim Dr. Kelly was anything but suicidal. They also contend the follow-up investigation was appalling, claiming the Hutton Commission set up by the British Parliament to investigate Dr. Kelly's death covered up important facts that would have implicated high-ranking British and American officials.
It is believed that Dr. Kelly knew all about the "Black only Bomb" as well as missing nuclear weapons which we will talk about after this segment covering CBW. It would appear that he may have been assigned to look into some aspects of the above by both Maggie Thatcher and John Major and therefore his implication would have put two very senior politicians in the firing line had he divulged this knowledge to the media or in his book. It is also believed that Dick Cheney was also clearly disturbed that Dr. Kelly could spill the beans on all of the above as well as information concerning missing nuclear weapons. At the time of his assassination Tony Blair just happened to be in the United States and was awarded a Gold Medal but never received it.......maybe because it was tainted with blood!
Dr Kelly had really gone through a very rough patch with the British political elite and many people in high places were aware that he could spill the beans on dangerous and deadly secrets that could topple governments, especially the CBW programme in South Africa to which Thatcher was privy. Biological weapons research continues today and remains a subject one cannot talk about. The 2001 Anthrax attacks in the US proved that the programme was still very much alive. Obviously all of the above implicated the USA and big cover-ups were made by the FBI.
It must be clearly understand that Maggie Thatcher and certain members of the Conservative were not only aware but also supported the "Black only Bomb" and were also involved in many other under the radar operations. There existed an under the table illegal arms trade which at the time amounted to around 55 million pounds (as a starter). Money would flow from government sources to the arms dealers for weapons provided to both Iran and Iraq. One can clearly see this is not only an extremely two faced approach but also a clear case of "You reap in the harvest of your own making".
Now we come to the establishment of the South African Nuclear Industry that managed to make 10 nuclear weapons without the United Nations ever finding out. Needless to say the US and UK Government certainly knew about them but not the United Nations. I find it amazing that David Cameron and others travelled to South Africa during the embargo period and not only violated international law but also violated international law in dealing with nuclear weapons that were not known to the UN. Perhaps we could give a clue as to who else became involved in this masquerade......one of them had the initials DW and another person involved is a Knight with the initials of KW.
So what was this shonky deal that took place whilst the United Nations was sleeping and involved the South African Government, the US Government and the UK Government and dare I say the Israeli Government? Let's again re visit the nuclear research programme that went a bit too far....thanks to all of the above.
It is believed that South Africa started its weapons nuclear research programme as early at 1973. It wasn't until 1977 that the Atomic Energy Board completed manufacture of South Africa's first full-scale nuclear explosive device based on a gun-type design. It was with the help of Israelis that South Africa achieved it first success when on 22 September 1979, a U.S. Vela surveillance satellite detected a distinct light event off of Africa's southern coast and this was believe to be the first test of a nuclear bomb. South Africa in actual fact designed and built a total of 10 fully operational weapons, ready for use! One can clearly see that this left only 9 weapons in the stockpile.
In August 1988, Roelof Frederik "Pik" Botha, the South African foreign minister, announced that his nation had "the capability to make one [a nuclear weapon]" should it want to do so. A month later, in September 1988, South Africa sent a letter to IAEA Director General Hans Blix expressing willingness to accede to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) if certain conditions were met, primarily that South Africa be allowed to market its uranium subject to IAEA safeguards. Less than two years later, the de Klerk government terminated the nuclear weapons program. All nuclear devices were dismantled and destroyed........let me just hold it there one minute and clarify what was said in this paragraph "That in less than two years all nuclear devices were dismantled and destroyed....... This was not the case!!
In 1989 David Cameron and others went down to South Africa to carry out some sinister plan that resulted in only 6 operational nuclear weapons going back to the US for de commissioning.The other three were to be purchased by the British Government as a standby mechanism against Saddam. Remember this is all under the radar of the United Nations!
So who was involved in this under the table deal, who paid for them and where did they go? Did anyone in the UK receive a significant party donation and if so whom and by what amount? Did other leaders get to know about this and was their palms brushed? The answer is simply "Yes" and those two leaders were Tony Blair and Gordon Brown......stay tuned for more clever 007 stuff.
Peter Eyre - Middle East Consultant - 3/2/2010
The US and UK lost three nuclear weapons each (Part 3)
Friday, 05 March 2010 13:28 Hits: 1649
UK, March 5, 2010 (Pal Telegraph; commentary by Peter Eyre) - The US and UK lost three nuclear weapons each (Part 3):What went missing on Prime Minister Thatcher's watch?
As discussed in Part 2 of this series, many countries have been involved in extremely disturbing activities, spearheaded by certain leaders and their senior staff members. They left a trail of unbelievable corruption and gross neglect, without any apparent concern for the consequences of their actions.
Let's revisit the circumstances surrounding the deal between the UK government under Maggie Thatcher, David Cameron (leader of the UK's Conservative Party) and his entourage, the South African government and the ruthless arms dealers. I would also like you to keep in mind the connection between the missing U.S. nuclear missiles and the same questionable dealers.
As a reminder, there were originally 10 nuclear weapons; out of this batch, one was tested, leaving nine weapons in total. David Cameron went to South Africa in 1989 to investigate many aspects of the WMD program. At the same time, Dr. David Kelly (British UN weapons inspector) was very much involved in looking for chemical and biological weapons, having made several visits to his South African counterparts. He was also knowledgeable about the weapons smuggling loop that existed in Africa at the time. This also gave him access to the nuclear weapons proliferation program in South Africa, especially nuclear bombs assembled with the help of Israeli nuclear scientists at the covert South African nuclear weapons facility at Pelindaba, near Pretoria. Later in this article, it will be documented how Dr. Kelly became involved in the nuke transfer deal.
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors visited Pelindaba and the Advena nuclear facility, built by the state-owned Armaments Corporation of South Africa (ARMSCOR), in 1990 and 1991. They were tricked into believing that South Africa's nuclear weapons had all been dismantled by the outgoing apartheid regime. However, what they didn't know is that after they had left South Africa, activities continued as usual. I repeat that both the U.S. and UK governments were very much aware of the existence of these weapons, with Maggie Thatcher rubbing her hands together in glee at the thought of receiving a significant contribution to party funds........David Cameron and his sidekicks also were very much part of these shady goings on!
Now we come to issue of how the weapons were transported out of South Africa and where they ended up. Let me remind you that we are talking about three armed, ready-to-use nuclear bombs, courtesy of Israeli technicians. We can then discuss who was involved, how the payments were made and the disappearance of the guilty parties.
The plan was originally to re-locate these weapons to some remote railway sidings and then load them into three standard, 20-foot ISO containers (one bomb per container) and export them with a false manifest listing them as metal cylinders. The main players were a British company called Astra and a South African company named ARMSCOR. At the government level, they dealt primarily with the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), funded by the Ministry of Defense. This alone gives some indication as to why this deal became so very special and confidential. One must also consider the middleman in the deal, who brought all the parties together to get the job done. To name names, obviously the "Iron Lady" was right in there, and also her son Mark Thatcher. Then we have David Cameron and that illustrious man with the initials KW who accompanied him to South Africa. The middleman and notorious arms dealer was John Bredenkemp. We also have to add John Major into the story, since he also became part of the deal.
In order to keep the deal out of Parliament and out of the public domain, Maggie Thatcher was asked to sign off on the purchase of these weapons under an Urgent Operational Requirement (UOR) in which they were listed as metal cylinders, not nuclear bombs. This was done completely under the table, unknown to anyone else outside the inner circle. This document was signed before she left office in late 1990.
Once the weapons left South African soil, the British government reimbursed ARMSCOR (the South African arms trading company), Astra (the British arms company) and the middleman (John Bredenkemp), compliments of the British taxpayer.
It should be noted that ARMSCOR has now split and the arms side has now become a company called Denel (Pty) Ltd. However, they work together. ARMSCOR advertises itself as the "Gateway to Defense Solutions," and Denel has branched out into a diverse empire including aviation, weapons systems, etc.
So to recap: There were nine nuclear weapons in transit to Chicago, and three of those were to be used as a standby weapon for the Gulf War, These three were sent for storage to Oman, where Dr. Kelly planned to conduct an inspection. Upon completion of the deal, the money would be paid to all those involved.
You must understand that this deal was processed via the private sector, which is difficult to believe once you fully understand the implications of buying, selling and shipping ready-to-use nuclear weapons! In this case, three South African nuclear weapons were sold to "private investors."
These containers were specially adapted to carry the highly mobile weapons to a private storage facility in Oman for safekeeping. The containers had a special seal on the lock of the rear door of each container, along with a temperature gauge in the front that was connected to the core of the bombs to prevent them from overheating.
The nuclear smuggling operations involved top members of the British Conservative Party, including individuals close to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, her son Mark and -- at a later date -- other members of the Labour Party. Both parties received an increase in funds, with the Conservatives taking a massive share. Keep in mind that their presence in South Africa was totally in violation of the embargo and the Nuclear Explosions Act.
As for John Bredenkemp, one cannot even attempt to calculate how much money he made. However, as would be expected, this money was very quickly converted to gold bullion, totaling many kilos.
I will next look at what happened to these weapons once they were stored in Oman, and how the British taxpayer donated money for a very unprofessional operation that was a failure from the outset. Needless to say, the nukes all disappeared and one can clearly see that indirectly, taxpayers' money ended up in the political funds of both the Labour Party and Conservative parties.
Many investigations have taken place since this event, all of which involved Jonathan Aitken, a Tory Party defense minister; Gerald Bull, a Canadian who worked with Saddam Hussein; Gerald James, chairman of Astra; and others. It became apparent just how sensitive the situation was when Alan Clark, DTI minister, became involved, as did Sir Ken Warren, chairman of Trade and Industry. The spider web certainly caught Tony Blair, with his connections to Bernie Eccelstone, who contributed £1 million to the Labour Party disguised as a donation from the tobacco industry (in fact, it was clearly from the gun-running episode).
Upon becoming Prime Minister in 1997, Tony Blair tried unsuccessfully to return the money to Ecclestone. However, his donation was only a fraction of what the Tory Party received. All in all, taxpayers' money was fuelling the arms trade to both Iraq and Iran with the British government the primary engine. It is clear that both parties were playing the same game and the end result was that these weapons were used against our own forces. This same situation occurs frequently around the world.
This week we will see the commencement of the Iraq inquiry: another waste of taxpayers' money. Will it bear fruit? I don't think so!
What we have to remember is that both Tony Blair and Gordon Brown summoned Maggie Thatcher to a meeting after taking office, and one can assume that the missing nuke played a major role. That is why this new inquiry most likely failed before it even started, like all the others. The period of investigation does not go back far enough for it to be reveal the real truth.
To date, there have been two assassinations: that of Gerald Bull, who was killed by Mossad in Brussels in 1990, and that of our own dear Dr. David Kelly. Alan Clarke died of a brain tumor in 1999, leaving only Gerald James. The latter had a brush with death at the end of last year, when one of his relatives was killed instead (purely by accident). When one looks at such incidents as the Matrix Churchill arms smuggling scandal, you can clearly see how such inquiries fail. It is interesting to see such people as Ken Macdonald - who also happens to be a partner with Cheryl Blair -- become involved in the Matrix Chambers scandal. We will have to see what Brown churns up tomorrow. This could be a make-or-break opportunity for him. But don't hold your breath!
