Shayler Talks 911 on Sky News

[Annie]

Hi TimmyG

Here's the interview. I think you will agree that Dave did an amazing job in getting all the key points over, and finishing on a note of hope and empowerment.

I think the interviwer had orders down his earpiece to ask Dave about the NPT. Up until that point he looks transfixed, and then comes to life and goes on the attack. However, from what I remember, Dave skirts around the issue, and just asks people to look for themselves.

Enjoy!

http://www.officialconfusion.com/shayleronsky.html

[commanderson]

Sh*t! Another very public straw man, I'm beggining to believe ANYBODY who you might find appearing on a mainstream programme discussing conspiracies, is a disinfo agent.
I've had a great deal of respect for David Shayler throughout his carreer as a whistle blower, and in a way the first twenty minutes of this interveiw is the best performance he's ever given, being very lucid and addressing all the points given made suctsinctly and articulately (almost although it was scripted)
The very fact the news caster allows and encourages this debate on fake terror (when the real topic is meant to be the libvanyenko assasination) is suspicious, as when David Icke appeared on this morning and started giving info on this topic, he was steered into his reptillian theoreys, to avoid and discredit the nuts and bolts 9/11 facts.
The same thing is done at the end of this interveiw, after all the right on, on the level research is disclosed, he drops a big turd in there (with a cheeky smirk) that planes didn't even hit the towers. He didn't need to say this, as he had just been able to speak for 20mins and give lots of credible verifyable research 9/11 7/7,
I don't know where this No planes theorey came from, but it seems like a few have been sucked in by it (or have adopted it to divide and scupper the truth campaign).
There is some synchronisity here as I was just listening this morning to the Jeff Rense show with william rodriguez (caretaker at WTC who helped firfighters access the stairwells) and this is where I first heard of this no-planes theorey William had to break ranks with jimmy water and his reopen911.org because or their endorsement of this ludicious idea.
It was just after hearing this on the show that I logged on here and read this tread and watched the shayler interveiw, we have to be aware that may of these public personalities and organisations, might well be controlled entities to misguide and divide the opinions of their supporters.
For me the same suspicions have fallen upon David Icke, for his involvement in this brandon corey storey fuc-u-mentary farce, it seems to me there is a series of constant attacks being made upon the overall truth movements, and that the presumed leaders and spokespeople for the alternative veiw are intimately involved in this dis-info.
All I'm waiting for now is for alex Jones to put his foot in his mouth.

[Andrew Johnson]

Here we go round the mulberry bush,
the mulberry bush,
the mulberry bush,

Here we go round the mulberry bush,
On a wet and windy morning!

Anyone like discuss points of evidence at all?

Or are we trapped in the media spin and PR world of mainstream media and digital TV?

"We look good!"
"We look bad!"

It's sounding like it was a party political broadcast!! Heck, I haven't even had time to watch it yet!! Tsk!

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

[John White]

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

[commanderson]

[markwm]

I felt he diminished his own arguments the moment he started talking about planes melting into buildings.

There's so much other evidence that you don't even need to mention this! the moment you do people will think you're an idiot.

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

[Fallious]

[kbo234]

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

[Fallious]

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

[Annie]

Hi TTWSY3

Not making excuses, just explaining. I think Shayler did a magnificent job on Sky IMHO.

And I'm not in any particular research camp. I hate labels. Plus, what with being on the road a lot and my computer being down about 70% of the time because it's being attacked, my research time has been severely curtailed recently.

If anything, I would say I'm in the campaigning camp: getting the fact that the official version of 911 is a crock of sh*t out to as many people as possible!

Regards

Annie

[Busker]

[Garcon Warrior]

Wow six posts by TTWSU3 and not one mention about the beam weapon that must be some sort of record. Now DS has mentioned of no planes on sky news were back onto the no planes. You mentioned your campaigning in the park does your dog walk you round or do you walk the dog?

I have a couple of questions about the interview firstly:

It looked to me that the interview was set up to talk about 9/11 and not about the russian spy or the moon or Iraq surely an interviewer brings the topic of discussion on to the topics that were mentioned at the top of the news hour and not going along with what a guest is saying. Usually an interviewer brings a new subject up or says to the guest we have gone slightly off topic?


Secondly AM states that she did not know that DS would be talking about 9/11 on the sky interview and also states that a producer asked the interviewer to question DS on the no planes theory. So did the producers know that 9/11 would be talked about so that the no plane theory would come up?

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

[Fallious]

[Graham]

great coverage

[utopiated]

[Snowygrouch]

I really never managed to understand why people have to write 2 lines of their own text and THEN copy about a page of text from the previous answer which is clearly visable 2 inches above anyway!!!!!

What a waste of web-space. Its my one personal item of net-hate.

Now to TWSU3; I belive that stating "I dont know" is an infinitely better state of logical analysis than being scared to "not know eveything".

If you MUST 'know' everything about 9/11 then you can just make up any old rubbish to fill in the gaps. Oh but wait; thats exactly what HAS happened here with NPT!

I dont know "where the passengers are" or "wheres the planes" and I`m perfectly comfortable with that.

It seems not everyone is..............

C.

[chek]

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

[chek]

You're in critic territory now TTWSU3 - demanding explanations is their favourite ploy.
But as a working hypothesis, big Boeings were flown into the Towers, and then - when it seemed likely the fires might be contained - they were demolished top down by a combination of high explosives on the outer walls and thermate in the corner and core columns.

Of course we don't know how, but we do know that holograms, simul-tv fakery and beam weapons are more creative thinking than hard fact.

[TimmyG]

that interview was going really well.. i was really pleased. I hoped the npt comment early on would be the only one made during the interview as david handled it well ('watch the video in slow motion and draw your own conclusions') and although I felt slightly uneasy, the debate didn't indulge on the issue at this point, so i was happy...

a lot of good comments were made by david, put across really well. The lack of evidence to support the OCT, explosives in the towers and wtc7. The interviewer was suprising receptive for a sky news presenter i thought. Even the on-hand 'critic' was fairly reasonable and not entirely dismissive of most of the evidence being discussed. Half way through the interview I was actually quite excited about the whole thing! David made reference his own experience of false flag terrorism, highlighted the fact that 9/11 isn't an isolated case, got some great information 'out there' about Litvinenko etc... came across as a credible voice, it seemed, although being (unsuprisingly) amidst skepticism, David was being taken seriously by both sky news and Margolis.. the public emails reflected a (so far) successful dialogue for David and the truth movement.

but then at the end, unfortunately, the issue of the planes was brought up again and David took things a step up with the 'melting' comment, causing both Johnathan Margolis and the sky presenter to stop dead in their tracks. Silence and an outward appearance which indicated that, whereas a few seconds ago they were skeptics who were considering this persons theories, they now were concerned about David's mental well being and perhaps even their own proximity to him.

Whether you are a noplaner or a plane hugger.. the public aren't ready to consider the no planes stuff, and they don't have to!! There's plenty of other evidence which is much more credible,involves a lot less speculation and far fewer variables. There was sooo much progress made in that interview before the end imo.. Personally I think it would benefit the 'movement' massively if people who appear credible (like david) don't juxtapose such highly speculative theories with credible evidence.

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

[John White]