| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Me
Moderate Poster
Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 431
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 10:38 am Post subject: Kill The Messenger |
 |
|
This looks great!
It’s the story of former FBI translator Sibel Edmunds (now whistleblower) and her battle to expose fraud, high crimes and cover-ups within the government, particularly in the FBI. One issue confronted appears to be (R) Dennis Hastert (Speaker of the House) and his acceptance of Turkish bribes. Hastert was apparently affectionately known by the Turks as “Dennyboy”. I guess it’s something like “Bandar Bush“? She has also been instrumental in the struggle to connect the dots about 9/11 even despite Ashcroft and others best attempts to shut her up. They clearly underestimated her sheer determination and drive. Thank the Lord for people like her who still care about this country. At least what’s left of it.
About it:
link
See the trailer here:
http://justacitizen.com/KillTheMessenger.html
Last edited by Me on Tue Oct 31, 2006 10:58 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Me
Moderate Poster
Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 431
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 10:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
You Can Be The Judge Of This One
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52680
Assassinate half of Congress, urges Web-radio hatemonger
'If you re-elect people who have committed these wrongs against us … then we may have to simply kill them!'
| Quote: | An anti-Semitic white supremacist who conducts an Internet radio show says if Americans return incumbents to Washington in the Nov. 7 election, he may just have to assassinate them.
Hal Turner describes himself as "outspoken, opinionated and brutally blunt." The biography on his website says he was a registered Republican until this month, when he changed his registration to unaffiliated.
If that's true, he has fallen hard and fast from the Republican ranks.
"As the November 7 Election approaches, I decided to write a few lines to my fellow Americans about the state of our nation and the ugliness that may have to occur if the people who caused these problems are re-elected: They may have to be assassinated," he writes in his Oct. 27 screed.
Just so there can be no mistaking his intentions, Turner repeats his premise several times and even offers fairly detailed plans involving five-men strike forces to carry out their wet work in wiping out half the U.S. Congress and at least three members of the Supreme Court.
(Story continues below)
In his "Last Chance America" plea, he also says: "If you re-elect the same people who have gotten us into the mess we're in, folks like me may have to assassinate them!"
Turner lists his beefs with the government:
* curtailment of political speech through campaign finance law restrictions;
* killing innocent people in Iraq;
* that members of Congress don't read the legislation they pass;
* that elected officials ignore the will of the people;
* that politicians lie to get themselves elected;
* spending is breaking the nation's financial back;
* disapproves of USA Patriot Act and Military Commissions Act of 2006;
* eminent domain ruling jeopardizing property rights.
"All these things took place right under your nose, but YOU have done NOTHING about it," says Turner. "Well, you may be willing to give up YOUR rights, but folks like me will not allow you to give away OUR rights. … So again I say, if you re-elect the people who have committed these wrongs against us and our Constitution, then we may have to simply kill them!"
WND screen shot of Hal Turner's website promoting assassination
Turner evidently believes the time is right for a violent overthrow of the federal government because the U.S. military is so overextended around the world it would not be in a position to defend officials.
"In watching the military campaigns of the past 25 years, I have come to admire 'surgical strikes,'" he writes. "When force is applied in a specific, limited way, the results can be magnificent. Such is my HYPOTHETICAL thinking for our present circumstance."
He poses the hypothetical scenario that half the members of Congress represent "problems" – a total of 267. He also sees at least three "problems" on the Supreme Court.
"Imagine if you will, teams of 5 committed citizens each, who were fed up with these 'problems,'" he writes of the assassination squads he envisions. He says it can be done with just 1,350 "committed citizens."
"Do you think that in America, a nation of 300,000,000 people, there are 1,350 committed citizens willing to put it all on the line to 'correct' these 'problems' and thus save the nation?" he asks. "I do," he answers.
Turner even has a name for his kind of political mass murder: "It could be called 'patriotic assassination,'" he writes.
He says these teams of super-patriot hitmen would gather information on the assigned targets – learning "daily schedules, public appearances, travel routes to and from work, etc. ... Once the data was collected and analyzed a time and date could be set for 'solving' these 'problems.'"
"Then, one night, perhaps in the wee hours of the morning, these HYPOTHETICAL heavily armed teams of five committed citizens each, would move," he continues. "I envision a surgically precise, lightning strike: Front doors kicked-in, entry, locating the target, solving the problem and out within 90 seconds. Within minutes, all 270 'problems' would be 'solved.'"
He explains that since most of the "problems" live in and around Washington, "the local police would be overwhelmed immediately and unable to respond to all the calls for help. This means only a limited police response and limited ability to 'apprehend' anyone. Even if there was a local security detail, taking them out at the start of such an operation wouldn’t be a problem; they would be 'collateral damage.' By the time police from neighboring towns, the county or even the state police were told what was happening, it would be too late. The feds at FBI, ATF, the military, et al would be useless because they too would all arrive long after it was over."
Turner hypothesizes that the president – who is not targeted in this scenario – would "roll over and behave quite nicely" in the aftermath of such a coup.
"Sure some of those involved in such a 'corrective action' may be arrested, tried, convicted, jailed or even killed during such an operation, but it would have been for a worthwhile endeavor; an effort that would go down in history!" says Turner. "This is not far fetched. It can be done. In my opinion, it might have to be done."
As if to cover his tracks, Turner also says he renounces and repudiates the use of force and violence to affect political change – "for now."
In closing, just remember, you may be willing to live under tyranny, but I am not. You may be willing to give up your rights, but I won't let you give up MY rights.
