The Writings of a Finnish Military Expert on 9/11..fusion

[mason-free party]

Evidence of advanced fusion devices at the WTC
The Writings of a Finnish Military Expert on 9/11

1. Pulverization of 99% of concrete into ultra fine dust as recorded by official studies. Concrete dust was created instantly throughout the towers when the fusion device million degree heat rapidly expanded water vapour 1000-fold in the concrete floors.

2. Superheated steels ablating (vaporizing continuously as they fall) as seen in video clips of the towers collapsing. This requires uniform temperatures roughly twice that of thermite. Conventional demolition or explosive charges (thermate, rdx, hdx etc.) cannot transfer heath so rapidly that the steel goes above it's boiling temperature.

3. 22 ton outer wall steel sections ejected 200 meters into the winter garden. Cutting charges cannot eject heavy steels and throwing charges cannot provide the energy required without heavy, solid surface mounts.

4. 330 ton section of outer wall columns ripping off side of tower. Cutting charges cannot eject heavy steels linked together and throwing charges cannot provide the energy required without very heavy, solid surfaces to mount those charges.

5. Molten ponds of steel at the bottom of elevator shafts (WTC1, WTC2, WTC7). Massive heath loads have been present at the lower parts of these high-rise buildings. As one of the witnesses after seeing the flow of metals declared: "no one will be found alive".

6. The spire behaviour (stands for 20-30 seconds, evaporates and goes down, steel dust remains in the air where the spire was). The spire did not stand because it lost its durability when the joints vaporized.

7. Sharp spikes in seismograph readings (Richter 2.1 and 2.3) occurred at the beginning of collapse for both towers. Short duration and high power indicate an explosive event.

8. A press weighting 50 tons disappeared from a basement floor of Twin Towers and was never recovered from debris. Not possible with collapses or controlled demolitions. The press was vaporized or melted totally.

9. Bone dust cloud around the WTC. This was found not until spring 2006 from the Deutsche Bank building. (In excess of 700 human remains found on the roof and from air vents). See www.911citizenswatch.org/print.php?sid=906

10. Fires took 100 days to extinguish despite continuous spraying of water. Thermate would burn out totally and then cool down much faster, just in a few days. This long cooling time means the total heath load being absorbed into the steels of the WTC was massive, far in excess anything found in collapses or typical controlled demolitions.

11. Brown shades of color in the air due nuclear radiation forming NO2, NO3 and nitric acid. TV and documentary footage changed the color balance to blue to disguise this fact indicating complicity in the coverup.

12. Elevated Tritium values measured in the WTC area but not elsewhere in New York. Official studies stated that 8 EXIT signs from two commercial Boeing jets were responsible. The tritium in those EXIT signs is insufficient to explain the measurements (very little tritium is available for measuring after evaporation into air as hydrogen and as tritiated water vapour. This can provide conclusive proof of fusion devices and therefore US/Israeli military involvement.

13. Pyroclastic flow observed in the concrete-based clouds. Only found with volcanic eruptions and nuclear detonations. The explosion squibs cool down just a few milliseconds after the explosion or after having reached some 10 meters in the air. Pyroclastic flow will not mix with other clouds meaning very serious heath in those clouds not possible with the conventional demolition or explosive charges. The pyroclastic clouds were cooling down at the WTC but this process took some 30 seconds. See http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1381525012075538113

14. Huge expanding dust clouds 5 times the volume of the building indicating extreme levels of heat generated far in excess of traditional demolition explosives.

15. Rubble height was some 10% of the original instead of 33% expected in a traditional demolition. Fusion device removal of underground central steel framework allowed upper framework to fall into this empty space and reduce the rubble height.

16. No survivors found, except some firefighters in one corner pocket in the rubble who looked up to see blue sky above them instead of being crushed by collapsing debris. Upward fusion flashlight-like beam of destruction missed this pocket but removed debris above those lucky firemen.

17. 14 rescue dogs and some rescue workers died far too soon afterward to be attributed to asbestos or dust toxins (respiratory problems due to alpha and tritium particles created by fusion are far more toxic)

18. Record concentrations of near-atomic size metal particles found in dust studies due to ablated steel. Only possible with vaporized (boiling) steels.

19. Decontamination procedure used at Ground Zero (hi-pressure water spraying) for all steel removed from site. Water spraying contains fusion radioactivity.

20. No bodies, furniture or computers found in the rubble, but intact sheets of paper covered the streets with fine dust. Items with significant mass absorbed fusion energy (neutrons, x-rays) and were vaporized while paper did not. Paper and powder theory.

