Hi,
I have just got to post the remaing 49 envelopes addressed to Chief Constables of the 52 UK Police Forces (I posted 3 today).
The files I have used can be downloaded from this link
http://www.checktheevidence.com/PoliceMailing.zip
(what happened to the attachment facility??). I used an MS-Word Mail Merge and have formatted all the addresses in a table, in case anyone else wants to use them.
I included:
1) The letter shown below (apologies for rubbish formatting the link at the bottom has a slightly better formatted version on its own page).
2) DVD - either Conf Ev or Loose Change
3) Copies of the replies I had from Home Office and Counter-Terrorism Policy office (included in file linked above).
I got all the postal addresses using links from this page:
http://www.police.uk/forces/forceslist.asp
I didn't do all the individual London Boroughs - just New Scotland Yard.
London Boroughs are here:
http://www.met.police.uk/contacts/Phonenumbers.htm
Perhaps someone can do those?
As an additional idea, someone could e-mail the UK forces something too (using links from the forcelist page above). Any takers?
Happy New Year to all. I think a lot will happen this year.
===================
Re:
Terrorism, re-opening investigation into the 2001 September 11th
Tragedy.
Dear
Sir/Madam,
Though
I have addressed this letter to the Chief Constable, I doubt he/she will be the
first person to read it, or whether they would even read it at all.
In
putting together this mailing, to obtain the postal addresses, I visited all of
the UK Police Force Websites and was interested to find a link on many of them
labelled “Countering Terrorism” or something similar. I am writing regarding
this same issue, which seems to be the defining one of our time, and I am
questioning its most basic assumptions.
I
have been researching the issues related to what really happened on 9-11 for
about 2 years, but it was only just over 1-year ago that I realised what really
happened to the WTC Twin Towers, for example. It seems I am one of a growing
number of people (collectively known as the
“9-11 Truth movement”) who are asking harder questions about the
official story of the 9-11 tragedy. Many people incorrectly refer to these
questions as "Conspiracy Theories" - we try to focus on evidence. Some
of the key questions we are asking are:
Why
did World Trade Centre (WTC) Buildings 1 & 2 collapse at near
“free-fall” rate, with many witness reports of explosions? Why did WTC 7
also collapse at free-fall rate, when no plane hit it? How were the towers
pulverised to powdered debris? Why did the WTC’s owner, Larry Silverstein,
state that WTC 7 had to be “pulled” by the fire department and yet the FEMA
report said “[how the fires caused the collapse] remain[s] unknown at this
time”? Why, when requested, was no clear film released of the supposed plane
that hit the Pentagon? Why
did none of the 19 hijackers appear on the passenger lists? Why didn't jets
intercept the airliners since they had numerous warnings of terrorist attacks?
Why were the flights Black Boxes never recovered, but many bodies were? How is
it the case that at least 6 (probably more) of the supposed hijackers have now
been reported as alive?
Just
over a year ago, a BAFTA award winning BBC documentary “The
Power of Nightmares”, came to the conclusion that the notion of Al Qaida
as an international terrorist organisation is largely a fantasy. This then begs
the question, “if Al Qaida does not really exist, then who did perpetrate
9-11”.
I
have been quietly campaigning regarding this issue for over 1 year now, and have
written a number of letters to Erewash MP Liz Blackman, who has forwarded 2 of
my letters to the Home Office. I have received responses from them, and 2
letters from the Counter Terrorism Policy Office, following a letter I wrote to
the Home Secretary, Charles Clarke (see enclosed copies).
Recently,
I hired a local cinema (at a relative personal cost of considerable size) to
show a film called Loose Change. Thanks to the support of David Shayler
and Annie Machon, and a
balanced article in our local paper, we ended up with a good attendance of
about 100 people.
In
the last year, there have been a number of significant developments in the
9-11 Truth Movement. A loose association of people have set up the UK
9-11 Truth online forum (http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/).
This now has over 200 members (and a number of off-line ones)
and presentations and talks have been given in several places other
than Derby such as London, Cork, Manchester,
Oxford, Bristol,
Brighton and the West Country. Ian
Henshall and Rowland Morgan’s “Book 9-11 Revealed” has also been published. The
only coverage this seems to have had in the mainstream media was in an
article in the Daily Mail (http://www.financialoutrage.org.uk/911_mainstream_media.htm)
In
Jun e 2005, a former Bush
Administration official, Morgan Reynolds, stated clearly that he thinks the
official story is wrong. He is a Professor Emeritus at Texas A & M
University. The President of the University, himself a former CIA director,
moved quickly to make a statement disagreeing with Professor Reynolds’
position.
