FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

MORE EVIDENCE FOR NO PLANES
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> 9/11 & 7/7 Truth Controversies
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
THETRUTHWILLSETU3
9/11 Truth critic
9/11 Truth critic


Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 1009

PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 1:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

flamesong wrote:
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:
Patrick Brown wrote:
Shouldn't this thread really be called “More evidence for no brains”? Rolling Eyes

Hello Moderators - yet again Mr Brown is using abusive language - will you have a word with him please

Hello Moderators - can I be the first to say that this hardly constitutes abusive language. Especially when measured against the language employed by certain no planers!


Ok moderators - how about a sin bin whereby abusive posters are locked out for a week
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
telecasterisation
Banned
Banned


Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs

PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 1:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:
flamesong wrote:
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:
Patrick Brown wrote:
Shouldn't this thread really be called “More evidence for no brains”? Rolling Eyes

Hello Moderators - yet again Mr Brown is using abusive language - will you have a word with him please

Hello Moderators - can I be the first to say that this hardly constitutes abusive language. Especially when measured against the language employed by certain no planers!


Ok moderators - how about a sin bin whereby abusive posters are locked out for a week


I must protest at such a move, blackcat would never get a look in poor love.

_________________
I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Patrick Brown
9/11 Truth critic
9/11 Truth critic


Joined: 10 Oct 2006
Posts: 1201

PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 1:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:
flamesong wrote:
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:
Patrick Brown wrote:
Shouldn't this thread really be called “More evidence for no brains”? Rolling Eyes

Hello Moderators - yet again Mr Brown is using abusive language - will you have a word with him please

Hello Moderators - can I be the first to say that this hardly constitutes abusive language. Especially when measured against the language employed by certain no planers!


Ok moderators - how about a sin bin whereby abusive posters are locked out for a week

How about a loony-bin where people are locked up for their own safety?

Have you seen my foot?

_________________
We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk
Get the Steven E Jones reports >HERE<
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
telecasterisation
Banned
Banned


Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs

PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 2:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Patrick Brown wrote:

Quote:
Have you seen my foot?


Is this a thinly disguided joke about your genitals?

_________________
I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Patrick Brown
9/11 Truth critic
9/11 Truth critic


Joined: 10 Oct 2006
Posts: 1201

PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 3:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

telecasterisation wrote:
Patrick Brown wrote:

Quote:
Have you seen my foot?


Is this a thinly disguided joke about your genitals?

Err no, the word was foot.

You seem to have a thing about genitalia tele!

Hey just for you:


_________________
We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk
Get the Steven E Jones reports >HERE<
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
utopiated
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 09 Jun 2006
Posts: 645
Location: UK Midlands

PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 3:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tumbongo wrote:

Really for me the bottom line is KISS and occams razor,


Yup. And it's this approach that makes you the dream client of the media and M.I.C. unfortunately.

http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=5531

[/url]

_________________
http://exopolitics.org.uk
http://chemtrailsUK.net
http://alienfalseflagagenda.net
--
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
John White
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Posts: 3187
Location: Here to help!

PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 3:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

flamesong wrote:
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:
Patrick Brown wrote:
Shouldn't this thread really be called “More evidence for no brains”? Rolling Eyes

Hello Moderators - yet again Mr Brown is using abusive language - will you have a word with him please

Hello Moderators - can I be the first to say that this hardly constitutes abusive language. Especially when measured against the language employed by certain no planers!


"No Brains" isn't much of an insult, its more of a tease. I'm sure Mr Brown could make a far more credible effort to insult if that was his intention

Although it is obviously possible to see the high speed of the Plane as evidence it wasnt there TWSU3 (becuase you do), perhaps it would be productive to explain why you dont consider it more likely to be the other alternatives: that is:

1) Being flown by remote control and therefore "safe" speed not an issue

or//

2) Being flown by a "nutta" on a death wish speed rush

_________________
Free your Self and Free the World
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
THETRUTHWILLSETU3
9/11 Truth critic
9/11 Truth critic


Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 1009

PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 4:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

John White wrote:
flamesong wrote:
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:
Patrick Brown wrote:
Shouldn't this thread really be called “More evidence for no brains”? Rolling Eyes

Hello Moderators - yet again Mr Brown is using abusive language - will you have a word with him please

Hello Moderators - can I be the first to say that this hardly constitutes abusive language. Especially when measured against the language employed by certain no planers!


