FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

What Did Britain Know About 911?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> General
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
TRUTH
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 15 Feb 2006
Posts: 376

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 11:38 am    Post subject: What Did Britain Know About 911? Reply with quote

One of the many perplexing things about the events that unfolded on the day of September 11 last year was the rapid speed at which British Prime Minister Tony Blair drew his own conclusions about the nature of the attacks. His all but his instant offering of completely unqualified support for the Bush administration was remarkable.

For some it seemed that a more reassuring approach would have been to allow a delay of a day or two to receive Foreign Office and intelligence briefings - in order to fully consider what was believed to have happened, who was behind it, and what should be the appropriate response.

One eminent foreign policy expert warned the next day that Britain's immediate pledge to stand 'shoulder to shoulder' with America in the aftermath of the attacks could have far-reaching implications for foreign relations. Professor Bulmer-Thomas, Director of London's Royal Institute of International Affairs, told the BBC 12 September that the consequences of offering such strong support for potential US retaliation could not be accurately gauged at such an early stage: "The danger is they do it far too early, before the facts are in."

By contrast, however, Blair gave the impression of being a man who did not need any briefings. Was this because, unbeknown to the rest of us, Blair already knew in advance exactly what the score was?

http://www.btinternet.com/~nlpwessex/Documents/WATbritain911.htm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ally
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 04 Aug 2005
Posts: 909
Location: banned

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 12:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A massive UK military 'exercise' was being held in the weeks prior to 911, was a handy pitstop to launch the invasion of Afghanistan over the coming months.

"Preparations are currently under way for one of the largest ever British military exercises in the Gulf"


A strong naval force is also already on its way to the Gulf region - some 24 surface ships in all, together with two submarines.
Among the vessels are the aircraft carrier HMS Illustrious, with both Navy Sea Harriers and RAF Harrier GR7s on board, the helicopter carrier HMS Ocean and the assault ship HMS Fearless.
Royal Marines from 3 Commando Brigade will be staging landings on the Omani coast and over 30 combat aircraft are also due to take part in the exercise, which extends through to October.


Last edited by Ally on Sat Sep 30, 2006 12:14 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SHERITON HOTEL
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 988

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 12:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We've had no comment from our 'dear leader' about the fact the FBI have no hard evidence to link Osama Bin Ladin with the events of 9/11.As we all know, he was flitting round the globe, like Bush's foreign secretary, telling any world leader who'd listen to him that he had 'smoking gun' intelligence(snigger) that proved OBL was guilty of planning and ordering the attacks.

He's gotten his 'thingy caught in his flies' so many times by slavishly toeing the Washington line, you'd think he'd learn WMD, Saddam400K plus mass graves...etc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ally
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 04 Aug 2005
Posts: 909
Location: banned

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 12:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Saif Sareea is a massive exercise involving 23,000 British military personnel and 14,000 Omanies.
It has been years in the planning, but no one could have predicted that the recent terrorist attacks would make it so important.


see also
Saif Sareea

The presence of such a large military force in the Middle East gave United Kingdom and United States commanders important assets for conducting the war against the Taliban government in Afghanistan, the UK contribution to which was known as Operation Veritas.


Last edited by Ally on Sat Sep 30, 2006 12:29 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bratcat808
Minor Poster
Minor Poster


Joined: 25 Sep 2006
Posts: 34
Location: Tiny rock in big water

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 12:28 pm    Post subject: Re: What Did Britain Know About 911? Reply with quote

TRUTH wrote:
One of the many perplexing things about the events that unfolded on the day of September 11 last year was the rapid speed at which British Prime Minister Tony Blair drew his own conclusions about the nature of the attacks. His all but his instant offering of completely unqualified support for the Bush administration was remarkable.

For some it seemed that a more reassuring approach would have been to allow a delay of a day or two to receive Foreign Office and intelligence briefings - in order to fully consider what was believed to have happened, who was behind it, and what should be the appropriate response.

One eminent foreign policy expert warned the next day that Britain's immediate pledge to stand 'shoulder to shoulder' with America in the aftermath of the attacks could have far-reaching implications for foreign relations. Professor Bulmer-Thomas, Director of London's Royal Institute of International Affairs, told the BBC 12 September that the consequences of offering such strong support for potential US retaliation could not be accurately gauged at such an early stage: "The danger is they do it far too early, before the facts are in."

By contrast, however, Blair gave the impression of being a man who did not need any briefings. Was this because, unbeknown to the rest of us, Blair already knew in advance exactly what the score was?

http://www.btinternet.com/~nlpwessex/Documents/WATbritain911.htm


Considering the far reaching scope of this event, and the 'complicity' I see possible in my own government, it is not impossible to consider that other high level officials across the globe might also be involved to some degree. I am not saying I have any reason to suspect or believe that Blair was involved, but the possibility remains, given the alliance he so strongly advocates.

