Headhunter
Moderate Poster
Joined: 14 Feb 2006
Posts: 117
Location: Canada
|
 Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:02 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| Quote: | Our critics have accused us of insisting that beam weapons did their damage from outer space, yet we make no claim about whether the directed energy weapon operated from a space-, air-, or ground-based platform. Nor do we make any claim about what wavelength(s) was used, what the source(s) of energy was, whether it involved interference of multiple beams, whether it was HAARP, what kind of acelerator was used, nor do we claim to know what the serial numbers of the parts were in the weapon.
In August 2006, we began looking at the bathtub which protected the WTC and it led us to look at more data. The data told us what destroyed the twin towers. The data told us that directed-energy weapons must exist. We were not aware that the US military had directed-energy weapons. After we concluded that some sort of energy weapon was used, we looked for evidence that such weapons exist and found it, as documented here. As Sherlock Holmes declared,
"When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth." |
Strange form of reasoning by which such conclusions are drawn.. 
And these are the same people who advocate for the "NPT" (no plane theory)?
Oh sigh.. 
_________________
Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime
“We will export death and violence to the four corners of the earth.” - George W. Bush |
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