"No Brains" isn't much of an insult, its more of a tease. I'm sure Mr Brown could make a far more credible effort to insult if that was his intention

Although it is obviously possible to see the high speed of the Plane as evidence it wasnt there TWSU3 (becuase you do), perhaps it would be productive to explain why you dont consider it more likely to be the other alternatives: that is:

1) Being flown by remote control and therefore "safe" speed not an issue

or//

2) Being flown by a "nutta" on a death wish speed rush



Because I have seen testimony from airline pilots saying that flying big boeings at 500 mph is extremely dangerous (at low altitudes) and also that planes flow by remote control have a very smooth flight path unlike the one at WTC2

We all know that hijackers never flew em


Last edited by THETRUTHWILLSETU3 on Fri Nov 24, 2006 4:37 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
flamesong
Major Poster
Major Poster


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 1305
Location: okulo news

PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 4:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:
Because I have seen testimony from airline pilots saying that flying big boeings at 500 mph is extremely dangerous and also that planes flow by remote control have a very smooth flight path unlike the one at WTC2

Probably not as dangerous as flying them into buildings, though, eh!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
THETRUTHWILLSETU3
9/11 Truth critic
9/11 Truth critic


Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 1009

PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 4:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

flamesong wrote:
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:
Because I have seen testimony from airline pilots saying that flying big boeings at 500 mph is extremely dangerous and also that planes flow by remote control have a very smooth flight path unlike the one at WTC2

Probably not as dangerous as flying them into buildings, though, eh!



waaay haaaaay ---- Flamesong has a sense of humour --whatever next?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
flamesong
Major Poster
Major Poster


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 1305
Location: okulo news

PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 5:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:
waaay haaaaay ---- Flamesong has a sense of humour --whatever next?

You noticed! Whatever next!?

Now, how about answering a few outstanding questions?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
THETRUTHWILLSETU3
9/11 Truth critic
9/11 Truth critic


Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 1009

PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 5:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

flamesong wrote:
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:
waaay haaaaay ---- Flamesong has a sense of humour --whatever next?

You noticed! Whatever next!?

Now, how about answering a few outstanding questions?


My answer to the unanswered question is YES.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bicnarok
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 334
Location: Cydonia

PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 4:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="Patrick Brown"]
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:
Patrick Brown wrote:
Shouldn't this thread really be called “More evidence for no brains”? Rolling Eyes


Hello Moderators - yet again Mr Brown is using abusive language - will you have a word with him please


Abusive language? thats not abusive language, something like this is ..you total and utter moronic pricking offspring of a rancid camel.

you mardy arsed git.

_________________
"Emancipate yourself from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free our mind..." Bod Marley
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
THETRUTHWILLSETU3
9/11 Truth critic
9/11 Truth critic


Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 1009

PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 5:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="Bicnarok"]
Patrick Brown wrote:
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:
Patrick Brown wrote:
Shouldn't this thread really be called “More evidence for no brains”? Rolling Eyes


Hello Moderators - yet again Mr Brown is using abusive language - will you have a word with him please


Abusive language? thats not abusive language, something like this is ..you total and utter moronic pricking offspring of a rancid camel.

you mardy arsed git.


In that case F UCK U YOU PIECE OF SH ITE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fallious
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 762

PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 5:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

... And thats why no planes flew into the twin towers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bicnarok
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 334
Location: Cydonia

PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="THETRUTHWILLSETU3"]
Bicnarok wrote:
Patrick Brown wrote:
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:
Patrick Brown wrote:
Shouldn't this thread really be called “More evidence for no brains”? Rolling Eyes


Hello Moderators - yet again Mr Brown is using abusive language - will you have a word with him please


Abusive language? thats not abusive language, something like this is ..you total and utter moronic pricking offspring of a rancid camel.

you mardy arsed git.


