Joined: 13 Apr 2006 Posts: 804 Location: London Town
Posted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 1:50 pm Post subject: Delayed reactions
This is a clip that is loused up with manipulative editing. Notice the cameraman on the left of the screen and his delayed reaction, he only stands upright after the building explodes. He obviously doesnt seem to notice any plane. There is a crafty sequencing of the female screaming which they sample just prior to the explosion. For more effect the clip is strangely dubbed with the dialogue of a fireman explaining that he " saw what millions of people saw", This is blatant media manipulation and very much part of the psy-op.
Link _________________ 'Maybe if I can show some lurking kids that this is all a pack of lies, then maybe I can make a difference. I don't plan on converting any of you because you're all mad.'
-Johnny Pixels
Last edited by prole art threat on Fri Dec 15, 2006 2:59 pm; edited 1 time in total
Joined: 13 Apr 2006 Posts: 804 Location: London Town
Posted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 10:27 pm Post subject:
kc wrote:
Did anyone in the world really think ONE tower would be hit by a plane? Let alone two?? Oh I cba
So planes fly around NYC as low as that all the time? _________________ 'Maybe if I can show some lurking kids that this is all a pack of lies, then maybe I can make a difference. I don't plan on converting any of you because you're all mad.'
-Johnny Pixels
Did anyone in the world really think ONE tower would be hit by a plane? Let alone two?? Oh I cba
So planes fly around NYC as low as that all the time?
No, this was a very special occasion, just like when Air Force One flew unusually low over Louisiana following the severe flooding.
This is exactly the point your question highlights - people expected the unusual following the first impact. _________________ I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC
I dunno, me and the office full of people I was with honestly thought it was a horrible pilot error until the second tower was hit. I remember being the only person in the room who had even heard of al queda that day and not thinking of them until the second tower was hit. After that I thought it would only be two attacks as that was the usual al queda attack plan at the time.
Joined: 07 Jul 2006 Posts: 595 Location: Australia
Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 11:42 pm Post subject: Re: Delayed reactions
prole art threat wrote:
Notice the cameraman on the left of the screen and his delayed reaction, he only stands upright after the building explodes. He obviously doesnt seem to notice any plane.
Actually he looks CIA to me. Are you sure he didn't purposely delay his reaction to put you off the track?
Did anyone in the world really think ONE tower would be hit by a plane? Let alone two?? Oh I cba
So planes fly around NYC as low as that all the time?
They do, as a matter of fact.
Not large airliners, mind. Except well out by the big airports, where airliners operate. _________________ So remember - next time you can't find a parking spot, go to plan B: blow up your car
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 2:22 am Post subject: Re: Delayed reactions
prole art threat wrote:
There is a crafty sequencing of the female screaming which they sample just prior to the explosion.
Yes, it's almost as if she sees a plane hurtling unavoidably towards the undamaged tower. _________________ Come and debate me in PalTalk. (Adult content: Off) Social issues>Human Rights>911 Conspiracy Nuts Have No Proof room.
Can someone please explain what this thread is trying to suggest? _________________ We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk Get the Steven E Jones reports>HERE<
Sorry kc but I have had a couple of beers and that just sounded really funny, please dont take offence!
None taken mate :)
See, the fing is, yer al queda, loike yer PROPER Al Queda used to do all their attacks simultaneous loike, car bombings, checkpoint attacks, holiday shoppin, always two at a time if they can manage it.
But what do I care? The christmas slowdown has officially started and the gaffers said we can play mario kart for the rest of the day!
Can someone please explain what this thread is trying to suggest?
Two things merged into one;
Firstly, there is no plane, hence the geezer on the left doesn't react as there is nothing to react to.
Secondly, the footage has been edited to include audio that wasn't there at the time.
Failing either of the above, it is just another dredged up example of a link to a video that in some way points to the WTC NOT being hit by planes.
The entire hologram/witness aspect does get confusing though when 'no-planes' actually means just a hologram, or genuinely just 'nothing whatsoever, or a combination of both, or something along those lines.
The whole NPT is in a constant state of flux, one minute, it is simply 'no plane' being highlighted, then we move to planes with missing or strangely angled wings, or sound effects being accidentally left on - you get the gist I am sure. _________________ I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC
Thanx “tele” that's pretty much what I thought i.e. A circular specious device to confuse readers and pull them into a mire of self-doubt and chaos which in tern will then cause them to stop investigating the events of 911!
As for the holograms I remember Andrew Johnson suggesting that missiles hit the towers with holograms masking their appearance!!! Good to see the Administrators of this site showing due diligence. Hey we wouldn't want people to stop believing in Santa Claus would we? _________________ We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk Get the Steven E Jones reports>HERE<
Do you think prole has become an agent provocateur?
Was some kind of shill all along?
Just taken to acting silly for a bit of attention?
Was slightly nuts all the time? _________________ So remember - next time you can't find a parking spot, go to plan B: blow up your car
Probably something to do with that short temper, foul language, and inability to construct logical arguments. _________________ "Thought is faster than arrows, and truth is sharper than blades." - David Gemmell | RealityDown wiki
..........tern will then cause them to stop investigating the events of 911!
Yes indeed, it is a tern! This aspect has not received sufficient publicity until now. Watch the bird theory video:
The earlier shots show nothing as the quality is too bad.
The really slowed down version at the end simply gets taken out by the bottom of the frame - it shows absolutely nothing.
As for the daft Genghis Khan reference.....
Absolute pants, the whole thing is a complete pointless exercise. _________________ I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC
Last edited by telecasterisation on Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:00 am; edited 1 time in total
Absolute pants, the whole thing is a complete pointless exercise.
But that is never a bar to a theory on 9/11!
Anyone who does not accept that the terns did it on Bush's direct orders is a disinfo shill, so there!
And of course Bush's greatx23 grandfather financed Genghis Khan, and thereby founded the Bush fortune. _________________ ".......some partial collapse [of WTC7] would not have been suspicious......." - chek
Absolute pants, the whole thing is a complete pointless exercise.
But that is never a bar to a theory on 9/11!
Anyone who does not accept that the terns did it on Bush's direct orders is a disinfo shill, so there!
And of course Bush's greatx23 grandfather financed Genghis Khan, and thereby founded the Bush fortune.
BW that's so weak as in "last week".
So don't be a silly Kant as in "stupid... _________________ We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk Get the Steven E Jones reports>HERE<
Is that bird video supposd to be genuine? _________________ I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC
It is as genuine or not as any other video posted on YouTube from an unknown source. I did not create it, if that is what you are asking, and I have no idea whether it is intended to be a spoof or not. With all the crazy ideas out there, how could one possibly tell? Much of the 9/11 Troof movement is beyond parody. _________________ ".......some partial collapse [of WTC7] would not have been suspicious......." - chek
Ah. Posted by this ghengis guy. He seems to be posting every piece of sh*t conspiracy short he can find (or make). _________________ "Thought is faster than arrows, and truth is sharper than blades." - David Gemmell | RealityDown wiki
thats the worst 9/11 video ive seen yet, the show nothing what so ever, then at the end slow it down, but just before you see anything crop the image off.
just another student who's seen all the other pink oboe players making a nice living of churning out 9/11 conspriacy books/films/website and plain ole' nonsense, just another cheap way to get your 15 minutes of fame.
________
buy magic flight launch box
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Good to see the Administrators of this site showing due diligence. Hey we wouldn't want people to stop believing in Santa Claus would we?