THE NEW NO 7X7 DEBATE

[catfish]

[program58]

I repeat:

The debate is superfluous. The buildings were brought down by controlled demolition. Building 7 was brought down by controlled demolition. No planes theories are in 'Tony Blair’s words, ' a ludicrous diversion'. Those that peddle the need to debate this misinformation should now consider that their actions are in Tony’s best interest.

It is not about debate any more. It is about action. Action that will get us the result we all crave. An inquiry with teeth and justice meted out to those responsible for 9/11.

The truth will set you free indeed. But those children dying in Afghanistan and Iraq experience an everyday truth while you can afford to slow down the truth movement with theories which can never be proven in a court of law.

The focus is myopic and your vanity is almost New Labour in proportion. If I have offended you I apologise, as my harsh words are meant to be compassionate. Maybe your energies would be best spent to create awareness around the collapse of Building 7; helping to bring about peaceful regime change within our 'democratic' governments, thus saving lives rather than the luxury of vain intellectual posturing on a blog.

[telecasterisation]

Why is there any debate about the TYPE of aircraft it is?

There are a considerable number of videos clearly showing the second plane. Anybody in the industry would be able to tell at a glance what type it is.

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

[telecasterisation]

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

[TimmyG]

flight 175 looks like the plane its meant to be to me.
a boeing 767.



i still think its most likely that the planes that hit the towers were the actual ones the OCS says they were. remote controlled to hit the towers successfully. with all the passengers on board.

i can't see any reason to doubt the planes were the official ones other than the unusual phone calls.. which aren't conclusive. just unusual

[telecasterisation]

[chek]

[prole art threat]

Im open minded on the NPT. I prefer to concentrate on the controlled demolitions myself but what I am witnessing here is a 'pack mentality' and it's not good. If TTWSU3 wants to create multiple threads on an issue he is obviously very passionate about then why the hell shouldnt he? Let's stop trying to be protective of potential recruits. If the NPT is going to scare them off, then BOO HOO to them! I say we should applaud TTWSU3's enthusiasm and not demonize his theory. After all we all have the same goal and that's to expose the devils who orchestrated it. We all agree on ONE thing and that is controlled demolitions brought down the twin towers and WTC 7.

So, get over it.

[chek]

[telecasterisation]

[chek]

[Ally]

For the attention of Mick Dear and everyone else who thinks I'm a lunatic for not believing those aluminium planes couldn't penetrate the WTCs steel cage.

•Controversial finding but proven
•Impossible physics for an aluminum airliner to “disappear” into a steel/concrete tower without decelerating and crumpling at the wall, breaking off flaps, panels wings and tail section
•No debris below impact zones
•No debris in gashes
•Run any WTC 2 penetration video frame-by-frame and it shows impossible butter-smooth entry with no deceleration

http://www.total911.info/2006/09/revere-radio-special-reynolds-wood-on .html

[chek]

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

[MiniMauve]

I guess you didn't understand my point, did you Truth? I'll explain again: CGI as evidence of No Planes (NOT no 7x7s) is a logistical impossibility because EVERY amateur and professional photograph and video would need to be faked. So, EVERY photo or video on the internet that shows a plane hitting the WTCs MUST have been faked, according to you. Do you not understand our skeptism???

Beyond CGI we also MUST assume that ALL eyewitness accounts of planes hitting the WTC are bogus, coerced or mistaken to fit your theory. That's stretches credibility too far. Do you understand?

[Ally]

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

MM Said

"My issue with CGI is the logistics that would be involved in ensuring that hundreds of private video tapes would also have to be faked"

I'm still waiting to see these hundreds of private video tapes MM

Ally's point about the Pentagon is very important

Why can you buy into no 7X7 with the eye witnesses lying about what they saw with the Pentagon but not with WTC?

If there was some fuzzy footage of a big plane hitting the Pentagon but no wreckage would you then believe the official story that the plane had vaporised?

[John White]

[Ally]

[John White]

[Ally]

[John White]

I'll take that as a "No John, I really dont get that at all" then

One thing you will learn about me Ally is that I am impossible to intimidate

[graphicequaliser]

[chek]

[graphicequaliser]

Chek, you sound like a staunch Bush supporter frantically flailing around trying to defend a ridiculous story. Stealth technology demonstrates holographic advances made so far, but as a matter of "national security", we are not privy to how advanced they are currently.

And if the average Joe still believes the towers came down under only gravitational forces, then what else will they swallow?

[chek]

[graphicequaliser]

Now, you're being obtuse. Stealth technology includes holographic techniques, not just AWACS on its own. And what people saw literally were controlled demolitions, which explains why, when I saw it at first, I thought there's something not quite right about these images I am seeing. While watching these CDs, people were being told by the reporters the official line. Images plus voice of authority yields deluded sheep. I don't believe in authority period. Everyone is equal, the Queen, Tony Blair, the beggar on the way to work this morning, and the newborn mongoloid baby. We are all worth the same in terms of the love we can give and receive. Social hierarchy makes the inequalities we experience daily, and since society is a construct of the human mind, we can reconstruct it just by thinking about it. We are each of us valuable, and each of us worth the same to the planet (our constructor). The competitive upbringing experienced by nearly all humans globally, is what is causing the need to constantly outdo each other, instead of co-operating with each other. Competition in small amounts is healthy, when it is mixed with compassion. However, schools do not teach compassion, but they teach a lot about competitiveness.

First step is to re-educate everyone into knowing that nobody has authority, and that the "natural" identification of an alpha male in any social gathering has got to stop. We do not need someone to tell us what to do next. Free will and concern for repercussions should determine our actions.

[chek]