| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
graphicequaliser
Moderate Poster
Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Posts: 111
Location: United Kingdom
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 10:15 am Post subject: Even better than "No Planes" theory |
 |
|
"Nothing at all" theory
Looking at the above gif of plane entry into the building, and the lack of plane deceleration except when wholly enclosed within the unscathed tower, I put it to you that these "planes" were not there at all - they were advanced tech holographic projections with bad sound effects (possibly done by the helicopter). The explosion seems to come from the centre of the tower after the plane has "sat" in there for several frames! I don't even reckon any missiles were used. Nothing at all apart from holographic projections.
Pros
You plant the plane debris yourself. That way you can claim it was a passenger jet without arousing suspicions.
No room for error. A pretend plane cannot miss the target. If real planes had missed their targets, what would they have done with all those explosives inside the towers? You can't detonate them if there was no plane impact, unless you're Larry Silverstein at WTC7! 
No people to compromise the lies told to the sheeple.
No hijackers or onboard fights with tough pilots.
Cons
High-tech holographic projection techniques required.
No real corpse bits to identify passengers aboard the flights from.
Lack of damage to surrounding area, for example, the Pentagon lawn.
To conclude, it was a clever high-tech crime, that was executed poorly by the perps, and left us with lots of clues to pin it on them. To me, it is amazing that we are still arguing about what Larry meant when he said "Pull it." when it is so obvious he wanted WTC7 down, with all the insurance covering it. He paid $3.2bn for the WTC complex, and got $7bn back in insurance claims.
Perhaps you lot can think of other factlets that fit this theory better than any other.
_________________
Patriotism, religion, tradition and political/corporate alliance are the vehicles they use to fool us passive, peace-loving, family-orientated apes into fighting each other.
Graphic  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
THETRUTHWILLSETU3
9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 1009
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's the problem Graphic - most of the users of this site believe that on 9/11 the laws of physics ceased to existed and planes could literally ghost into buildings?
They have also offered no explanation why ALL the footage is fuzzy and why there was no wreckage falling to the ground after impact.
Graphic your wasted on this site - they don't deserve your contribution |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bicnarok
Moderate Poster
Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 334
Location: Cydonia
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nice gif.
You tend to forget that there is a lot of footage from various angles and places of the plane hitting this tower.
| Quote: |
The explosion seems to come from the centre of the tower after the plane has "sat" in there for several frames!
|
this doesn´t mean that no plane hit the building. Firstly the "several" frames delay doesn´t coincide with the time frame because the gif has been slowed down a lot. The plane hi the building the explosion in REAL TIME happened in a reasonable time frame afterwards. Secondly maybe the explosion wasn´t cause by the plane but the demolition units which were installed prior to the event.
_________________
"Emancipate yourself from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free our mind..." Bod Marley |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DarrenUK
Minor Poster
Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 12
Location: England
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Any theory with "no-planes" is pointless, sorry. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation
Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | That's the problem Graphic - most of the users of this site believe that on 9/11 the laws of physics ceased to existed and planes could literally ghost into buildings?
They have also offered no explanation why ALL the footage is fuzzy and why there was no wreckage falling to the ground after impact.
Graphic your wasted on this site - they don't deserve your contribution |
I am unsure if your response is sarcastic or not? If not, do you discount the aero engine that landed in Murray St?
_________________
I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
THETRUTHWILLSETU3
9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 1009
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Telly wrote
I am unsure if your response is sarcastic or not? If not, do you discount the aero engine that landed in Murray St?
No sarcasm Telly just my thoughts - have you got a link to the engine? - is it a Boeing Engine? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation
Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | Telly wrote
I am unsure if your response is sarcastic or not? If not, do you discount the aero engine that landed in Murray St?
No sarcasm Telly just my thoughts - have you got a link to the engine? - is it a Boeing Engine? |
Yes to Boeing. Although the model has thrown up all kinds of questions.
http://www.rense.com/general64/wth.htm
There are other sources if Rense doesn't really float your boat. I am surprised you ask for a link though as this is old and well trodden ground.
_________________
I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
James C
Major Poster
Joined: 26 Jan 2006
Posts: 1046
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | That's the problem Graphic - most of the users of this site believe that on 9/11 the laws of physics ceased to existed and planes could literally ghost into buildings?
They have also offered no explanation why ALL the footage is fuzzy and why there was no wreckage falling to the ground after impact.
Graphic your wasted on this site - they don't deserve your contribution |
TTWSU3, excellent evidence has been posted by many on lots of occasions so far and you know it. The fact is you choose to ignore it for your own purposes of creating disinformation and confusion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
James C
Major Poster
Joined: 26 Jan 2006
Posts: 1046
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | That's the problem Graphic - most of the users of this site believe that on 9/11 the laws of physics ceased to existed and planes could literally ghost into buildings?
They have also offered no explanation why ALL the footage is fuzzy and why there was no wreckage falling to the ground after impact.
Graphic your wasted on this site - they don't deserve your contribution |
TTWSU3, excellent evidence has been posted by many on lots of occasions so far and you know it. The fact is you choose to ignore it for your own purposes of creating disinformation and confusion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ally
Moderate Poster
Joined: 04 Aug 2005
Posts: 909
Location: banned
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bicnarok wrote: | | The plane hi the building the explosion in REAL TIME happened in a reasonable time frame afterwards. Secondly maybe the explosion wasn´t cause by the plane but the demolition units which were installed prior to the event. |
yes but the the system which caught it in 'real time' is the same which prints the american football grids on fields during live matches. go figure....
WESCAM |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ally
Moderate Poster
Joined: 04 Aug 2005
Posts: 909
Location: banned
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 8:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
play first square - another interesting
WITNESS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