Dr Paul
Craig Roberts, a former Reagan Administration Official, has made similar
remarks to those of Morgan
Reynolds.
Also,
on Oct 15th & 16th, 2005, Professor David Ray Griffin,
a Theologian (he was a professor of philosophy of religion and theology, at the
Claremont School of Theology in Claremont, California until 2004) gave 2
presentations in New York regarding 9-11 Truth. He said:
‘It
is already possible to know, beyond a reasonable doubt, one very important
thing: the destruction of the World Trade Center was an inside job, orchestrated
by terrorists within our own government."
He
also said :
"The
evidence for this conclusion (that 9/11 was an inside job) has thus far been
largely ignored by the mainstream press, perhaps under the guise of obeying
President Bush’s advice not to tolerate "outrageous conspiracy
theories." We have seen, however, that it is the Bush administration’s
conspiracy theory that is the outrageous one, because it is violently
contradicted by numerous facts, including some basic laws of physics.’
In
the last few months, Physics Professor
Steve Jones of Brigham Young University (USA) has presented
a paper for peer review which discusses the demolition of the World Trade
Centre buildings using explosives. He
also appeared on MSNBC (USA) to describe his analysis.
There
has also been a wonderful new development – www.mujca.com
- Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth.
We
are hoping that more people will be willing to join us in our campaign of
education, once they have checked and validated the evidence for
themselves. As the Police will be “on the front line” of implementing any
further legislation that is passed relating to terrorism, following the already
significant loss of certain basic freedoms, it seems to me that it is imperative
that Police personnel are included in our campaign of education.
So,
now you have read this, perhaps you might ask yourself a few more questions. Why
would a Florida Millionaire (Jimmy Walter)
spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on advertising campaigns and the
distribution of over 300,000 free DVD’s? Why would he organise events in
London, Paris and other European Cities? Why would he be ridiculed on prime-time
US TV? Why would student Dylan Avery make a high quality film called “Loose
Change” and give it away for free? Why would 3 Professors publicly criticise
many elements of the official story? Why would a person from Borrowash, Derbs,
UK, a graduate of Computer Science and Physics, feel it necessary to spend
nearly £300 hiring a cinema and then later send out 52 letters and DVD’s to
all UK Police Force Headquarters? Answers to all these questions can only be
found by studying the evidence, which I hope the Police – everyone, in fact -
will do for themselves.
The
question of evidence also arises in relation to the July 7th London
bombings, which share many similarities to the events on 9-11. Our research
suggests that a similar set of “stories” has been “put out” about the
7-7 bombings, by someone. These
stories have now entered the public perception as being true, despite them being
based on flimsy or non-existent evidence. The denial of a public enquiry now
behoves people like us to present the evidence we do have, so that people
question the whole basis of what has been shown on the regular media. I
personally question, for example, Mr Blair’s announcement at 3pm on 7-7 that
the incident “bore all the hallmarks of an Al Qaida attack”. BBC news
reports focused on an Internet rumour of an Al Qaida link (this claim was later
shown to be a hoax). As far as I am aware, all but 1 of the witness accounts
described “bombs under the train”. Most people didn’t notice this. We did.
It
seems likely that I will receive no replies to this letter, because what it is
suggesting is rather shocking in itself and also diametrically opposed to the
view on which “counter terrorism” policy has been dictated and imposed.
However, what I have written is based on verifiable evidence. A response to this
letter in itself does not matter at all to me personally. What does
matter is that whoever reads this takes time out – or even makes time -
to check the evidence mentioned and come to an informed opinion. It also
matters that they share and discuss this evidence with other people and decide
what, if anything, they wish to do about it in their own sphere of influence.
Thanks
very much for taking the time to read this and thanks for any time spent in
reviewing any of the information included. Time will show that it is valid and
of the utmost importance. Bet on it.
Yours
Most Sincerely,
Andrew
Johnson
P.S.
I have included a number of key links in this letter (where the underlining is).
If you wish to view or listen to the information linked, please access an online
version of this letter here:
http://tinyurl.com/ds2j5
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
