FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

'no hijacked planes' for Dummies
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Critics' Corner
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Ally
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 04 Aug 2005
Posts: 909
Location: banned

PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 12:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

crazytmacy wrote:
Ally, you have truly opened my eyes and I would like to thank you for doing so. If it wasn't for you I would have never known that the United States Government pulled off the greatest special effects feat in history and then slipped it to every major television station without anyone noticing that the live footage was being manipulated to absolute perfection. Me being the computer science and special effects major in college that i am, find it simply brilliant that they pulled off such beautiful explosions that were identical from all angles and even fake handicam shots from the ground. That is not by any means possible to do, but they did it, and that just makes it even more amazing. But the most brilliant maneuver by this horrible government was the mass brainwashing of the entire city of New York to completely re-write the population's memory and make them think they saw a plane hit the building. We need to get the word out and inform everyone. Thanks again Ally, I promise to do my part.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
crazytmacy
New Poster
New Poster


Joined: 07 Dec 2006
Posts: 6
Location: US of A

PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 12:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why is it patronizing? Am I not allowed to agree with you?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
telecasterisation
Banned
Banned


Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs

PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 1:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

crazytmacy wrote:
Why is it patronizing? Am I not allowed to agree with you?


You are allowed to agree - but you did it in a patronizing way.

In addition, you were condescending and sarcastic, heavily lacing it with satire, rhetoric, not to mention you were a trifle sardonic.

_________________
I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
crazytmacy
New Poster
New Poster


Joined: 07 Dec 2006
Posts: 6
Location: US of A

PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 6:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm very sorry, I just got on this forum, I don't want to make enemies right off the bat. So I guess I will re-word my first post with a little less enthusiasm.

Thank you Ally for pointing me in the direction of the truth. No one around me in my school, town or family agrees with me on the subject so it is comforting to find someone who does. Planes did not hit the buildings, I think I am one of the only people on this thing that agrees with you. I know the special effects that were done are impossible, but it's the United States Government, we can't put anything past them. Then the systematic brainwashing off all the citizens of New York who believe they saw planes hit the buildings. Im sorry if my previous post was overzealous, but it is very pertinent and disturbing issues that I believe should be met with that type of excitement. So Ally, I know we have started off on a bed foot, but I hope I can be your friend on here, from what I've read it seems not too many people agree with you, but I do.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Johnny Pixels
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 932
Location: A Sooper Sekrit Bunker

PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 7:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

crazytmacy wrote:
I'm very sorry, I just got on this forum, I don't want to make enemies right off the bat. So I guess I will re-word my first post with a little less enthusiasm.

Thank you Ally for pointing me in the direction of the truth. No one around me in my school, town or family agrees with me on the subject so it is comforting to find someone who does. Planes did not hit the buildings, I think I am one of the only people on this thing that agrees with you. I know the special effects that were done are impossible, but it's the United States Government, we can't put anything past them. Then the systematic brainwashing off all the citizens of New York who believe they saw planes hit the buildings. Im sorry if my previous post was overzealous, but it is very pertinent and disturbing issues that I believe should be met with that type of excitement. So Ally, I know we have started off on a bed foot, but I hope I can be your friend on here, from what I've read it seems not too many people agree with you, but I do.


So they can CGI planes into hundreds of videos and hologram them into the sky to fool thousands of eyewitnesses, carry out some kind of explosive attack on the pentagon, but they can't keep their ratings up in simple opinion polls?

_________________

I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth. - Umberto Eco
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
crazytmacy
New Poster
New Poster


Joined: 07 Dec 2006
Posts: 6
Location: US of A

PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 7:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Johnny it's not holograms, I dont buy that one. We are far more capable of brainwashing the witnesses than creating large moving holograms.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Johnny Pixels
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 932
Location: A Sooper Sekrit Bunker

PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 8:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

crazytmacy wrote:
Johnny it's not holograms, I dont buy that one. We are far more capable of brainwashing the witnesses than creating large moving holograms.


Ok substitute your brianwashing technique for holograms then, but they still can't control their opinion poll rating. Even more bizarre if they can control the population in the way you suggest.

