View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
michael_1037 New Poster
Joined: 26 Aug 2006 Posts: 3 Location: South Carolina,USA
|
Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 10:56 pm Post subject: Passport |
|
|
How is that a passport belonging to one of the "piolt hijacker" is found 2 blocks away and very little aircraft debris is recovered? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wokeman Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 27 Jul 2005 Posts: 881 Location: Woking, Surrey, UK
|
Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 11:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
michael_1037,
It's because there were no "arab hijackers", the names were used as patsies, like Lee Harvey Oswald (a long time ago, but I remember it), who famously said: "I'm just a patsie!" (which he was- there were two Oswalds, one was used to incriminate the other, but that's another story!) The planes were remotely controlled. The "passport" was planted. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
michael_1037 New Poster
Joined: 26 Aug 2006 Posts: 3 Location: South Carolina,USA
|
Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
I thought the same.Just nice to know others share the same thought. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uselesseater Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 21 Sep 2005 Posts: 629 Location: Leeds
|
Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think the FBIs position now is that the passport story is an urban ledgend which may or may not be true. Doesn't make muich difference now though as typicaly rumour and supposition are reported as fact, later to be admitted to be fake. The casual viewer is unaware as the tv news probably won't pick it up so effectively, to a great number of people, it does not make up part of their reality. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
michael_1037 New Poster
Joined: 26 Aug 2006 Posts: 3 Location: South Carolina,USA
|
Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
If Bush were to say we got "Benny Laden"(i do know his name),we would demand he bring our troops home.Ithink we killed him soon after.This keeps the "war machine" running. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zappasearcher Minor Poster
Joined: 21 Aug 2006 Posts: 59 Location: Birmingham UK
|
Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
michael_1037 wrote: | If Bush were to say we got "Benny Laden"(i do know his name),we would demand he bring our troops home.Ithink we killed him soon after.This keeps the "war machine" running. |
I always thought that Osama was hiding out at a certain ranch in Crawford, Texas.
_________________ Hydrogen is not the most plentiful thing in the world. Stupidity is. - Frank Zappa (1940 - 1993) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TimmyG Validated Poster
Joined: 04 Apr 2006 Posts: 489 Location: Manchester
|
Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | I think the FBIs position now is that the passport story is an urban ledgend which may or may not be true. |
it is mentioned in the official report though.. so it is cited as 'evidence'
quite ridiculous _________________ "During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Newspeak International Validated Poster
Joined: 18 Apr 2006 Posts: 1158 Location: South Essex
|
Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 11:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
michael_1037 wrote: | If Bush were to say we got "Benny Laden"(i do know his name),we would demand he bring our troops home.Ithink we killed him soon after.This keeps the "war machine" running. |
Hi Michael, the FBI have stated that there is nothing linking OBL to the attacks on 911.Which would beg the question why did we attack Afghanistan?
President Bush also has stated Iraq had nothing to do with the attacks either.
Which would raise a further question on why we attacked Iraq?
N |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scubadiver Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Apr 2006 Posts: 1850 Location: Currently Andover
|
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Newspeak International wrote: | michael_1037 wrote: | If Bush were to say we got "Benny Laden"(i do know his name),we would demand he bring our troops home.Ithink we killed him soon after.This keeps the "war machine" running. |
Hi Michael, the FBI have stated that there is nothing linking OBL to the attacks on 911.Which would beg the question why did we attack Afghanistan?
President Bush also has stated Iraq had nothing to do with the attacks either.
Which would raise a further question on why we attacked Iraq?
N |
Its all about taking control of Central Asia and the oil production. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
James C Major Poster
Joined: 26 Jan 2006 Posts: 1046
|
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Newspeak International wrote: | Hi Michael, the FBI have stated that there is nothing linking OBL to the attacks on 911.Which would beg the question why did we attack Afghanistan? |
A few years ago an enormous oil field was discovered by the Caspian Sea. Plans were immediately put into place by the US to transport the oil and gas from there to India/Pakistan and Turkey for supply to the US. Two very significant events happened therefore. Firstly, the US would use its influence militarily in the Yugoslavian conflict to maintain peace since the pipeline destined for Turkey would have to travel through former Yugoslavia (strange really considering the US started the conflict in the first place although the oil field wasn't significant then). Secondly, the US tried negotiating with the Taliban to allow the India/Pakistan bound pipeline to be built through Afghanistan. However, negotiations broke down and within months 9/11 happened giving the US the green light to remove the Taliban.
As it happens, the Caspian find is not expected to be as big as first thought but the pipelines will still supply much needed oil and gas ready for shipment to the US and UK at a time of great energy uncertainty. This is why attacking and continuing to defend Afghanistan is so important.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/oil.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Newspeak International Validated Poster
Joined: 18 Apr 2006 Posts: 1158 Location: South Essex
|
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
scubadiver wrote: | Its all about taking control of Central Asia and the oil production. |
and James C:
Listen up guys,I was not asking the questions, merely pointing out to Michael the flaws in the US administrations argument,in case he was new to things.
OK |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paul wright Moderator
Joined: 26 Sep 2005 Posts: 2650 Location: Sunny Bradford, Northern Lights
|
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 9:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think Icke sorted this all out as reported in his 2003 presentation in Brixton, that he phoned the FBI and managed to get them to admit the story of the passport was probably untrue _________________ http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|