Joined: 13 Apr 2006 Posts: 804 Location: London Town
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 10:04 am Post subject: Give me photographic evidence...
proving that these mythical hijackers went anywhere near an airport on September 11th, 2001. _________________ 'Maybe if I can show some lurking kids that this is all a pack of lies, then maybe I can make a difference. I don't plan on converting any of you because you're all mad.'
-Johnny Pixels
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 2:27 pm Post subject: Re: Give me photographic evidence...
prole art threat wrote:
proving that these mythical hijackers went anywhere near an airport on September 11th, 2001.
If they didn't, how did they get on the planes? _________________ So remember - next time you can't find a parking spot, go to plan B: blow up your car
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 2:40 pm Post subject: Re: Give me photographic evidence...
prole art threat wrote:
proving that these mythical hijackers went anywhere near an airport on September 11th, 2001.
You pose a difficult question for both others and yourself to answer to a satisfactory conclusion.
Firstly how do you know what the 'hijackers' look like? We are given photos by official sources of those who are supposed to have been involved. Yet we are also told some of the 'hijackers' are still alive and working abroad - so are those shown the hijackers as they really looked?
Therefore, look at the accompanying images, supposedly of those involved - do they satisfy you? If not, is it because you don't know who you are looking at? Is it actually the right airport? Is it an airport? Is it the right day?
Your question cannot really be answered for even if the photos are genuine and of the people concerned, who are we to say that they are legitimate or just Vipin Mahatmacoat at Butlin's security desk?
Joined: 13 Apr 2006 Posts: 804 Location: London Town
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 7:44 pm Post subject: Re: Give me photographic evidence...
telecasterisation wrote:
prole art threat wrote:
proving that these mythical hijackers went anywhere near an airport on September 11th, 2001.
You pose a difficult question for both others and yourself to answer to a satisfactory conclusion.
Firstly how do you know what the 'hijackers' look like? We are given photos by official sources of those who are supposed to have been involved. Yet we are also told some of the 'hijackers' are still alive and working abroad - so are those shown the hijackers as they really looked?
Therefore, look at the accompanying images, supposedly of those involved - do they satisfy you? If not, is it because you don't know who you are looking at? Is it actually the right airport? Is it an airport? Is it the right day?
Your question cannot really be answered for even if the photos are genuine and of the people concerned, who are we to say that they are legitimate or just Vipin Mahatmacoat at Butlin's security desk?
Listen, we were given photos of the so called 'hijackers' we match them to them. If hijackers really, truly, honestly got on that plane there would have been pictures. They didnt, they didnt provide anything apart from the Mohammed Atta publicity shot.
I mean, we didnt know what the 7/7 bombers looked like but they still gave us pictures. I really dont get your point, Telecasterisation. You tend to play this devil advovate's position all the time, I sometimes wonder why you dont join this lot down here on a permanent basis. _________________ 'Maybe if I can show some lurking kids that this is all a pack of lies, then maybe I can make a difference. I don't plan on converting any of you because you're all mad.'
-Johnny Pixels
Joined: 13 Apr 2006 Posts: 804 Location: London Town
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 7:47 pm Post subject: Re: Give me photographic evidence...
Ignatz wrote:
prole art threat wrote:
proving that these mythical hijackers went anywhere near an airport on September 11th, 2001.
If they didn't, how did they get on the planes?
They werent on the planes. You know that. Hey how are those kids with behavioural problems you work with? I presume they are much better when youre not around them?? _________________ 'Maybe if I can show some lurking kids that this is all a pack of lies, then maybe I can make a difference. I don't plan on converting any of you because you're all mad.'
-Johnny Pixels
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:25 pm Post subject: Re: Give me photographic evidence...
prole art threat wrote:
Ignatz wrote:
prole art threat wrote:
proving that these mythical hijackers went anywhere near an airport on September 11th, 2001.
If they didn't, how did they get on the planes?
They werent on the planes. You know that. Hey how are those kids with behavioural problems you work with? I presume they are much better when youre not around them??
I guess your crusade allows you to insult anyone you like huh?
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:27 pm Post subject: Re: Give me photographic evidence...
prole art threat wrote:
Ignatz wrote:
prole art threat wrote:
proving that these mythical hijackers went anywhere near an airport on September 11th, 2001.
If they didn't, how did they get on the planes?
They werent on the planes. You know that. Hey how are those kids with behavioural problems you work with? I presume they are much better when youre not around them??
You're one of these voice morphing fakery proponents, aren't you? _________________ "They, the jews, also have this thing about linage don't they?
