Britishfilm company to make flight 93 bs movie..picket

[mason-free party]

---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------

Working Title Films
Oxford House

76 Oxford Street

London

W1D 1BS

MAYBE WORTH DOING A PICKET/DEMO OUTSIDE THEIR ZIONIST OFFICES OR PINEWOOD STUDIOS?

Crucible Media Limited
44 James Place East
Dublin 2
Ireland
www.workingtitlefilms.com

21ST NOVEMBER 2005
FLIGHT 93 BEGINS PRODUCTION
Principal photography has commenced on Universal Pictures' and Working Title's FLIGHT 93 directed by Paul Greengrass.

FLIGHT 93 tells the story of 9/11 through a meticulous re-enactment of events surrounding United Airlines 93, the last of the four aircraft hijacked on the morning of September 11th 2001, in the belief that by examining this single event something much larger can be found - the shape of our world today.

Made with the full support of the families of those on board, FLIGHT 93 will track in real time the dramatic story of what happened inside the aircraft as well as on the ground, as passengers, crew, civilian air traffic controllers and military command centres struggle to make sense of an unimagined and unimaginable crisis.

Paul Greengrass has explored the subject of terrorism many times in his film making career, most recently in 'Bloody Sunday' (2002), a documentary recreation of a momentous 1972 Civil Rights march in Northern Ireland. 'Bloody Sunday' was hailed by critics as a devastating portrayal of the moral vacuum caused by terrorism and won prizes around the world including the Audience Award at the Sundance Film Festival and The Golden Bear at the Berlin Film Festival. Last year he directed the box office hit 'The Bourne Supremacy' for Universal Pictures.

Greengrass said "9/11 was unique - the most important event of our lifetime, casting a shadow over all our futures. It's vital for cinema to begin the task of exploring what it meant, and what it continues to mean today. Hopefully FLIGHT 93 will be a worthy contribution to that process."

FLIGHT 93 began shooting at Pinewood Studios and on location in the UK and US on November 14. The film is directed by Paul Greengrass and produced by Tim Bevan, Eric Fellner and Lloyd Levin. The film will be released by Universal Pictures in the US on April 28, 2006 and worldwide thereafter.

A dedicated website to the film will launch on Wednesday, November 23rd. Included within the site will be information on the production, a 'forum' which will give people the opportunity to air thoughts and opinions and a 'Memorial' to the passengers and crew of UA93. For details of the site, check back here on Wednesday

[Ally]

Last week the Mail run this story on the flick, they have a comments section to which I sent at least 15 remarks, they ignored everyone and printed utter bull instead.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/showbiz/bazbamigboye.ht ml?in_article_id=369084&in_page_id=1794

[Ally]

OMG the website and forum is up

http://www.theflight93project.com/forum/

see all there later ;->

[Pikey]

Thanks for that Ally and MFP!!

I've posted an article on the forum with the important references (DRG book, 911 truth websites and dvds) including a copy of the Scientific report produced by Steven E Jones on the collapse of the Towers and WTC7 (his conclusion: that they collapse due to planted explosives)

I've asked if the film is going to be fictional or fact?

The forum is not a forum. Its just a messenger system. You have to register to send your messenge and once you have submitted your message you cannot view it or see other messages posted by others.

This website could of course be a Trojan Horse but I just have no fear any longer its the truth thats the no. 1 issue and priority IMHO!

[Ally]

[Andrew Johnson]

Eek - check out their links section - the very anithesis of ours, I think. What a terrible travesty of a project that must be.

[Pikey]

Check out the Flight 93 website forum. You have to register and also accept their terms and conditions before you can access and contribute.

Someone has posted the rather pro 911 truth campaign message on their forum:-

[Ally]

Paul Greengrass is selectively answering some posts but not printing most of the comments sent to him.

http://www.theflight93project.com/forum/message.php?topicID=16

[ian neal]

I think this is such an excellent opportunity that it needs a little thought how to make the most of it.