In that case F UCK U YOU PIECE OF SH ITE



Yeh someones got it, well done Laughing

_________________
"Emancipate yourself from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free our mind..." Bod Marley
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Patrick Brown
9/11 Truth critic
9/11 Truth critic


Joined: 10 Oct 2006
Posts: 1201

PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 10:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:
Bicnarok wrote:
Patrick Brown wrote:
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:
Patrick Brown wrote:
Shouldn't this thread really be called “More evidence for no brains”? Rolling Eyes


Hello Moderators - yet again Mr Brown is using abusive language - will you have a word with him please


Abusive language? thats not abusive language, something like this is ..you total and utter moronic pricking offspring of a rancid camel.

you mardy arsed git.


In that case F UCK U YOU PIECE OF SH ITE



Yeh someones got it, well done Laughing


Err the quote above "you total and utter moronic pricking offspring of a rancid camel" is not mine. Was this an error or an atempt?

_________________
We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk
Get the Steven E Jones reports >HERE<
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Briaman
Minor Poster
Minor Poster


Joined: 27 Jul 2006
Posts: 39

PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:18 pm    Post subject: Flamesong and TTWSU3 Reply with quote

THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:

flamesong wrote:

Now, how about answering [my question]?


My answer ... is YES.


Wow! Congratulations Flamesong and TTWSU3! I knew there was something about you two from the start.

When's the happy day?

I do hope I haven't gotten the wrong idea.

_________________
Error in module creativity.dll : unable to create witty comment.
Abort / Retry / Ignore
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
flamesong
Major Poster
Major Poster


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 1305
Location: okulo news

PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:32 pm    Post subject: Re: Flamesong and TTWSU3 Reply with quote

Briaman wrote:
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:

flamesong wrote:
Now, how about answering [my question]?

My answer ... is YES.

Wow! Congratulations Flamesong and TTWSU3! I knew there was something about you two from the start.

When's the happy day?

I do hope I haven't gotten the wrong idea.

It might have been funny if you had't had to make up your own quotes. Sounds like you might get the wrong idea quite easliy.

As it happens, THETRUTHWILLSETU3 does not do answering questions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
THETRUTHWILLSETU3
9/11 Truth critic
9/11 Truth critic


Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 1009

PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Please wind this on to 2 minutes 56 to see the impact

The on the scene reporter sees no plane only an explosion

The studio anchor says he saw a plane ---but why no emotion in his voice?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMucVeew8eg


MORE EXAMPLES TO FOLLOW
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
THETRUTHWILLSETU3
9/11 Truth critic
9/11 Truth critic


Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 1009

PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So you say there were hundreds of witnesses who say the planes

If that is the case why are they talking to witnesses who did not see them?

Wind this clip to 4 mins 30 and listed to Lindsay Grimm

She was in a building nearby for the first impact and outside for the second --- she did not see either impact --- if there were hundreds of witnesses why were they talking to her?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoJwq86jw2k&mode=related&search=


MORE TO FOLLOW
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
telecasterisation
Banned
Banned


Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs

PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 11:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:
Please wind this on to 2 minutes 56 to see the impact

The on the scene reporter sees no plane only an explosion

The studio anchor says he saw a plane ---but why no emotion in his voice?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMucVeew8eg


MORE EXAMPLES TO FOLLOW


This is a strange question Mr T. People approach life from different angles and I would hazard that part of a newscaster's brief is to impart a lack of emotion so as to not create panic. To even cite this as evidence of anything is misleading.

However, over in the Critic's Area, I have posted an image of my limited edition Chuckle Brothers gravy boat that I purchased from Ebay and I admit to crying when it arrived.