We know a person from recent history who had a thing for linage and gene pools don't we?"
--Patrick Brown
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 10:06 pm Post subject: Re: Give me photographic evidence...
prole art threat wrote:
Ignatz wrote:
prole art threat wrote:
proving that these mythical hijackers went anywhere near an airport on September 11th, 2001.
If they didn't, how did they get on the planes?
They werent on the planes. You know that. Hey how are those kids with behavioural problems you work with? I presume they are much better when youre not around them??
Are you suggesting the pilots just had an off day and all spontaneously decided to fly into important buildings? Or was it a suicide pact? _________________ So remember - next time you can't find a parking spot, go to plan B: blow up your car
Joined: 13 Apr 2006 Posts: 804 Location: London Town
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 10:11 pm Post subject: Re: Give me photographic evidence...
Ignatz wrote:
prole art threat wrote:
Ignatz wrote:
prole art threat wrote:
proving that these mythical hijackers went anywhere near an airport on September 11th, 2001.
If they didn't, how did they get on the planes?
They werent on the planes. You know that. Hey how are those kids with behavioural problems you work with? I presume they are much better when youre not around them??
Are you suggesting the pilots just had an off day and all spontaneously decided to fly into important buildings? Or was it a suicide pact?
Im suggesting you are suffering from a severe mental illness, Ignatz, nothing more, nothing less. _________________ 'Maybe if I can show some lurking kids that this is all a pack of lies, then maybe I can make a difference. I don't plan on converting any of you because you're all mad.'
-Johnny Pixels
Joined: 13 Apr 2006 Posts: 804 Location: London Town
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 10:14 pm Post subject: Re: Give me photographic evidence...
chipmunk stew wrote:
You're one of these voice morphing fakery proponents, aren't you?
"Hi Mum. It's Mark Bingham here.....you do believe me , dont you?"
In answer to your question, er, yes I am. _________________ 'Maybe if I can show some lurking kids that this is all a pack of lies, then maybe I can make a difference. I don't plan on converting any of you because you're all mad.'
-Johnny Pixels
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 10:21 pm Post subject: Re: Give me photographic evidence...
prole art threat wrote:
Ignatz wrote:
Are you suggesting the pilots just had an off day and all spontaneously decided to fly into important buildings? Or was it a suicide pact?
Im suggesting you are suffering from a severe mental illness, Ignatz, nothing more, nothing less.
Ah. But who flew the planes into the buildings, if it wasn't the hijackers? _________________ So remember - next time you can't find a parking spot, go to plan B: blow up your car
However, the issue presumably rests on whether the identity of the alleged hijackers can be satisfactorily confirmed; if not, it makes little sense to say it must have been them anyway because you don't know who else did.
While we're talking hijackers, what I'd really like to know is how they managed to have a 100% success rate in getting knives, mace and boxcutters on board the planes, with one 'unresolved' metal detector incident. I've been on internal flights in the US before 911 and in my (very limited) experience, they weren't that slack. Just seem pretty lucky or devilish cunning. _________________ It's a man's life in MOSSAD
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 11:36 pm Post subject: Re: Give me photographic evidence...
prole art threat wrote:
chipmunk stew wrote:
You're one of these voice morphing fakery proponents, aren't you?
"Hi Mum. It's Mark Bingham here.....you do believe me , dont you?"
In answer to your question, er, yes I am.
And Mark Bingham's mother's comment that when he was in work, "official" mode he often used both names to her, are we to ignore that? Or perhaps it is just proof of how carefully they faked the voices? _________________ ".......some partial collapse [of WTC7] would not have been suspicious......." - chek
Joined: 27 Mar 2006 Posts: 3187 Location: Here to help!
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 12:30 am Post subject: Re: Give me photographic evidence...
Bushwacker wrote:
prole art threat wrote:
chipmunk stew wrote:
You're one of these voice morphing fakery proponents, aren't you?
"Hi Mum. It's Mark Bingham here.....you do believe me , dont you?"
In answer to your question, er, yes I am.
And Mark Bingham's mother's comment that when he was in work, "official" mode he often used both names to her, are we to ignore that? Or perhaps it is just proof of how carefully they faked the voices?
Ignore it? Certainly not. (source please?)
But it could just as easily indicate the woman's been leaned on as it may indicate her son was a "special" person with an emotionally retarded way of expressing himself _________________ Free your Self and Free the World
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:03 am Post subject: Re: Give me photographic evidence...
John White wrote:
Bushwacker wrote:
prole art threat wrote:
chipmunk stew wrote:
You're one of these voice morphing fakery proponents, aren't you?
