WTC7 Just an idea

[Charliemouse]

Building 7 held some very important documentation within the files of the most sencitive organisations America has, Every country has buildings which hold sencitive information and they are closly guarded.
What would you do if a building such as this was sudenly stormed by some obscure but angry grupe?. Bring it down with a controled explosion perhaps?, I wouldnt be suprised if other such systems exist in other buildings in the US. A capability like that would have to be cept a secret because who would feel compfortable working in a place like that.
Building 7 was vulnerable and empty when it was pulled.

Who sold the world traid centre complex to Silverthingy and how much did they make?. atleast he insured them, i would have. Most of the money seems to have been lost by the insurance company which seems odd if they are so close to the big money men. Silverwatsits' buildings were distroyed.

I expect ill get a good barating for this but it is chritics corner and without a satisfactory explanation from on high we are all left to flayle in the dark.

Also It would be nice to know how a skinny little missile took down all those lamp posts although acording to the hole in the side of the pentagon the missile was 14ft in diamiter, measure 14 ft out, its a gigantic missile i,m suprised anything was left at all. the hole in Malosavich's bedroom window seems much smaller.

Also a recent story in a paper i dare not mention reported a hijaking whare the hijacker simply forcefully followed a hostess through the cocpit entrance door as she was surving food to the crew (tailgating). He said a bomb was on board and he said he had acomplaces, Nither of which was true but they did what he said anyway, He was unarmed.

I havnt got a clue how to explain alot of the issues raised on theese sites but the truth is usualy stranger than fiction.

[telecasterisation]

[Charliemouse]

I can asure you i know who i am. My spelling is worse than * i know but the ideas are still sound.
Are you sure of who you are sir?

Thanks for replyying anyway.

[aggle-rithm]

[Charliemouse]

And you don't think the raging fires and threat of immenent collapse were enough to keep obscure but angry groups out?

As we saw the fires were very small and steel buildings have never collapsed
before

Good point though

[chek]

Don't ask me where on earth I heard it, so it is completely anecdotal, but I recall someone claiming that after the 1993 attack, the WTC was setup for demolition should the need arise again in the event of another attack.

Now I admit I have no idea of the shelf life of explosives, I have no idea what liability that would place you under in as far as duty of care to the occupants, and I'm willing to bet every insurance company in the world would laugh you out the door.

At the time I recalled it as being a bit too convenient, not to mention outlandishly crazy, but I just thought I'd mention it here.

[Charliemouse]

Perhaps the WTCs collapsed too soon for some reason. Just maby we are witnessing an almughty fowl-up on the scale of Perl Harbour and everyone in the know is hiding under thair desks with thair hands over their heads because 3000 people died.

[aggle-rithm]

[chek]

[SHERITON HOTEL]

Wasn't this idea important buildings built in rigged for CD in that Mel Gibson film 'Concpiracy Theorist'?

[Bushwacker]

[Ignatz]

[chek]

[quote="Ignatz"]