PEAK OIL IS A MYTH

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

I wish to expose James C as a fraud for pushing Peak Oil.

I urge you all to listen to Alex Jones and Paul Watson on the link below


http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio/

[mason-free party]

[iro]

look, peak oil in the sense that the world is going to run out of oil in the next 15-25 years is a total lie. fact. Just look at hugo chavez's speech recently saying his nation had 200 years of oil left alone.

BUT

the 'myth' of peak oil is certainly a major strategy being pushed by the ptb's for their own selfish reasons. It will bring about a severe depression, concentrate unimaginable power into few hands and few nations and make the means of waging modern warfare only available to those who can turn on the lights and power the missile launchers.

This is a scam for sure, but it is going to be used to manipulate world affairs either as a ruse for more centralised control and further war or for something much more sinister that doesn't bear talking about.

so whether its a scam or not is a side issue. the threat is real in practical terms.

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

Iro said

"This is a scam for sure, but it is going to be used to manipulate world affairs either as a ruse for more centralised control and further war or for something much more sinister that doesn't bear talking about"



Iro you are spot on - and Alex Jones would agree with you - they want to use the control of oil to destroy the middle classes

[iro]

[mason-free party]

pop along to Costco and fill up your car with their cheap veggie oil...around £2 per gallon...you know it makes sense

[iro]

[Dr Doom]

If you think peak oil is about running out of oil you
have missed the point entirely. It's about running out
of highly-available cheap oil.

Chavez's 200yr oil supply might well be so deep as to be uneconomical
to extract, else why is noone doing it? There is loads of oil all over the place that will never be extracted simply because it takes more energy to do so than you get out of the oil.

[ianrcrane]

To buy-in to the myth of Peak Oil is just one step removed from believing that 19 muslims with box-cutters were responsible for perpetrating the evenys of 9/11.

US Sees Biggest Increase in Gas Reserves in 35 Years
by Jeanine Prezioso
Wed, Sep 27, 2006 04:45 GMT

HOUSTON - U.S. natural gas reserves grew by 6% in 2005, the largest annual increase in gas reserves in 35 years, according to a government report released Tuesday.

The amount of onshore gas reserves for 2005 has increased for the seventh year in a row and made up for the 10% decrease in Gulf of Mexico federal offshore reserves, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration's "Advance Summary: U.S. Crude Oil, Natural Gas, and Natural Gas Liquids Reserves 2005 Annual Report."

The largest gas reserve increases came from Texas and Colorado, according to the report. Texas is home to the vast Barnett Shale gas play, which contains an estimated 2.1 trillion cubic feet of gas. Several large companies drill in the area which extends west 5,000 miles from Dallas. Devon Energy Corp (DVN), EnCana Corp (ECA), EOG Resources (EOG), XTO Energy Inc. (XTO) and Chesapeake Energy (CHK), which has plans to drill for gas under the Dallas-Fort Worth Airport, under which the Barnett Shale extends, all hold wells in the gas play.

Total U.S. gas production declined 4% in 2005 from gas trapped in wells after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita hit the Gulf Coast, the report said. The Gulf accounts for about 20% of all U.S. dry gas production, which was 80% shut-in after the hurricanes. Before the hurricanes, gas production had been declining about 10% a year in the Gulf of Mexico, the report added.

Crude oil reserves went up in 2005 for the first time in three years, according to the report, with two of the four largest oil-producing states, Texas and California, reporting increases.

Montana reported the largest increase in crude oil reserves due to the development of the Bakken Formation in the Williston Basin, the report added.

[James C]

Ian,

You appeared to have posted something about gas and not oil and I don't see what relevance this has since individual reserves are not the issue; it's about market forces, demand and offsetting declines elsewhere.

Perhaps you'd like to explain why the US peaked in production in 1970 as predicted by Hubbert when everyone said it wouldn't? Perhaps you'd also like to explain how come 53 other countries have also peaked in production including the UK in 1999?

Why does every organisation including all oil companies say that a peak will happen and yet you deny it? What informtaion do you have that gives you the power to fortell the future?

I'd love to know.

[James C]

[iro]

to say believing peak oil is like believing the 9/11 myth is an absurd statement ian.

are you saying the theory of abiotic oil is so convincing? because it is not - at best it is an unproven and speculative wild theory.

what is for sure is that peak oil is a political tool - another manipulation that will be used to further a sinister goal - like 9/11 was. Doesn't mean it is an absurdity...

we dont know all the facts on this, whether it is real or not it is coming and thats the important fact

[James C]

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

James said

"That Alex Jones interview is utter nonsense by the way. Manufactured as is most of Jones stuff. Pure conjecture"


James you do yourself no favours slagging of Alex Jones - everybody knows he is the real Mcoy.

[James C]

[iro]

yeah - aj is a good guy, but his manner and personality 'suck' as a fellow yank would say. he's an overgrown playground smart ass bully who's stumbled onto somehting big

[Dr Doom]

[Roger the Horse]

[Roger the Horse]

[iro]

[John White]

I'm going to have to get a new laughter chip: mines obviously ten years out of date

[James C]

OK, so maybe (just maybe) the peodo joke was a bit strong. Obviously, it's my sick sense of humour. It's a shame that some of you turn all namdy pamdy on me and start to criticize though. It was a joke, not a damn allegation - Paul Watson is a man for a start!

The problem with Jones is that he rarely backs up his facts and any sources he does refer to are written by the very people who are controlled by the elites he wishes to attack. The same can be said for Webster Tarpley.

Compare those two to David Ray Griffin however and there's just no contest.

[Barker]

I don't agree that peak oil is a myth. Chavez might have enough for 200 years at his current production levels but Saudia Arabia is running out and the North Sea is nearly exhausted. Sure there is oil in some places, there is a lot around the Caspian sea and in Russia, but Putin has made it clear the those reserves are for the development of the Russian economy. And what about the increasing demands of India and China? Peak oil is the point at which demand overtakes production. It is clear that the Iraq invasion was to give the west control of the Iraqi oilfields
and any planned war with Iran will be to take control of the Iranian oilfields.
What about future generations? crude oil is much more valuable as a source of plastic that it is as fuel. We must develop alternative sources of fuel and power which do not extract such a cost in environmental and social terms.

[iro]

plastic can be made from sugar effortlessly - losing oil is not early as dramatic as 'they' say it is. it will be the best thing we have ever done since civilisation began

[Roger the Horse]

[Dr Doom]

[John White]

[James C]

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

So how is oil formed?

(A) decomposed organic sea plants and animals

Or (B) left here for us by aliens/creative design

Or (C) Produced by the heat of the earth's core
boiling it out of the rocks


Given that the PTB lie to us about most things, I cannot believe (A) which we were taught in schools.

(B) is possible, but if they would wanted to give us an energy source - then why make it so difficult to get out of the ground?

(C) would explain why some oilfields are refilling themselves, and if true, it would mean that the PTB would do everything in their power to stop us finding out.

So what you think - any other ideas?

[James C]