_________________
I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
THETRUTHWILLSETU3
9/11 Truth critic
9/11 Truth critic


Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 1009

PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 11:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

wind this on to 7 minutes 15

The eye witness said

"we heard a big bang, then we saw smoke coming out, then we saw a plane coming out the other side of the building"

"then i heard another plane had hit"

FUNNY HOW WITH SO CALLED HUNDREDS OF WITESSES IT IS BASED ON WHAT THEY HEARD NOT WHAT THEY SAW


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5bVVc8bhac&mode=related&search=
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Patrick Brown
9/11 Truth critic
9/11 Truth critic


Joined: 10 Oct 2006
Posts: 1201

PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 11:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Moderators:
Could the above posts (listed below) be edited as they misrepresent me and are at the very least extremely abusive.

http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=39481#39481

http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=39546#39546

I mentioned the error here:
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=39549#39549

_________________
We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk
Get the Steven E Jones reports >HERE<
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
THETRUTHWILLSETU3
9/11 Truth critic
9/11 Truth critic


Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 1009

PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 11:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Witnesses hear say they saw a Stealth plane that had switched it's engines off ----maybe it was a Hologram



http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=6540795031318334268&q=911+AS +IT+HAPPENED
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chek
Mega Poster
Mega Poster


Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland

PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 11:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:

FUNNY HOW WITH SO CALLED HUNDREDS OF WITESSES IT IS BASED ON WHAT THEY HEARD NOT WHAT THEY SAW


No, really it isn't. People on busy city streets do not walk around staring upwards, until something attracts their attention.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Patrick Brown
9/11 Truth critic
9/11 Truth critic


Joined: 10 Oct 2006
Posts: 1201

PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 11:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:
Witnesses hear say they saw a Stealth plane that had switched it's engines off ----maybe it was a Hologram
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=6540795031318334268&q=911+AS +IT+HAPPENED


4U2P you really are a shill even if you don't know it! Just remember that No Planes = No Brains. So we conclude that you're thick or a shill. Which one is it?

_________________
We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk
Get the Steven E Jones reports >HERE<
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
telecasterisation
Banned
Banned


Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs

PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 11:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:
Witnesses hear say they saw a Stealth plane that had switched it's engines off ----maybe it was a Hologram



http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=6540795031318334268&q=911+AS +IT+HAPPENED


No, he says 'It wasn't a stealth, it just came in dead quiet'.

Try to quote correctly at least.

_________________
I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC


Last edited by telecasterisation on Sat Dec 09, 2006 11:54 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chek
Mega Poster
Mega Poster


Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland

PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 11:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:
Witnesses hear say they saw a Stealth plane that had switched it's engines off ----maybe it was a Hologram


The phrase 'grasping at straws' springs to mind.

Anybody who has witnessed a fast fly-by at an airshow will readily testify that there is no noise until the aircraft is almost upon you.

But I am interested in what you think your continual espousing of NPT theory achieves, because all the evidence you seem to base it on looks at best faulty, and at worst deliberately misleading.

Does it make you feel cleverer than the rest of us?
More aware of the NWO's secret technology?
Or perhaps some chance of ingratiating your way into Rosie Grable's pants?
You must have some reason, so what is it?

Moreover what difference does the 'how' make to 911 being an inside job?
Obviously, you believe I'm the shill here, but hey! - aren't shills allowed to ask questions too?

Not that I expect any answers....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
THETRUTHWILLSETU3
9/11 Truth critic
9/11 Truth critic


Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 1009

PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 12:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

chek wrote:
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:
Witnesses hear say they saw a Stealth plane that had switched it's engines off ----maybe it was a Hologram


The phrase 'grasping at straws' springs to mind.

Anybody who has witnessed a fast fly-by at an airshow will readily testify that there is no noise until the aircraft is almost upon you.

But I am interested in what you think your continual espousing of NPT theory achieves, because all the evidence you seem to base it on looks at best faulty, and at worst deliberately misleading.

Does it make you feel cleverer than the rest of us?
More aware of the NWO's secret technology?
Or perhaps some chance of ingratiating your way into Rosie Grable's pants?
You must have some reason, so what is it?

Moreover what difference does the 'how' make to 911 being an inside job?
Obviously, you believe I'm the shill here, but hey! - aren't shills allowed to ask questions too?

Not that I expect any answers....


The how is important for umpteen reasons - if you don't know what they are then you are not as bright as I thought you were.

I'm not grasping at any straws Chek - how many coincidences do you need?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> 9/11 & 7/7 Truth Controversies All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16  Next
Page 12 of 16

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group