| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
scubadiver
Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 1850
Location: Currently Andover
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Woodee
Moderate Poster
Joined: 08 Sep 2006
Posts: 159
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marky 54
Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 6:29 am Post subject: Re: Anyone seen this Pentagon video: very strange... |
 |
|
| just hoping you know thats fake? im sure you do but from the talk you seem to believe it. someones mocked it up for a laugh(taking the piss) although not sure what they are taking the mick out of conspricay theorys or the original pentagon footage. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Woodee
Moderate Poster
Joined: 08 Sep 2006
Posts: 159
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I really can't believe there isn't more replies to the video I posted!!
http://www.911blogger.com/node/4783
A very blurry "security" video. I'll post here what I posted at 911blogger
| Quote: | | It looks like SOMETHING hit it... wasn't a plane, moving too slow. Looks like a truck bomb or something? A big lump moved towards the building and explodes. Definately not an object moving at 500 mph |
| Quote: | Has it occured to anyone that this video isn't a very good "security" camera? If this was supposed to be covering the car park to catch people on tape that might be trying to steal cars... then why the hell is it so blurry? Even my oldest VHS tape isn't that bad!!! If security cameras are as blurry as this then I guess no one ever finds people's faces on them, just a blurry mess to convict car jackers.
Wouldn't it be worth asking the hotel to see their current camera footage and how clear it is? Or would they have been told to not say anything about their OWN security camera? Matching the perpective from now... to the version we have now would be a simple overlay job, then we will see what video is truely lying!!
Surely the staff at that hotel can tell someone something?? |
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hazzard
Moderate Poster
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 368
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I knew it was a dildo....I just knew it!
_________________
Since when? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
commanderson
Minor Poster
Joined: 03 Dec 2006
Posts: 94
Location: Edinburgh
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi there, first time poster here
this video is laughable, looks like a toyplane superimosed on the pentagon, totally rubish, the second shows no plane, but something at incredibly low level, looks like theyre realy trying hookwink confessions here, almost like a threat. Like saying "hey we are gonna mock up such fake footage, to tell you we're covering it up, but you better lock in your doublethink mechanisms, to allow you to see this and still at the sametime accept the official storey as your truth"
Theyre messing with our heads psy-ops rather than oops I reckon |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
utopiated
Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Jun 2006
Posts: 645
Location: UK Midlands
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Woodee
Moderate Poster
Joined: 08 Sep 2006
Posts: 159
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jesus... will you you ppl look at the OTHER video? the one which isn't 3 frames that someone knocked up in photoshop to act like a jerk!
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GodSaveTheTeam
Moderator
Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 575
Location: the eyevolution
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 10:31 pm Post subject: actual new pentagon footage |
|
|
Again..where is the plane?The CNN report beneath the vid says the only known images of the plane are on the Pentagons own footage released earlier this year which was also released due to a lawsuit from Judicial Watch but the plane as we know is not visible on that footage either.So, one would have to ask, what is Judicial Watch's own standpoint on 9/11 theories?According to their sites front page they attribute the word 'terrorism' to 9/11.This would suggest no questioning of the official theory.If I am wrong please tell me,but if the latest 'no plane' footage is not enough to make JW publicly question the Keane commission,one would have to question their credibility and involvment in the possible 'honey trap' Pentagon tapes theory.
_________________
http://www.youtube.com/user/bobzimmerfan?feature=mhum#p/a |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Woodee
Moderate Poster
Joined: 08 Sep 2006
Posts: 159
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
what confuses me is they said this one was released because of a lawsuit, why haven't the other been released because of this lawsuit? and what was the lawsuit?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