Stay tuned for the final installment (Part 4) of this series.
Peter Eyre - Middle East Corresponden
The US and UK lost three nuclear weapons each! - Part 4
Saturday, 06 March 2010 13:30 Hits: 1169
UK, March 6, 2010 (Pal Telegraph) -The US and UK lost three nuclear weapons each! Part 4 - What went missing on Prime Minister Thatcher's Watch?
I have already discussed in Part 3 of this series how the British Government manage d to acquire 3 ready- to- use nuclear bombs from Pelindaba under the nose of the United Nations. These three nukes were part of a total consignment of 9 that were destined to travel from South Africa to Chicago in the US. It became apparent that Maggie Thatcher had made an arrangement with the Government of South Africa and the United Station for three of these be acquired and shipped to Oman for storage. The main purpose was to have these weapons on stand-by for possible use on Iraq.
These weapons were then shipped in standard 20 foot containers and manifested as metal cylinders and not nuclear weapons. This would have been in violation of international regulations regarding the shipment of dangerous good. The weapons were then placed into private storage in Oman and left for Dr.David Kelly to carry out an inspection in order to accept the consignment prior to final payment. Dr David Kelly was the only person in mainstream UK MOD tasked with being in the loop for that covert offshore procurement of battlefield nukes from Apartheid South Africa.
Dr Kelly did carry out that inspection and final payment was made by the British Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) using money from the Ministry of Defence (MOD). This process was a direct breach of normal protocol in the purchase of munitions, even more so with the fact that this was money being paid to the private sector.
Sometime after Dr Kelly had inspected the three weapons they apparently went missing. It became apparent that when these weapons were no longer required they continued on their journey to Chicago and when the containers were offloaded and checked, it was found to contain only concrete and not bombs! So what happened to the security system for looking after such dangerous weapons and how did the switch take place?
It would appear that three trucks with containers onboard left the private storage facility and were replaced with three trucks and containers that only contained concrete. We must fully understand that these operational nuclear weapons were highly mobile and did not present any problem. It became apparent that these weapons did in actual fact end up in Iraq and it was believed that this formed part of the final intelligence brief leading up to the war.
Prior to the outbreak of the war these three weapons were transported to Syria in three separate ambulances as they were extremely mobile (as we have already discussed). What happened to these weapons after that is anyone's guess but one could associate an attack by the Israeli Air Force on the Syrian Nuclear Facilities in 2007 a possible clue.
What did transpire after the war was that the British Government found out that these weapons had in actual fact left Iraq prior to the war but did not reveal this to the rest of the world. Likewise both the US and UK kept this entire fiasco top secret from the eyes of the United Nations and their respective media etc.
Before looking into who knew what and who received what let's just make it clear that this war in Iraq had a main focus of establishing a regime change. It was Bush's intention right from the onset and Tony Blair was very much aware of the US stance and also agreed with it. The Secret Downing Street Memo proved beyond a shadow of doubt that whatever the outcome the US and UK would end up going for the final option of a regime change.
Finally we come to the question of how much money was placed into the Conservative Party Funds for their 1992 election campaign (as a direct result of this nuke deal). We already know that Tony Blair got a 1 million pound bonus which was disguised as a donation from the tobacco industry but what about the Tory Party?
Tory funding of their 1992 General Election Campaign -
Origins of Mystery Donation of £17.8 millions:
If we can recall HANSARD 22nd June 1993 we can find the following:
Column 197
Mr. Hoyle: If the hon. Gentleman will allow me, I shall tell him what information is now given to us. We understand the expenditure and what Tory central office receives. In 1992, central office received £20.7 million. When we asked about that and about company donations, the Tory party told us to look at company accounts.
I repeat: in 1992, the Tories received £20.7 million. When the records were checked by Companies house, only £2.9 million was shown in company accounts. That means that there is a deficit of £17.8 million. We want to know where that £17.8 million came from.
It is very clear where this money came from as well as the token offer given to Blair.
Right from the onset a small group of people in both the US and UK knew of this deal and how the weapons that the British Taxpayer had paid for had gone missing. On this side of the Pond we can be rest assured that the following people knew: Thatcher (Mother and Son Mark), David Cameron, the nobleman with the initials of KW, John Major and his senior guys. On the Labour Party side of the fence it would have been Tony Blair and his close team followed by Gordon Brown. As we already know Thatcher put in an appearance at Number 10 Downing Street when they both came into office.....once can assume it was not to congratulate them!
We now have to ask some serious questions......did we go to war for these weapons (WMD) and if so then all those involved in this charade must be guilty of not only gross neglect but also for the unnecessary lost of millions of people(Including troops). Everyone knows the money is blood money and everyone knows that nothing will be done about this incident. How can we truly vote for any of these monsters who knew an awful lot but kept it to themselves? What we can see here is the fact that the tax payers money was not only totally abused, but some of it ended up in the party fund election drive. How corrupt can one become?
It was interesting to hear the reason for David Cameron going to South Africa. His office insisted the visit by the 23-year-old future leader was a "fact-finding mission" that took place 20 years ago, and the Thatcher government was opposed to sanctions against South Africa at the time. I think we can assume it was to do with the "Nuke Deal" before the regime change and also to raise money for party funds!
Perhaps when you vote next time you will hesitate before ticking the box?
Has anyone seen tomorrow's Sun
saying thet Gordon Brown gave permission for News International to get into his bank account and sons medical records
Disgusting - drivel - and shows how deeply they have lost it.
So lovely to see somebody taking the name of Murdoch apart so terminally.
Former chairman of HTV Louis Sherwood said Rupert Murdoch was 'poison'.
Dennis Potter named his pancreatic cancer after him.
But there may well be some deep criminality at the heart of all this that is propelling it......????????????
Here s a link to the Peter Eyre Armscor story
Yes, it's explosive stuff that places the Prime Minister David Cameron as key mover in an illegal nuclear arms deal.
Thank you for joining my space. The world is truly a remarkable and beautiful place but somehow we have lost our direction. Why can't we all get on together and live in peace? Why so much agression and no compassion or love for each other? Why do our leaders want to wage war in order to gain an economic advantage in controlling the natural resources of our planet? Why do such nations as the USA allow the manufacturing of weapons containing uranium components and yet profess that they are promoting disarmament? Who do they, the UK, European Countries and Israel insist in using these WMD's. I sincerely wanted to welcome you all in such a very nice and gentle way but I carry so much pain for the innocent men, women and children of past and current war zones that have sucumbed to these evil uranium weapons. We must all try to prohibit DU/EU or any other "Dirty Weapon" and learn to live in peace. We in the west have to close all bases that exist on Islamic soil and learn to trade instead of fighting. So I again welcome you to "Peter's Space" If you support war in any shape or form please do not enter my space. If you are a Christian Zionist or Jewish Zionist please do not enter my space. If however you are against war and any form of intimidation you are most welcome to take over my space.
The US and UK lost three nuclear weapons each!
Thursday, 4 March 2010
Part 3 - What went missing on Prime Minister Thatcher’s Watch?
As we have discussed in Part 2 of this current series many countries were involved in extremely disturbing activities and this was spearheaded by certain leaders and their senior staff members. It has clearly shown a trail of unbelievable corruption and gross neglect without any due concern as to the consequences of their actions.
So lets again visit the circumstance of the deal between the UK Government under Maggie Thatcher, the David Cameron entourage, the South African Government and the ruthless arms dealers. I would also like you to keep in mind the connection between the missing US Nuclear Missiles and the same shonky arms dealers.
First we must again identify the fact that there were originally 10 nuclear weapons and out of this batch one was tested, leaving 9 weapons in total. David Cameron went down to South Africa in 1989 to look into many aspects of the WMD programme. At the same time Dr David Kelly was very much involved in the CBW programme having had several visits with his South African counterparts. He was also knowledgeable about the weapons smuggling loop that existed in Africa. This also gave him access to the nuclear weapons proliferation programme in South Africa, especially South African nuclear bombs assembled with the help of Israeli nuclear scientists at the covert South African nuclear weapons facility at Pelindaba nuclear research facility, near Pretoria.We will see how Dr. Kelly became involved in the nuke transfer further on in this article.
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:41 pm Post subject:
by email.....
Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu is trying to persuade his cabinet to authorise a military strike against Iran's suspected nuclear weapons programme - a discussion that comes as Israel successfully tests a missile believed capable of carrying a nuclear warhead to Iran, an official said.
Even though Iran may have a nuclear programme for enriching Uranium.......
It is highly unlikely that they could be sufficiently advanced to go onto the next stage and make the Plutonium for warheads for the missiles to attack Israel.
-
Instead it is far more likely that Israel fears that..........
Iran may still have some of the aged ex-USAF type W-69M warheads?.....see below
-
Initially 3 in no.ex-USAF Short Range Attack Missiles - SRAMs c/w warheads - were found by the Afrikaner Rhodesians and sold on in 1995.
Incidentally one of those three was fizzle-exploded , and still in an unserviced state - by North Korea on 9th Oct 2006.
-
However back in Feb 1991 B-52g airplane described below , in the Octagonal Rotator in its rear bomb bay, had been carrying 8 .in no. SRAMs c/w hydrogen bomb warheads as above.
The original finder, Bill Rautenbach re-visited that same find area starting summer 2003 to look for the other five..
-
Servicing those warheads even nuclear weapons is no big deal.....as the plutonium has a long half-life.
Only the Tritium Gas in the Initiators needs to be replaced.
That can be done on site.
Thus Israel and the US now threatening to bomb Iran's nuclar installations is utter madness.
-
According to today's Guardian.....
David Cameron i& Co. also keen for the Royal Navy to be involved with submarines carrying Trident Missiles.
-
Incidentally David Cameron is a proud and self proclaimed Zionist.
-
---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
-
WASHINGTON, Oct. 16 — American intelligence agencies have concluded that North Korea’s test explosion last week was powered by plutonium that North Korea (allegedly) harvested from its small nuclear reactor, according to officials who have reviewed the results of atmospheric sampling since the blast.
No B-52Gs were lost as a result of enemy action. However, several were damaged.
One B-52G (59-2593) was lost on February 3 (1991) when it experienced a catastrophic electrical system failure while returning to its base at Diego Garcia.
While responding to the failure, improper fuel management on the part of the crew caused five engines to flame out, and the aircraft began to descend.
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 1:53 am Post subject: Press TV: Cameron 'fixer' in nuclear weapons deal?
UK extremely worried about stolen nukes
Fri Nov 25, 2011 1:26PM GMT
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/212022.html
Did we the British public know that our current Prime Minister was instrumental in the loss of three illegal nuclear weapons?
Is the UK frantically trying to find out where they were sold on the “Black Market”?
We know something that you don't…… but can't talk about it Under the Nuclear Explosions Act otherwise we will all end up in goal for life.
Chris McGreal of the Guardian newspaper published an article 24th of May 2010 revealing how Israel offered to sell nukes to South Africa during the apartheid era. What he failed to reveal was that Israel struck up a deal with South Africa to move its technicians down to the high-security weapons research and development facilities at Pelindaba.
It was at this location that the Israeli technicians managed to covertly give themselves nuclear weapons but also under the table gave South Africa its own nuclear capability but guess what?.......the US and UK knew all about the programme but the UN did not!!!.......what was even more amazing was the fact that the UN sent a team to South Africa where they were convinced that South Africa had curtailed its nuclear weapons programme when in actual fact it had not!!
