Missiles and the poor sod on Question Time

[Ally]

No Plane Video



"That wasn't a plane"

"It was a rocket it something"

"It didn't go all the way in, it zinged it....."

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

Yet again - the camera very conveniently zoomed out so that the impact is fuzzy. Whatever there is no plane!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[ComfortablyNumb]

At that distance neither witnesses could discern the shape. it's a probability they could only see the fuselage at that distance. Both witnesses would have been focussing on WTC1, thus the plane would have just been in their peripheral vision for a split second.

What this footage does prove however, is there was no CGI, no hologram. There was a physical object that hit the tower. There is a frame or who that shows a dark mass in the sky prior to the explosion.

So much for only a dozen witnesses!

[Ally]

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

There was a physical object that hit the tower. There is a frame or who that shows a dark mass in the sky prior to the explosion.



Please show us the frame

[ComfortablyNumb]

Fair question.

Here are a set of frames from 15 sec approx in. I've taken it from the YouTube footage so it is obviously heavily compressed. I can't confirm the first 3 frames are sequential as I was using the pause button. The last frame is there as reference of the initial impact. I also used the top of the bridge (in front of WTC) as reference.

If you watch the footage focussing on that area you will see movement recorded in line with the explosion. My only caveat is that the footage is heavily compressed and this could be a result of that.

[Banish]

Calling the jpg image by the title "plane.jpg" was a nice touch.

[Briaman]

You're absolutely right Banish - there's no clear image of a plane flying into the towers in the pictures above.

There's also no clear images of the towers themselves - just couple of fuzzy rectangles. The towers themselves would have to be proper 3d objects which would mean that they must have sides however the blobs shown here seem to be missing their sides. The blobs are also clearly out of all proportion to the surrounding blobs. This unequivocal evidence clearly indicates that not only were the planes photoshopped onto the screen - the towers were too. The real towers must have been dismantled earlier if indeed they ever existed. The few 'survivors' who say that they were in the towers on the day or lost relatives there are obviously just establishment shills.

I call this the no-towers theory and invite you all to discuss it freely alongside the no-planes theory. It's an important theory because if true it constitutes undeniable proof that the whole thing was part of a conspiracy. Of course - I can't prove that its true. But you can't prove that its not true and I'm so certain of the rightness of this idea that I'll call anyone who says otherwise a blind fool or an establishment shill / zionist pig / lizard lover / or something else equally constructive.

This is all a bit too much for me so I'm going to wipe the foam from my mouth and go and have a lie down.

[ComfortablyNumb]

Ok ya right, I cant say its a plane cos it just a line of dark pixels. I named the file with a smile on my face so ya got me there Banish. However, there is definite movement of something on the same level to where the tower was struck approx 15secs into the film.

I'm grateful for your post Briaman as I gives me the opportunity to explain why I'm so anti the 'no planes' theory.

You stated

[ComfortablyNumb]