View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
optimus79 Minor Poster
Joined: 03 Sep 2006 Posts: 50
|
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 7:08 pm Post subject: How long was this planned for? |
|
|
One of the many arguments I hear in debating this subject is how and when they could have rigged the Towers for controlled demolition.
I know that there was Neo Con links to the security companies, but it does make me think just when they started rigging these buildings.
Could this process have been started months before 9/11? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wokeman Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 27 Jul 2005 Posts: 881 Location: Woking, Surrey, UK
|
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Optimus79,
I don't know how long it took to plan the demoliton of the WTC, probably weeks. How long to plan the whole operation, years! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ian neal Angel - now passed away
Joined: 26 Jul 2005 Posts: 3140 Location: UK
|
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 1:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is this the way forward to start debating between us our favourite explanation for the madness we see around us. I know (beyond all reasonable doubt) that '9/11 was an inside job'. At the very least the case to reopen 9/11 is totally overwhelming and the media's distortion and cover-up of 9/11 ever more clear.
The fact that despite being aware of us, the media in this country tip toe around us. The coverage exists now. 9/11 truth is discussed on Radio 4's today programme and James Whale gave 2 hours of reasoned debate. On the BBCs Heaven and Earth show. We put on an event at Conway hall the likes of which they haven't seen for years. A peaceful demonstration at Grovenor Square (media coverage zilch). No problem, as we continue to grow, we will become impossible to ignore
When we provoke the inevitable public debate I would focus the debate on what we can prove they are lying about and leave speculation until a later date. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
IronSnot Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Jul 2006 Posts: 595 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 2:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'd say since the mid 90s sometime, although the idea may have come earlier.
I hate to say this, mainly because it can't be backed up, but the reason I don't believe the official line is because I saw an outline of this operation (both scenarios) on the Guardian board in May 99. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scar Moderate Poster
Joined: 25 Feb 2006 Posts: 724 Location: Brighton
|
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 2:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
IronSnot wrote: | I'd say since the mid 90s sometime, although the idea may have come earlier.
I hate to say this, mainly because it can't be backed up, but the reason I don't believe the official line is because I saw an outline of this operation (both scenarios) on the Guardian board in May 99. |
Hey Ironsnot,
I remember you alluding to this before but i didnt pursue it, i didnt know if you were serious. I must admit it sounded very strange at the time but you didnt say where you read it.
Care to elaborate? Even though you cant back it up i'd still find it interesting quite what was outlined etc and by whom. In a Pm if you like.
If only you had saved the page... _________________ Positive...energy...activates...constant...elevation. (Gravediggaz) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
waking life Minor Poster
Joined: 20 May 2006 Posts: 32
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
IronSnot Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Jul 2006 Posts: 595 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Scar, a one off poster put up a link to the list of British spies in May 1999. He or she also gave information about a plan which became 9/11. Stated that this information was important.
Although I did save it and other stuff, I also managed to lose it, although I havn't given up 100% hope of retrieving it, at some stage. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Skeptic Validated Poster
Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Posts: 485
|
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
perhaps we should have a forum called 'Pure Speculation'
(I know that many people believe the 1993 bombing was an attempt to topple the towers that went wrong) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fixuplooksharp Moderate Poster
Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 216
|
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
they could have rigged the towers easily! they took away the sniffer dogs weeks before 9/11 and they also had lots of people coming in for 'national security' in the preceeding weeks working on certain aspects in the builing; surprisingly nobody knows exactly what they were doing. if someone has the link/source of that info would be appreciated. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Skeptic Validated Poster
Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Posts: 485
|
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
^ the problem is that a lot of this info about 'power-downs' in the weekend before 9/11 rests on the testimony of one man: Scott Forbes
I know he has done radio interviews
I remember hearing that other people who worked in the WTC towers verified his statements but have seen no confirmation of this |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|