Pentagon Probed!

Thermate · Angel - now passed away Joined: 13 Nov 2006 Posts: 445

Which do you support? The 'Other' option would include the Honeypot Theory where they plan to release footage showing the Big Boeing when the time is right, to debunk us.

outsider · Posted: Sat Dec 16, 2006 9:34 pm Post subject:

I put my vote in, for a missile. Slightly related, any one know if any request was made to Naudet Bros. for permission to examine their original film?? Not that they would allow it, of course, but it would be one more indication that the Twin Towers 'plane/s' footage was tampered with if/when they refuse. Powers that be check it out??? By the way, why not a poll on not 'planes/no planes', but 'scheduled passenger-containing airliners' / 'something else'. My vote will be 'something else'.

Busker · Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 8:30 am Post subject:

I went for missile as well.

The main reason for this is in all the crappy quality stills that have been released there appears to be a vapour trail of whatever did hit.

I've never seen a jet engine leave a vapour trail at ground level.

I have seen the Shuttle leave a vapour trail at ground level during launch.

IronSnot · Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 9:47 am Post subject:

There are too many witnesses in my view, for it to have been a missile.

So I've gone for a big boeing but I don't believe for a minute that it was N644AA.

But who knows.

Hazzard · Moderate Poster Joined: 14 May 2006 Posts: 368

Global Hawk.

Newspeak International · Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 11:13 pm Post subject:

IronSnot · Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 11:34 pm Post subject:

Newspeak International · Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 12:26 am Post subject:

There's that S word again, you wont find evidence to prove such.

That's all very well stating "it's probably a 737" where is the evidence on the ground, er lawn?

IronSnot · Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 5:19 am Post subject:

Newspeak International · Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 6:50 am Post subject:

IronSnot · Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 8:18 am Post subject:

Enough.

This is a poll, where posters can also state what they think happenned. I don't think it's a suitable place to pick a fight.

Mate.

telecasterisation · Banned Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 1873 Location: Upstairs

Many accuse me of being a 'shill' (daft word in the context used here I know), because I often come at thread topics from what some consider a confusing angle, one that tends to appear contradicory to Truther ideals. This is because I haven't made up my mind either way. Just because I question controlled demo or agree that a critic has made a good point, simply means I am looking at things from both sides/angles.

I am certain I am not the only one here who finds aspects and theories discussed to be incomplete and inconclusive. We have in the poll here an 'Other' voting option, which in my opinion does not cover 'Undecided' - undecided being a very specific stance - having no real view or allegiance - in other words, you don't know.

I would vote in every poll if there were options to cover everyone, but the poll caster usually loads the options in favour of you 'must' have a belief and here they are - sod everyone else who has yet to make an informed decision.

Every poll must include 'Undecided' as a voting option.

marky 54 · Mega Poster Joined: 18 Aug 2006 Posts: 3293

tele:
Many accuse me of being a 'shill' (daft word in the context used here I know)

i think everyone has been accused of it, its easier to call someone that than to except the comment that person made as being a possibility because it shatters their belief. it's getting silly to.

	9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> General	All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1