FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

UK Agents "Did Have Role in IRA Bomb Atrocities"

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> General
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Wokeman
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 881
Location: Woking, Surrey, UK

PostPosted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 9:38 am    Post subject: UK Agents "Did Have Role in IRA Bomb Atrocities" Reply with quote

Henry McDonald / London Observer | September 11 2006

The controversy over claims that Britain allowed two IRA informers to organise 'human bomb' attacks intensified this weekend.
A human rights watchdog has handed a report to the Police Service of Northern Ireland, which concludes that two British agents were central to the bombings of three army border installations in 1990.

Meanwhile the Police Ombudsman's Office in Belfast confirmed it is investigating allegations by the family of one victim that the bomb in Newry on 24 October 1990 could have been prevented.

The British Irish Rights Watch report will also put the focus back on the alleged MI6 agent 'J118'. Army intelligence officer turned whistleblower Martin Ingram has alleged 'J118' was Sinn Fein's chief negotiator Martin McGuinnesss.

The Mid Ulster MP strenuously denies Ingram's allegations and has claimed the speculation is fuelled by the Democratic Unionist Party.

The 'human bomb' tactic involved forcing civilians to drive vehicles laden with explosives into army checkpoints and included deadly sorties near Newry and Coshquin outside Derry. Six British soldiers and a civilian worker at an army base died in the simultaneous blasts on either side of Northern Ireland.

British Irish Rights Watch said: 'This month BIRW sent a confidential report to the Historical Enquiries Team on the three incidents that occurred on 24th October 1990... at least two security force agents were involved in these bombings, and allegations have been made that the "human bomb" strategy was the brainchild of British intelligence.

'Questions arise as to whether the RUC, Garda Síochána and the army's Force Research Unit had prior and/or subsequent intelligence about the bombings. These questions in turn lead to concerns about whether these attacks could have been prevented and why no one has been brought to justice.'

Although British Irish Rights Watch has made no reference to the identities of the informers they allege were involved in the 'human bomb' plot, the group's intervention in the controversy is a significant development.

The group has issued several detailed reports previously outlining cases of collusion between loyalist terrorists and the security forces. These include the Pat Finucane murder and the killing of Raymond McCord Jr by the Ulster Volunteer Force. In both cases, British Irish Rights Watch claim many of the loyalists involved in these murders were agents for the security forces - allegations that were later substantiated.

Speaking from a secret location in Europe this weekend, Ingram (not his real name) said that while the latest report was not decisive proof over his claims about 'J1118', it raised questions about the role of informers in the 'human bomb' killings.

'This report from a very credible source brings up the question of informers working at the top tier of the IRA who were allowed to commit crimes up to murder while working for the state. 'I stand by what I have said in the past about "J118" and challenge anyone to debate it with me in a public forum.'

Ingram, a former NCO with the army's highly secretive Force Research Unit, said he was prepared to expose his own identity in public in any such debate.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mark Gobell
On Gardening Leave
On Gardening Leave


Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Posts: 4529

PostPosted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And today it's official the RUC & Special Branch colluded with Loyalist terrorist groups and provided cover for murderers, from Chief Constables down.

Of course no public enquiry and no prosecutions due to lack of evidence.

The Northern Ireland Police Ombudsman's report on Operation Ballast is here : (770kb)

http://www.policeombudsman.org/publicationsuploads/BALLAST%20PUBLIC%20 STATEMENT%2022-01-07%20FINAL%20VERSION%20PDF.pdf

_________________
The Medium is the Massage - Marshall McLuhan.


Last edited by Mark Gobell on Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:11 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bicnarok
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 334
Location: Cydonia

PostPosted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 7:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

They did a lot of False flag operations in N.Ireland mainly bumping off IRA folk in the name of the UFF, it was the ITT, dunno if any of you have heard of the special unit. A few ex army folk might have, I don´t know any in depth info, just what I overheard or heard from people when I was in.
_________________
"Emancipate yourself from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free our mind..." Bod Marley
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PaulStott
Relentless Limpet Shill
Relentless Limpet Shill


Joined: 13 Jul 2006
Posts: 326
Location: All Power To The People, No More Power To The Pigs

PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 11:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There was also the attacks on INLA members by "Loyalists", particuarly after INLA killed senior Conservative Airey Neave in 1979. Nieve had long-term links to MI5.

