Blair: David Duke at Iran Conference 'Unbelievable'

[kbo234]

Blair is certainly a Freemason. It has been reported that he is also a 'Knight of Malta', another masonic outfit.

Most masonic oaths were written, as I understand it, by one Albert Pike, a Luciferian (Google 'Morals and Dogma' and read his own words for yourself).

Pike was also one of the FOUNDERS of the Ku Klux Klan.

Is Blair really the person to be criticising Duke whose involvement with the Klan (overtly at least) ended many years ago.....while he himself has sworn blood-curdling oaths of loyalty to secret powers in words written by Pike.

Blair's behaviour is therefore RIGHT NOW bounded and defined by these wicked oaths.

The two most serious political changes our world requires are:

1) The abolition of the creation of money by private interests.
2) The banning of the involvement of secret societies and secret oaths for anyone standing for public office.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTic3F6clrM

[conspirac man]

That's very interesting. I whole-heartedly agree.

But boys will be boys, & masons will be masons.

[PaulStott]

[Mark Gobell]

It's easy Paul. Start up your web browser, type in www.google.com then press enter. Then type blair david duke then press enter then click on the first link.

et voila

http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/world/ny-woholo135013828dec13, 0,5451087.story?coll=ny-worldnews-print

VIENNA - British Prime Minister Tony Blair joined a firestorm of indignant voices across Europe yesterday, denouncing a gathering of Holocaust deniers in Iran as "shocking beyond belief" and proof of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's extremism.

"I mean, to go and invite the former head of the Ku Klux Klan to a conference in Tehran which disputes the millions of people who died in the Holocaust ... what further evidence do you need that this regime is extreme?" Blair asked in London. David Duke, an ex-Klan leader and former Louisiana state representative, was among those at the two-day conference.

Although organizers touted it as a scholarly gathering, the meeting angered many in countries such as Austria, Germany and France, where it is illegal to deny aspects of the Holocaust and the Nazis' systematic extermination of 6 million Jews.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel said her country repudiated the conference - which gathered 67 writers and researchers from 30 countries, most of whom argue that either the Holocaust did not happen or that it was vastly exaggerated.

"We absolutely reject this. Germany will never accept this," Merkel told reporters as she stood alongside visiting Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, who denounced the meeting as a "danger" to the Western world.

Anger over the conference could further isolate Iran as the West considers sanctions in the standoff over Tehran's nuclear program. Yesterday, Ahmadinejad said Israel will one day be "wiped out" as the Soviet Union was, drawing applause from conference participants. He appeared to revel in meeting delegates, shaking hands with American participants and sitting near six anti-Israel Jewish participants dressed in black ultra-Orthodox coats and hats.

Ahmadinejad announced the conference would set up a "fact-finding commission" to determine whether the Holocaust happened and "help end a 60-year-old dispute."

The White House condemned Iran for convening a meeting it called "an affront to the entire civilized world."

Soeren Espersen of the Danish People's Party, which staunchly defended the publication early this year of cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad, said again that people should have the right to speak their minds - even at a "hideous" conference like this one. "We believe in freedom of speech also for nut cases," he said.

Deborah Lipstadt, a professor of Holocaust studies at Emory University in Atlanta, drew a distinction. "It's one thing to poke fun at a faith - even Judaism," she said.

"It's a different thing to lie about history."

===============================================
I just love the allegory: "a firestorm of indignant voices"

Organising a conference to debate an historical issue of global significance is now "extremism".

Blair: what further evidence do you need that this regime is extreme?

Well, Princess Tony, not anywhere near as extreme as murdering 650,000 Iraqi civilians wouldn't you agree ?

Or dropping nuclear weapons on Japan ?

Or appointing the Stalinist John Reid who started political life like most of your erstwhile politically cleansed party as an acolyte of another famous mass murderer, who slaughtered tens of millions of Russians. That's kinda extreme don't you think Princess ? Does that holocaust count ? Does the 50 million who died in the 2nd World War count as a holocaust ? Or the millions who died in the 1st war ? Can we discuss those without fear of having our books burned and thrown into your gulags ?

Or how about having your own gestapo murder it's own citizens in cold blood and then denying them justice eh Princess ? That's a tad extreme by anyone's book isn't it Tony ?

I guess the Rabbis who attended are just your typical, run of the mill, anti-Israeli, self-hating Joos with nothing better to do.

Ehud Olmert: ... a "danger" to the Western world.

Explain please Mr Olmert ?

The only possible way that I can interpret your statement that proposes the organisation of a conference in Tehran to discuss an historical event is a threat to the Western world is that it is only the "west" that could be threatened by it and that implicit threat would somehow undermine the security of the Western world ?

All you have to do now Mr Olmert et al is to provide some evidence. Tell us all how the west and not the east, is threatened by a discourse and we'll all no doubt go back to sleep.

Could it be that something dark and nasty could emerge from such a conference that would threaten the very pillars of our society ?

Is that what you mean Mr Olmert ?

Are we to imagine a sinister post conference orgy of enlightenment that could shake the foundations of the "western" world ?

What is it that you know Mr Olmert that eludes me ?

In the meantime, I guess you'd better dust off those nukes just in case eh before someone blows the gaff.

Deborah Lipstadt: "It's a different thing to lie about history."

Indeed it is Ms Lipstadt. Indeed it is.

Or, even, to lie about contemporary events eh Ms Lipstadt ?

The Palestinians know all about lies don't they Ms Lipstadt. As do we all. Historically and presently.

[telecasterisation]

[Newspeak International]

Nice post Mark.

[kbo234]