| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
rodin
Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Dec 2006
Posts: 2224
Location: UK
|
 Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 4:43 am Post subject: Shayler is so wrong here |
 |
|
I just looked again @ the slowmo of the plane entering the building. It's a real plane IMO. As it goes in it will be sliced like a potato hitting a tennis racket...
Get a grip you lot. Time is short.
_________________
Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Leiff
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 509
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
utopiated
Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Jun 2006
Posts: 645
Location: UK Midlands
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
commanderson
Minor Poster
Joined: 03 Dec 2006
Posts: 94
Location: Edinburgh
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 6:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | Hi Veronica
That was an excellent post.
I wish you would post more frequently on this site.
More and more people are accepting that conventional CD of the whole building is no longer plausible - however as you can see from the last couple of posters some are still in denial.
Don't let them put you off - they still believe that planes can cut through buildings like a knife through butter |
setus3!
Will you stop trying to divide opinion here, trying to link the beam weapon argument with no planes.
The plain facts are-
1. There is NO need, or evidence for no planes (other than recently appearing video footage with planes disappearing behin the buildings), the origonal footage shows no such anomolies.
2. There may be a need to have something else pulverising the concrete ALONG WITH conventional controlled demolition, as this alone does not explain the concrete powder or pyroclastic flows.
Don't try to link them, they are nothing to do with oneanother, one explains the way we saw the towers collapse and pulverise, the other is a strawman argument predicated on some mocked up footage thats only been seen recently- go and watch the naudet bros doco, or road to tyrany and see if the anomolies are there.
p.S. Yea thanks Veronica for a great post, I think the beam weapon argument has much validity to it, but it seems like we're really getting hung up on squables about detail right now.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
THETRUTHWILLSETU3
9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 1009
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| commanderson wrote: | | THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | Hi Veronica
That was an excellent post.
I wish you would post more frequently on this site.
More and more people are accepting that conventional CD of the whole building is no longer plausible - however as you can see from the last couple of posters some are still in denial.
Don't let them put you off - they still believe that planes can cut through buildings like a knife through butter |
setus3!
Will you stop trying to divide opinion here, trying to link the beam weapon argument with no planes.
The plain facts are-
1. There is NO need, or evidence for no planes (other than recently appearing video footage with planes disappearing behin the buildings), the origonal footage shows no such anomolies.
2. There may be a need to have something else pulverising the concrete ALONG WITH conventional controlled demolition, as this alone does not explain the concrete powder or pyroclastic flows.
Don't try to link them, they are nothing to do with oneanother, one explains the way we saw the towers collapse and pulverise, the other is a strawman argument predicated on some mocked up footage thats only been seen recently- go and watch the naudet bros doco, or road to tyrany and see if the anomolies are there.
p.S. Yea thanks Veronica for a great post, I think the beam weapon argument has much validity to it, but it seems like we're really getting hung up on squables about detail right now. |
Don't Panic Commanderson - it's only a game (life that is)
Go and lock yourself in a darkened room and say to yourself
Another day another crocodile
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