"Hi Mum. It's Mark Bingham here.....you do believe me , dont you?"
In answer to your question, er, yes I am.
And Mark Bingham's mother's comment that when he was in work, "official" mode he often used both names to her, are we to ignore that? Or perhaps it is just proof of how carefully they faked the voices?
Ignore it? Certainly not. (source please?)
But it could just as easily indicate the woman's been leaned on as it may indicate her son was a "special" person with an emotionally retarded way of expressing himself
You're a right b*st*rd. Pissing on both Mark and Mrs. Bingham in a single short sentence. _________________ "They, the jews, also have this thing about linage don't they?
We know a person from recent history who had a thing for linage and gene pools don't we?"
--Patrick Brown
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:27 am Post subject: Re: Give me photographic evidence...
prole art threat wrote:
telecasterisation wrote:
prole art threat wrote:
proving that these mythical hijackers went anywhere near an airport on September 11th, 2001.
You pose a difficult question for both others and yourself to answer to a satisfactory conclusion.
Firstly how do you know what the 'hijackers' look like? We are given photos by official sources of those who are supposed to have been involved. Yet we are also told some of the 'hijackers' are still alive and working abroad - so are those shown the hijackers as they really looked?
Therefore, look at the accompanying images, supposedly of those involved - do they satisfy you? If not, is it because you don't know who you are looking at? Is it actually the right airport? Is it an airport? Is it the right day?
Your question cannot really be answered for even if the photos are genuine and of the people concerned, who are we to say that they are legitimate or just Vipin Mahatmacoat at Butlin's security desk?
Listen, we were given photos of the so called 'hijackers' we match them to them. If hijackers really, truly, honestly got on that plane there would have been pictures. They didnt, they didnt provide anything apart from the Mohammed Atta publicity shot.
I mean, we didnt know what the 7/7 bombers looked like but they still gave us pictures. I really dont get your point, Telecasterisation. You tend to play this devil advovate's position all the time, I sometimes wonder why you dont join this lot down here on a permanent basis.
I understand my point is difficult to tackle, but you seem to be struggling with the concept of identity theft. We are told that many of the hijackers are still alive, so I am unable to draw any type of conclusion as to the people actually being the hijackers, alive or dead.
Many of people from that part of the world look 'similar' so it is easy to replace one with another. In addition, we are shown official pictures of the terrorists/supposed hijackers - how do you know they are genuine?
My point is crystal clear - there are many sources for stills taken from airport cameras of the supposed terrorist hijackers - these are proof in one form, deny or accept, it is your choice. What would be acceptable proof for you??
As for the Devil's advocate aspect, I simply supplied what you asked for, it does not mean I believe any of it.
Joined: 27 Mar 2006 Posts: 3187 Location: Here to help!
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 12:40 pm Post subject: Re: Give me photographic evidence...
chipmunk stew wrote:
John White wrote:
Bushwacker wrote:
prole art threat wrote:
chipmunk stew wrote:
You're one of these voice morphing fakery proponents, aren't you?
"Hi Mum. It's Mark Bingham here.....you do believe me , dont you?"
In answer to your question, er, yes I am.
And Mark Bingham's mother's comment that when he was in work, "official" mode he often used both names to her, are we to ignore that? Or perhaps it is just proof of how carefully they faked the voices?
Ignore it? Certainly not. (source please?)
But it could just as easily indicate the woman's been leaned on as it may indicate her son was a "special" person with an emotionally retarded way of expressing himself
You're a right b*st*rd. Pissing on both Mark and Mrs. Bingham in a single short sentence.
Somewhat illogical Chipmunk. If Mrs Bingham had been leaned on, she'd deserve sympathy for being put in that plight. And you can ask as many human beings as you like, the massive consensus is going to be that any child talking to his or her mother who introduces themselves with both their names is somewhat unusual.
Do you have a source for Bushwacker's statement? Or are you playing the man and not the ball? _________________ Free your Self and Free the World
Joined: 26 Apr 2006 Posts: 1850 Location: Currently Andover
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 1:28 pm Post subject:
Though I can't remember the source now, I did hear or read somewhere that Mark's mum did say that his habit was to say both names to her because he did it so many times while working.
Though I can't remember the source now, I did hear or read somewhere that Mark's mum did say that his habit was to say both names to her because he did it so many times while working.
Absolutely agreed, I too read this. In fact, I was not allowed to make personal calls at work and used to used to call my mum 'Mrs Johnson' when I called her from work (my parents were divorced by then so we never had the same surname at that time). On a couple of occasions I did the same from home by force of habit.
