Prof Jones Vindicated. Bush admits explosives used!

[truthseeker john]

http://www.supportthetruth.com/
http://www.supportthetruth.com/hill.php

http://www.supportthetruth.com/audio/Craig_Hill___Bush_0915_1x60_Versi on_2.mp3

Bush Admits Demolitions?


www.SupportTheTruth.com

George Bush Admits Demolitions?

Craig Hill For Senate

Since they can no longer deny explosives in the building, they're trying to set up a shift in tactics that says "okay, there were explosives but it was Al-Queda that put them there." Get this information out to everone now! Those who already are part of the 911 truth movement need this valuable tool in waking others up. Those who have lived in denial or try to claim there was no demolition will have to take notice.

Most importantly, if you know anyone in the Vermont area please do all that you can to support this messenger of truth. If you don't know anyone in the area, get on a Vermont based blog and support him by educating others in that area. Remember, for an activist, the goal of education is not knowledge but action! We are winning the information war! Take Action!


More Evidence Of Demolitions Weigh in on the debate

So we have Larry Silverstein admitting they "pulled" wtc 7, clearly the term for building demolition, we have wtc 7 falling on its own foot print at near free fall speed, which is impossible without demolitions, we have fema admitting to the sulfidation of wtc metals which is obviously evidence of thermate charges used for demolition, and molten pools of metal 6 weeks after 9-11 which is impossible from jet fuel or burning office furniture to produce, we have plumes ejecting 60 floors below the collapse and pyroclastic flows that have only been observed from volcanic eruptions and demolitions which is more overwhelming evidence of demolitions, we have James Woods reporting Mohamad Atta to airline security for practicing a plane hijacking 2 months befor 9-11, and don't forget that Atta was denied entry into the US untill the CIA informed them the reason he was on the terror list is because he was working undercover as a CIA asset, then Atta was granted entry and trained for piloting at Pensacola Naval Air Station and housed under an FBI landlord (but the government never knew anything), we also have odigo admitting they told people to get out of the building 4 hours befor the impact, and then there is the magic passport of one of the hijackers that miraculously survives unmarked at ground zero (but no one talks about that any more because it proves impossible and therefore it must have been planted by people with prior knowledge trying to set a trail, so your just suppose to forget about it and not ask questions), we have pnac stating they would need a new pearl harbor to sell an imperialistic war, and then there's the pentagon running drills of hijacked jets being flown into the world trade centers at the exact same time as the real hijacking, (gee, what a perfect coincidental excuse to get NORAD to stand down for hours and neutralize real patriots from acting in defense of this nation), and now we have George Bush trying to imply that it was Al Queda that put the explosives in the wtc builings where Marvin Bush ran security (and the list goes on and on and ...).

The conclusion is irrefutable to anyone not living in total denial of the facts. The world trade center buildings were brought down by demolitions! and 911 was an inside job to sell wars to the American people. Any one who believes the "coincidence theory" put out by the government probably believes in the tooth fairy or they just don't have the courage to accept the truth because the implications are too big and the responsibilities too great for those going through life as cowards. Dare to Know, Have Courage to Use Your Own Reason!

[Snowygrouch]

All,
This could be very interesting but personally I`d like to hear the rest of bush's speech to judge the context before I crack open the champagne.

Anyone know where the full recording/transcript is?

Cheers.

C.

[Patrick Brown]

Could be good but as Snowy says we need to hear / see the original footage to make sure of the context. I personally doubt the government would ever admit to there being explosives in the towers. Although William Rodriguez did say he recognized one as the terrorists working as an employee at the towers: http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/203065p-175130c.html

[Stefan]

Yeah, but he doesn't say the information they got is about 9/11, he specifically says, in fact, that it was information about "planned attacks" and the captured him after 9/11...

I can't stand hearing people parroting the "pull it" thing- it's so weak, it's hardly going to convince anyone of anything,

...Best to stick to the irrefutable evidence, which you outlined well in your post as well. Physical evidence like the melted steel, the speed of the collapses, the horizontally ejected material.

That last one sounds little, but I was trying to convince a very intellegent woman of some of this stuff and everything was going in one ear and out the other, then on one of the photos there was images of pieces of steel flying outwards and that stopped her in her tracks, she said it wasn't possible and looked puzzled, then I showed her that photo of the beam literally sticking out of near by building as though it had been shot in to it, and alink about the fragments of bone on nearby roof tops. Now she's going to do some of her own research.

I really think it is the simple irrefutable facts, how ever small which are most useful in changing someone's mind. Hit someone with a grand and detailed theory and alarm bells of "conspiracy theory" will go off in peoples minds instantly and they'll stop listening. The only way people change their minds is when they feel they have done it themselves, people need to be convinced to get beyond the official story and look for themselves rather than be hit with a full length rant...

[Techybloke666]

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060906-3.html

heres your speech in full.

The portion is not conclusive evidence but it is strange none the less.