View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
DisgracedDemocracy New Poster
Joined: 08 Dec 2006 Posts: 7 Location: Cardiff
|
Posted: Sat Dec 16, 2006 4:44 pm Post subject: Interesting Email |
|
|
I was browsing on the BBC web site and found an interview with a Mr Robertson. He helped to design the World Trade Centres. So I looked up his email and sent him a message, asking what he thought of the controlled demolition hypothesis and the 911 truth movement in general!
This was the reply I recieved,
'in order for the 'controlled demolition' theory to have validity, it would be necessary for those who would demolish to develop a method for the timing of the many concentrations of explosives to be detonated in exact timing with the falling of the towers.
This and many other reasons lead persons without political motives to abandon the theory.
Professor Jones is no longer a professor...having come to a parting of the ways with his univesity.
This is not a "massive movement".
The matter is not worthy of further serious consideration by non-prejudiced scientists and engineers.'
This is his email if anybody wants to contact him - xxlerxx@yahoo.com _________________ The patriot's blood is the seed of Freedom's tree. ~Thomas Campbell
It is easy to take liberty for granted, when you have never had it taken from you. ~Dick Cheney aka tossa |
|
Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 1873 Location: Upstairs
|
Posted: Sat Dec 16, 2006 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It is strange that he is both architect and demolitions expert.
What did you think of his response? _________________ I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PersianPaladin New Poster
Joined: 16 Dec 2006 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Sat Dec 16, 2006 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
His response means nothing and is laughable. Does he not know what a controlled demolition is? lOL. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pikey Banned
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 1491 Location: North Lancashire
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
John White Site Admin
Joined: 27 Mar 2006 Posts: 3187 Location: Here to help!
|
Posted: Sat Dec 16, 2006 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | 'in order for the 'controlled demolition' theory to have validity, it would be necessary for those who would demolish to develop a method for the timing of the many concentrations of explosives to be detonated in exact timing with the falling of the towers. |
Hardly seems like an insurmountable technical barrier to me _________________ Free your Self and Free the World |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Snowygrouch Validated Poster
Joined: 02 Apr 2006 Posts: 628 Location: Oxford
|
Posted: Sat Dec 16, 2006 11:02 pm Post subject: Explosives |
|
|
The PC he used to type that message is 1000times more complex than a system required to do such a thing.
_________________ The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist
President Eisenhower 1961 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ignatz Moderate Poster
Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 918
|
Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 12:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
John White wrote: | Quote: | 'in order for the 'controlled demolition' theory to have validity, it would be necessary for those who would demolish to develop a method for the timing of the many concentrations of explosives to be detonated in exact timing with the falling of the towers. |
Hardly seems like an insurmountable technical barrier to me |
Then you might be interested in The Truther Challenge. Details available over in CC.
£500 donation available for NSPCC, I'll cover incidental expenses, and perhaps we can all meet up and have a pint and a jolly old chat about, er, fishing? _________________ So remember - next time you can't find a parking spot, go to plan B: blow up your car |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hazzard Moderate Poster
Joined: 14 May 2006 Posts: 368
|
Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OMFG ofcourse they can time demolitions to fall with the building!
You see it in just about any big budget action movie with anything resembling an explosion in sequence. _________________ Since when? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|