| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
uselesseater
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Posts: 629
Location: Leeds
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
telecasterisation
Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs
|
 Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 7:21 pm Post subject: Re: Public don't buy the 'terrorists threat' by the looks of |
 |
|
| uselesseater wrote: | http://newsforums.bbc.co.uk/nol/thread.jspa?threadID=4664&&&edition=1& ttl=20061110174740
What do you make of these comments? Encouraging that people can see that they are being governed by fear?
or...
Worrying as a 'truly horrendous' attack, as Ian Blair talked of the other day, could put them back in their boxes quickly? |
In a word I find it 'terrifying'.
I quote;
The head of the security service has given a stark warning that her organisation is tracking 30 UK terror plots and 1,600 individuals. How safe do you feel?
There it is in a nutshell, a woman is in charge = terrifying.
_________________
I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
xmasdale
Angel - now passed away
Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 1959
Location: South London
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 7:39 pm Post subject: Re: Public don't buy the 'terrorists threat' by the looks of |
|
|
| uselesseater wrote: | http://newsforums.bbc.co.uk/nol/thread.jspa?threadID=4664&&&edition=1& ttl=20061110174740
What do you make of these comments? Encouraging that people can see that they are being governed by fear?
or...
Worrying as a 'truly horrendous' attack, as Ian Blair talked of the other day, could put them back in their boxes quickly? |
Both.
I've added my comments to the thread.
Noel |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chek
Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 8:30 pm Post subject: Re: Public don't buy the 'terrorists threat' by the looks of |
|
|
| xmasdale wrote: | | uselesseater wrote: | http://newsforums.bbc.co.uk/nol/thread.jspa?threadID=4664&&&edition=1& ttl=20061110174740
What do you make of these comments? Encouraging that people can see that they are being governed by fear?
or...
Worrying as a 'truly horrendous' attack, as Ian Blair talked of the other day, could put them back in their boxes quickly? |
Both.
I've added my comments to the thread.
Noel |
I've also added to it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Belinda
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Until Eliza Manningham Buller and her mentors give any evidence for their claims IMO she remains a conspiracy theorist  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chek
Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Belinda wrote: | | Until Eliza Manningham Buller and her mentors give any evidence for their claims IMO she remains a conspiracy theorist |
With a further interest in maintaining the conspiracy theory. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Disco_Destroyer
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 6342
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 11:15 pm Post subject: Re: Public don't buy the 'terrorists threat' by the looks of |
|
|
| uselesseater wrote: | http://newsforums.bbc.co.uk/nol/thread.jspa?threadID=4664&&&edition=1& ttl=20061110174740
What do you make of these comments? Encouraging that people can see that they are being governed by fear?
or...
Worrying as a 'truly horrendous' attack, as Ian Blair talked of the other day, could put them back in their boxes quickly? |
Well the bomb scare and subsiquent Liquid ban failed completely hence why we are back to normal already 
_________________
'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'
“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”
www.myspace.com/disco_destroyer |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marky 54
Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 6:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| i asked the question why are they not arresting these people before they can strike? then heard on abc news when the news reader ask the same question, that they need more evidence before they can act. so a few questions arise 1. why make those claims when they have lack of evidence and have it plastered all over the news? 2. why plaster it all over the news and give the terrorists a tip off that your on to em? the only reason i can think of is there are no terrorists, its simply a warning that a attack will happen and they know it will happen and they dont plan to stop them for at least a generation. how else would they know the war on terror will last generations? are they so sure that no one will come up with a good plan/idea to solve the problem for at least a generation or is it simply how long it is planned to go on for. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation
Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| marky 54 wrote: | | i asked the question why are they not arresting these people before they can strike? then heard on abc news when the news reader ask the same question, that they need more evidence before they can act. so a few questions arise 1. why make those claims when they have lack of evidence and have it plastered all over the news? 2. why plaster it all over the news and give the terrorists a tip off that your on to em? the only reason i can think of is there are no terrorists, its simply a warning that a attack will happen and they know it will happen and they dont plan to stop them for at least a generation. how else would they know the war on terror will last generations? are they so sure that no one will come up with a good plan/idea to solve the problem for at least a generation or is it simply how long it is planned to go on for. |
This is a very clear and direct question you ask and it needs addressing. Well done for raising it.
To put it simply, if it happens and they are but don't know that it will, they can be sure that there is a chance that it wont. The reasoning behind this cannot be more transparent. If the terrorists have access to recruit for generations, they cannot be warned if that is the case or even tipped off and stopped. To know that the war on terror will last for those generations is incredibly lengthy but I digress as you ask is it simply how long it is planned to go on for? The answer has to be in the league of certainty and omission and until such times as people use paragraphs when broaching such radical issues, then it has to remain unanswered.
_________________
I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC
Last edited by telecasterisation on Sat Nov 11, 2006 3:03 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Disco_Destroyer
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 6342
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 2:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 you really are cruel sometimes 
_________________
'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'
“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”
www.myspace.com/disco_destroyer |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
