Doubts placed on ABLE DANGER claims - LA TIMES

[Reflecter]

I found this a few days back and havent seen it here it to my knowledge. What do people think?

Alarming 9/11 claim is found baseless :
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-intel25dec25,0,31 49507.story?coll=la-home-headlines

"The conclusion contradicts assertions by Rep. Curt Weldon (R-Pa.) and a few military officers that U.S. national security officials ignored startling intelligence available in early 2001 that might have helped to prevent the attacks."

[Wokeman]

Reflector,
Able Danger was a confidence trick. It was a programme (sorry, program) designed to create a legend (a false identity, a personality of a terrorist and a conspiracy). Mohammed Atta was a womaniser, a drug addict and dealer). The 9/11 terrorists existed on paper only (and in the mass media, of course, but nowhere else). You must get hold of a copy of Webster Tarpley's "9/11 Synthetic Terror — Made in USA", and watch a copy of "Who Killed John O'Neil".

[Bushwacker]

[Reflecter]

I was a little suprised to see this article merit moving to CC. I thought the news section contained many MSM articles that criticise 9/11 Truth arguments. I guess the LA Times overstepped being mere MSM shills into full blown critics. Oh well

Wokeman, I havent read Tarpleys book its true but I aim too. WKJO I am familiar with, its ideas of the hijackers potential roles etc. I agree in part with you that Able Danger maybe a part of a campaign of deliberate misinformation. However I find it difficult as to where the line can then be drawn on whats useable evidence of foreknowledge and what isnt.

I personally see Able Danger as a damning piece of foreknowledge that they have had to kill off via this investigation (likely whitewash). The remaining pieces of foreknowledge can perhaps all be brushed off with more ease as Incompetance, which they are hoping can be relied upon if public pressure comes to bear. At which point we will see the pathetic firing and reprimands of a bunch of nobodies and the justification of further centralisation and intelligence sharing between agencies.