| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
HERA
Validated Poster
Joined: 17 Feb 2006
Posts: 141
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 7:32 pm Post subject: 77 Report Imminent |
 |
|
Commons Intelligence and Security Committee
Paul Murphy (Chairman) Torfaen Labour
Baroness Ramsay of Cartvale Labour
James Arbuthnot North East Hampshire Conservative
Alan Beith Berwick-upon-Tweed Liberal Democrat
Ben Chapman Wirral South Labour
George Howarth Knowsley North & Sefton East Labour
Michael Mates East Hampshire Conservative
Richard Ottaway Croydon South Conservative Ms Dari Taylor Stockton South Labour
due to report to Blair on the 77 incidents
in the report look out for
The photograph of the FOUR BOMBERS OUTSIDE LUTON STATION, ON THEIR WAY TO CATCH THE 07.40 TRAIN TO LONDON, THEN TO COMMIT SUICIDE AND MURDER. - “taken from the” non-existent “CCTV footage” - is a poor quality fake with the four “Photoshopped in”: white-hat-man has been particularly-badly added with his body in front of the railings and half of his face and lower left arm behind the rails : the rail sections, either side of the phantom, do not align : there are rain puddles: there was no heavy rain, if any at all, at that time : on a busy day for Luton station, no-one else is in the photo ..
The July 7 05 : 07.40 : Luton to London train was cancelled.
The next train to London, the 07.48, arrived at London King’s Cross at 08.42: seven minutes before and miles away from the detonations of the first explosives on the rail tracks.
As the cancellation could not have been foreseen and with it being far too late to alter the plans, the police released the pre-prepared “four suicide bombers took the 07.40 train” etc. statement.
The London Underground - entrances, platforms, carriages, escalators - has saturation CCTV coverage. No footage showed any evidence of the four “suicide bombers”
Eye-witness reports tell of the explosions on the Underground being on the rail-tracks : effectively ruling out any external party involvement.
“The policeman said ‘mind that hole, that’s where the bomb was’. The metal was pushed upwards as if the bomb was underneath the train. They seem to think the bomb was left in a bag, but I don’t remember anybody being where the bomb was, or any bag,”
" I knew it was a bomb. … . A second later and the explosion would have punched a hole in our carriage. …our driver … opened the outer door and looked at the track ahead. There were huge pieces of metal which had been ripped out of their rivets lying about.”
“ … there was a woman .. who was on her back, trapped in the metal WHICH HAD TWISTED UP THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF THE CARRIAGE. The roof was still on but the lining of the carriage had been blown off … there was a big hole in the middle of the floor.” POLICE WOMAN Lizzie Kenworthy.
The announcement that it was, obviously, military explosives that were used, was quickly changed to “home made” : then followed farcical raids on “home-made-bomb-factory-houses” in Yorkshire.
Stagecoach employees reported that the no. 30 bus - the one which had the explosive device under the top-deck back-seat - was the only bus diverted after the tube explosions .
The previous Saturday, a maintenance group, previously unknown to the depot crew, spent “20 hours” “on CCTV maintenance” on that bus ; an unheard-of length of time for that task.
There has never been any evidence, whatsover, linking
the explosions with Islam or the mythical “Al Qaeda”.
The Brazilian contract electrician, Charles de Menezes, executed by agents, may have had inside knowledge of the placing of the devices and/or the electrical surge - reported by witnesses - which triggered them.
After 8 weeks and with the “suicide bombers” story falling further apart, the BBC Arabic Service, Al Jazeera, broadcast a “suicide bomber” video ; an obvious fake, parotted, uncritically, by the media.
The police/BBC later dreamed up a “bomber reconnoitre” video and more Al Qaeda claims.
WWW.LONDON77TRUTH.COM |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ian neal
Angel - now passed away
Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 3140
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Hera
We need to take care how evidence is presented. For example are you sure "the police released the pre-prepared “four suicide bombers took the 07.40 train” etc. statement."? Source? Or that "Eye-witness reports tell of the explosions on the Underground being on the rail-tracks"? Source? I know of the 2 survivor accounts that describe the bomb damage that in dicate the bombs may have under the trains but this is different from "Eye-witness reports tell of the explosions on the Underground being on the rail-tracks"
Do you know how imminent the narrative is.? Rachel told me last month that she thought May but this was an educated guess |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HERA
Validated Poster
Joined: 17 Feb 2006
Posts: 141
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 1:46 pm Post subject: Set up |
|
|
Re police statements. If the whole thing was a set up - as it was, the police would have assumed that the 740 would go as usual. As it did not the police issued the statement anyway. They had no choice .
