Post

[simonralli]

Post

[simonralli]

A guy who is on the news to dismiss the theories has just said he interviewed all the staff 3 days after the crash - they all said Henri Paul was not drunk. So he has just said all the hotel staff are lying!!

After David going on the news about 9/11, it is good to see Sky invite him back again - they could have totally banned him.

A very good succinct summary of the facts by David given his short amount of time on air. I feel he has done well.

Simon

[Zabooka]

indeed simonralli, I second that!

I cant wait to see it online.

[PaulStott]

[paul wright]

[PaulStott]

[Light Infantree]

[Busker]

[Ally]

[Andrew Johnson]

[Light Infantree]

[poiuytr]

Light Infantree,

If you served in the first Iraq war,don't you agree David should expose the DU scandal ?

To this very day,and against very strong evidence brought by the first gulf war syndrome ,plus the multiplication of birth defects among servicemen returning from iraq and local population,both countries still maintain DU ammunitions are safe to use and aren't causing harmfull radiation poisonning either to the servicemen or the local area/population.

Geneva conventions stipulate that any warring party guilty of contamination of any region with radiation has the duty to decontaminate and give medical assistance to those affacted,soldiers AND local populations.

Doug Rokke,an army doctor that was assigned by general shwarzkopf during the first gulf war to assess the contamination problem and create safe procedures for decontamination of material and soldiers,attested it tooks him months to decontaminate a few DU hit vehicules:he often was driven to BURY the contaminated material in the sands for lack of an alternative.

His conclusions to the general attested there was no way to lessen the radiation effects of DU and that soldiers were affected in the 48 hours of exposition.

Furthermore,there is evidence radiation isn't contained locally were it has been used,but is carried by the winds and ends up touring the whole world in a few weeks.
During the beginning of the Iraq bombing raids,radiation levels were detected across britain (not reported by mainstream press) and persisted during the whole intensive bombing campaign:scientists estimated we all breathed poisonous uranium oxyde gas for weeks:

[John White]

[Light Infantree]

[poiuytr]

[prole art threat]

[Zabooka]

easy Prole Art Threat, hes not saying or meaning anything bad, im sure hes just trying to suggest helpful things, no fault of his/her own I should imagine. (forgive me, for I cant ascertain gender from these forum names, plus I dont think its so important, just that the voice is heard of that person)

Me personally, I believe that everything is connected. The same people that are hideous enough to do 911, are not going to feel shameful about Depleted Uranium weapons use either. Its the same beast. We should look at how they are in warfare, as its their wars and its because they can get away with 911 that they can get away with DUs and other sick things.
Thats my opinion, though yes at the same time... DUs on their own means jack, its just a puzzle piece, not the entire puzzle. Its when you know about 911, that all else makes real sense, war on terror, arbritrary arrests, DUs, war crimes, other scandals, etc, etc. So in essence, its going to be seen as a side issue to the main issue; DUs in respect to 911.

[poiuytr]

[Zabooka]

Global Warming is just as bad and many other forms of pollution. MacDonalds, Coke and Pepsi, plus all the tobbacco firms are doing just as much harm and will harm our children. That harm is IN YOUR FACE!

Yet look at people. The thing about 911, is that its such an extraordinary thing, that if people really knew that their governments are likely to kill them for small gains and purposes... thats REAL fear!

DUs... well people will still see it as something thats used in some other part of the world, far far away from them. I also believe 911 will be grabbing the media and people more likely than DUs.

David Shayler covers many many topics on interviews, not just 911. Im sure he may talk about DUs sometime, at his own choosing.

Thank you for informing me by the way and letting me know more about DUs, it has certainly made me more interested. However, this is 911 Truth, with the basis that its the fundumental thing and all else sort of rests upon it. DUs too, used in War on Terror, War on Terror from 911. 911 made Arms Manufacture, Research and Deals rocket, this includes DU weapons.

[poiuytr]

[Zabooka]

forgive me.

I still can not see the link between 911 and DUs. Does not STOP THE WAR, or Socialist Worker or Respect... or Newstatemen, New International, or ZMAG, or Indymedia talk of DUs?

I agree with you that DUs are an important and urgent issue, yes severly so perhaps. Yet this is the UK 911 Truth Forums.

John Pilger and many others have written about it and spoken DUs. So its not something that no one speaks about. I cant speak for other people or other publications or pressure groups.

Well, I cant really speak for David Shayler about DUs. Have you tried asking him yourself? What responses have you recieved?

[poiuytr]

[Light Infantree]

[TonyGosling]

Right, now, where were we? Back to Diana!

It is the fact that we would most probably have half-brothers and sisters to William and Harry who would have been Muslims that is the prime motive for me in the slaying of Diana.

That does assume of course that the clash of civilisations between the pseudo (secular/zionist) Jews and pseudo (CIA) Muslims has been planned for a long long time before 911

Anyway, have a listen to Diana here talking in her own words
http://www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=392

xx

Tony

[Zabooka]

[PaulStott]

[poiuytr]

[halm]

poiuytr, your argument is bordering on the arrogant. DU is the most important thing in the world.... to you. Anyone that does not hold this as dear to their heart as you obviously do is then dismissed at a shill deflecting from the most important thing in the world... DU (or you?).

There are a million good causes which mean a million things to a million people. How you can assert that David Shayler is false simply because he chooses to speak about 911 and 77 rather than DU is beyond me.

I suggest that you have more chance getting your message across by pointing out the facts and letting people make up their own minds. Attempting to force people to run with your agenda will only turn them off it. As you have probably managed to do in this thread. Twice.

Good luck with your campaign, and keep writing to those journalists, one of them will be brave enough to pick up the story sooner or later (have you tried Robert Fisk?)

But please, stop preaching to the choir.

[poiuytr]

[ian neal]

Is DU an important issue?

Undoubtedly yes

I would imagine there is almost universal support here for anti-DU campaigns such http://www.cadu.org.uk/. I certainly support CADU.

Is DU more important than a range of other issues that people have suggested are paramount and linked to 9/11 and the GWOT, for example, peak oil, threats to civil liberties, media reform, banking reform, global poverty, climate change, etc?

Well this is a matter of opinion. The solution lies in placing 9/11 and GWOT in its full context: linking 9/11 and phoney terrorism to a whole range of other issues. All issues relate to all other issues. I would like to see a loose coalition of campaigns to help join up the dots.

Would David S speak out on DU?

Probably if approached nicely and fully briefed. He is easy to contact

Would you want David to speak out on DU?

Not if you don't trust him, but this will not be resolved by posting here. Only by contacting him and discussing further.

Alternatively I suggest contacting other people who are speaking out against GWOT and the need to reopen 9/11 eg truthfest to give one example. Contrary to popular uninformed opinion David is not the only route available to get the message out

http://www.myspace.com/truthfest