prole art threat Validated Poster
Joined: 13 Apr 2006 Posts: 804 Location: London Town
|
Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 3:10 pm Post subject: The 9/11 Myth: Collective Schizophrenia |
|
|
'Received opinion in the United States has come to regard the official version of the events of 9/11, that is to say the 9/11 myth, as normal. Those who doubt the veracity of the official, mythical account are likely to be accused of being mentally imbalanced, and possibly paranoid. In this chapter we will seek to turn the tables on the official mythographs and their gullible followers. We have already discussed some of the fantastic, contradictory, and absurd features of the official myth. We now turn our attention to the problem of why the myth has been accepted by so many people, especially in the English - speaking world.
Our conclusion is that readiness to believe the myth is correlated with a mental outlook which can only be described as schizophrenic and autistic. In other words there is something more than fear and stress at work. The resulting outlook operates not just at the level of individuals, but also in the Anglo-American culture as a whole. To do justice to this dangerous but fascinating phenomenon, we must venture into the fields of psychology and psychoanalysis to develop a familiarity with some of the main features of schizophrenic and autistic thinking. This will allow us to evaluate the 9/11 myth as a product of troubled and clouded thinking, and will also shed light on the role of the main purveyor of the myth, G.W. Bush.
The impact of the myth on American life and on the psychology of individual citizens has not been sufficiently studied by psychologists, since most of them also worship at the shrine of the myth. But in a general way, it is possible to see that the prevalence of the myth reflects a mass psychopathology of delusion and fake consciousness, a turning away from reality into a politics of myth. The United States is well on it's way under the second Bush regime to becoming an autistic power, estranged and alienated from surrounding reality. This poses the question: why does anybody believe the official story of 9/11, with all of it's absurdities? What explains the power of the myth?
Countries which have chosen to build their polity upon myth have generally fared poorly. The classical example is of course German Nazism, whose leaders openly rejected reality in favour of a fantastic world of Germanic and Wagnerian heroes and monsters. The politics of modern Serbia, which has seen defeats dating back to the fourteenth century as more real and more relevant than the economic realities of today, are another example. Unless the 9/11 myth can be deconstructed and demystified, we will soon experience many more of the unpleasant effects of mythical politics here in the United States.'
- Taken from '9/11 Synthetic Terror' by Webster Griffin Tarpley _________________ 'Maybe if I can show some lurking kids that this is all a pack of lies, then maybe I can make a difference. I don't plan on converting any of you because you're all mad.'
-Johnny Pixels |
|
chipmunk stew Moderate Poster
Joined: 19 Jul 2006 Posts: 833
|
Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 6:11 pm Post subject: Re: The 9/11 Myth: Collective Schizophrenia |
|
|
prole art threat wrote: | 'Our conclusion is that readiness to believe the myth is correlated with a mental outlook which can only be described as schizophrenic and autistic. In other words there is something more than fear and stress at work. The resulting outlook operates not just at the level of individuals, but also in the Anglo-American culture as a whole. To do justice to this dangerous but fascinating phenomenon, we must venture into the fields of psychology and psychoanalysis to develop a familiarity with some of the main features of schizophrenic and autistic thinking. This will allow us to evaluate the 9/11 myth as a product of troubled and clouded thinking, and will also shed light on the role of the main purveyor of the myth, G.W. Bush. '
- Taken from '9/11 Synthetic Terror' by Webster Griffin Tarpley |
Does Mr. Tarpley go on to examine these features and how they relate to the 9/11 myth, or does he merely continue on with his hollow generalizations and vapid analysis? |
|