More Pentagon NIST evidence

[Snowygrouch]

All,
Here is an excel chart I made showing the altitude of the Pentagon plane in the last 45 seconds of flight.

It is abundantly clear that the plane DOES NOT come even close to levelling out at any point here.

It maintains a fairly steady rate of descent. Hence it COULD NOT have flown in at tree top level in the CCTV footage.

I will personally vouch for the source of the data used to make this chart but I must keep the detail under wraps for now. DONT ask me any more, I am under oath.
All will be revealed in the next week or two.

Calum

PS The AVERAGE rate of descent is 55 feet/sec or (18Meters/sec in philistine units)

(Damn I`m such a F*kin tease!)

[brian]

snowy, you seen this?

Pilots for 9/11 Truth - Flight 77 animation analysis

Submitted by Reprehensor on Tue, 08/29/2006 - 10:46am. Animation | Flight 77 | Flight Path


Further analysis of the puzzling NTSB Pentagon data available at Pilots for 9/11 Truth;

We have determined based on the Flight Data Recorder information that has been analyzed thus far provided by the NTSB, that it is impossible for this aircraft to have struck down the light poles.

We have an animation of the entire flight provided by the NTSB. I have sat through the whole flight from taxi out at Dulles... to the impact at the Pentagon in real time.

The screenshot below shows the very last frame of the recorded data. Its stops at 9:37:44 AM EDT (Official Impact Time is 09:37:45). You will notice in the right margin the altitude of the aircraft on the middle instrument. It shows 180 feet. This altitude has been determined to reflect Pressure altitude as set by 29.92 inHg on the Altimeter. The actual local pressure for DCA at impact time was 30.22 inHg. The error for this discrepancy is 300 feet. Meaning, the actual aircraft altitude was 300 feet higher than indicated at that moment in time. Which means aircraft altitude was 480 feet above sea level (MSL, 75 foot margin for error according to Federal Aviation Regulations). You can clearly see the highway in the below screenshot directly under the aircraft. The elevation for that highway is ~40 feet according to Google Earth. The light poles would have had to been 440 feet tall (+/- 75 feet) for this aircraft to bring them down. Which you can clearly see in the below picture, the aircraft is too high, even for the official released video of the 5 frames where you see something cross the Pentagon Lawn at level attitude. The 5 frames of video captured by the parking gate cam is in direct conflict with the Aircraft Flight Data Recorder information released by the NTSB. More information will be forthcoming as we come to our conclusions on each issue. We have contacted the NTSB regarding the conflict between the official story and the FDR. They refuse to comment...

Curioser, and curioser.

http://www.911blogger.com/node/2341

[Snowygrouch]

Brian,
Yes well spotted, where do you think they got their data?..........(me)

Bongo,
Indeed I have been shamed, your calculation is correct!
(the horror, the horror )
I should have stuck with PROPER units like Fathoms and hectares.

In my defence my figure is only marginally out using Iraqi feet!!!

(oh the irony)

I can guaranntee the data used to make this graph is 100% authentic.

As I said all will be revealed.

PS Go out NOW and buy Scott Ritters book Iraq Confidential.
Its absolutely FKing Top bloody notch. Finished it in hours, a MUST read for anyone serious about their US military history.

[physicist]

I can't wait to read your evidence.

(Let's stick to SI units. )

[SHERITON HOTEL]

Wasn't there a problem about the time on that Pentagon radar animation you posted on youtube Callum? it read '13.30-ish something daylight time' I vaguely recall