If we rely on them to selectively post and reply as they see fit on their website we will achieve v little. But how about setting up a mirror site such as the therealflight93project or http://www.theflight93project.org/ or something similar, where the evidence and voices that challenge their 'conspiracy theory' are presented and a forum is established that we moderate, then we can take them on at their own game

The http://www.theflight93project.com/ site and their pretence at openness and dialogue is a joke. How about creating our own bit of cyberspace to take them on. Anyone up for this?

[Sinclair]

Info related to Flight Passenger lists..........

Excerpts from
http://69.28.73.17/thornarticles/911passengerlist.html

[Ally]

[Ally]

I refuse to believe he's ignorant.

[brian]

Like Ally I think its a grand idea, like Ally I have not the ability but would be willing to contribute.

[Pikey]

Yep the flight 93 website is a joke!

Mr Greengrass has made the following response to the pro 911 truth campiagn message sent in by "Truthseeker":-

[ian neal]

Well likewise I'm no IT guru but surely it can be as simple as creating a simple blog such as this and then including a link to a dedicated forum such as this. If we want extras pages we can create them either as pages on the blog or locked threads on the forum.

I will ask the techies on this site if they can offer anything a little more sophisticated. In the meantime why not post me your best flight 93 links. In particular the film is making great play of the co-operation of the families involved yet so any links to dissenting or 'off-message' families most welcome

A few links: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

[ian neal]

Interestingly it seems this site http://www.theflight93project.org/ has been replaced by http://www.flight93project.com/ and this site http://www.flight93.net/. is now the official website of the film

No further forward on creating an alternative site I'm afraid. I've had focus on work/family of late, but still reckon it's a good idea.

Article from above website

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/01/movies/01timm.html?ex=1293771600&en= f5a28a31bbbc6611&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss

[Ally]

I sent Greengrass about 20 emails illustrating alternative viewpoints on Flight 93 and asking him what aspects he was using for his 'true story'

Never got 1 single response.

Do you reckon he's been caught with a young boy in Thailand?

[ian neal]

Based on the news reports to date I would say it is a fairly safe bet to say they will cover similar ground to the film screened the other week "the plane that fought back", namely focussing on the passengers/crew experiences and nothing on the (non) response of FAA/NORAD/USAF, the intelligence questions and so on

That will leave thse type of questions unanswered

1) Questions about the hijacker's identities (for example questions re Jared ) and suspicions about Florida flight schools and hijacker behaviour

2) Intelligence failures and here (2)

3) Air defense failures and failure to follow standard operating procedures This to me is the most glaring area. By 9.28 clear signs ua93 is hijacked, all doubt removed when transponder is turned off. Everyone including cheney, rumsfeld, FAA and NORAD were all talking to each other by this time according to various testimony including Richard Clarke's. That's over 30 minutes to intercept the plane. What has never been satisfactorily explained is why NORAD would not be able to track the planes, hear air traffic radio, talk directly to FAA and USAF all in real time from the time a communications bridge was established.

4) Lack of transparency and openness in the subsequent investigations, why not release all the tapes in full, why not rebuild the plane wreckage and allow independent analysis. Why the constant obfuscation and blocking of inquiries. Why the glaring gaps, questions and contradictions in the various versions of the official account of the air defense response

5) No hijack warning from any of the planes. Why is this?

6) Dispute over time of crash and reports of the sound of wind rushing in (mentioned on the film once) cast considerable doubt over the final minutes especially since the full tape has never been released and there are questions about why the tape ends early at 10.02. Seismic evidence places the impact at 1006

Reports (and here) of sightings of a small jet, possibly military plane based on eye witness descriptions, that tallies with the possibility that the plane was shot down. This is further supported by photos of the crash site and reports of the debris scattered over many miles, with one report of a major engine component found over a mile away

Other anomalies: under occupancy on the flight, the number of last minute changes, report of UA93 landing due to bomb scare

Do you have any other areas you flag up or sources of evidence you would recommend?

[Ally]

Compare the crash site to that of Pan Am 103 over Lockerbie and you find little proof of Flight 93. If F93 was downed and so clearly seen by witnesses passing overhead then it was flying at a much lower altitude than PA 103. It's cockpit survived completely intact despite being decapitated from the rest of the plane. Hell, even passengers were found still strapped to their seats after falling 30k feet. Didn't the Shanksville coroner say no bodies or blood were found?