911 Eyewitness dvd/video

[Pikey]

Hi 911 Truth seekers,

Ally wrote:-

[Ally]

Those pyroclastic flows are revealing ;->

Any Sherlock's want a copy let me ken, will be next week tho.

[xmasdale]

We watched the first half of it at the London group meeting on Monday. We had two newcomers present. The newcomers said it didn't at all explain what we were about, and one of them said she was very confused about what we are about.

We came to the conclusion that it's a good movie for those already acquainted with the main evidence, but is not a good movie with which to introduce the topic to people.

Noel

[Ally]

I disagree with your conclusion, the film focuses solely on one aspect (WTC demolition) and doesn't rely on conjecture. It is aimed at a more intelligent adult audience which is probably a challenge for the ignorant masses. Rick made a fantastic flick.

[sonic]

Ally I would appreciate a copy.

Thanks

Sonic

[Pikey]

Xmasdale wrote:-

[Garrett Cooke]

Ally,

I have watched a stremed low quality version and was generally very impressed. I would appreciate DVD version if you have one available.

Garrett

[Ally]

Hey Gareth PM your address. It's on its way for all who asked, anybody else want it on DVD let me know.

[sonic]

Got the DVD "911 Eyewitness" yesterday Ally, thank you.

I think this is an amazing recording by Rick Siegal.

I have to say that this is the best I have seen yet from a viewpoint of considering how WTC1, 2 and 7 were brought down and I have seen so many DVD's on this subject, probably everything in the 911 truthseekers circuit.

Towards the end Rick is weeping. Here we have someone from the actual locality who realises what many people don't want to face up to. The reality that the "Official Version" of the events of 911 are not true at all. We have all been lied to in a very big way.

I urge everyone who has not seen it to watch this DVD and share it with others.

At last a good (very scientific) piece with audio of the explosions (adn analysis) taking place. I gained a clearer understanding than ever, that this was a planned demolition of these buildings. To some degree, I felt as though I was there, just across the bay watching it all happen. It made the hairs on the back of my neck stand up.

As I watched the film, I was both sad and angry to have my feelings and suspicions confirmed, that the people in the towers, most certainly all of those below the fire areas, and I guess many above as well as the brave the rescue services, all of these folk, could so easily have been alive and well and here today. Yet, the evildoers behind these attacks had all along coldly calculated that they were going to let them all die in order to further their own evil and long term goals.

The truth will prevail in the end, and we we should all hope and pray for eventual justice for these poor folks who were so cruelly blown to little pieces, most likely by their own kindred.

Sonic

[xmasdale]

I was not trying to knock the 911 Eyewitness movie, merely to point out the kind of audience I think it is most suitable for: those already suspicious to some degree that the 911 attacks were an inside job.

It's a good movie, but it has a specific role IMHO

Noel

[paul wright]

Yeah - the explosions sound evidence on this movie is particularly good as is the helicopter #4 manouevres with the accompanying strange flashes
The little bit of flashes material here is extremely important taken in conjunction with the other well-known flash evidence
Also the posit of nuke blasts being involved in consideration of the long-lasting, month-long, pool of molten steel involved

[jake]

911 Eyewitness is the film that really did it for me in terms of believing that 9-11 was an inside job. the other films I'd seen - "painful questions", "in plane site" and "loose change" - all do a good job of questioning the official 911 story, but also make claims that are themselves highly questionable - certainly to people who believe that the official story is true.

911 Eyewitness just replays the actual video and audio of the towers burning and collapsing in NYC on 9-11 as recorded by Rick Siegal's camera - and then analyses the footage scientifically to show how certain characteristics of the collapses can only be explained by controlled demolition.

for example the film shows how the collapse of the south tower breaches of all 3 of newton's laws of motion, as well as demonstrating conclusively that building 7 collapses at freefall speed.

the audio of explosions prior to the collapses followed by smoke rising from the base of the buildings and the stuff about the pyroclastic flows is amazing.

it's also spooky to watch all those helicopters circling around the top of the burning towers at such regular intervals - sometimes within feet of people reaching out of broken windows in the north tower - but making no attempt to rescue anybody. plus there's the one that hovers for a considerable time over the top of the south tower (with the mysterious flashes) and then departs just before the tower collapses....

