Shayler in New Statesman on "No Planes"

Ally · Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 5:55 am Post subject:

MM has been here 3 weeks and has done except go out it's way to attack anyone who's looking into the plane issue, for me the demo of the WTC was a fact five years ago but this issue is unresolved because so many half wits try and distract the discussion with pointless comments to derail the investigating. MM demonstrates this sweetly in nearly all its posts.

Gotta ask what it's motivation is?

Andrew Johnson · Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 7:01 am Post subject:

chek · Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 10:28 am Post subject:

Any relation to the flights reported hijacked that morning and the planes that hit the towers has yet to be conclusively proved.

Certainly similar looking planes hit the towers, but the reported markings -grey with blue disc - and 'windowless' planes that were seen, make the contention that these were regular airliners suspect at the very least.
These to me are legitimate areas for further enquiry.

Planes were reported by eyewitnesses, they are seen on multiple cameras and people in the towers reported the buildings swayed after the impacts.

Holograms and CGI theories to me though are far-fetched and demonstrably damaging (they plonked a NPT mention into an otherwise eminently reasonable DRG article for instance) until such time as that type of technology can be shown to exist.

IronSnot · Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 12:15 pm Post subject:

Geez this word shill gets thrown around with abandon by certain posters doesn't it?

Ally · Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 12:19 pm Post subject:

IronSnot · Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 12:36 pm Post subject:

No, this is a movement, not your movement.

Unfortunately we see too much of the second.

scar · Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 1:12 pm Post subject:

chek · Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 2:09 pm Post subject:

GazeboflossUK · Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 5:07 pm Post subject:

No planers, I'm sorry but you really need to stop it.

Andrew Johnson · Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 7:10 pm Post subject:

GazeboflossUK · Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 12:45 am Post subject:

Yes, I know...The sheer amount of ammunition we have gained through the controlled demolition findings to use against the perpetrators of this 'inside job' is gigantic..

However, the "no plane" theory really gets my back up, that's all...haha...but that's just me.

I was watching that 9/11 Mysteries Part 1 again today and I found myself incontrollably sniggering to myself. It's not that I was enjoying the event or subject matter to any point to which it gave me "joy" exactly.....however there was a definite elevation in the status of my belief and understanding of why those 3 buildings fell, which triggered my reaction.

I mean, I have known for a long, long time that those towers were a demolition job but I think that the sheer hilarity of the official 'story' and the absolute pathetic assumption by the treasonous cowards that us 'little people' wouldn't be able to get this far prevoked my almost hysterical laughter fit.

You all know, this issue is big. It's so big that once you get past the worry and become free of any sort of doubt surrounding a particular issue then you realise that you've actually achieved something very worthwhile---
I don't know about everyone else (this probably applies to a fair few) but I've spent a very long time cementing in stone the feelings that I had from the start about 9/11. That it wasn't quite right, that there was something fundamentally and drastically amiss.
I did however, during my none stop viewing of the MSM from the day of 9/11, slightly fall into the clutches of the official lie.

Thank god for my intuitive nature, I'll say. I managed to dedicate a section of my life to figuring out what actually did happen and what needs investigating about this catalyzing event.

I've gained so much knowledge that simply watching those towers fall on a really basic level now, just gazing at the exploding dust as they fall, is enough to remind myself how obvious it all was from the very start.

I only can hope that more other highly educated people, who probably already knew the essensial science of the matter from day one will rally to the cause......because you know, we are getting there..

And I'm a believer that they will.

That was a little off topic but....errm....nevermind.

MiniMauve · Moderate Poster Joined: 24 Aug 2006 Posts: 220

MiniMauve · Moderate Poster Joined: 24 Aug 2006 Posts: 220

MiniMauve · Moderate Poster Joined: 24 Aug 2006 Posts: 220

Annie · Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 4:39 pm Post subject:

Hi Brian

Thanks for that. That's all I'm suggesting. I'm definitely not trying to stop people pursuing their own areas of interest and research, let alone stifle free speech - I know from bitter personal experience in Dave's case quite how frustrating that can be!

But we also have to remember that we are campaigning for the truth, and that we want to reach as many people as possible. A consistent and coherent line will help us to do that most effectively IMO. As you say, we're not there to supply the answers - that's what the PTB should be doing.

Regards

Annie

ewing2001 · New Poster Joined: 02 Sep 2005 Posts: 3

Did you look into this already?

Video Overlay proves 9/11 TV Fakery (v.2.917)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4AlmPyQ4IU

IronSnot · Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:29 am Post subject:

How are you Nico?

Why the hell are you associating yourself with this?

ian neal · Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 2:51 pm Post subject:

Hi Nico

Thanks for visiting us

As I say in this post

chek · Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:46 pm Post subject:

Mark Gobell · On Gardening Leave Joined: 24 Jul 2006 Posts: 4529

	9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Stratehy Of Tension, Fake Terror, 9/11 & 7/7 Truth News	All times are GMT Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3