Psyop or natural evolution?

[telecasterisation]

The Truth Movement has many internal factions;

There are those that believe no actual planes were involved in 9/11, there were missiles used, holographic projectors brought into play to mask this or cover up that. But whatever your belief, this started somewhere as the result of some piece of 'evidence'.

Therefore, this poll is designed to reflect the thinking as to there being a nefarious 'purpose' behind the various concepts and ideas.

In other words, are all the assorted theories that have evolved following 9/11 simply engineered, or 'planted' by design by a third party and covertly injected into the mix to deliberately divide and dilute The Movement? Or are they the result of logical thought and investigation based upon viewing genuine undoctored footage?

[Busker]

Which is why I've thought for a long time that the Truth movement should not spend huge efforts trying to prove what happened, but exert energies on explaining why the official story is a fabrication.

It is up to "them" to prove their case and say what happened once their deceptions are exposed.

[Hazzard]

I dont call myself a member of a movement. I have no leader, no influence or no ties.

I simply want truth and justice and I found all this out on my own without infowars.com or some scholar nob telling me what he thinks or what theory he thinks is true.

I know who did it, I just want justice not contention or conjecture.

F\/CK THE "MOVEMENT!"

how 'bout them apples?

[telecasterisation]

[Hazzard]

Without .

Care to comment on what I said or will you comment on my terrible spelling and grammar?

[telecasterisation]

Yes, I will comment.

I completely support your right to have an opinion.

[Hazzard]

LOL T I have to admit you make me chuckle sometimes .