I found the whole thing compelling and conclusive.

[Wokeman]

Rick Siegal's low key and minimalist presentation is very effective:

"The building was burning away. There was no sign it was going down, just black smoke. They're designed not to fall - they're designed not to blow over. They're saying they fell because of the fire. They didn't fall. That doesn't make sense!"

"This is where they hit! There were guys 20 miles out. Fighter jets, hey! I shoulda been thrilled. I don't feel thrilled. Where were you guys? You wanna stand up for it, but you can't stand up for that. Where were you?

The DVD was brilliantly produced and its impact overpowering. We must make millions of copies of this revealing record. No one after seeing it can ever again continue to believe the official lies about buildings falling down because of fire. You can hear the explosions, boom after boom, after boom

[paul wright]

Three little things that this film raises for me on a second viewing-
The 'Mission accomplished' put up on screen after helicopter #4 does its business - according to Siegal having dropped a line on WTC1 whilst hovering above and then the flashes as it moves on - unless I'm mistaken there is no conjecture as to the nature of the 'mission' as far as I can perceive unless I missed something - perhaps because the nature of the movie is conjectureless. Any ideas?
Second the showing of that de Martini (?) clip, the Projects and Construction Manager filmed by the History channel in January 01,missing since 9/11 saying that the buildings could take multiple jet hits because these hits given the mesh-like steel girder structure of the buldings would be like a pencil penetrating mosquito netting. Now the analogy would be fine if we neglect the wings. Like the wings situation is fine as regards the Pentagon. If the story were real, we ought to find them strewn on the Pentagon lawn.
Yet with regard to the WTC2 in particular we find that a 'winged pencil' can penetrate the girder mesh complete and without shearing leaving its perfect imprint as an entry hole. The most familiar videos of the entry of this plane into the WTC2 building appear to ignore Newton's 3rd Law of Motion as explained in this movie
Third, this film gives the most perfect I've seen of that spire of central core girders swaying after the completion of the demolition of WTC1. Now I've watched the clip of these girders in slow-motion and zoomed in, and Siegal mentions this scene - he says 'why do they go down like that'
but if you look they don't just go down in a mysterious way.
Rather starting primarily from the bottom of the screen they start to self-pulverise from the bottom of the screen up towards the top until the topmost drops as part-remaining solid suddenly transforming into a whisp of dust. And this well after the downward pressure of the building or any explosive force could exert an influence on these huge girders
They self-destruct?

[jake]

[paul wright]

Very revealing, Jake, revealing what exactly?
I'm pleased that one other person in the universe shares this perception
That cold steel has been zapped with something so extreme that it kind of carbonises rather than melts or something?
That there is some other force additional to the well-demonstrated detonations that continues to create the same instantaneous entropy in these girders as appears to have been exerted over the whole mix of concrete steel and human bodies just previously?

[jake]

I just don't get it....

just after the initial collapse a substantial portion of the central core can still be seen up to a height well above the nearby WTC7.

it then rapidly breaks up - and one group of core columns snaps off and falls to the left, and immediately afterwards another group of columns falls in a direction that's more towards the camera, while others are just pushed over towards the right - and then what remains (the "spire") is taken out from below somehow - it just sinks slowly down into the smoke....

I think this footage is amazing, and I'm not sure how to explain this disintegration of the core - but seeing "911 eyewitness" has prompted me to get the second edition of "Loose change". I should be receiving that next week along with 2 other dvds I've never seen before - "aftermath: unanswered questions from 9/11" (from the guerilla news network) and "the great conspiracy" (by barrie zwicker) - which will hopefully give me a few more things to think about....

[paul wright]

This might also be of interest to you Jake
http://www.cloakanddagger.de/shows/webcast/_new_August/_cloakanddagger .de_stefan_i.mp3
Also
http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com/

[jake]

cheers for the info - I'm going away for a few days but I'll check it out (along with the dvds) when I get back....