Targeting selected MP's in larger numbers.

[marndin]

Hi all

I have just recieved a letter from my MP Francis Maude, (he always replies to my letters).

I sent him a quite detailed e-mail about 9/11 covering the collapse of building 7 and the way that the twin towers fell, freefall speed, melting point of steel, etc.

His reply was this: "Thank you for your e-mail with your interesting theory about the events surrounding 9/11.

I have no reason to disbelieve the official version of events."

Surely he has a duty to investigate the claims and evidence put to him from his constituents.

Please feel free to e-mail him with your views:

francismaudemp@parliament.uk

I just get the feeling that if enough people target the same MP at the same time (with pre-written copy and pasted letters), we may have more impact.

What do you think?

Martin Noakes

[Justin]

Well done Martin. Don't be put off by the ridiculous, brief and evasive reply from Francis Maude. We've all had similar letters from our MPs - if you get one back that has more than ten lines in it you are making real progress!

These people are starting to get worried - their safe little world is under attack. My advice is that you ring his office and arrange for you and a friend (ie a witness) to go and see him at one of his surgeries. Take a laptop with you with Loose Change 2 ready to be played at the crucial points (ie collapses of WTC 1,2 and 7). Put the b* under pressure - but be really nice and friendly. A warm smile and friendly handshake will bring down his defences - share a joke or two and even have a laugh about being a 'conspiracy theorist'. Try and dress in a way so that he takes you seriously - I hate grey suits and ties myself, but just occasionally it pays to look like one of 'them'! Ask leading questions and try and avoid lecturing him - not easy as I know myself! Get him to admit the absurdity of the official conspiracy theory.

Whatever you do, have fun and keep at him.....and get friends, family and neighbours to write to him. If he gets ten different snail mail letters from ten constituents about 9/11, he will start to take this issue more seriously.

Good luck!

Justin

[TimmyG]

keep at it. they can't ignore us forever.

but don't show them loose change.theres too much speculation in it
try 'press for truth' and maybe 9/11 mysteries. much better

[Andrew Johnson]

There is SOME speculation in LC2. However, the discussion of the destruction of WTC 1,2 and 7 is essentially the same as in other films. So it may boil down to which is easier to cue up.

If a laptop is available, it doesn't make much odds...

[mkpdavies]

I have written to my MP many times (Humfrey Malins) on a range of issues. Every single time, I come away with nil action and the feeling of being heavily fobbed off.

While I realise they can't jump to every request, I would hope to see my concerns dealt with much better and I just get the feeling they are going through the motions, just to make it look like we have some sort of accountability.

I actually ran for parliament in 2005, just to see if I could get some issues out there, but it is impossible. If you kept at it for many years and a big issue you were known for came up, then you might have a chance. Otherwise it's a total stitch up. People in the main vote, depending on what they watch on T.V and what they read in the papers. All the mainstream media talk about is the three main puppet parties.

Even then they are encouraged to vote blue or red and the yellows are a joke. It's a sham and one that will take years to break.

The internet is the only thing driving the change I see at the moment and I reckon it will be locked down sooner or later. You can bet there are already major campaigns to push people back into their boxes being pushed out their on the web already.

Writing to MPs I think is actually a waste of time. Replacing them should be the ultimate objective.

[John White]

Try him on 911pressfortruth

[xmasdale]

[Pikey]

Well done Martin your efforts deserved better. This stonewalling from the press and politicians is consistent and representative of the reality......a totally dysfunctional democratic and free society.

[Pikey]

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=4687

[TimmyG]

i like what you said there pikey.
spot on


has anyone else received letters from Ian Pearson (foreign minister) after contacting their local mp?
it would be interesting to see what he's said to other people

[mkpdavies]

[jason67]

[/quote]

I think Swizerland are close to being an ideal model and the fact they have no terror problems, no war problem, no real enemies are wealthy, happy and have a strong democracy says it all for me.[/quote]

I have never understood why Hitler didnt touch switzerland during the second world war. Just because they said they were neutral??? I'm sure alot of countries were 'neutral' but Hitler invaded anyway. So why leave Switzerland alone?

[Andrew]

Probably something to do with Switzerland being central to Nazi finances - Google the "Bank of International Settlements" and also look at the work of Antony Sutton.

Here's a link:

http://reformed-theology.org/html/books/wall_street/chapter_01.htm#B.I .S.%20The%20Apex%20of%20Control