This is not proof of what happened on 9/11, but I can relate to the 'whole' name thing. It is a bit strange though why you would revert to such a naming convention during times of stress.
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 2:06 pm Post subject: Re: Give me photographic evidence...
John White wrote:
chipmunk stew wrote:
John White wrote:
Bushwacker wrote:
prole art threat wrote:
chipmunk stew wrote:
You're one of these voice morphing fakery proponents, aren't you?
"Hi Mum. It's Mark Bingham here.....you do believe me , dont you?"
In answer to your question, er, yes I am.
And Mark Bingham's mother's comment that when he was in work, "official" mode he often used both names to her, are we to ignore that? Or perhaps it is just proof of how carefully they faked the voices?
Ignore it? Certainly not. (source please?)
But it could just as easily indicate the woman's been leaned on as it may indicate her son was a "special" person with an emotionally retarded way of expressing himself
You're a right b*st*rd. Pissing on both Mark and Mrs. Bingham in a single short sentence.
Somewhat illogical Chipmunk. If Mrs Bingham had been leaned on, she'd deserve sympathy for being put in that plight.
Forgive me, I wrote in haste--her name is not Bingham, it's Alice Hoglan.
You're saying she's lying. Whether she was "leaned on" or not, you're accusing her of lying to cover up the truth behind her son's murder.
Quote:
And you can ask as many human beings as you like, the massive consensus is going to be that any child talking to his or her mother who introduces themselves with both their names is somewhat unusual.
Next time you're under life-or-death stress and say something a bit odd, I'll be sure to call you a retard.
Bingham's wasn't the only call that got through, you know. If Mark Bingham's voice was faked, then so were:
Tom Burnett's
Jeremy Glick's
Edward Felt's
Linda Gronlund's
Todd Beamer's
Honor Elizabeth Wainio's
CeeCee Lyles'
Sandra Bradshaw's
Lauren Grandcolas'
It also means the cockpit voice recorder was faked.
Is it getting absurd enough for you yet? _________________ "They, the jews, also have this thing about linage don't they?
We know a person from recent history who had a thing for linage and gene pools don't we?"
--Patrick Brown
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 2:22 pm Post subject: Re: Give me photographic evidence...
prole art threat wrote:
chipmunk stew wrote:
You're one of these voice morphing fakery proponents, aren't you?
"Hi Mum. It's Mark Bingham here.....you do believe me , dont you?"
In answer to your question, er, yes I am.
By the way, this is how the call went, according to Ms. Hoglan:
Quote:
ALICE HOGLAN:
I took the phone and I heard my son's voice and he said to me, "Mom, this is Mark Bingham." I knew from that he was trying to maintain composure, but I could tell he was a little rattled because he was giving me his first and last names. He said, "I want to let you know that I love you. I'm on a flight from Newark to San Francisco, and there are three guys on board who have taken over the plane and they say they have a bomb."
.....
ALICE HOGLAN:
It sounded as if someone was speaking to him quietly, possibly sitting right next to him, then he came back on the line and said, "You believe me, don't you?" I said, "I believe you, who are these guys?" There was another long pause. I listened and then the phone went dead.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/events/newsnight/1726647.stm _________________ "They, the jews, also have this thing about linage don't they?
We know a person from recent history who had a thing for linage and gene pools don't we?"
--Patrick Brown
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 3:41 pm Post subject: Re: Give me photographic evidence...
chipmunk stew wrote:
prole art threat wrote:
chipmunk stew wrote:
You're one of these voice morphing fakery proponents, aren't you?
"Hi Mum. It's Mark Bingham here.....you do believe me , dont you?"
In answer to your question, er, yes I am.
By the way, this is how the call went, according to Ms. Hoglan:
Quote:
ALICE HOGLAN:
I took the phone and I heard my son's voice and he said to me, "Mom, this is Mark Bingham." I knew from that he was trying to maintain composure, but I could tell he was a little rattled because he was giving me his first and last names. He said, "I want to let you know that I love you. I'm on a flight from Newark to San Francisco, and there are three guys on board who have taken over the plane and they say they have a bomb."
.....
ALICE HOGLAN:
It sounded as if someone was speaking to him quietly, possibly sitting right next to him, then he came back on the line and said, "You believe me, don't you?" I said, "I believe you, who are these guys?" There was another long pause. I listened and then the phone went dead.
You might have been wining until you made that last post munky.
