Stefan Banned
Joined: 29 Aug 2006 Posts: 1219
|
Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you're interested in opinions the "News" pahe should not be called the "News" page- it is not about "News" it is about opinions, debate and so on.
The fact that new topics for discussion are flagged as "News" at the bottom of the page does damage the credibility of the place. Whereas if it was described as what it was- an open discussion forum, anything goes and it is understood- even at a glance that these opinions are not those of any kind of organisaed movement,
Why not have one forum called "Debate" and have the link saying "News" link to something only the organisers can contribute to and containing... well news! Links to articals, new videos found etc. Members could contact the organisers and flag up new developments.
But having a section called "News" which talks about death rays/no planes etc and is full of tittle tattle debate between deniers and truthers.
It does drain the credibility.
The fact everything is in forum format makes the place disorganised.
Why not have a submissions policy for articals. Have several sections (Twin Towers, Building 7, Pentagon, Pensylvania, Motives, Money Trail, General etc) and people can post their actual arguments on it- it could become a well organised resource where new comers could very quickly and easily view, in an organised userfriendly way, a plethora of arguments and decide for themselves which has the most merit. When articals are submitted the organsiers can run a spell check and post them in the right area- no censorship of ideas, just an effort to make the place a well designed and formatted resource. |
|
andrewwatson Moderate Poster
Joined: 14 Feb 2006 Posts: 348 Location: Norfolk
|
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The new Campaign site looks smart - which is very important - although obviously it is still low on content. I look forward to browsing the articles in due course.
Of course it will be difficult even here to avoid any discussion of the 'how' as the articles inevitably are likely to involve some degree of speculative discourse. Maybe what the site is aiming at is to be a kind of British 911Truth.org, with this forum as its lively open debating chamber,
much like 911blogger in the US
I can't see any link to this site here.
www.911truthcampaign.net |
|