It is fairly obvious why Israel is totally consumed in trying to find these stolen weapon and needless to say the US and British Governments are equally as concerned and yet are not in a position to admit to their loss as in doing so would incriminate past and current very senior politicians including our current Prime Minister David Cameron.
It always appear to be the case that your past always comes back to haunt you. So let's just recall the history behind these weapons that were designed and commissioned all during the UN embargo years and who was allegedly involved.
I must also make it quite clear that many of the world leaders and senior members of government have been involved in these under the table deals which has resulted in many of them accumulating much wealth either for the party election funds or for their own personal gain. When one further considers that these faceless individuals not only govern out country but are also directly responsible for the death of millions of people both military staff and civilians it is extremely hard to understand.
How can any government have such a flawed intelligence network and allow such things to take place without some sort of audit to see what is going on behind the scenes. We have seen both the US, UK, EU and Israel transfer almost everything from chemical and biological weapons to nuclear part to countries which they have since called the “Axis of Evil.”...........that statement is not totally true because the "Axis of Evil" is right here in the heart of London!!
It was in the late 1970 when the South African nuclear programme started to go into full swing with the compliments of the Israeli scientists resulting in the first test and only test firing of a nuclear weapon. The test took place on a moored vessel anchored off Prince Edward Island on the 22nd of September 1979 when a typical double flash was observed from a passing US satellite.
One has to understand that this was all under the radar of the United Nations with the full knowledge of selected members of the US and British Governments. The US immediately went on the defensive by creating their “False Flag” report known as the “Vela Incident” in which they explained the following:
The conclusions of the Presidential panel (the Ad Hoc Panel) were reassuring, as they suggested that the most likely explanation of the Vela detection was a meteoroid hitting the satellite - in part because of the discrepancy in bhangmeter readings Others who examined the data, including the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), the national laboratories, and defense contractors reached a very different conclusion - that the data supported the conclusion that on 22 September 1979, Vela 6911 had detected a nuclear detonation.
What I find ironic here is the fact that several agencies confirmed it was a nuclear explosion but the US Government conveniently put it to bed. I can assure you that through my own scientific contacts in the US this did actually happen and an internal memo at the Los Alamos nuclear research facility confirmed that it had been a nuclear explosion. One has to understand the high stakes involved in such programmes, especially when vast sums of money are being banded around senior political figures. This is truly corruption at its best!
The joint venture (Israel - South Africa) created 10 Battlefield Bombs and after the first test that left nine. The bombs were designed to be highly mobile and reasonably compact and could be carried by the British Canberra bomber or the Buccaneer.
It became apparent in later years that the supremacy of white power in South Africa was about to finish and so they had to open up discussion with the Americans and British as they feared these weapons getting into the hands of the blacks. It was during this time that a decision was made to ship all nine bombs to Chicago for de commissioning. However, our dear “Iron Lady” Maggie Thatcher decided that it would be a good idea to maybe acquire a few of the weapons for possible use against Iraq in the event Saddam did not toe the line.
Thatcher then ordered her Page Boy, David Cameron, to go down to South Africa along with what was believed to be the only technical man available (non other than the now( Sir) Kenneth Warren). Others also believed to be implicated was David Wilshire and many other senior members of government. In actual fact as we follow this charade up to the current time we could possible include other very senior person such as Lord McAlpine, Peter Lilley, Alan Clarke and Ken Clarke and others I have previously named in other articles. The late Dr. David Kelly was also involved.
We have to remember that this was almost a private sector deal with many political figures implicated some of whom became share holders in the illegal nuke purchase. We are talking here about an extremely high risk deal, with little security for the weapons themselves as everything had to be done in a low key covert way.
As we already know David Cameron was able to secure a deal for his lady mentor, Maggie Thatcher, and returned with a deal for three nuclear weapons. They were shipped to Oman whereby they were put in private sector storage and eventually stolen by John Bredenkamp, the arms dealer who sold them to Britain and then stole them back to sell on the Black market and the rest is now history.
We have to understand that British Tax Payers money was then placed in the Conservative Party Electoral Fund (£17.8m) which to this day has not been accounted for and other money was made available to Tony Blair (£1m) compliments of Bernie Ecclesone. On top of this a slush fund was also developed to silence other third parties that knew of the deal and our dear Mr. Ken Clarke then implemented his gagging orders to those involved!!
I guess you do not believe this story......why don't you check it out yourself it is written in Hansard 22nd June 1993, and starting at Col. 197 when Lord Doug Hoyle raised the issue in the House as follows:
“Mr Hoyle: If the hon. Gentleman will allow me, I shall tell him what information is now given to us. We understand the expenditure and what Tory central office receives. In 1992, central office received £20.7 million. When we asked about that and about company donations, the Tory party told us to look at company accounts. I repeat: in 1992, the Tories received £20.7 million. When the records were checked by Companies house, only £2.9 198million was shown in company accounts. That means that there is a deficit of £17.8 million. We want to know where that £17.8 million came from.
Mr Tim Smith: The hon. Gentleman has made the suggestion about the accounts of the Conservative party that was made by a member of the Select Committee last week: that no accounts had been published between 1979 and 1983. They were published, and I undertook to send copies to the Select Committee.
Mr Hoyle: I gave way to the hon. Gentleman because I expected him to tell me where the difference of £17.8 million came from. I shall give way again to him. I am told that he is a treasurer of the Conservative party. I give way to him now so that he can stand up and tell us where the £17.8 million came from. Does the hon. Gentleman care to do that? I am waiting. I do not think that we shall get the information from the horse's mouth. We certainly did not get it from the Secretary of State.”
I could write article after article on the many levels of corruption that occurred in both the US and the UK (not forgetting Israel) and the terrible consequences of this greed resulting in the death of many of our own troops and innocent civilians….all for their own pocket. Solid evidence proves that over the period of 1982-90 Iraq was supplied by the US and UK with WMD, including biological cultures and chemical precursors of nerve gases etc.
By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor
This week, the media, all of it, traced stories about Iran’s nuclear weapons program to its real source.
The IAEA, which has been unable to locate the vast Dimona nuclear facility in Israel or even begin to ask questions about Israel’s illegal nuclear arsenal, has put together a “rigged” report built of rumors and spin.
The IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency), a “quasi-official” group is, in fact, an Israeli intelligence organization, long infiltrated, long engulfed, long ago a force for propaganda and, primarily, an organization tasked with helping Israel “hide” its nuclear arsenal “in plain sight” while fabricating evidence.
If you follow Gordon Duff and Veterans Today, you get some seemingly incredible stuff. However, my concern for the statements they make, is that they appear to be unsubstantiated.
I know (we all know) from events like 9/11, that sometimes you have to make connections between seemingly unrelated events or look for evidence to support particular theories. However we also know that there was and still is an enormous amount of dis-information, to confuse the arguments, and lead investigations in the wrong direction.
While Gordon Duff and VT continue to make statements which are neither cross-referenced nor substantiated by facts, my heart says they make sense, but my head says I can't believe it. _________________ In the end, it's not the words of your enemies you will remember, but the silence of your friends. Martin Luther King
If you follow Gordon Duff and Veterans Today, you get some seemingly incredible stuff. However, my concern for the statements they make, is that they appear to be unsubstantiated.
I know (we all know) from events like 9/11, that sometimes you have to make connections between seemingly unrelated events or look for evidence to support particular theories. However we also know that there was and still is an enormous amount of dis-information, to confuse the arguments, and lead investigations in the wrong direction.
While Gordon Duff and VT continue to make statements which are neither cross-referenced nor substantiated by facts, my heart says they make sense, but my head says I can't believe it.
Quote:
The IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency), a “quasi-official” group is, in fact, an Israeli intelligence organization, long infiltrated, long engulfed, long ago a force for propaganda and, primarily, an organization tasked with helping Israel “hide” its nuclear arsenal “in plain sight” while fabricating evidence.
Do you mean it's a bit misleading to say "long infiltrated" rather than initiated by the Nazi banksters?
Do you mean it's a bit misleading to say "long infiltrated" rather than initiated by the Nazi banksters?
Call the masters of the NWO anything you like; Nazi Banksters, Zio fascists, or anything else appropriate. My concern is with lengthy detailed articles which by their very nature may be complex.
The subjects that Gordon Duff and Veterans Today deal with are never covered in a serious manner by the mainstream media. They may be read by many who are only 'half awake'. IMO, for this group especially, where one chooses to say something like 'long infiltrated', the statement/claim/allegation must meet one of two criteria to bolster the validity of the entire text. Either, it must be widely accepted as fact, or there should be reference to some corroborating evidence. _________________ In the end, it's not the words of your enemies you will remember, but the silence of your friends. Martin Luther King
I see redadare; I suppose it’s easy for regular readers of his articles to see all the corroborating evidence. Perhaps he should make reference to that for the purpose that you have brought up.
Which would be better IMHO than leaving room for comments/commentators to fill some of the gaps, but draws them in to read the articles.
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Mon May 28, 2012 7:20 pm Post subject:
Blair in on this too
On 9th Oct 2006 North Korea fizzle-exploded (in an unserviced state) a USAF plutonium warhead ,......
-
In early 2003 and before the war with Iraq..... Dan Norris as war-whip had been made aware before he secured the crucial Commons vote that those plutonium warheads could the real WMD that the US were hoping to get-back by invading Iraq...
-
The whole US military build-up for War with Iraq had been disproportionate and extreme for the WMD simply being bags o fertiliser-quality chemicals for converting into biological and chemical nerve gas agents,
-
---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------
-
Gordon Brown pushed Tony Blair to quit: Cherie
Economic Times of India
10 May, 2008, 1052 hrs IST, AGENCIES
-
LONDON: Gordon Brown hounded Tony Blair out of office, the latter's wife, Cherie, has dramatically claimed in her autobiography, serialised versions of which will start appearing in The Sun from today.
Cherie Blair accuses Brown of "rattling the keys above his head" as far back as April 2004.
Cherie says she fought to stop Tony from standing down, but admitted that the two are now once again on talking terms.
"I thought he (Brown) was putting too much pressure on Tony to leave when Tony wasn't ready," the tabloid quotes her, as saying.
According to The Telegraph though, Tony would have handed power to Gordon Brown before the 2005 General Election if the then Chancellor had agreed to push ahead with Blair's reforms.
Cherie Blair argues that her husband should still have been the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, and tells how Tony Blair had a "crisis of confidence" over the Iraq war and feared that he had become an electoral liability.
Mrs Blair makes the revelations in extracts from her memoirs, Speaking for Myself, which are serialised today.
The extracts are expected to infuriate Brown who has already seen his authority diminish following the recent Labour meltdown in the local elections.
The former first lady also says that her husband is now informally advising Brown on how to win back support.
Blair is said to have been concerned that Brown would not back key policies on city academies, foundation hospitals and pension reform if he had taken over before last year.
Cherie Blair, a successful barrister, has had a rocky relationship with Brown and she apparently was persuaded to tone down her autobiography by her husband.
She has brought forward the release of extracts of her memoirs which were not due to be published until October prompting speculation that she is trying to deepen Brown's current problems.
However, Mrs. Blair insists that she takes no pleasure from Brown's current difficulties. But she does disclose that "Gordon's impatience" to take over from Mr Blair was a problem that he could have done without.
