| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Me
Moderate Poster
Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 431
|
 Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 1:02 am Post subject: Bush: The Accidental 'Explosive' Confession |
 |
|
This is really something!!!!
Download (audio) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Me
Moderate Poster
Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 431
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 5:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
I wish I knew the exact context for which these statements were made because he just says "buildings" in general, not WTC specifically. I've been wondering if this wasn't actually said on purpose? Perhaps they feel that the WTC 7 evidence for controlled demolition is becoming too strong? This could provide a possible backdoor. They might say, "according to investigations it seems that explosives may have been planted in building seven by the terrorists". Then they'd quote this supposed testimony to support the notion that it was part of their plans from the start. "They did after all speak of planting bombs in buildings", they might say?
It smells fishy to me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Me
Moderate Poster
Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 431
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 5:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
You can read the full transcript here.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060915-2.html
| Quote: |
...For example, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed described the design of planned attacks of buildings inside the U.S. and how operatives were directed to carry them out. That is valuable information for those of us who have the responsibility to protect the American people. He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a high -- a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mark Gobell
On Gardening Leave
Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Posts: 4529
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 10:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've heard this "explosives at a high point" statement elsewhere recently, maybe on one of the propagandocumentaries, I'm not sure.
Anyway, what strikes me as odd about the idea that terrorists would plant bombs in buildings "high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping" is that if it is a true statement then the terrorists do not seem inclined to maximise casualties.
Surely if you wanted to prevent the maximum amount of people escaping then it would be more effective to plant bombs lower down.
Am I missing something really obvious here ?
_________________
The Medium is the Massage - Marshall McLuhan. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Me
Moderate Poster
Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 431
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | Anyway, what strikes me as odd about the idea that terrorists would plant bombs in buildings "high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping" is that if it is a true statement then the terrorists do not seem inclined to maximise casualties.
Surely if you wanted to prevent the maximum amount of people escaping then it would be more effective to plant bombs lower down.
|
I thought the same thing as well. Forgot to add that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
uselesseater
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Posts: 629
Location: Leeds
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And the people who had maintained that explosives could not have been planted by black ops could have been planted by arabs.
And the arab terrorists are also experts at neat and tidy CD jobs - well Bin Ladens dad is in the construction industry you know  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