I just don't understand why Mark Bingham said “You believe me, don't you” am I the only person who thinks this is very strange? It's almost like someone is trying to convince Alice Hoglan that her son was on a plane with three terrorists! My point is we don't even know if he was on a plane so it may have been Mark Bingham giving us a clue before... well he's dead isn't he! _________________ We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk Get the Steven E Jones reports>HERE<
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:08 pm Post subject: Re: Give me photographic evidence...
chipmunk stew wrote:
John White wrote:
chipmunk stew wrote:
John White wrote:
Bushwacker wrote:
prole art threat wrote:
chipmunk stew wrote:
You're one of these voice morphing fakery proponents, aren't you?
"Hi Mum. It's Mark Bingham here.....you do believe me , dont you?"
In answer to your question, er, yes I am.
And Mark Bingham's mother's comment that when he was in work, "official" mode he often used both names to her, are we to ignore that? Or perhaps it is just proof of how carefully they faked the voices?
Ignore it? Certainly not. (source please?)
But it could just as easily indicate the woman's been leaned on as it may indicate her son was a "special" person with an emotionally retarded way of expressing himself
You're a right b*st*rd. Pissing on both Mark and Mrs. Bingham in a single short sentence.
Somewhat illogical Chipmunk. If Mrs Bingham had been leaned on, she'd deserve sympathy for being put in that plight.
Forgive me, I wrote in haste--her name is not Bingham, it's Alice Hoglan.
You're saying she's lying. Whether she was "leaned on" or not, you're accusing her of lying to cover up the truth behind her son's murder.
Quote:
And you can ask as many human beings as you like, the massive consensus is going to be that any child talking to his or her mother who introduces themselves with both their names is somewhat unusual.
Next time you're under life-or-death stress and say something a bit odd, I'll be sure to call you a retard.
Bingham's wasn't the only call that got through, you know. If Mark Bingham's voice was faked, then so were:
Tom Burnett's
Jeremy Glick's
Edward Felt's
Linda Gronlund's
Todd Beamer's
Honor Elizabeth Wainio's
CeeCee Lyles'
Sandra Bradshaw's
Lauren Grandcolas'
It also means the cockpit voice recorder was faked.
Is it getting absurd enough for you yet?
Anyone else's final words to their loved ones you'd like to accuse of fakery without any evidence, Patrick? _________________ "They, the jews, also have this thing about linage don't they?
We know a person from recent history who had a thing for linage and gene pools don't we?"
--Patrick Brown
Were all those people on the same flight? _________________ We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk Get the Steven E Jones reports>HERE<
All fakes? _________________ "They, the jews, also have this thing about linage don't they?
We know a person from recent history who had a thing for linage and gene pools don't we?"
--Patrick Brown
Hmm any from flights 175 and 11? _________________ We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk Get the Steven E Jones reports>HERE<
_________________ "They, the jews, also have this thing about linage don't they?
We know a person from recent history who had a thing for linage and gene pools don't we?"
--Patrick Brown
Joined: 13 Apr 2006 Posts: 804 Location: London Town
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:12 pm Post subject:
....and each and every one of these lucky callers managed to get through, despite the fact that they were in the midst of an hijacking and making panic-stricken calls from planes flying at such high speeds. Ah, September 11th, 2001, the skies were full of magic and wonder.... _________________ 'Maybe if I can show some lurking kids that this is all a pack of lies, then maybe I can make a difference. I don't plan on converting any of you because you're all mad.'
-Johnny Pixels
....and each and every one of these lucky callers managed to get through, despite the fact that they were in the midst of an hijacking and making panic-stricken calls from planes flying at such high speeds. Ah, September 11th, 2001, the skies were full of magic and wonder....
Yes, almost every call was made from a magical device called an air phone.
There are also many attempted calls recorded by the phone companies that never got through. _________________ "They, the jews, also have this thing about linage don't they?
We know a person from recent history who had a thing for linage and gene pools don't we?"
--Patrick Brown
Last edited by chipmunk stew on Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:20 pm; edited 1 time in total
Joined: 13 Apr 2006 Posts: 804 Location: London Town
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:20 pm Post subject:
chipmunk stew wrote:
prole art threat wrote:
....and each and every one of these lucky callers managed to get through, despite the fact that they were in the midst of an hijacking and making panic-stricken calls from planes flying at such high speeds. Ah, September 11th, 2001, the skies were full of magic and wonder....
Yes, almost every call was made from a magical device called an air phone.
You were standing next to them all were you? It must have been a big queue?? _________________ 'Maybe if I can show some lurking kids that this is all a pack of lies, then maybe I can make a difference. I don't plan on converting any of you because you're all mad.'
-Johnny Pixels
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