Mrs Blair added that there was no deal struck in an Islington restaurant in 1994 for Mr Brown to take over from her husband as has been reported..
The book also dismisses recent speculation that Mr Blair does not believe that Mr Brown can beat David Cameron.
It is understood that Cherie Blair is receiving a six-figure sum for the interview and serialisation deal with two Rupert Murdoch titles that includes many anecdotes about her decade in Downing Street.
Since leaving office last June, Tony Blair is estimated to have earned about 10 million pounds, even though his role as a Middle East peace envoy is unpaid.
He has received an advance of almost five million pounds for his memoirs and will be paid a reported two million pounds a year as an adviser to Zurich, a Swiss-based financial company.
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 11:01 pm Post subject:
Mr. Hoyle: If the hon. Gentleman will allow me, I shall tell him what information is now given to us. We understand the expenditure and what Tory central office receives. In 1992, central office received £20.7 million. When we asked about that and about company donations, the Tory party told us to look at company accounts.
I repeat: in 1992, the Tories received £20.7 million. When the records were checked by Companies house, only £2.9 million was shown in company accounts. That means that there is a deficit of £17.8 million. We want to know where that £17.8 million came from.
Cameron's freebie to apartheid South Africa
Tory leader admitted his party had got it wrong over sanctions when he later visited Mandela
BY JANE MERRICK AND JAMES HANNING Sunday 26 April 2009
David Cameron accepted an all-expenses paid trip to apartheid South Africa while Nelson Mandela was still in prison, an updated biography of the Tory leader reveals today.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/camerons-freebie-to-apar theid-south-africa-1674367.html
The trip by Mr Cameron in 1989, when he was a rising star of the Conservative Research Department, was a chance for him to "see for himself" and was funded by a firm that lobbied against the imposition of sanctions on the apartheid regime.
Critics described it as a "sanctions-busting jolly" that raised questions about the character of the man who, after a week when the Government's credibility on the economy hit a new low, is now on course to be prime minister in a little more than a year's time.
Mr Cameron will portray himself as prime minister-in-waiting today when he addresses his party's spring conference in Cheltenham with a promise to introduce a "government of thrift".
The trip is revealed for the first time in a newly updated edition of Cameron: The Rise of the New Conservative, by James Hanning, the deputy editor of The Independent on Sunday, and Francis Elliott, the deputy political editor of The Times.
Mr Cameron's office insisted the visit by the 23-year-old future leader was a "fact-finding mission" that took place 20 years ago, and the Thatcher government was opposed to sanctions against South Africa at the time.
He met union leaders and black opposition politicians, including the head of the left-wing Pan Africanist Congress (PAC) during the trip, a spokesman said. The trip was organised and funded by Strategy Network International (SNI), created in 1985 specifically to lobby against the imposition of sanctions on South Africa.
Yet when asked by the authors if Mr Cameron wrote a memo or had to report back to the office about his trip, Alistair Cooke – in 1989 his boss at Central Office – said it was "simply a jolly", adding: "It was all terribly relaxed, just a little treat, a perk of the job. The Botha regime was attempting to make itself look less horrible, but I don't regard it as having been of the faintest political consequence."
In 2006, shortly after becoming Tory leader, Mr Cameron tried to make amends for his party's record on South Africa by visiting Nelson Mandela, by then President, at the same time as suggesting the party's policy from the 1980s was from another era that he did not belong to. He said at the time: "The mistakes my party made in the past with respect to relations with the African National Congress and sanctions on South Africa make it all the more important to listen now.
"The fact that there is so much to celebrate in the new South Africa is not in spite of Mandela and the ANC; it is because of them – and we Conservatives should say so clearly today."
But what was not known, and which sheds new light on the 2006 meeting with Mr Mandela, was that Mr Cameron himself paid an official visit to the country under the apartheid regime. Civil servants and advisers were told not to go on such trips, the book reveals.
Peter Hain, the former Cabinet minister and prominent anti-apartheid campaigner, said last night: "David Cameron asks us to judge a leader's character – well, Gordon Brown at this time was active in the anti-apartheid movement, while Cameron was enjoying a sanctions-busting jolly. That is a measure of character.
"This just exposes his hypocrisy because he has tried to present himself as a progressive Conservative, but just on the eve of the apartheid downfall, and Nelson Mandela's release from prison, when negotiations were taking place about a transfer of power, here he was being wined and dined on a sanctions-busting visit.
"This is the real Conservative Party, shown by the fact that his colleagues who used to wear 'Hang Nelson Mandela' badges at university are now sitting on the benches around him. Their leader at the time Margaret Thatcher described Mandela as a terrorist."
A spokeswoman for Mr Cameron said: "Yes, he did go to South Africa. He met with anti-apartheid campaigners, he met opposition politicians when he was out there, including Zeth Mothopeng, the head of the PAC.
"It was a fact-finding mission that happened 20 years ago. He met union leaders and was shown around mines. The position of the Conservative Party at that time was against sanctions."
The trip was offered to the Conservative Research Department by Derek Laud, who was employed by SNI and was later a Big Brother contestant.
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 12:54 pm Post subject:
Friday, July 1st, 2011 | Posted by Gordon Duff
Murder, Glastonbury and the Nuclear Nightmare
“The Worst Thing That Can Happen” is Real
The Only Question is Timing
By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor
Someday, perhaps soon, a nuclear weapon will destroy a city, America, Europe, it’s only a matter of time. Behind the scenes, however, the stage is being set and things are in motion. Intelligence agencies around the world are on it, working but not always optimistic they will succeed. The problem, of course, is that not all intelligence agencies want to succeed.
Investigations inside Britain have stumbled on a grand conspiracy, one that ties 9/11, the Iraq invasion and even the murder of Princess Diana together. Nothing of this magnitude has begun in the US or is likely. Even in Britain, as witnesses come forward and investigators push for broader inquiries, doors are closed, sometimes as with the Derbyshire incident but more often with government sanctioned killings like the murder of Dr. David Kelly and the mysterious death of Robin Cook.
The killings, Cook, Kelly and more, many more, all seem to circle around arms dealers known for their ties to access to nuclear material and their willingness to broker deals between Israel and such unlikely customers as Iraq or North Korea. Thus far, only the death of Dr. David Kelly is confirmed to have been a murder tied to one or more of these arms deals.
This week, Tory MP Christopher Shale may well have met a similar fate. By T. Stokes:
Chairman for West Oxfordshire Tory Party, Christopher Shale was found dead in a toilet cubicle at Glastonbury Festival the day after his interview with the Mail On Sunday was published. Significantly in the interview Shale had criticised his own party for being, as he put it: “voracious”, “grasping” and “always seen to be on the take”.His comments on the economy echoed what many felt, that it could not be coincidence that almost every country in the world was facing economic collapse simultaneously. Tory leader, Prime Minister Cameron was said to have been furious with this rising star in the party for his forthrightness.
Shale was a big music fan and had friends in pop music, charitable fundraising and banking and coupled with his insider knowledge, his outspokenness posed a potential threat to the establishment.
He regularly received a newsletter from Rwanda, which claimed that grasping voracious moneylenders were breaking-up every country in the world. The newsletter must have made a deep impression on Shale with its references to “grasping and voracious money-grabbers” because he later used these exact terms to describe the Tory Party.
Avon and Somerset police force cover Glastonbury festival and they had a lot of undercover officers working the fields after Shale’s death.
This police force has a better name than most and is less tainted with corruption so gets more public support, and people were soon talking about the death of a popular rising politician.
Like many music festivals drugs are rife, particularly the area around the toilet cubicles with the relative privacy they offer. But with upwards of 200, 000 people at Glastonbury the area around these toilets isn’t salubrious. In fact hygienically it is literally the pits, with the vast number of people using them.
So what was 56-year-old Christopher Shale doing there, particularly when he had a luxury motor home nearby with its own private shower and toilet?
To forgo his private toilet facilities to use one of these dirty public cubicles just does not add up.
Did this politician with his plans to modernise the Tory Party speak out to loudly and pay with his life?
The family of Christopher Shale say they have been told it is almost certain that he died of a heart attack, despite a pathologist being unable to determine an official cause of death.
Just like Robin Cook, who opposed arms sales and the invasion of Iraq and who died of heart failure while walking in the Scottish hills, despite his never having had heart problems.
From the way Christopher Shale died experts can tell who did it because of what the intelligence community call ‘tells’; tell-tale signs or signatures that distinguish a murder made to look like death by misadventure: like Robin Cook, Dr David Kelly and now maybe Christopher Shale too.
Lets hope the Avon & Somerset police force are as good as their reputation and investigate this properly.
Yesterday, a British politician, Christopher Shale, died in an outdoor toilet at the Glastonbury Festival in Britain. This is a yearly “Woodstock’ type event that draws hundreds of thousands, U2 was only one of the headliners but the real story is usually mud and traffic. I have been stuck getting out of Glastonbury for endless hours. Glastonbury was the backdrop, the death will be a minor event. In truth, it is not, it is part of a pattern of mysterious deaths tied to a horror story.
YouTube - Veterans Today -
Missing nuclear weapons.
Coincidentally, the same cast of characters are probably, more than probably, responsible for the murder of Princess Diana. She didn’t die over Dodi Al Fayed or Islam, nothing so conspiratorial. She simply made it harder to sell landmines, those things that blow the legs off small children but make hundreds of millions in profits for folks who can make your car crash, help you commit suicide as with Dr. David Kelly or make you show up dead in a probably filthy public toilet when your million dollar motor home is only a few short yards away.
Last week, journalist Peter Eyre wrote an article on this two decade old story that still threatens the lives of millions. Eyre talks of British politics, murder, corruption, things Christopher Shale had been looking into. Shale didn’t last very long. From Eyre’s article:
Let’s refresh our minds about what happened in 1989 when a young Tory researcher, David Cameron (under the apron strings of Maggie Thatcher), went to South Africa on a sanctions-busting all-expenses-paid trip (paid by ARMSCOR) to Pellindaba, a nuclear weapons facility. David Cameron was accompanied by Sir Kenneth Warren and the purpose of the trip was to purchase three, battlefield ready 20kt nuclear bombs that the Conservatives wanted to use on Saddam in the event he did not toe the line.
Under the UN radar, South Africa, with the help of Israel, developed ten bombs and test fired one at Prince Edward Island to the South of the country. This left nine weapons that caused South Africa, US, UK and Israel great concern as they did not want them to fall into the hands of the next black regime.
The plan was to ship the entire load to Chicago for decommissioning, but Maggie Thatcher had other ideas and so just before she left office she signed an Urgent Operational Requirement (UOR) document that listed them as being three cylinders! They were prepared and shipped in standard 20-foot sea containers from Durban to Oman without any security. There was a hidden observation window so that the core temperature could be checked as required.
The deal was arranged privately using British taxpayers money and involving arms dealer John Bredenkamp with the assistance of Sir Mark Thatcher and many high profile politicians. £17.8 million was siphoned off and went into the Tory Party Election Fund; which was exposed by the Labour Party in Parliament by Lord Doug Hoyle and Margaret Beckett MP and is listed in Hansard June 22 1993 from Column 197.
The nuclear bombs arrived in Oman and were put into an insecure compound and checked by Dr. David Kelly who had the responsibility to look after the weapons and check that they were in good condition prior to the release of the money. (So you see dear Dr. Kelly knew too much). Some time later the three weapons were stolen by the same arms dealer, John Bredenkamp, and sold on the black market. It was believed that these weapons found their way to Iraq, but were then moved into Syria in three ambulances as they were highly mobile.