21. 200 000 gallon sprinkler water tanks on the roofs of WTC1 and WTC2, but no water in the ruins. Heat of fusion devices vaporized large reservoirs of water.

22. Reports of cars exploding around the WTC and many burned out wrecks could be seen that had not been hit by debris. Fusion energy (heath radiation and the neutrons) caused cars to ignite and burn far from WTC site.

23. Wide area electrical outage, repairs took over 3 months. Fusion devices cause EM pulse with Compton scattering. See German engineers help the USA plate 5.

24. EM pulse was recorded by broadcast cameras with high quality electronic circuitry. This occurred at the same time as the seismic peaks recorded by Lamont Doherty during the beginning of the collapse. This is due to the Compton Effect and resulted in a large area power outage at the WTC.
Source: www.saunalahti.fi/wtc2001/evidence.htm
_________________
NO more Disinformation - NO more Deceit - NO more Greed - NO more Corruption
NO more MASONIC GOVERNMENT AND JOHN REID bs!
LONG LIVE TRUTH & FREEDOM!
http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/pro-freedom.co.uk/part_6.html

[PaulStott]

[mason-free party]

[rodin]

Basically I agree with the Finn. Only difference I would think that the initial radiation would be captured close to the weapon and a secondary less detectible emmission given out. Given the brief of Plowshare to produce atomic muntions for the construction industry, and given the need in the future to bring down stupidly high steel structures relatively safely, cheaply, and with minimum collateral damage, the commercial imperative is there for something which vapourises steel buildings without turning a city into a radioactive wasteland.

My research has shown that microwaves melt metal. Microwave bombs have been designed that can push out 10 times the daily output of the Hoover Dam in a few nanseconds.

Microwaves are material-specific. Your plastic bowl does not melt in the microwave oven.

One further hypothesis NOT yet verified is that a microwave frequency may be used to target steel specifically, leaving water bonds unaffected. I would propose the following experiment if it is possible

1) Obtain a tunable microwave (is there such a thing?)
2) Beam it at preheated iron
3) Vary the frequency and see if there is one which particularly resonates with iron ie melts rapidly the iron. - in fact I found one quoted when researching this - it is about 10% removed from conventional microwave frequency
4) Now see if that frequency readily boils water

UPDATE

I am now thinking that the microwave frequency used was much higher than that which will boil water. See

http://www.nolajbs.net/forum/index.php?topic=7043.msg54890#msg54890

[Mark Gobell]

The official tritium report is here http://www.llnl.gov/tid/lof/documents/pdf/241096.pdf

30 million gallons of water passed through the pile into the bathtub between 11.9 and 21.9 when the tritium levels were measured.

http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=4848

[Fallious]

[Mark Gobell]

I would say that depends on the interpretation of the word accounted.

Those of the Enron school of acounting may concur that the measured levels of tritium made 10 days later and after 30 million gallons of water had cleansed the pile, could be attributed to the tritium contained in the aircraft exit signs and an unspecified number of night sights assumed to have been destroyed in the ATF armoury.

Only the problem was that those quantities still could not provide enough tritium to account for the measured levels.

So, the missing tritium was then attributed to an unspecified number of luminous watches that may or may not have been worn by those who perished at the WTC.

[Fallious]

[rodin]

[rodin]

Straight out of Wikipedia. I emphasise the points I think are most relevant to WTC observations

Pure fusion weapon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[utopiated]

Thanks for posting that. Good to have some data posted on the restrictions of thermate as a PRIMARY/SINGULAR mechanism for destruction.

As we accrue more items like this - a shift will occur and prevent the scenes from 2006 where any devation from basic controlled demo was seen as pointless. Whether it's directed energy weapons/sources or fission/fusion/nuke - it doesn't matter. It does matter that these areas get given consideration in addition to being stuck in the conventional demolition loop.

[rodin]

[rodin]

Calculations I would like to see done

1) What was the total amount of tritium in the basement of WTC6 (a building which was not even part of the main demolitions)? For this we need to know the volume of water held there. We know the concentration. It is possible that even in this one location more tritium was actually present than could conceivably have come from the official sources?

Here is the official research on tritium

http://216.239.59.104/search?q=cache:-sc5Z5KBiTQJ:repositories.cdlib.o rg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi%3Farticle%3D1678%26context%3Dlbnl+tritium+level +911&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2

Background amounts are clustered around 0.1 nCi/L. WTC 6 basement (only basement measured) average 3.0 nCi/L

[rodin]

A close examination of the Tritium report yields