Bush admits (in passing) to explosives

[IronSnot]

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060915-2.html

"For example, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed described the design of planned attacks of buildings inside the U.S. and how operatives were directed to carry them out. That is valuable information for those of us who have the responsibility to protect the American people. He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a high -- a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping."

[andrewwatson]

from http://www.911blogger.com/node/2950

Wow, this seems very important.

Here's my take on it: 9-11 End Game
http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2005/11/9-11-end-game_14.html

"I believe that the time is now right to force the issue, and that the harm from discussing the end game is far outweighed by the need to come up with a strong counterargument to the "Osama did it" story. So here are my thoughts:

(1) The story that Al-Qaeda planted bombs logically fails. First of all, a couple of truck bombs wouldn't have done it. It took a coordinated and controlled demolition, involving bombs in the basements and throughout the buildings. Controlled demolitions of large buildings take many months of planning, expert timing, and complete control and coordination.

(2) The Twin Towers were some of the world's largest buildings, and they were demolished with near perfection, causing very little damage to surrounding buildings. This is not something that a bunch of rag-tag terrorists could have done on their own.

(3) Additionally, the sudden "straightening out" of the upper 34 floors of the South Tower after they had precipitously leaned over and started toppling like a tree could ONLY have been accomplished through very sophisticated demolition techniques. There are only a handful of demolition experts in the world who could have changed the direction of a toppling building in mid-air through destruction of the support structures underneath the falling building, so that the building would not topple sideways and destroy surrounding buildings. Osama and the boys? Impossible.

(4) Security for the trade centers was provided by a Bush-linked company. How did a couple of sent-from-the-cave terrorists, unconnected with the military or intelligence resources of the United States (with help from Israel?), have gained the access necessary to have installed the elaborate network of explosives and triggers required to implement these controlled demolitions?

(5) Even if the first tower had been brought down by Al-Qaeda, why didn't the government jam the radio frequencies or cell phones which would have been needed to orchestrate the controlled demolition of the second tower and of building 7? Why didn't the military send in an AWACS plane and jam all communications signals in the entire area (its easy to do)?

(6) Why did the 9-11 Commission and NIST lie and say fires brought down the buildings? This is evidence of guilt, and a cover-up. "We didn't want to scare the people" does not cut it. Covering up with a lie is evidence of guilt.

9/11 researchers and writers who are better informed than me will be able to add points I missed, and to take points off the list which are weak or unimportant. I'm providing a rough first draft, not a finished product.

If we can refute the coming limited hang out story that Al-Qaeda done it, we can win the 9-11 end game -- getting the full truth out there and imprisoning all of those responsible."

Submitted by GeorgeWashington on Sun, 09/17/2006 - 10:50am

[Skeptic]

he just mentionbs 'buildings', not the WTC especially

I'm sure this is supposed to be about plans that they <allegedly> didn't put into place

[Sinclair]

[HERA]

Letter to
Independent

On Sep 20, at a White House Press Conference, George W Bush stated, referring to a "captured terrorist"
"Khalid Sheikh Mohammed described the design of planned attacks of buildings inside the U.S. ... He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a high - a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping."
Incredible as it may seem, the Bush camp could be setting us up, after 5 years, for "Al Qaeda carried out the controlled demolitions of the 3 WTC buildings."
If this is so, what response can be expected from the faithful? Will the US "tell them anything" policy - always successful in the past - hold with the US/UK media or will this be a fantasy too far : even for them?