The investigation, now a massive coverup which includes, not only murders in Britain but a secret motive for staging a series of building demolitions known as “9/11″ pointed at Iraq. When it pointed at Syria, as explained by Eyre, it was buried. We will get to that in a minute. These missing bombs have been writing history for years, it never stops.
Sources have tracked them, not to Syria but to Israel and from there, one went to North Korea where it was exploded May 25, 2009. Who would sell a nuclear weapon, one build by Israel and South Africa, one bought by Britain, one stolen and moved, if we believe the stories, from country to country, to North Korea?
A more important question, where are the others? How many others? Two more of these are missing. A year ago, at least one was reported inside the United States.
The Delta Force was sent to Indiana to recover it from a warehouse. It may have been found, we hope so. However, we do have multiple confirmations of the reports and the search. A local news channel showed up and filmed it of all things.
YouTube - Veterans Today -
From the Daily Telegraph:
Friends say Mr Shale suffered a massive heart attack. But Michael Eavis, the festival organiser, hinted at something more sinister when he suggested to journalists that it was a suicide.
Speaking at a press conference he said: “Apparently, I’m told it was a suicide situation in the early hours of this morning. He was in the Winnebago area and he was found on the other side of the site. It is very, very sad.”
The suggestion of suicide was quickly ruled out by police sources and friends of Mr Shale.
Tributes to Mr Shale came from the highest offices of Government. Mr Cameron said he was “devastated” and described Mr Shale as “a rock”.
Andrew Mitchell, the International Development Secretary, knew Mr Shale from trips they had been on in Rwanda as part of a project to help young Africans prepare for work.
He said: “He was a wonderful man whose zest for life and love of his family and friends coloured everything he did. For his close friends his company was like a freshly opened bottle of champagne. I can hardly bear to accept that he will not be with us.”
Mr Shale was a veteran of the festival. Although he and his family camped off the site, he would buy tickets for the VIP area each year so that they could enjoy the facilities.
YouTube - Veterans Today -
Bookmark and Share
Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=118806
The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT or any other VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners and technicians. Legal Notice
Posted by Gordon Duff on Jul 1 2011, With 0 Reads, Filed under 9/11, Editor, Iraq War, WarZone. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
COMMENTS
To post, we ask that you login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.
Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with VT and post.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Feedback
Comments Closed
Frank
July 6, 2011 - 11:16 pm
A good write-up and a lot of new information was related. I have followed the David Kelly incident from day 1 and this gives a clue as to what he meant when he was referring to “dark actors playing dark games” in an email to a friend shortly before his death.
A couple of other points. The Valerie Plame (Joe Wilson) affair would also be part of the play ball or else mantra. So would the anthrax to the most vocal anti-war Senators Daschle and Delay. What ever happened with the anthrax and Phillip Zack or whatever his name was anyway? From my layman understanding, one cannot have the vaccine without knowing the exact strain one is dealing with. If you have that, you could also be in place with video cameras like the Mossad
read more ...
Dax
July 6, 2011 - 2:44 am
Avon & Somerset Police force comparatively ‘clean’?
Not a chance. They are all grunts under command. That command is guided and trained by Common Purpose. Coverage of Shale’s cause of death has disappeared in the UK, the media have blanketed the ‘NEWS’ with phone tapping of murdered teenagers ad nauseum.
“This video has been removed by the user” Well rot my socks! Can’t imagine why . . .
Monkee tellee – Monkee dead.
Art
July 1, 2011 - 10:58 am
Diana was a beautiful gentile in a Judaized Khazarian royal family. After offering two ‘presentable’ princes (unlike their dad), she was thrown out like a used pair of socks. Dismayed and angry, she starts dating an Egyptian and knowingly gets pregnant with him. She was coming back with a real Semitic prince to an Altaic royal family for revenge. We need more than “land mines” to blow this Semitic fetus apart. Why would prince William betray her mother and marry another khazar to be accepted as an Altaic prince in the cult?
equalizer
July 1, 2011 - 9:31 am
must be why I prefer rodeos…
adeUK
July 1, 2011 - 9:29 am
This website is about the corrupt activities of Common Purpose, a fraudulent ‘educational charity’ acting as a change agent being used to recruit and train the commissars and apparatchiks needed to implement the British government’s hidden New World Order communitarian agenda.
I have not received any legal challenge or complaint from Common Purpose or its named associates about the allegations of corruption made on this website. Why not?
If you want to find out what is going wrong in Britain (and also the USA to a certain extent) and why, you have come to the right place.
http://www.stopcp.com/
read more ...
peter
July 6, 2011 - 8:41 am
Like I wrote before – 5th columnists…probably a mossad operation based on goyim theme of destroying christian ethics and social structure…
adeUK
July 1, 2011 - 9:25 am
Working with Common Purpose and NGO’s gradually imposing global governance (UN diktats) via stealth and deception is the game. Cameron is in it up to his neck and his activities and loyalties are a continuation of the Blair/Brown regime.
Excerpt 1
The Big Society is a guiding philosophy – a society where the leading force for progress is social responsibility, not state control. It includes a whole set of unifying approaches – breaking state monopolies, allowing charities, social enterprises and companies to provide public services, making Government more accountable’.
Of course this isn’t BigDave’s idea and neither did it originate within the Conservative Party. The Conservative home blogsite admits that
‘This plan is directly based on the successful community
read more ...
Alexander
July 1, 2011 - 9:15 am
We are in a race, and the contestants are, the global population that is awakening quickly and from this stage goes into Personal Initiative and action, vs. the top 1/1000th of 1% Elite Vermin, that know they need to destroy us before we wake up, or their heads will removed (after some lengthy and painful softening-up).
stevor
July 1, 2011 - 8:35 am
“Investigations inside Britain have stumbled on a grand conspiracy”? Wow, with the Big Brother state that they have, I’m surprised that anybody has a hope of learning the truth about what’s going on. Because of that, I wonder if there’s some agenda behind that “stumbling”.
Yes, the “money-lenders” are doing “their part” in the destruction of the world, but are they pulling all the strings or just using this group with their well-known “skills” at that?
Sure, it makes sense that a nuke will go off, if a total nuclear war isn’t started. If you look at the evidence (and hints such as the “Georgia stones” that put the desired world population at 500 million – 90% of the current population being Eliminated) the Elite want a smaller population. It’d be easier to manage a smaller
read more ...
peter
July 6, 2011 - 8:30 am
This is all a load of * – destroying the world makes no sense even if these loons are criminal minded…their system works on the numbers and their system works on consumption and if they do more nuclear * then there isnt going to be much left for them and hiding in heavy duty dugouts isnt going to save them – thats all doomsday stuff and it wont work for them, But little battles and attritional wars will and there is going to be plenty of cannon fodder for them with the unemployment being so bad – its all a psychological thing. Besides the masses are not the problem – its the “gangs” amongst them fighting for the big power – but its all relative and has been going on thousands of years. Its just that the internet brings it all in closer and with so many 5th columnists playing games
read more ...
Rehmat
July 1, 2011 - 8:26 am
The so-called ‘nuclear threat’ against the countries which have stockpiles of nuclear bombs – is a good PR for the next Zionist military adventure in the Muslim world – most probably in Israel’s #1 enemy – Islamic regime in Tehran.
David Cameron fired his smoking gun from his Jewish family tree last year: “Iran already have a nuclear bomb”. On Wednesday, his FM, William Hague, an Israel-Firster, told the world that Iran has carried out secret tests of missiles capable of delivering a nuclear payload in breach of UN resolutions.
Interestingly, one month ago, Israeli DM Ehud Barak had said that Iran will never nuke Israel or any of its other neighboring countries.
read more ... _________________ www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org www.rethink911.org www.patriotsquestion911.com www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org www.mediafor911truth.org www.pilotsfor911truth.org www.mp911truth.org www.ae911truth.org www.rl911truth.org www.stj911.org www.v911t.org www.thisweek.org.uk www.abolishwar.org.uk www.elementary.org.uk www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149 http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor
[Editor’s note: Seldom do we get a video that has everything right. Whether you work your way through the story, do take time to view the video. We have confirmations on the information there as well as our own sources that go considerable further.
I am looking for comment board participation from the UK and South Africa from those with information we need to move this project forward. This is a critical story that has to be brought back to the forefront.)
_____________________
British Prime Minister David Cameron has taken an aggressive stance advocating the silencing of anyone who refuses to stick to his version of what he likes to tell others are “facts.” We have something to say about that. In 1989, Cameron, only 25 years old but a rising star in Britain’s dirty political game, traveled to Africa on a trip that would lead to election fraud in Britain, stolen nuclear weapons and a war in the Middle East.
Let us supply some background. Cameron has equated challenging his long proven fabrications as acts of terrorism and is threatening to use British security services to silence honest journalists the way Dr. David Kelly was silenced. He seems to have appointed himself “god.”
Sanction Busting, Israel, Britain and South Africa
In 1975, South Africa signed a top secret accord which allowed Israel to build and test, not only nuclear weapons but chemical and biological weapons as well. The deal was “build and test,” not just nukes but gas and bioweapons as well, conveniently done in Africa where mass slaughter doesn’t matter so much.
This was done, covered up by the Reconciliation Commission, but the facts are there, BX gas, VX gas, ebola, anthrax, small pox among others, released in Angola and against other non-white populations across Africa.
On September 22, 1979, one of ten nuclear devices to be created through this partnership was exploded. American satellites picked up the 80 millisecond double flash while sonic detectors, part of the worldwide anti-submarine network, picked up the signature of a nuclear explosion, this one on a barge off Prince Edward Island. (See Figure 1)
David Cameron secret 1989 S. Africa nuclear arms deal behind Mandela's back, raises £17.9m 4 Tories?
As explained in the video, which gets everything right, the remaining 9 nuclear weapons were sold to the US and Britain. David Cameron was part of the delegation that purchased 3 of the weapons. This deal was an 11th hour scam, worked out between politicians and arms dealers.
It involved stealing at least $50 million for a political slush fund but there was something far more sinister involved. The deal Cameron was a part of along with Dr. David Kelly and John Bradenkamp, the quite famous arms trafficker, involved stealing nuclear weapons.
Cameron’s visit violated UN sanctions against South Africa and UN treaties covering nuclear non-proliferation as well. These facts are clearly in evidence.
gg_089
Figure 1
Britain Simply Gave 3 Nukes to Terrorists
This operation, to steal 3 nuclear weapons from South Africa, weapons supposedly bought by Britain to be disassembled, according to sources directly involved in the sale and transport of the weapons themselves, interviewed at length, began at the Pelendaba nuclear facility in South Africa.
There, the bombs were loaded onto Blatchford cradles and moved into blue 20 foot containers. VT personnel were along for the ride to Durham where they were put on a ship for Oman, a ship arranged for by John Bradenkamp, a Rhodesian/Zimbabwean arms trader only recently off the terrorist lists.
This represented David Cameron’s “blooding” as a real “insider.” In Britain we know what that generally entails.
His good friend on the trip, Dr. David Kelly, has been murdered in 2003, over threats to expose the dirty deal cut with arms traders to steal nuclear weapons. Did Cameron know the details of the deal he helped negotiate? We suggest yes.
