Remote controlled demolition

[Skeptic]

I'm having a debate with someone on another forum.

They are arguing that in order for the towers to have been brought down by controlled demolition, this would require 'miles of cabling'.

Is this true?

He is also saying that large scale explosives would be necessary.

Does anyone know about the ins and outs of controlled demolition?

[MiniMauve]

I don't know much about controlled demolition but I do know simple off-the-counter radios have more than enough range to trigger detonations in the towers from surrounding buildings (WTC7 perhaps?). I'm actually currently in the testing phase of a PLC system that uses radios to pass data to a laptop computer. Our testing bench is about 250m and 3 cinder block/steel walls from where the system is already permanently mounted system and we have excellent communication. This is without any signal boosters so, remotely triggering demolitions from buildings within line of sight in a 1km radius would be possible, I would think.

[Skeptic]

Thanks

What I really need to know is if 'miles of cabling' are necessary for such demolition.

Can't seem to find anything so far.

[telecasterisation]

[Serge]

[chek]

[telecasterisation]

They'd never be able to get the film down to the chemist's for developing?


There’s always someone who has to add a degree of silliness to a sensible debate, particularly when I have done so much research and made so many good points.

The key element you miss is that we no longer rely on ‘chemists’ to get film processed. There are now dedicated shops where people with degrees use magic chemicals to get the pictures to appear – gone are the days when we rely just on purveyors of pharmaceuticals for our pictures. Where do you live – Yorkshire?

The other major flaw in your observation is that, of course we could get the film ‘down’ as you put it, There are reusable rockets and all kinds of stuff, think ‘Yuri Gagarin’ and that Japanese monkey – see, get my drift??

So getting the film down isn’t the problem, it is what happens when you bring it down at night? You would have men in spacesuits waiting about in high streets for the shop to open giving away all kinds of military secrets.

There should be better screening in these rooms - 'chemists' - what century are you living in??

[chek]

By 'eck, we used t'dream of emigrating to Yorkshire when I were a lad.

Your what century question has an interesting provenance in itself.
For iistance here I am now, connected to the most incredible human invention since the electric guitar fully conversant and au fait with 21st Century stuff like internets and so forth, yet earlier on at work it's the 19th century. How do they do that?

While later still I may be attempting to create ( or indeed re-create) something of the late 20th Century musical genre, preferably involving feedback.

I'm glad you mentioned space monkeys, because I always thought that's why they were sending up dogs. It makes perfect sense if for example an astronaut working on space work drops a space spanner in freefall, it could be halfway to Saturn before he notices. So, send the space dog after it. It'll likely enjoy the exercise.
It's therefore not inconceivable they could also be trained to retrieve film from photo labs, and during normal business hours.

Of course, NASA's been doing this kind of thing undercover for years, but now and again they slip up on minor things.

Like when they started sponsoring a NASA Space Dog of the Year event at Crufts, but nobody knows because the CIA clears the building first so there's no witnesses or photo evidence. That's always conveniently edited out of the version seen on TV, or explained away as a 'fire drill'.
Every year.
And they think we don't know what goes on.

(Btw - somewhat off-topic, what's your take on the Crufts No Dogs Theory?)

[waking life]

[chek]

[blackcat]

Isn't it funny that he became like all the other experts who "believe" the official version.

[chek]

The sudden lowering of what I'd imagined were fairly fixed values - the melting points (as in molten) and softening points of steel - is a good example.

I sometimes wonder what it takes to get people like MIT Prof Thomas Eager to come up with his physics re-writes and sophistry.
And he's not the only one.

http://911review.com/coverup/fantasy/melting.html