We are constantly being told that we are on the cusp of a
cashless society. The financial services industry would
certainly like to see it that way. We are being enticed with
contactless cards, mobile phone payment apps, and methods
of bank transfer: all, apparently, for our convenience.
But as Ross Clark argues in this compelling new book, it is
not in our interests to surrender the right to use cash.
Commercial interests want us to pay electronically in order
to collect valuable data on our spending habits, while
governments would love us to move to cashless payments in
order to control the economy in ways which suit them, not
us.
If we choose to pay electronically, that is one thing, but we
will regret it if we do not defend the right to pay with cash.
A massive digital security firm, that is behind the introduction of biometric banking (fingerprint payments), is about to be taken over by one of the worlds largest defence contractors. It is a huge story and yet nobody is talking about it. Aerospace & defence giant Thales has bid for cyber-security pioneer Gemalto. The deal will be approved next month. It is astonishing that there is no opposition to this and that the media is silent. First a word on the roll-out of biometric banking and what it means.
I've talked about the cashless society agenda on The Richie Allen Show this week. The implications of it are terrifying. Paying with cash has been overtaken by credit/debit card payments with increasing numbers of people going contactless and tapping the card on the shops machine, rather than inserting it and entering their pin. But chip & pin/contactless will soon be phased out with banks planning to introduce biometric cards, which will enable the user to buy goods using their fingerprints, like Apple's Touch ID for the iPhone.
You would simply pop round to your bank and register your fingerprint on an Apple iPad. The bank would then register your fingerprint to your card. It is claimed that it would only be stored on the card, and not on a central database. Pull the other one eh?!? So when paying in a shop, you'd be able to place your fingerprint on your card, verify your identity, and the payment would go through. Why is it necessary at all? Why to prevent fraud of course you dummy! This Dystopian anti-privacy * is always sold using the same methods. It's for your safety and to prevent fraud right? Wrong!
Digital security firm Gemalto is behind the technology. The firms major shareholders include Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs and BlackRock. 100,000 Pfizer employees use Gemalto smart cards as ID badges. The company has provided e-driver licenses for Mexico and Sweden and e-ID citizen cards for Portugal. This is where it gets very sinister. French aerospace and defence group Thales has bid €4.8 billion for Gemalto. The EU has said that it will make a decision on whether or not the acquisition can go ahead by July 23rd. There's absolutely no doubt that the takeover will be approved.
What could go wrong eh? I mean there's nothing to worry about right? It's perfectly OK for a massive digital security firm that is rolling out biometric bank cards with fingerprint scanners, to be taken over by one of the worlds largest defence contractors right? Thales has operations in more than 56 countries. It has 64,000 employees and generated €14.9 billion in revenues in 2016. It is also the 10th largest defence contractor in the world. It has a very chequered past.The company has been found guilty of running slush funds to bribe officials and was blacklisted by the World Bank because of its FRAUDULENT practices. Hmmm......fraud. A defence contractor with a history of fraud, will soon own the digital security firm that has developed biometric bank cards to prevent fraud and will own your biometric data....need I say any more?
And where is the media? Why absent of course, but then what's new? The UK's Mirror and Sun tabloids are today extolling the benefits of biometric banking, while deliberately ignoring the very relevant issues of a) the companies who currently have shares in Gemalto and b) the sordid past of the defence contractor which will soon own it all! I'm on my own here, I've no researchers or editors and yet I was able to find this stuff out in just a few minutes. Welcome to Planet Dystopia folks.
Click HERE to discuss or comment on this post in our forums.
Richie Allen
Richie is the host of The Richie Allen Show and has enjoyed a long, and varied, broadcasting career.
http://www.richieallen.co.uk _________________ --
'Suppression of truth, human spirit and the holy chord of justice never works long-term. Something the suppressors never get.' David Southwell
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com http://aanirfan.blogspot.com
Martin Van Creveld: Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother."
Martin Van Creveld: I'll quote Henry Kissinger: "In campaigns like this the antiterror forces lose, because they don't win, and the rebels win by not losing."
By: Kanika Saigal Published on: Thursday, April 02, 2020 The number of cashless transactions is rising as the coronavirus pandemic limits the use of physical cash. Order Kanika Saigal payments_780 Covid19_shutterstock-600x150 Read all
Euromoney coronavirus coverage
When the World Health Organization released a statement on March 9 recommending that people turn to cashless transactions to fight the spread of Covid-19, a number of governments and retailers across the world took action. In China, thousands of banknotes were destroyed or disinfected to eliminate the spread of the virus.