What was the nature of that deal? Britain was to simply unload the weapons in Oman, leave them unguarded and walk away. They never mentioned them again, never looked for them and never asked questions even when one of the bombs supposedly belonging to Britain was exploded by North Korea on May 25, 2009.
Britain was quickly informed that one of the “Saddam nukes” had exploded in North Korea. American satellites or ground teams can detect the origin of nuclear material and the specifics of bomb design. Pelandaba for North Korea and Hanford for 9/11, two of nearly 50 unexplained post World War 2 nuclear explosions according to sources at the IAEA.
This is when liability under the UK’s Nuclear Explosion Act of 1998 which was carried over into the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act of 2001 become a reality. The following provision within the expanded 2001 act applies:
The Act explicitly declares that to knowingly cause the detonation of a nuclear weapon, for a test or any other reason, will be an offence, and punishable by life imprisonment and confiscation of anything relating to the offence. The only exception is where the explosion is deemed to have been carried out in the course of an armed conflict – if a question arises over this then the Secretary of State for Defence decides and issues a certificate of his determination. The Act will apply to any weapon used within the United Kingdom, or used elsewhere by British nationals or corporations.
Two British prime ministers are in danger from this act, Tony Blair who received nearly $5 million in political payoffs. later returned, laundered through a source tied to Formula One racing. Blair’s cash came from Bradencamp and is assumed to have been his cut for keeping quiet about the source of what he was told were Saddam’s nukes. The Chilcott Inquiry was tasked specifically with tracking down those involved in “misplacing” these nuclear weapons.
The defining language in the act and those with full knowledge and access to conclusive proofs of violations, the Bradenkamp group, Murdoch’s “News of the World” spy operation and its affiliate, Israeli military intelligence, have gained and clearly exercised broad leverage over these two prime ministers and, through a decades old sex and murder scandal now rocking Britain, key ministries and members of parliament as well.
The other is Cameron. Both are assumed to have information tied to the Korean nuclear explosion and that, either through failure to act while in office or complicity in the transfer, they are culpable and potentially liable under provisions of the 2001 Security Act that apply to nuclear weapons. Enforcement of these provisions is “non judicial.”
How This Changed History
The weapons have played several roles in recent history:
Britain and the US invaded Iraq to seize these weapons stating: “There are 3 nuclear weapons in Iraq, only 45 minutes from assembly and use, which we believe are being transported to Syria via ambulances.
Later Israeli intelligence said the bombs were in a Beirut hospital, kept in the X-ray room to hide them.
Then Israel claimed they were transported to Turkey and placed on the Mavi Marmara, under the hull to shield radiation. Israel gave the US this reason for their attack on the Gaza convoy.
Two weapons are believed to have been transported to the US inside vending machines sent from Israel. This was the plot of the Israeli financed Sum of All Fears, a film that blamed Syria for what US intelligence believed Israel had done.
Alexander Cockburn of CounterPunch, a suspected Israeli backed “alternative news” outlet, in 2005 penned an article titled “Lost Nuclear Warheads in Iran.” (quoted and linked below) The article is believed to have been written to not only to push for an attack on Iran but to cover an Israeli nuclear material smuggling operation to North Korea using Dolphin submarines supplied by Germany.
On July 13, 2010, the Delta Force hit a warehouse outside Indianapolis, “The Loft,” a company that sells furniture for college dorm rooms. They believed one of the nukes was there. We can’t confirm that one was recovered.
In 2012 and American NES-Team (Nuclear Emergency Security) was dispatched to Essex to recover what was believed to be a nuclear weapon meant to threaten the London Olympic games. Russian intelligence had leaked a story about a midget submarine moving the weapon up the Thames estuary. We have confirmations that a weapon was recovered.
Starting around this time, according to investigators for the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) and the Able Danger teams in the US, nuclear material in the forms of W-54 pits began disappearing from the Pantex facility in Amarillo, Texas.
2_israel-saagreement_page_11
Similarly, on February 3, 1991, a B 52 flying a secret mission near Iraq, armed with crashed off Somalia. Its 3 SRAM nuclear warheads were believed to have been recovered by South African Special Forces and transported through Mombasa. Several “Broken Arrow” missions were dispatched. It is not known if these weapons were recovered.
Peter Eyre and Gordon Bowden
Much of the original work on this story was done by Peter Eyre who has consistently gotten it right.
Do the people fully understand that vital evidence is being withheld from the Chilcot Inquiry regarding the Conservative Party being implicated in illegal arms to Iraq prior to the war and as a direct result of their actions put our own troops at great risk?
Do the public fully understand just how much of this deplorable, under the table dealing, Dr. David Kelly knew and that he was about to expose it?
You may ask why Dr. Kelly? It’s very simple really because he was the only man that could be trusted into making sure the three nuclear weapons that were shipped out of South Africa arrived safely in Oman prior to the British Government releasing the money!!
Dr David Kelly physically checked the three “battlefield ready” nuclear bombs, after they arrived in standard sea containers in Oman by checking the internal core temperature via a concealed inspection panel.
Don’t you just find it incredible that these weapons were purchased illegally and in violation of the UN Sanctions on South Africa, were illegally shipped to Oman without any security and then were stored in an insecure private compound in Oman?
This under the table deal was all done using British Taxpayers money via a notorious arms dealer named John Bredenkamp, and who later stole them back knowing that our government could do nothing about it……..this man who graces the shores of the United Kingdom, living a life of luxury, then sold them on the black market…..one of which was test fired by North Korea two year ago…….such is the level of trust we bestow on the Conservative Party who currently are running our country with the very man at the helm who was part of this conspiracy!!
___
gg_087
The Mossad Cover Operation Exposed
There are reports that the smaller plutonium pit from one of the SRAM warheads was detected in a failed nuclear test in North Korea on October 9, 2006, a “fizzle.” Still, however, intelligence sources tried to cover up the North Korean role, one that strongly supports a hypothesis that North Korea only has access to black market nuclear material and has no domestic production capability of its own.
Alexander Cockburn, now deceased, of Counterpunch, included this very suspicious language in a 2005 article cleverly titled “Lost Nuclear Warheads in Iran:”
As the three warheads entered international arms-smuggling loops, the Bush-One and subsequently Clinton administrations dispatched various covert units to recover them, with no success.
As possible substantiation that the warheads may have ended up in Iran, CounterPunch’s informant cites a hour-long BBC-TV Channel-2 documentary, broadcast on May 3, 2005,titled “Iran’s Nuclear Secrets” in which they showed their TV-cameraman with UN weapons inspectors in Iran.
During those searches the inspectors found radiation traces in rooms left by the previous presence of weapons-grade uranium, with an enrichment of 40% to 60%.
The BBC program suggested that as local enrichment had not started then the Iranians must have held non-local black-Market material. The BBC concluded that with this material Iran was already perceived as a threat by Israel and the Scott Ritter’s forecasted raids were a likely possibility.
If the US or Israel does launch an aerial attack on the suspected depository of the three warheads, or of uranium from them, the consequences could be lethal in more ways than one, if a “bunker busting ” raid simply dispersed the nuclear materials into the atmosphere, with unpleasant consequences for all in the wind path.
CounterPunch has long been on our radar, fronting for Assange in his push toward war with Iran, moving in and around Libya and Syria, while putting out “chickenfeed.”
Conclusion
What we do know is this, David Cameron has knowledge of missing nuclear weapons. This can be proven. We know he was involved in the theft, in what manner we can’t prove but we are sure others have and have used this leverage to get Cameron to make a fool of himself over and over as he is doing in his Ukraine policy and as he did before the UN General Assembly on September 24, 2014 in his “declaration of war” against the world’s independent media.
As an ally, we simply don’t trust David Cameron.
No telling of this story should fail to credit the work of Peter Eyre.
Addendum I
Correspondence from Gordon Bowden to the Attorney General, Dominic Grieve:
You will refer the forwarded reply from your official office below, dated Sunday 22 August 2010 timed at: 15:42:08. I make and hold on record this further legal communication to you and the added list of Cc Recipients, forwarded to you via your Constituency address.
As a Duty of Care: Given the recovered Documents of Ms TARA ANDREA DAVISON I hold, duplicated, forwarded and held safe by others.
I make accusation that you have, as Attorney General committed Treason, lied and conspired with others in perverted the course of Justice, using your respected and trusted Public Office as Attorney General to refuse a new inquiry into the conspired Death of Dr David Kelly.
I make legal accusation. You have used your legal, trusted and public Political position, to criminally protect those who hold high Conservative Government Office, current and Past from facing Criminal prosecution (Under the Nuclear Explosions Act) and Deliberate criminal Fraud involving an Overcharge to the Treasury of £17.8 Million to Purchase covertly 3 Nuclear Bombs from ARMSCOR, the £17.8 million laundered into the “EMPTY” Tory accounts as recorded in HANSARD via a front UK registered Company of Rhodesian John Arnold Bredenkamp.
Addendum II
Recorded in Parliament
HANSARD JUNE 22 1993 starting from Column 197
Statements regarding these facts entered and recorded by LORD DOUG HOYLE and Derby South MP MARGARET BECKETT.
I make record in this legal communication, that these Conservative Government Corruption Facts were disclosed and exposed in “Classified” Document form to the then Labour Party leadership by a senior civil servant, Ms TARA ANDREA DAVISON then an ARMS to IRAQ Investigator who went on to be Senior INTELLIGENCE ADVISOR to the Select Committee of the Department of Trade and Industry under Kenneth Warren and MP Peter Lilley.
From my research:
Ms TARA ANDREA DAVISON ex Sister-in-Law of MP Peter Lille and one of Four Daughters of Senior Conservative SIR JOHN BIGGS-DAVISON
That you have further used your respected official position as Attorney General to protect those involved, by covering up the official involvement of DR DAVID KELLY, who was ordered by the then Conservative Government to oversee this covert Nuclear WMD operation that turned into a CONSERVATIVE POLITICAL disaster when John Bredenkamp and his ex SAS Group stole the Nuclear Weapons in OMAN and sold at least One Nuclear Bomb to North Korea.
To use your Office to further protect the expose of those MP’s, Grandees and VIP’s involved in the Criminal Covert government / Private finance purchase in 1991 of 3 x Pelindaba Pretorea, Battlefield Ready 20kt Nuclear Bombs.
I include as an attachment the one page article disclosure and accusations of Conservative Government Corruption by:
Ms TARA ANDREA DAVISON.
One page of over 400 “Classified” I recovered without copyright from the personal web blog of Ms TARA ANDREA DAVISON on the Internet before they were removed.
I make record:
Given Ms TARA ANDREA DAVISON gives clear statement in the attachment, that the Derbyshire Police have acted beyond their official remit and acted as a Conservative Political Party agent, to seize and withhold vital criminal evidence required by the “PUBLIC” CHILCOTT IRAQ Inquiry.
I also understand, that you replaced MP Tim Smith in the Constituency of Beaconsfield
I am also informed, it was Tim Smith who had inside information regarding the LAUNDERING of the deliberate criminal overcharge to the Treasury of £17.8 Million (A theft of TAX PAYERS assets) via a front Company of John Arnold Bredenkamp into the “EMPTY” 1991 Tory accounts to fight the 1992 General Election: HANSARD JUNE 22 1993 from Column 197
I await your official reply.
