| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
DaveyJ
Minor Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 94
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 3:47 pm Post subject: Sites in support |
 |
|
could someone please link me some 911 truth sites that they concider the best of the bunch. that best display the theory and evidence behind the arugment
many thanks
________
Honda CMX250C
Last edited by DaveyJ on Tue Feb 01, 2011 9:26 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bushwacker
Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 1628
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This one is quite good, and this one.
_________________
".......some partial collapse [of WTC7] would not have been suspicious......." - chek |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation
Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 5:23 pm Post subject: Re: Sites in support |
|
|
| DaveyJ wrote: | could someone please link me some 911 truth sites that they concider the best of the bunch. that best display the theory and evidence behind the arugment
many thanks |
Unquestionably;
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?act=idx
Whilst it may not be packed with A - Z type followability, it does cover every aspect of 9/11 and has people on the ground doing actual research and not just offering debate.
There isn't a 9/11 subject that hasn't been covered and you can ask questions - be wary though, newbies are always regarded with suspicion.
_________________
I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Johnny Pixels
Moderate Poster
Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 932
Location: A Sooper Sekrit Bunker
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 7:18 pm Post subject: Re: Sites in support |
|
|
| telecasterisation wrote: |
There isn't a 9/11 subject that hasn't been covered and you can ask questions - be wary though, newbies are always regarded with suspicion. |
I don't think that suspicion is the right word. You're alright there as long as you follow their line. Start asking questions and you're out on your ear. Which is ironic coming from a movement that's "just asking questions".
_________________
I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth. - Umberto Eco
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DaveyJ
Minor Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 94
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
One argument that always seems most relevant is profiling the people alleged behind the attacks. A silhouette puffing on a Cuban in a dark room is easy to vilify but its hard imaging an elaborate and extensive net work of people going home to children and wives having just murdered five thousand of their all American country men. However the CIA did do this in panama by sending in troops meant to to look guerrilla fighters to kill a boat of load of American tourists to give motif to invade. But having googled this i can find no references or any mention at all. Does anyone know where i can find some sources of this?
________
marijuana trichomes
Last edited by DaveyJ on Tue Feb 01, 2011 9:26 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Patrick Brown
9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 10 Oct 2006
Posts: 1201
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Thermate
Angel - now passed away
Joined: 13 Nov 2006
Posts: 445
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 1:18 pm Post subject: Re: Sites in support |
|
|
| Johnny Pixels wrote: | | Start asking questions and you're out on your ear. |
Could do with more of that around here... If you claim to believe the Official Conspiracy Theory, why would you spend time on a forum for people who believe its bs?
_________________
Make love, not money. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Johnny Pixels
Moderate Poster
Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 932
Location: A Sooper Sekrit Bunker
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 7:06 pm Post subject: Re: Sites in support |
|
|
| Thermate wrote: | | Johnny Pixels wrote: | | Start asking questions and you're out on your ear. |
Could do with more of that around here... If you claim to believe the Official Conspiracy Theory, why would you spend time on a forum for people who believe its bs? |
Good idea, chuck out dissenters so it doesn't make your crazy world look quite so stupid.
If you believe in the conspiracy theory, why do you need to hang around a forum convincing yourself it is true?
_________________
I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth. - Umberto Eco
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Stefan
Banned
Joined: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 1219
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Retracted for now- needs updating.
Last edited by Stefan on Tue Dec 12, 2006 10:31 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Johnny Pixels
Moderate Poster
Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 932
Location: A Sooper Sekrit Bunker
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Koheleth wrote: |
After quoting the government website “Ohio Task Force workers anchored this 600,000-pound beam from the World Trade Centre lodged in a nearby building.” They immediately say that it must be wrong and they must have in fact meant 60,000 pounds. Did they ring the government agency and check? No, they just say they must mean this because the calculations they soon give rely completely on it being so.
|
The calculations they give are:
| Quote: |
First, the reported weight of this particular beam is quoted as “600,000 pounds”, or 300 tons. But as each WTC tower is generally said to have used 200,000 tons of steel, that means this beam is supposed to represent 0.15% of the entire structure, or around one sixth of the structural steel required for a single floor. Now, a close up shot shows there is a big chunk of steel there, but “600,000 pounds”? We don’t think so. |
Do you really think that one floor is held up by 6 of those beams? I think it is safe to assume that the 600,000 pound figure is in error.
_________________
I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth. - Umberto Eco
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