_________________

I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth. - Umberto Eco
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
kc
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 359

PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 12:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

just curious but am I the only person here who actually knows someone who was at ground zero on 11/9?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ally
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 04 Aug 2005
Posts: 909
Location: banned

PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 1:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

no
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
telecasterisation
Banned
Banned


Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs

PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 4:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kc wrote:
just curious but am I the only person here who actually knows someone who was at ground zero on 11/9?


I didn't know anybody at Ground Zero on 9/11, but I saw the Chuckle Brothers in a pantomime that same year. I also bought my most treasured possession from E-bay, a Chuckle Brothers gravy boat.

_________________
I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fallious
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 762

PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 5:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Surely that's not an official, licensed chuckle brothers gravy boat?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
telecasterisation
Banned
Banned


Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs

PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fallious wrote:
Surely that's not an official, licensed chuckle brothers gravy boat?


It absolutely frikkin' is - I even have the paperwork to prove I have number 17 of a LIMITED run of 100 (yes you read that correctly).

It stays locked in the presentation case and it will be buried with me.

_________________
I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sandhutbabe
New Poster
New Poster


Joined: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 3
Location: Greenville, NC, USA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 8:16 am    Post subject: Re: 'no-planes' for Dummies Reply with quote

[quote="Ally"]
Johnny Pixels wrote:
Ally wrote:



This still leaves unanswered the question of what happened to the passengers alleged to be aboard the non existent flights. (See update below) In the case of AA 77, while one can always speculate about the most plausible scenarios, I prefer to wait until some real evidence emerges. However in the case of AA 11, I think it is worth noting that UA 175 left from the same airport, at the same time for the same destination as that normally applicable to AA 11. Therefore, although there is no direct evidence to support the claim, it would seem reasonable to speculate at this stage that any passengers who booked for AA 11 that day, and went to the airport, expecting to get on AA 11, may have been told that there was a last minute problem with the flight which could not be fixed within a reasonable period of time, and were offered a flight on UA 175 as compensation.



The data in this search indicates that we have been systematically lied to about the alleged flight paths and hijacking sequence of AA 11 and AA 77, as well as the alleged phone calls made from the planes.



It also indicates probable complicity by American Airlines in the events of Sept 11 , 2001.




Why is it that none of these supposed passengers have come foward with any "hey thats right!! They changed my flight that day!" information? If this was a concieveable theory (it isnt) then dont you think someone would want their 15 mins of fame on Larry King Live?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Dogsmilk
Mighty Poster
Mighty Poster


Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 1616

PostPosted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 8:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I genuinely do know someone who was in central New York on the day - and she didn't see any planes.
However, this was probably explained by the fact she'd been out drinking the night before and slept through the whole affair in her hotel room. Which is typical for her.

_________________
It's a man's life in MOSSAD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
IronSnot
Relentless Limpet Shill
Relentless Limpet Shill


Joined: 07 Jul 2006
Posts: 595
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 1:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

See all the clowns here;

http://breakfornews.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=515&start=30&postdays=0& postorder=asc&highlight=&sid=e9201720fce1699abe055c2374e71f87

I wonder who that stilldiggin bloke is. Rolling Eyes

Next time you're chatting online to the Webfairy, Ally, would you mind getting her to pass on a pic of herself?

Twisted Evil
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ally
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 04 Aug 2005
Posts: 909
Location: banned

PostPosted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 1:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

someone pls ban this worthless sack of shat

thanx

_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bushwacker
Relentless Limpet Shill
Relentless Limpet Shill


Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 1628

PostPosted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 2:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ally wrote:
someone pls ban this worthless sack of shat

thanx

OK then, you are hereby banned Ally.

_________________
".......some partial collapse [of WTC7] would not have been suspicious......." - chek
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ally
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 04 Aug 2005
Posts: 909
Location: banned

PostPosted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 3:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote


Link
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
IronSnot
Relentless Limpet Shill
Relentless Limpet Shill


Joined: 07 Jul 2006
Posts: 595
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 11:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think it's kind of illuminating Ally that on that thread from Fintan's site, that both Veronica and one of the webfairys have come out of nowhere to encourage you.

Think about it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Critics' Corner All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Page 4 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group