Mr Gordon Bowden
Addendum III
—– Forwarded Message —-
From: Dominic Grieve <GRIEVED@parliament.uk>
To: GORDON BOWDEN <rafbowden@yahoo.co.uk>
Sent: Sun, 22 August, 2010 15:42:08
Subject: Thank you for contacting Dominic Grieve MP
Here is a copy of your message:
This is not a Constitutional Matter.
It is a NATIONAL MATTER.
I make record of this web site Communication and it’s total written contents.
DR DAVID KELLY.
You ask for Motive into his MURDER:
He was the appointed Conservative Nuclear Weapon Scientist entrusted in 1991 to oversee the covert purchase of 3 ex Stock Pelindaba, Pretoria Battlefield Bombs.
On a request UOR From ASTRA via the DTI, the UOR Signed by Stephan Kock for ASTRA and Peter Lilley for the DTI to purchase from ARMSCOR 3 “CYLINDERS”
The Operation, a deliberate Conservative Fraud to overcharge the Treasury by £17.8 Million to top up their EMPTY Coffers to fight the 1992 General Election.
As uncovered by the Labour Party
HANSARD JUNE 22 1993 From Col 197.
The 3 Nuclear Weapons purchased along with 6 others with a logged Destination of Chicago USA for de commissioning.
The 3 Conservative Nukes, diverted to OMAN for retaliatory use against Saddam if he used Chemical or Bio Weapons against UK or Coalition Forces in the Retake of Kuwait (Gulf WAR 1)
In effect, the Weapons were held over in OMAN until all military action ceased.
Somehow, the weapons broker, JOHN ARNOLD BREDENKAMP with a group gained access to the Weapons in OMAN and Stole them.
He sold at least one of the Nuclear weapons on the OPEN Market.
NORTH KOREA Detonated it on 25 MAY 2009
Under the NUCLEAR EXPLOSIONS ACT
There are many MP’s and VIP’s to face Prosecution.
3 US W69 H-bombs lost off coast of Somalia 1990
During the 1970s, Israel and South Africa joined in a program to develop, not only nuclear weapons but biological and chemical weapons as well. Working closely with them were the following countries: Iran, Libya, East Germany, Czechoslovakia, the Soviet Union and North Korea.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/06/30/gordon-duff-the-most-dangerous -nuclear-weapons/
We know for certain that ten nuclear weapons were built in South Africa, six of which were dismantled, one tested on September 22, 1979. Of the remaining three, one was detonated in North Korea on May 25, 2009. The three weapons, at the time in possession of Great Britain, 1991, were stolen and the whereabouts of the remaining two “Hiroshima sized” nuclear weapons is unknown. We also know, for certain, that Israel informed the Bush administration that these weapons were in the possession of Saddam Hussein, information that led to the invasion of Iraq. This information was totally false. Israel then told the US, while the invasion was on, that the weapons were being moved to Syria. This was also false, proven by US detection devices. Israel has since claimed these remaining nuclear weapons are either in Iran, Syria, Lebanon or Gaza.
A fact, Pakistan has never been involved in nuclear proliferation and Dr. A. Q. Khan is a patsy covering for another group at the demand of the United States. This is not conjecture.
When news services were told that 3 more nuclear weapons, thermonuclear W69 warheads, 3 or as many as 8, had “gone missing” from a damaged B-52 that crashed off Diego Garcia in 1990, few took it seriously, especially after vigorous denials by the United States. These weapons are plutonium based hydrogen bombs, out dated at the time, unstable and requiring regular servicing to replace the tritium gas necessary to trigger the second stage that makes these so much more deadly than simple fission devices.
The stories about these weapons have been reported in one variation or another for years with fact and fancy mixed to the point where no one takes this threat seriously. The stories of these missing American hydrogen bombs has been sent to every major news service in the world. Some don’t believe the stories and others have been threatened if they attempt to publish them. When we were told these weapons, three American hydrogen bombs, were ejected from a B-52 off the coast of Somalia we found the idea unlikely. When the names of those involved in the recovery, shipment and sale came up and we were able to directly verify many of the facts, we began to reconsider.
Aging hydrogen bombs are useless unless “recharged” every seven years, something only a nuclear state is capable of. However, they can be used for weapons such as the August 18, 2006 North Korean plutonium bomb that failed. North Korea is incapable of producing any plutonium, thus a plutonium bomb, especially one that proved ineffective, such as this one with an explosion of less than one kiloton, may have been a “Rube Goldberg” device made from an unserviced American weapon, in fact this is extremely likely. With North Korea exploding one fully verified nuclear weapon build by Israel and South Africa and an earlier failure that was certainly an aging unserviced device from another nuclear power, a pattern emerges. Some country is supplying North Korea with weapons to publicly test, for the purpose of creating political instability in the world.
Four nations are being actively investigated for these violations: South Africa, Pakistan, Israel and Iran.
There is no scientific proof, not available for publishing, that establishes the first plutonium device detonated by North Korea in 2006 as being an American W-69. However, intelligence agencies, since 1990, have scoured the planet offering nuclear triggering devices to any buyer, as part of sting operations. It is believed by many that Dr. A. Q. Khan of Pakistan assisted in this intelligence effort.
With a proper triggering device, even an aging W69 warhead could be converted from its thermonuclear state to a configuration similar to the bomb dropped on Nagasaki, but much more powerful.
CURRENT BRITISH EFFORTS
Britain’s concern is the Israeli/South African weapons, three of which it took into possession in 1990. Current Prime Minister David Cameron, then a member of parliament, was involved in the negotiations and Dr. David Kelly made the arrangements.
Funding authorizations were signed personally by Margaret Thatcher in a classified document referring to the bombs as “cylinders.”
We are told by informants tied to the highest levels of the British security services that the current closed hearings are not just to determine if who is responsible for the death of Dr. David Kelley, who we have also been informed was not just ready to inform on Tony Blair falsifying intelligence leading up to the war but on much wider areas.
The David Kelley “suicide” is one of the most famous in British history. Kelley is said to have killed himself after being attacked on the BBC for saying Tony Blair lied about WMD’s. Were people who know Tony Blair to have lied to have killed themselves, all of them, our planet might today be barren of human life entirely. Kelley’s involvement in South Africa was twofold. He investigated relationships between Russia and the Mossad in South Africa tied to, not only the manufacture of illegal germ warfare weapons but their use as well. The South Africa Truth Commission outlined instances where bio-weapons were deployed in Africa in a program involving Israel, Libya and Russia. The program which also developed a number of crop diseases is said to have relocated, not to Iraq as claimed, but to Israel. In fact, all of the programs said by Bush and Blair to have been in Iraq were, in fact, South African and later relocated in Israel. Iraq had used bio-weapons and gas but had purchased these weapons from brokers involved in Iran-Contra with ties to, not only South Africa and Rhodesia but Israel and the United States as well.
The South African Truth Commission also released in their report that the United States, not only purchased poison gas from South Africa but deployed it in Iraq, gas which may well have indirectly poisoned hundreds of thousands of American soldiers. Invoices for purchases of BZ gas by the United States and evidence of its use in Iraq are currently in the public domain.
THE KELLY DEATH
The Kelly death, though ruled a suicide despite the fact all forensic evidence indicated otherwise, was actually blamed on Iraq by Ahmed Chalabi, fabricator of much of the false evidence NATO troops followed across Iraq, from on imaginary sight to another in their fruitless search for weapons labs, a story outlined in the recent film, Green Zone. Kelley was found in a wooded area in Oxfordshire, an area 40 some miles outside London. Around the body were packets of harmless arthritis medications and a half filled bottle of Evian spring water. Autopsy results show a minuscule amount of medication in his body and injuries inflicted by a dull kitchen paring knife, injuries not potentially fatal. Kelly had told of being stalked by security services, of a recent break-in and how he had been warned to keep silent or he faced being “found dead in the woods somewhere.”
Informants who tie this murder to weapons of mass destruction, some to Israeli involvement and others to stolen nuclear weapons sold to North Korea, a crime Israel is suspected of, have amazing pedigrees. Nearly all are full fledged “James Bond” types from the highest levels of the intelligence services or directly tied to companies long involved in support of covert operations. This is a group of people who have “royals” on speed dial.
THE “BUSH-BLAIR” FACTOR
The missing nuclear weapons that Dr. David Kelly was directly involved in moving from South African and Israeli hands to British custody are one of the biggest secrets in recent history. That they were stolen and one of the weapons exploded in North Korea, a fact verified by western intelligence services, would be a security concern but is also a serious crime. Britain has a law called The Nuclear Explosions Act. This law states that if any “British resident” has knowledge of a nuclear explosion not involved in a war, they may be imprisoned for life, initially even without trial. The purpose of the law was to punish any British citizen or resident who got involved in trading nuclear weapons or hiding information.
One British citizen is at the center of this enquiry, former Prime Minister Tony Blair, tied to allegations that he had been briefed in 1997 about missing nuclear weapons and failed to act to recover them. Stories coming in list mysterious campaign donations, millions, from foreign arms dealers, not just to Blair but even earlier on, funding John Major’s campaign as well. The British “spooks” pressing stories on the papers, stories still largely suppressed, have much of Britain’s government involved in running interference for these illicit nuclear weapons.
Remember, there are two sets, one heading out of Oman, the “Hiroshima” sized nukes and the other out of Somalia. This is where it gets tricky. Word out of Somalia confirms, not only a possible recovery of nukes, done by a South African diving group claiming to be on a treasure hunt and more confirmations have prominent white South African politicians contacting sources for, not only triggers but special equipment to load and ship the weapons as well, dealing with companies known and backed by reliable testimony.
Another story says the US went after these nukes when they were shipping through Kenya and blew up an embassy blaming Osama bin Laden. No hard confirmations but they are expected. If this is true, everything Americans have been told about Al Qaeda is a total fiction, covering a “broken arrow” operation that has been ongoing for well over two decades.
AMERICAN SILENCE, NO INVESTIGATION, NO NEWS, NOTHING BUT COVERUP
When “lost nuke” recovery team leader Valerie Plame was framed by Republicans close to President Bush, was this to cover Bush or Tony Blair or Israel. The Plame “outing” puts the lost nukes in Israel. None of the other possible countries that could be holding the weapons would get White House protection. Plame got too close but couldn’t be murdered like Dr. David Kelly, not with a husband that had the kind of political connections that Plame has.
How many stories in the news have been nothing but cover for one half baked attempt after another to recover nuclear weapons that may be in South Africa, perhaps at the bottom of a mine with the Israeli nuclear arsenal rumored to be stored there? Remember when a B-52 filled with nukes showed up at Barksdale Air Force Base, all by accident, a “bent spear” misplaced nuke gambit supposedly a mutiny of top Air Force officials who refused to take part in moving these weapons forward to Diego Garcia? Ever wonder why such a story was never made into a movie of the week for the Hallmark Channel?
No, the end of the story isn’t here. Investigations are ongoing, only in Britain. We will never know what they reveal, well, that’s not true. I will get a call. Will I hear the truth? _________________ --
'Suppression of truth, human spirit and the holy chord of justice never works long-term. Something the suppressors never get.' David Southwell
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com http://aanirfan.blogspot.com
Martin Van Creveld: Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother."
Martin Van Creveld: I'll quote Henry Kissinger: "In campaigns like this the antiterror forces lose, because they don't win, and the rebels win by not losing."