South Korea followed suit, and in the US, the Federal Reserve has started storing banknotes that have come in from Asia before recirculating them back into the economy. Canadians, however, have taken a different approach. Rumours persist that some people have been shoving banknotes into washing machines to rid them of the virus – taking advantage of the fact that their ‘paper’ money is made of plastic. This takes money laundering to a whole new level.
Some retailers have banned the use of cash in their stores to keep employees and customers safe, opting for contactless payments instead. Meanwhile, for those confined to their homes, online shopping is a lifeline. Even the most unwilling are keen to adapt. Manish Kohli, head of cash management at Citi, says from his home office in New York that even his wife –previously hostile to mobile money – has started to use Venmo to transfer funds to members of the community who have been braving the streets to get goods for others in need.
"People are adapting to the new normal," he says. Necessity over convenience Digital payments, once born out of convenience, have become a necessity for some. Yes, there might still be a number of people who hoard cash – as is often the case in times of crisis – but others will cease to see the point if they are not able to use physical money to buy essential goods and services.
Luckily, we live in a time where much of the infrastructure required to complete an online purchase is already in place. This may not have been possible even ten years ago. Cash managers and payments experts agree that payment volumes will be down across the board. But they also agree that the number of digital transactions relative to physical cash transactions will soar as more and more countries go into lockdown. Santosh Tripathy 160x186 Santosh Tripathy, SmartStream "It is probably too early for the data to tell us this, but most of us in the payments space are certain that this is the case," says Santosh Tripathy, practice lead, digital payments with financial transaction management company SmartStream Technologies.
"In this environment, cash is losing its shine," he says. This could be the push needed for some countries to become truly cashless. "It's no longer inconceivable for entire countries to run on digital cash – we are already seeing this play out," says Victor Penna, global head of treasury solutions at Standard Chartered. "Most people have access to a mobile phone – which can also act as a digital wallet – and a number of central banks are thinking about introducing digital currencies. This is how we can boost financial inclusion and support the most vulnerable in society." "One good thing to come out of this crisis is that I think more and more economies will start going cashless," says Kohli. Benefits and challenges There are plenty of benefits to going cashless: digital payments are convenient and – in current circumstances – are increasingly necessary. More importantly, however, they are a lot cheaper to process than their cash equivalents. Take one example: In India, 1.7% of GDP – or $210 billion – is spent on printing, storing and distributing cash. If all payments were digital, Tripathy argues that the cost would be a fraction of this. There is also the argument that digital offerings will boost financial inclusion, as more and more individuals are able to open bank accounts online and transact digitally without ever having to enter a physical bank branch – difficult at times like this in most developed economies, almost impossible for rural populations in emerging markets that live far from their nearest town or city. But the transition from cash to cashless isn’t all that straightforward. Online payments may seem easy enough, but there still remains a lack of standardization in the system that delays payments and creates bottlenecks.
For example, real-time payments within the UK are a reality, but challenge your bank to make an instant payment to a recipient in India or Brazil, for instance, and delays are inevitable. If any one country was to move entirely towards digital payments, bank liquidity would be essential because people and businesses need to have confidence in the banking sector - Santosh Tripathy, SmartStream Fintechs such as Transferwise, WorldRemit and Revolut have plugged some of the gaps, but this often means that an individual may have a number of different accounts with a number of different payment providers and banks – which arguably removes the convenience that digital payments offered in the first place. Moreover, capacity is often limited and large transactions by multinational corporates still require strict due diligence and bank support for completion. Until application programming interfaces are much more commonly used, the fragmentation in the payments space will be another barrier to fully cashless societies. In addition – and perhaps most importantly within the current context – bank liquidity will be essential to the success of implementing and maintaining a cashless society. "If any one country was to move entirely towards digital payments, bank liquidity would be essential because people and businesses need to have confidence in the banking sector," says Tripathy. "A cashless society would mean that, hopefully, there wouldn't be a run on the banks, but individuals still want to be confident in the fact that if they wanted to withdraw their money from their accounts, they could," he says. Liquidity is essential for people to remain confident in the whole financial system. Following the global financial crisis, banks' financial buffers have become much more robust, but liquidity may soon dwindle as banks introduce a number of measures to prop up corporate clients and the economy, including emergency funding for repo markets, debt restructuring, mortgage holidays, new credit lines, huge credit drawdowns and more. This is the paradox we face right now: while a viral pandemic is conducive to the establishment of cashless societies, the pressure on banks is not.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
