Just curious

[Hazzard]

Hello fellahs,

Ive been watching the so-called 9-11 truth movement collect all types of nutjobs, providing the perfect strawman for its eventual downfall and infighting.

Just out of curiosity, are their any nutjobs here who believe in this Beam-weapon bs?

I have no apologies about being so frank with idiots who so easily fall flat in the face of such REDICULOUSLY OBVIOUS COINTELPRO DISINFORMATION!!!

I enjoy seeing the responses and defence.

[Fallious]

No defence, only a reality check. Every campaigning movement I know of is a little left-right micro culture in itself. There are folks who believe in only words, and those swear on the power of direct action. There are those who only care for the concept of the movement and people who are convinced it defines the the rules of all reality.

You can find nutjobs anywhere, some places in far more concentration than i've seen in the 9/11 truth movement, just consider those who still peddle the official theory! Either way, I think that assuming people have the best intentions of the movement in mind you can't say one person is more valuable than another. So long as all parts share the same goal, then they will all benefit the whole in some form.

[telecasterisation]

[kbo234]

This is rubbish and should be ignored. It should be of no interest to us, as this wild theorising will only discredit the simple undeniable 9/11 evidence that we should be promoting.

First prove the crime

....then expose the criminals (another controversial area that the moderators, probably rightly, insist we should leave alone)

[SHERITON HOTEL]

I'm curious what Hazzard thinks of the official 911 story and all those '911? Idunnit!' Bin ladin grainy videos that keep turning up, carelessly left out for the CIA to find.


Is there some reference to 9/11 anomolies in the new James Bond film? Annie said that David Shayler had been asked for his comments re. the movie on a critics corner thread.

[Bicnarok]

Nutjobs

Thats exactly what I thought when I first read about the beam weapon possibility, but after listening to the interview with judy and reading up about it i think its possible. If they can use Microwave weapons on rioters and if you consider how long the Stealth bombers and other ewapons were kept secret then who knows what else is out there.

[Thermate]

Beam weapon is possible, so is mini-nuke, but Controlled Demo is PROBABLE, that's the difference. I don't see anything in Judy Woods work that is more plausible or in-explicable by CD.

Alternative theories for the sake of it don't really help the movement. The important thing is the official conspiracy theory is bs.

[Bowery Boy]

[quote="Thermate"]Beam weapon is [i]possible[/i], so is mini-nuke, but Controlled Demo is [b]PROBABLE[/b], that's the difference. I don't see anything in Judy Woods work that is more plausible or in-explicable by CD.

Alternative theories for the sake of it don't really help the movement. The important thing is the official conspiracy theory is bs.[/quote]

As the twins came down in less than free fall speed, C D is not possible let alone probable
see
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=646337772656177512&q=Jim%2BFet zer

One point : beam must have been from above, not from WTC7 : as the large, cut, hole is up/down.

[alwun]

For my part, I await a plausible explanation for the fact that the twin towers were pulverised to dust and blew off down Broadway, leaving only mangled remnants of the mighty steel core to be tidied up. Kerosene, dynamite plus gravity don't do it for me.
Those perfectly rounded holes drilled through WTCs 3 and 6 are somewhat, if not even supremely, anomalous. Although the beam weapon theory is thoroughly fascinating, it is also terrifying.
I do not, however, dismiss the possibility.

cheers Al...

[Newspeak International]

[Hazzard]

Sorry about my spelling, ofcourse with such a contentious issue with such dire consequences spelling is the key to solving the problem.....yeah.

ANYWAYS. This is what is called COINTELPRO and I originaly thought a few years ago that they could never destroy the 9/11 truth movement, I was clearly wrong.

[telecasterisation]

[alwun]

Well quite so, Newspeak.
Why, just the other Saturday night, I engaged an aquaintance of mine, an Oxbridge maths prof, on the absurdity of the notion that the WTC towers simply "collapsed" due to the stress imposed upon them by the jet planes crashing and the ensuing short conflagrations.
This fellow snorted and blurted and grew red in the face. "I'm a scientist!" he reminded me, and this, he forcibly asserted, should be enough to carry his belief that all was and is fully correct as stated by MSM. Virtually demanded an apology of me, he did. I, of course, thought it prudent at that moment to hold off from any mention of the 'theory that dare not speak its name'. I am not about to submit myself to ridicule down the pub, don't worry.

[blackcat]

[Hazzard]

The other day I had a welder in my house fixing my washing machine. He was a specialist in welding steal of all things!

I just couldnt resist asking him to explain the official story of 9/11.

IT WAS SO WONDERFUL WATCHING THE REVELATION SPILL ACROSS HIS CONSCIENCE! BY GOD I THINK WE GOT ONE! .

And yes im sorry if I was rather abrupt with my presentation of the question, but I could not help it. I have had many disputes like this on an old forum and it is something that creates such a rift its beyond reason. THERMATE WAS FOUND IN THE TOWERS. JIM FETZER ADMITS THAT HE THINKS THE DEMOTWATS ARE GOING TO SAVE THE DAY!

COINTELPRO, is all there is to it and it seems to be working a treat to be honest.

Its just that sometimes I feel that this movement is more a time consuming hobby for some people, when it really should be more than that. Not something so flippantly discussed and irrisponsably concluded upon.

How do we expect people to take us seriously, when we have impressionable, bored, memebers of this movement running around claiming it was scalar, when something as simple as well timed thermite detonation would do the trick just as well. They use scalar and such to modify the weather, THAT is not a conspiracy, THAT is a fact. They do not use scalar to melt buildings for goodness sake. They use it to modify weather, fact. They use it to create earthquakes, fact. They use it to effect tidal waves, fact. They use it to find oil reserves, fact. They use it to find underground water tables, fact. They use it to disrupt missile navigation high in space (ICBM) fact.

They use thermate to melt steal like a hot knife through butter, fact. So why make it into some rediculous debate about beam weapons and hocus pocus. Why go back over well trodden territory.

INFACT WHY BOTHER ARGUING OVER THE METHODOLOGY OF MURDER, WHEN WE SHOULD BE WORRYING ABOUT ESTABLISHING THE BLAME FIRST!

We are fighting amongst ourselves about how they did it, when the majority of people still dont know WHO did it!