"I don't want to see such an attack against our government," he concludes. "I have no plans (at this time) to kill anybody. But I can – and I am willing to – if it comes down to it."
The Washington field office of the FBI did not return a phone call about the matter tonight.
Elsewhere, Turner advocates targeting vehicles full of illegal aliens with rifle fire or tire spikes forcing them to crash. He also calls for a meeting in Atlanta featuring Abraham Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League to be disrupted "by any means necessary."
"Let's confront these filthy k---- and all their supporters immediately," he writes. "I wouldn't shed a tear of (sic) that hotel was BOMBED or if someone walked into their meeting hall with fully-automatic firearms and sprayed all of them with bullets. I would laugh if someone firebombed their meeting halls with Molotov Cocktails carried concealed in a coat." |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Me
Moderate Poster
Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 431
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
The kids here in the US are being primed and prepped for the coming police state.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/S/SCHOOL_DRILL?SITE=FLTAM
School Safety Drill Upsets Some Parents
| Quote: | A school safety drill that included police officers in riot gear with weapons has caused concern among some parents who say it was too realistic and frightened some students.
Police in the western Michigan community of Wyoming entered two classrooms at Lee Middle and High School on Thursday and announced there was a threat to the school, The Grand Rapids Press reported.
Students, who were unaware police were conducting a drill, were taken from the classroom into the halls, patted down by officers and asked what they had in their pockets, the newspaper said.
"Some of these kids were so scared, they just about wet their pants," said Marge Bradshaw, a parent with four children in Godfrey-Lee Schools. "I think it's pure wrong that the students and parents were not informed of this."
Officers wore protective gear, including vests and helmets, and carried rifles that were unloaded and marked with colored tape to indicate they were not live weapons, the newspaper said.
Diana Silva, a parent of an eighth-grade student, said the drill went too far.
"My child was with his face to the wall in the hallway of the high school," Silva said. "I certainly don't want anything like this happening to my child."
Principal David Britten said students weren't told ahead of time to make the drill as realistic as possible. Teachers were informed moments before it took place, he said.
Buy AP Photo Reprints
"I think this is the best way to do it," Britten said. "We're not looking to scare anyone, but we want a sense of urgency."
But Wyoming Police Chief James Carmody said his officers were not aware students and parents were not told. He said his department will mandate that parents be notified ahead of time in the future.
"The purpose was to show how we will evacuate the classroom, not to assault the classroom," Carmody said.
© 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Learn more about our Privacy Policy. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Me
Moderate Poster
Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 431
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 11:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.armytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-2274936.php
U.S. Army North up and running
| Quote: |
U.S. Army North, the Army’s newest service component command reached full operational capability Monday, which means that it is fully manned, equipped and ready to assume its mission.
As part of Army transformation, USARNORTH was formed to become the dedicated Army service component command to Northern Command, the unified command responsible for defending the homeland and coordinating defense support of civil authorities.
Located at Fort Sam Houston, Texas, USARNORTH achieved initial operating capability in September 2005, and is responsible for specific missions, including:
• Execute homeland defense and defense support of civil authorities missions.
• Provide training and readiness oversight of certified weapons of mass destruction—civil support teams.
• Conduct the Army-to-Army portion of the theater cooperation mission with Canada and Mexico.
• Coordinate the activities of defense coordinating officers and their elements assigned in each Federal Emergency Management Agency region.
• Organize up to two task forces that, with augmentation, can become joint task forces and deploy within the operational area to command and control Department of Defense forces responding to homeland defense or civil support operations.
For the past 12 months, USARNORTH has been building its organization, readiness and mission capability. USARNORTH officially assumed the Army component command duties from Forces Command on Oct. 1.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bicnarok
Moderate Poster
Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 334
Location: Cydonia
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 9:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Who is getting elected a new president or party?
Sorry for being out of touch.
_________________
"Emancipate yourself from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free our mind..." Bod Marley |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Me
Moderate Poster
Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 431
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | Who is getting elected a new president or party?
Sorry for being out of touch. |
No problem, I'll explain.
2006 (coming up soon) is the elections for Congress. The democrats are looking to gain a majority of seats in the House of Representatives and/or the Senate to 'hopefully' earn the power to start investigating Bush and his administration. I say “hopefully” because lately the democratic party has no balls. The democrats need 15 seats to gain control of the House and 6 seats for Senate. According to the polls, their better chance for victory is in the House even despite needing significantly more seats to attain a majority there. It’s not so much about voting one party in or out rather it’s about shifting the balance of power. The majority party has substantially more power in government from which to call hearings and what not. The minority party can’t really do all that much. As it is, the republicans basically control every branch of the US government. In other words, no balance of power whatsoever. It’s practically a one-party system. Some (like me) would call it fascism.
2008 is for president. If Bush is ever impeached before then, it only means that Dick Cheney becomes president. Many would say that as Bush’s puppet master, he is already president anyway.
Most importantly are the privatized electronic voting machines we have capable of rigging these elections. According to the exit polls, Bush lost in 2004, but the e-voting machines seemed to decide differently. This Bush administration is on the ropes right now and desperate. They know full well that losing their majority could entail multiple criminal investigations against themselves. For this reason they’ll resort to the dirtiest of tactics to retain their power, even cheating.
There is no democracy in the US any longer. I call it a de-mock-racy. Don't be surprised if you read about a lot of upset victories against all odds and much turmoil at the voting booths thanks to malicious vote-switching software.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JESZiLpBLE
| Quote: | Fox News exposes the Princeton report that confirms that Diebold machines cannot be trusted in elections.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