Zimbabwean arms dealer sues Foreign Office for freezing ...
The Government is at the centre of an extraordinary legal battle with a Zimbabwean arms dealer who claims the Foreign Office unlawfully caused his assets to be frozen ...
Uncertainty still exists as to how many ex-USAF plutonium warheads, each a H bomb, JAB's Rhodesian mob finally acquired.
One of those ex-USAF plutonium warheads was made to fizzle by North Korea on 9th Oct 2006
WASHINGTON, Oct. 16 American intelligence agencies have concluded that North Korea’s test explosion last week was powered by plutonium that North Korea harvested from its small nuclear reactor, according to officials who have reviewed the results of atmospheric sampling since the blast.
A spare ex-USAF plutonium warhead would be ideal for the new North Korean long-range missile that they claim can be targeted at Manhattan.
Sometimes you come across a story that seems so unbelievable that you simply can’t absorb and process the information properly. It doesn’t compute or make much sense – until an investigation produces evidence.
The allegation is this. David Cameron sold three nuclear weapons of a foreign state, put them in unsafe hands and the Conservative party banks nearly £19 million which then sets the pretext for a conflict that kills a million people. Conspiracy theory? Fake news? Read on.
South Africa – A nuclear state armed by Israel
Although UN Security Council Resolution 418 of 4 November 1977 introduced a mandatory arms embargo against South Africa, requiring all states to refrain from “any co-operation with South Africa in the manufacture and development of nuclear weapons”, it was with the help of the Israelis that the apartheid regime designed and built a total of 10 fully operational nuclear weapons.[1]
One device was successfully tested in 1979, which left 9 nuclear weapons in South Africa’s stockpile.[2][3] In August 1988, foreign minister Pik Botha announced that South Africa had “the capability to make one [a nuclear weapon]” should it want to do so. A month later, in September 1988, South Africa sent a letter to IAEA Director-General Hans Blix expressing willingness to accede to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) if certain conditions were met, primarily that South Africa be allowed to market its uranium subject to IAEA safeguards.
In summary, South Africa operated a covert nuclear ballistic missile program. The United Nations introduced a mandatory arms embargo against South Africa in the development and manufacture of such weapons. Israel assisted anyway. The result was that nine nuclear weapons were left after testing. The purpose was to prove to international markets it had that capability and was willing to sell that capability to willing buyers.
Image result for south africa nuclear weapons
Bomb casings at South Africa’s abandoned Circle nuclear bomb production facility near Pretoria (Source: Wikipedia)
David Cameron’s Sanction Busting Trip
Peter Eyre is a documentary film maker who specialises in Middle-Eastern wars, weapons technology, terrorism and human rights abuses. He wrote a series on the subject of the UK’s involvement in the selling of South Africa’s nuclear weapons.
Eyre writes that David Cameron visited South Africa in 1989 accompanied by Conservative MP, Sir Kenneth Warren, and nuclear weapons inspector, Dr David Kelly. Kelly had made a number of earlier visits having been given access to the covert nuclear weapons research facility at Pelindaba, near Pretoria.
An excerpt from part two of his documentation [4]:
“I find it amazing that David Cameron and others traveled to South Africa during the embargo period and not only violated international law but also violated international law in dealing with nuclear weapons that were not known to the UN. In 1989 David Cameron and others went down to South Africa to carry out some sinister plan that resulted in only 6 operational nuclear weapons going back to the US for de commissioning.The other three were to be purchased by the British Government as a standby mechanism against Saddam. Remember this is all under the radar of the United Nations!”
Eyre stated that David Cameron’s trip, although officially ‘a fact-finding mission,’ [5] which was heavily criticised at the time, was to arrange for three of South Africa’s nuclear weapons to be shipped to the Arabian peninsular, where they would be stored in case they were required in Iraq. This fact alone is alarming. These weapons were not only stored unsafely but they were stored in a volatile region and subsequently went missing.
Thatcher’s illegal nuclear weapons deal
More from Wikispooks: The remaining six nukes were destined to travel from South Africa to Chicago in the US. The next phase of the operation was that, once the weapons had left South African soil, the British Government would reimburse the South African firm Armscor [6] and the British firm Astra through the middle man John Bredenkamp [7] At Government level it would be dealt with primarily by the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) using Ministry of Defence money. In order to keep this out of Parliament and out of the public domain, Margaret Thatcher was asked to sign off these weapons in late 1990 under a special Urgent Operational Requirement (UOR) describing them as metal cylinders rather than nuclear bombs.
Excerpts from part 4 of Peter Eyre’s documents:
“These weapons were then shipped in standard 20 foot containers and manifested as metal cylinders and not nuclear weapons. This would have been in violation of international regulations regarding the shipment of dangerous goods. The weapons were then placed into private storage and left for Dr.David Kelly to carry out an inspection in order to accept the consignment prior to final payment. Dr David Kelly was the only person in mainstream UK MOD tasked with being in the loop for that covert offshore procurement of battlefield nukes from Apartheid South Africa.”
Eyre’s (image on the right) documents show that the final inspection was then carried out, the final payment made by the British Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) using money from the Ministry of Defence (MOD) and it was subsequently revealed that £17.8 million was siphoned from this secret nuclear deal into Conservative Party funds. Eyre is unequivocal about this:
“It should also be pointed out that David Cameron managed to siphon off £17.8 million pounds of tax payer´s money into the Conservative Party Election Fund.”
Nuclear weapons go missing?
Veterans Today claim [8] they actually had personnel there for the trip from South Africa with the three nuclear weapons disguised in cylinders:
“There, the bombs were loaded onto Blatchford cradles and moved into blue 20 foot containers. VT personnel were along for the ride to Durham where they were put on a ship, a ship arranged for by John Bradenkamp, a Rhodesian/Zimbabwean arms trader only recently off the terrorist lists. This represented David Cameron’s “blooding” as a real “insider.”
VT then makes a really big statement:
“What was the nature of that deal? Britain was to simply unload the weapons, leave them unguarded and walk away. They never mentioned them again, never looked for them and never asked questions even when one of the bombs supposedly belonging to Britain was exploded by North Korea on May 25, 2009.” [9]
Analysts have generally agreed that North Korea’s nuclear test was successful and despite uncertainty of the exact yield, Russia placed the yield of the test at 10 to 20 kilotons. The Defence Minister of South Korea confirmed similar findings. The description of these weapons were: 3 x Pelindaba Pretorea, Battlefield Ready 20kt Nuclear Bombs.
The VT article goes on to say that Britain and the US invaded Iraq to seize these weapons back stating:
“There are 3 nuclear weapons in Iraq, only 45 minutes from assembly and use.”
Tony Blair – Weapons of Mass Destruction and 45 minutes
The damning document that led to war is described as the “September Dossier” [10] which says:
“However, two sections later became the centre of fierce debate: the allegation that Iraq had sought “significant quantities of uranium from Africa”, and the claim in the foreword to the document written by British Prime Minister Tony Blair that “The document discloses that his military planning allows for some of the WMD to be ready within 45 minutes of an order to use them.”
The dossier also alleged that Iraq had reconstituted its nuclear weapons programme. Without exception, all of the allegations included within the September Dossier have been since proven to be false, as shown by the Iraq Survey Group. No nuclear weapons were subsequently found, leaving open-ended questions of their whereabouts.
On 8 February 2015, it was revealed that the Chilcot Inquiry had been tasked specifically with tracking down those responsible for “misplacing” three nuclear weapons obtained from apartheid South Africa 25 years ago. Both David Cameron and Dr David Kelly are understood to have been involved in the diversion of these WMD which eventually became the pretext for the Iraq War [11].
Dr David Kelly was found dead in controversial circumstances in July 2003. A group of doctors later published reports that stated the cause of death was unsound and illogical.
In the meantime the documents displayed on the VT website appear to back up the selling of a nuclear weapon to North Korea:
Click here to see bigger picture
Click here to see bigger picture
(The documents above are expanded below to make them readable.)
Recorded in Parliament
HANSARD JUNE 22 1993 starting from Column 197
Statements regarding these facts entered and recorded by LORD DOUG HOYLE and Derby South MP MARGARET BECKETT.
I make record in this legal communication, that these Conservative Government Corruption Facts were disclosed and exposed in “Classified” Document form to the then Labour Party leadership by a senior civil servant, Ms TARA ANDREA DAVISON then an ARMS to IRAQ Investigator who went on to be Senior INTELLIGENCE ADVISOR to the Select Committee of the Department of Trade and Industry under Kenneth Warren and MP Peter Lilley.
From my research:
Ms TARA ANDREA DAVISON ex Sister-in-Law of MP Peter Lille and one of Four Daughters of Senior Conservative SIR JOHN BIGGS-DAVISON
That you have further used your respected official position as Attorney General to protect those involved, by covering up the official involvement of DR DAVID KELLY, who was ordered by the then Conservative Government to oversee this covert Nuclear WMD operation that turned into a CONSERVATIVE POLITICAL disaster when John Bredenkamp and his ex SAS Group stole the Nuclear Weapons in OMAN and sold at least One Nuclear Bomb to North Korea.
To use your Office to further protect the expose of those MP’s, Grandees and VIP’s involved in the Criminal Covert government / Private finance purchase in 1991 of 3 x Pelindaba Pretorea, Battlefield Ready 20kt Nuclear Bombs.
I include as an attachment the one page article disclosure and accusations of Conservative Government Corruption by:
Ms TARA ANDREA DAVISON.
This document supports the allegation that £17.8 million of taxpayers money was illegally laundered into Conservative party funds to fight the election of 1992:
One page of over 400 “Classified” I recovered without copyright from the personal web blog of Ms TARA ANDREA DAVISON on the Internet before they were removed.
I make record:
Given Ms TARA ANDREA DAVISON gives clear statement in the attachment, that the Derbyshire Police have acted beyond their official remit and acted as a Conservative Political Party agent, to seize and withhold vital criminal evidence required by the “PUBLIC” CHILCOTT IRAQ Inquiry.
I also understand, that you replaced MP Tim Smith in the Constituency of Beaconsfield
I am also informed, it was Tim Smith who had inside information regarding the LAUNDERING of the deliberate criminal overcharge to the Treasury of £17.8 Million (A theft of TAX PAYERS assets) via a front Company of John Arnold Bredenkamp into the “EMPTY” 1991 Tory accounts to fight the 1992 General Election: HANSARD JUNE 22 1993 from Column 197
I await your official reply.
Mr Gordon Bowden
As further evidence, old Labour Oxford Economist Martin Summers talks about what he believes was the secret and highly illegal nuclear arms deal involving a young and ambitious David Cameron as well as Doctor David Kelly. Done behind the back of Nelson Mandela and the ANC, designed to raise £17.8m Tory funding for the 1992 General Election Campaign in this video:
References
1 wikispooks: David Cameron 1998 South Africa Trip
2 States should refrain from co-operation with South Africa in the development and manufacture of nuclear weapons
3 South Africa’s covert ballistic missile programme
4 US/UK Lose nuclear weapons
5 David Cameron’s Freebie to Apartheid South Africa
6 Armscor – Armaments Corporation of South Africa
7 John Bredenkamp – Trader/arms dealer
8 Veteran’s Today: If Cameron was “dirty” at age 25, could he be filthy now?
9 North Korean nuclear test May 25th 2009
10 The September Dossier – 45 minutes WMD and Nuclear Warheads
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
