Questions about Hussain and Kings Cross.

[GazeboflossUK]

I've been passing around info about 7/7 for the past year but I could do with a bit of help clearing up a matter here, I would appreciate it if anyone can offer some thoughts on this.

I during a lengthy blogg discussion with someone not really known to me, he pointed out something which I have become slightly confused about.

I quoted an extract from julyseventh.co.uk about the Hasib Hussain CCTV picture outside Boots at King's Cross Station.
This one:

And this is the text I quoted..
"On October 2nd, just under three months after the London bombings, another still image was released of Hasib Hussain on his own. He is apparently exiting the Boots store at Kings Cross mainline station. Like the earlier image of him alone, there is no date or timestamp on the image shown to the public. On this basis, the photo could have been taken at any time. The media stated that the image was captured at 9am on July 7th, but by this time, Kings Cross station was being evacuated, and there are reports of "pandemonium", of which there is no sign in the picture.

There has been no explanation as to why this image was released so long after the others. According to the reports that accompanied the image, the police were hoping that it would jog the memories of potential witnesses. Andy Hayman, Assistant Commissioner for Specialist Operations at the Met said, "It is possible that he bought items in Boots or other shops, or that he spoke to people. We would urge anyone with any information to come forward."

If the public's memories are to be jogged, especially three months after the event, it would surely make more sense to release as many images as possible, not just of Hussain at Boots, but all the other locations in which he would have been captured on camera. The image of Hussain at Boots only places him within that context and may not prompt the memory of a person who saw him, or any of the other accused men, somewhere else in the area that morning.

Remember, quite apart from the journey from Luton to King's Cross, the Official Report has Hasib Hussain wandering around Central London for nearly an hour after the incidents underground. There are hundreds of CCTV cameras in and around King's Cross station and on the section of road between King's Cross and Euston and along which Hasib Hussain is alleged to have walked before boarding a diverted number 30 bus."

This was his reply:

You still haven't explained the significance (unless of course the significance is in fact so insignificant that I've missed it), nor why the government would state something (Hussain being in Boots at 9am) in their official report, if it is only going to implicate them in some sort of wrong doing. Please do so.

Furthermore, that Observer article doesn't state that at 9am, there were "reports of pandemonium", it states there were "the first signs of pandemonium". The same article also states that the decision to evacuate the Undergroud came at 9.15am - the *decision*, not the actual evacuation.. and that's the Underground which presumably would have been the first priority, not Kings Cross, so your claim that it was being evacuated at 9am is clearly false.

And yes, Hussain was walking down a route with a number of CCTV cameras - but how many thousands of other people would have been at the same time? I don't know if you remember what it was like, the streets were rammed, vehicles everywhere etc. It's perfectly possible that one man might not be distinguishable amongst such carnage.

But conspiracy theorists aren't interested in reasonable answers to questions they ask, obviously.

If anyone can provide me with some info that can either back up his or my argument then I would be grateful. Just I am gathering information and creating my own document pack so I can try and make sense of everything.......and this matter is causing me some head scratching.

[numeral]

Here is what TfL say:

[Kier]

Hello

There was more than one report of King's Cross being evacuated at 9am.

[GazeboflossUK]

Thanks guys.

I'm pretty clued up on pretty much everything that happened but I appreciate the help with this.....Thanks.

I had also point out to him that I'm not the only conspiracy theorist here. He is one too.....by the very nature of our discussions.
It's always fun for non-believers to call someone a conspiracy theorist isn't it. Those words have been used so many times in attempts to discredit anything said by any given person who asks questions of the government about big events like this. I said that "Why do you think when governments are "investigating" (and I use that term loosely) these events that they are never labelled conspiracy theorists?" When essencially that is what they are.....they don't know what was exactly going on and therefore theoretically reaching conclusions about a plot where multiple people are alleged to have conspired to commit a crime.

It's because the conspiracy theorist term has now been put aside for anyone wanting to reassure themselves that everything is ok by calling us "crazy nut jobs" - because that is what it now has really become to mean across to the general public.

[Muncher]

A better image of Hussein outside Boot at King's Cross could be found in a Met Police PDF document "Communities Together Information Bulletin Number 51" dated 5th October 2005. It appears to no longer be on the Met Police web site.

In the image there is a time stamp: 09:00:13 07/07/05

[numeral]

Anybody fancy putting in a FOIA request to the Met asking if they possess CCTV records inside W.H. Smith at King's Cross between 9 and 9.15 that day?

[suspecta]