It was a bomb not a plane

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

Well done Andrew Watson for finding this

Here we have an eye witness report stating categorically that it was a bomb and not a plane at WTC 2


http://911foreknowledge.com/debris/itsabomb.htm

[andyb]

do you know where he was standing? Could he not have been on the opposite side to the plane? He could have looked up and only seen the fireball? I'm less inclined to believe the Pentagon story yet there are numerous witnesses saying they saw a boeing coming in. You can't base a case on witness testimony.

[telecasterisation]

Agreed, because he saw no plane simply means he didn't see a plane.

There are a myriad of witness who all have conflicting stories of what they 'saw' on that day.

Take The Pentagon for instance = missiles with wings, small plane, big plane, no plane, three planes, two planes, one man and his dog - which is correct?

He is just some guy who says one thing whilst another says something else - I don't get why such a big deal is made of him specifically?

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

[chek]

[telecasterisation]

THETRUTHWILLSETU3 eruditely responded;

So who do you believe - the Fox news reporter or the witness?

This is a bizarre question;

The news reporter said;

[Fallious]

No plane or no Big Boeing theorists like to cite the highly dubious official theories of the Shanksville and Pentagon incidents as an endorsement for suspicious aircraft events at the Twin Towers. However, with a little consideration it should be clear that the nature of the Pentagon and Shanksville events actually suggest events at the Twin Towers were exactly as they looked.

Lets take a quick look at the pentagon NP scenario versus the Towers...

- Unlike the twin towers, there is currently no video of a plane crashing into the pentagon.
- Unlike the twin towers, the majority of pentagon witnesses have contradictory accounts.
- Unlike the twin towers, there is evidence of secret service intimidation and foresight, gathering video evidence from all cameras in the area and 'briefing' witnesses.
- Unlike the twin towers, as far as I'm aware a black box was recovered from the pentagon 'crash'.
- Unlike the twin towers, the Pentagon video(s) which has been released are clearly suspect even to the untrained observer.
- Unlike the twin towers, bodies from the Pentagon plane were found.
- Unlike the twin towers, The pentagon structural damage does not conform with a big Boeing impact.

The Shanksville incident features a wealth of similar evidence and contradictions. When we contrast these events with the WTC opperation, it seems to me that NPT's have some fundamental questions to answer...

Firstly.. How could two operations, with so few witnesses and no video evidence fail so badly to convince that the planes existed, while attacks on perhaps the most famous landmarks in the world, in broad daylight have so little evidence which favours the No Plane theory?

[telecasterisation]

[Fallious]

[telecasterisation]

[andrewwatson]

One thing that makes no-planes at the Towers more difficult to sustain is this:

If they were able to fake all those videos of WTC2 being hit by a 767. why on earth didn't they also fake the Pentagon crash? Even stranger , why make such a total hash of the Shanksville crash site and not leave half a plane sticking out of the ground? That's what I would have done. They should have asked me.

I find the ineptitude of so much about 9/11 strangely at variance with a massive conspiracy. We know it was a conspiracy, and that it was succcessful. so maybe the mistakes they made were not bad ones from their pint of view.