| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Snowygrouch
Validated Poster
Joined: 02 Apr 2006
Posts: 628
Location: Oxford
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:35 pm Post subject: Visit my new BLOG! |
 |
|
All,
Please visit my new BLOG
http://nineelevenfacts.blogspot.com/
Just started it tonight so only one post on there and it probably wont be anything new to you hardened veterans but any comments would be gratefully recieved.
New to BLOGGING so also have no idea how (if its even possible) to promote visability of my blog?
Cheerio 
Calum
_________________
The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist
President Eisenhower 1961 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
A_Foxwit
New Poster
Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Posts: 5
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:47 pm Post subject: Blogs |
|
|
Go to statcounter.com and get a free account. They'll give you a bit of code to paste into your blog template (near the bottom). This will put a counter on your blog so you (and others) can see how many hits you get.
Just keep updating the blog as often as possible. Google ranks blogs highly, but the more stuff you put in, the more chance people have of finding it in searches. Add links to the other 911 sites by copying the lines in your template which link to google etc, and then changing the URLs. The more links you have going out, and coming into your blog, the higher it will rank on a search.
You could also list it on technorati and del.ico.us and places like that. Add it to your sig here, if you haven't already done so.
Best. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ian neal
Angel - now passed away
Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 3140
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 1:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Callum
| Snowygrouch wrote: | ..... it probably wont be anything new to you hardened veterans but any comments would be gratefully recieved.
|
It's not a question of presenting new information to hardened veterans. 'We' already believe 9/11 is an inside job. We can argue about the detail but in essence we know to our core that 9/11 stinks and that opens up all kinds of further questions. But how to get people to take that first step.
It is a question of presenting the strongest case as consisely as possible to people who have never considered or been aware of the 9/11 truth movement before. To get them to the next stage of watching a few 9/11 DVDs or reading a few books. To examine the evidence in detail themselves
It is this message which as a movement we need to refine. There may well come a day when Newsnight invites a 'representative of the 9/11 truth movement in the UK' to debate the issue with Jeremy Paxman and a puppet for the defence of the Kean Commission.
When that day comes, what of all the possible multitude of angles to focus on will be the case against the Kean Commission kick off on.
In that sense I reckon your blog is inspired
I reckon Condoleza's quote and the put options are a perfect place to start and the next step is to question WHY the BBC and all mainstream media (including the Sun) have failed to ever hold Condoleza Rice or the investigators of the 'insider trader accusations' to account.
As many of us know there was a raging 'debate' in the states between LIHOPers (those that focus on the 'intelligence' failures and shun debate of the physical evidence) and MIHOPers (those that focus on the physical/video evidence largely to the exclusion of the wider evidence).
This LIHOP/MIHOP schism was hugely detrimental to the movement and largely kicked off with the release of In Plane Site by Dave von Kleist and the barrage of criticism he attracted from 'LIHOPers'. I would say on balance that this debate between those that favour the physical/video evidence (MIHOPers) and those that focus on the 'intelligence' and 'defense' failures evidence (LIHOPers) has largely been won by the MIHOPers. This is largely because the physical evidence is so compelling.
Through this prism your 2 angles (the Condi quote and the put options) would be seen as LIHOP. What has been lost in this 'debate' between LIHOPers and MIHOPers is that LIHOP is as good as MIHOP. The hypothesis that elements of the US authorities were aware of and then stood down its defense systems in order to LIHOP is every bit as damning as if elements of the US authorities MIHOP and it is far easier to 'prove beyond all reasonable doubt' or at least to have very strong suspicions.
When it comes to identifying people to 'represent the 9/11 truth movement in the UK' in the MSM it is not a question of who knows the most or who is closest to 'the truth', but who can articulate their understanding of the truth in the most articulate and credible way. The more voices, blogs, websites and campaigners 'we' have the more choice there is and your first blog is a great start.
In your blog, there are few typos and other possible improvements such as inserting links within the text to sources (eg the Condi quote).
Remember keep it simple and less is more |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
