Demolishing the demolition "hypothesis"

[Annie]

Dear Friends and Colleagues,

Here is a website which examines the WTC demolition "hypothesis" and does
its very best to demiolish it, so to speak. Can we get a volunteer to take
this on by a) visiting the site below, b) examining the arguments, and c)
sending Mr Brumsen a message with your analysis?

Since Brumsen wants to appear "scientific," it looks like he wants to go
head-to-head with us - a wonderful opportunity to repair any weaknesses in
our arguments.

If you decide to do this, please copy me on your correspondence.

Cheers,

Kee


----------
From: Michiel Brumsen <m.brumsen@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:05:07 +0100
To: akd@uwo.ca
Subject: 9/11 controlled demolition hypothesis

Hello,

I hope to be able to interest you in the following page:
http://911hypothesis.blogspot.com/2006/02/update.html
It is an attempt at scientific consideration of how strong the case for
refutation of the controlled demolition of WTC1 and WTC2 is. (The jury is
still out).

best wishes,
Michiel Brumsen

[Andrew Johnson]

This is a typical site. They refuse to explain the near-freefall time of the towers - unprecedented in the history of buildings affected by fire and or plane crashes.

For all the arguments, see the Physics thread I started in Sept 2005:

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?s=d325cc19b2e38285f36b6dd3b38629c9& showtopic=3108

This blog (above) will probably become a repeat of that.

Greening's paper is flawed - it appeared just after Steve Jones'. His assertions about Aluminium have been tested by Steve Jones and students and found to be inadequate

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/ExptAlMelt.doc

Like most people, Greening fails to address the collapse of WTC7 - officially caused by fire.

What University did Greening go to? Which academic establishment or company does he now work for? If someone can post these answers here, this would be useful.

Just a point, we are not debating the evidence here - we are campaigning to ultimately bring a legal case against those responsible. We have all the evidence and want it to be tested in court.