As for rail track damage eye-witness look at the site www.London77truth.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ian neal
Angel - now passed away
Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 3140
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 9:36 pm Post subject: Re: Set up |
|
|
Hi Hera
Thanks for the reply
“I knew it was a bomb … A second later and the explosion would have punched a hole in our carriage … our driver .. opened the outer door and LOOKED AT THE TRACK AHEAD. There were huge pieces of metal, which had been ripped out of their rivets, lying about.”
Do you have a source for this quote?
As for the police statement, I remember a request last year on this forum for a link or source to indicate that the police actually said at the first press conference that they definately caught the 7.40. I don't think one was found. Do we have one?
It may be this evidence does exist on the public record, but we need to be able to show it does.
Many thanks for your help |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gypsum
Moderate Poster
Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 211
Location: Scotland
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here is another example of why I hate the media so much. I had not even caught a whiff of there being any flaws in the 7/7 story that was shown on the news etc. Untill i read this post i had no clue. Shows you why so many people refuse to even consider 'conspiracy theories'...the idea that they could have been lied to by the media and their governments is ridiculous!!
I hate it all... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Prole
Validated Poster
Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 632
Location: London UK
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
From today's Observer 2/4/06:
Official: Iraq war led to July bombings
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1745085,00.html
| Quote: | The narrative will be published in the next few weeks, possibly alongside the findings of a critical report into the London bombings by the Commons intelligence and security committee.
Initial drafts of the government's account into the bombings, which have been revealed to The Observer, state that Iraq was a key 'contributory factor'. The references to Britain's involvement in Iraq are contained in a section examining what inspired the 'radicalisation' of the four British suicide bombers, Sidique Khan, Hasib Hussain, Shehzad Tanweer and Germaine Lindsay. |
Who'd have guessed it?
_________________
'The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie -- deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought'. JFK |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Prole
Validated Poster
Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 632
Location: London UK
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 11:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here's the whole article (saves paying a quid to access it in a couple of months)
| Quote: | Official: Iraq war led to July bombings
Mark Townsend, crime correspondent
Sunday April 2, 2006
The Observer
The first official recognition that the Iraq war motivated the four London suicide bombers has been made by the government in a major report into the 7 July attacks.
Despite attempts by Downing Street to play down suggestions that the conflict has made Britain a target for terrorists, the Home Office inquiry into the deadliest terror attack on British soil has conceded that the bombers were inspired by UK foreign policy, principally the decision to invade Iraq.
The government's 'narrative', compiled by a senior civil servant using intelligence from the police and security services, was announced by the Home Secretary, Charles Clarke, last December following calls for a public inquiry into the attacks.
The narrative will be published in the next few weeks, possibly alongside the findings of a critical report into the London bombings by the Commons intelligence and security committee.
Initial drafts of the government's account into the bombings, which have been revealed to The Observer, state that Iraq was a key 'contributory factor'. The references to Britain's involvement in Iraq are contained in a section examining what inspired the 'radicalisation' of the four British suicide bombers, Sidique Khan, Hasib Hussain, Shehzad Tanweer and Germaine Lindsay.
The findings will prove highly embarrassing to Tony Blair, who has maintained that the decision to go to war against Iraq would make Britain safer. On the third anniversary of the conflict last month, the Prime Minister defended Britain's involvement in Iraq, arguing that only an interventionist stance could confront terrorism.
The narrative largely details the movements of the four bombers from the point when they picked up explosives in a rucksack from a 'bomb factory' in Leeds to the time when the devices were detonated on the morning of 7 July.
Alongside Iraq, other 'motivating factors' for the bombers, three of whom came from west Yorkshire and one from Buckinghamshire, are identified. These include economic deprivation, social exclusion and a disaffection with society in general, as well as community elders. A videotape of Mohammed Sidique Khan was released after the attacks, in which he makes an apparent reference to Iraq, accusing 'Western citizens' of electing governments that committed crimes against humanity. Osama bin Laden's deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri, also appeared on the tape, repeating his claim that Blair's decision to go to war in Iraq was responsible for the outrage.
The Home Office account of the July atrocity also chronicles in detail the trips to Pakistan made by Khan and Shehzad Tanweer and is understood to confirm that the two met al-Qaeda operatives. However, the final report will not name the militants known to some of the London bombers in case criminal proceedings are taken against them.
Leaks last week from the intelligence and security committee similarly confirmed how Khan, the mastermind of July 7, slipped through a security net. MI5 called off surveillance on him in the months before the bombings, in which 52 people were killed. The Home Office narrative supports the parliamentary committee's general view that the security services are not to blame. Despite the trips abroad, however, the narrative says that the London suicide bombers were only ever peripheral players in terrorist organisations and that, on the whole, there was 'nothing exceptional' about them before the attack.
Recent letters to the Home Office from the law firm Leigh Day & Co - acting for the family of one victim - warned that an independent inquiry was essential to explore 'what could be done to prevent such attacks happening again, and how to protect and save lives in the future'.
|
_________________
'The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie -- deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought'. JFK |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