Blair may change his devotion to Bush (for his own political gain) if the growing trend of disbelief and faith in the current administration in the US continues to gain momentum. Recent passage of two bills by our congress that supersede the Constitution and basic freedoms Bush claims to be advocating in his "war on terror", will get more people to notice this trend of "Do as I say, not as I do!" and back away from supporting the "US led Military War on Terrorism". IMO, this would be a good thing, despite the negatives, because there would be more call for accountability in all of this, and under real and persistent pressure, the truth WILL prevail.

and BTW.. don't look behind the curtain.. there is nothing of interest there! The great Wizard of Oz has spoken! Shocked Laughing Twisted Evil

_________________
9/11 Truth


"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." T. Jefferson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
IronSnot
Relentless Limpet Shill
Relentless Limpet Shill


Joined: 07 Jul 2006
Posts: 595
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 1:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I suspect other governments were also involved but as for the British, I'm absloutely certain they were. Whether this was at the Blair level (not the highest office in the land) I'm not sure. But if it wasn't then he's remiss in not making sure he was appraised of it. So he's either complicit or not good at this job.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
chek
Mega Poster
Mega Poster


Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 1:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

IronSnot wrote:
I suspect other governments were also involved but as for the British, I'm absloutely certain they were. Whether this was at the Blair level (not the highest office in the land) I'm not sure. But if it wasn't then he's remiss in not making sure he was appraised of it. So he's either complicit or not good at this job.


I'm not certain that there is any other way to see this other than that collaborators have been seeded into other governments over time.

Blair here, Harper in Canada and Howard in Australia; (the main US allies)
all essentially right-wing hijackings of the traditionally (if only relatively) 'progressive' political parties in those countries;
all towing the war line against the wishes of the majority of their own people.

It might lead a reasonable person to speculate that an agenda only given legitimacy by the mythical War on (although I prefer 'of') Terror is obviously being adhered to.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wokeman
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 881
Location: Woking, Surrey, UK

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 6:39 pm    Post subject: "Put" options Reply with quote

A "put" option is a leveraged bet that a stock price is going to fall precipitously (a "call" option is the opposite bet). One option covers 100 shares of a given stock and usually has an expiry date of four months. For a very small investment — sometimes a dollar a share — a speculator can purchase the right to sell a stock at a fixed price during the contract period even though he doesn't have to own the stock when the option is placed. So if one were to place a put option contract on American Airlines at $30 per share and the stock fell to $18 a share a few days or a few weeks later, one could go out and purchase one hundred shares at $18 and sell them immediately at $30 per share netting a $12 profit per share or $1,200. This is what happened on a far larger scale and with many companies around the world on 9/11.

Insider trading, or suspicious trades indicating possible 9/11 foreknowledge, were reported in the USA, Germany, BRITAIN, Canada, Japan, (8 times above normal level on the Osaka exchange) Switzerland, Hong Kong, France, Italy, Spain, Belgium, Luxembourg and Singapore. Official investigations were announced in eight of those countries. Details of international trades have not been disclosed, but shares of American companies are routinely purchased through foreign exchanges.
Mike Ruppet, quoted in CROSSING THE RUBICON

According to Cleveland Plain Dealer's Jonathan Schrader:
While trading fluctuations happen all the time for no apparent reason, it seems there's certainly something here. It's interesting that they thought they could get away with it.
Back to Mike Ruppert: Indeed, no one could hope to get away with it unless they controlled all the enforcement mechanisms that would be called in afterward.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bratcat808
Minor Poster
Minor Poster


Joined: 25 Sep 2006
Posts: 34
Location: Tiny rock in big water

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 8:56 pm    Post subject: Re: "Put" options Reply with quote

Wokeman wrote:
Back to Mike Ruppert: Indeed, no one could hope to get away with it unless they controlled all the enforcement mechanisms that would be called in afterward.


Since this seems like such a reasonable thing to be addressed, who is responsible for investigating stock fraud?

_________________
9/11 Truth


"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." T. Jefferson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
chek
Mega Poster
Mega Poster


Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 9:07 pm    Post subject: Re: "Put" options Reply with quote

bratcat808 wrote:
Wokeman wrote:
Back to Mike Ruppert: Indeed, no one could hope to get away with it unless they controlled all the enforcement mechanisms that would be called in afterward.


Since this seems like such a reasonable thing to be addressed, who is responsible for investigating stock fraud?


Similar to the same people who run the drug trade that they also enforce - the intelligence agencies.
In the case of US stocks, the SEC (lost a lot of info in WTC7) and the FBI (ditto).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
IronSnot
Relentless Limpet Shill
Relentless Limpet Shill


Joined: 07 Jul 2006
Posts: 595
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 12:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

chek wrote:
Blair here, Harper in Canada and Howard in Australia; (the main US allies)
all essentially right-wing hijackings of the traditionally (if only relatively) 'progressive' political parties in those countries;

Howard is the leader of the Liberal Party, which despite the name is just a Tory party.

Howard was in Washington DC on 9/11, and there's an interesting story about late changes to travel arrangments associated with his visit there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> General All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group