If you read Paul Routledge's excellent book on Neave, and it is clear he believes the British state decided to take out senior INLA members after his death.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
conspiracy analyst
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 27 Sep 2005
Posts: 2279

PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 8:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This exposes Britain not as peacemaker, but perpetrator


Now it's official: the state sponsored death squads for years in Northern Ireland and this collusion prolonged the war

Beatrix Campbell
Tuesday January 23, 2007
The Guardian

Nuala O'Loan is a heroine. None of us should under-estimate the moral courage this fastidious lawyer has mobilised merely do her job as Northern Ireland's police ombudsman: to tell the world that collusion describes the relationship between the British state and loyalist gunslingers.

Raymond McCord is a hero. When his own loyalist leaders and militias refused to acknowledge his quest for justice for his murdered son, he risked his life by turning to the purported enemies of his state - the human-rights organisations.

McCord joins the band of relatives who become heralds for their lost loved ones, whose journey confronts them with the state itself. McCord didn't retreat when he found himself in a web of special branch and loyalist assassins.

The human-rights advocates are heroes too, because they would not bow to the slur that they were mad, bad or Provo agents provocateurs for investigating the state's patronage of death squads. Lest we forget, the ombudsman's investigation was prefigured by an earlier report naming the guilty men, published by Jane Winter, the forensic director of British Irish Rights Watch.

None of these people are republicans. But the sectarian slur ricocheted across the ombudsman's bows again yesterday when Lord Maginnis - a liberal in the unionist firmament - dismissed her report not only as "rubbish" but as having "an alternative agenda" - code for Provo propaganda.

The devastating McCord report that was published yesterday tells us that allegations of collusion once dismissed as rubbish are true. But that epochal admission risks being swamped by an old paradigm: tribal paddies dragging the reluctant Brits into their dirty war. It is time for a paradigm shift. It is time for Britain to be brave and tell the truth about itself. It must narrate a new story about that 30-year conflict.

The ombudsman tells us that the collusion prevailed between the prelude to the ceasefires and the new millennium. Her investigation was constrained by the narrow focus imposed on her: she was only able to investigate the murder of Raymond McCord Jr, a 22-year-old RAF cadet. But Mount Vernon, his north Belfast neighbourhood, is both the local and the larger story of collusion.

Peter Hain, the Northern Ireland secretary, acknowledges that this is very embarrassing for the state. This is progress - when O'Loan published her heart-stopping chronicle of the RUC's disastrous role in the Omagh bombing of 1998 she was insulted by unionists, abused by the chief constable and abandoned by Downing Street. The ombudsman was being warned by No 10 that she was on her own.

At least this time Hain has accepted her critique. Even so, he consigns it to the past. But the past lives on - the ombudsman insisted yesterday that Ronnie Flanagan, the former chief constable, had responsibility for everything that happened in the police force he commanded, whatever he did or did not know. He has not been called to account before a public tribunal, and no one expects him to be now. Indeed, after his retirement he has been reincarnated with her majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary.

Flanagan wasn't alone. He was part of an entire system. Who were the civil servants who staffed that security system in Northern Ireland during the Mount Vernon terror? Where are they now? What else were they doing to thwart justice while the state was investing in the Mount Vernon boys? What did these civil servants think they were doing? What did they tell the politicians sequestered in Hillsborough Castle? And the biggest question: what was the overarching agenda?

The Mount Vernon boys were state-sponsored assassins. Special branch ran their local leadership. We now know that British security services had penetrated all the paramilitary organisations. Was there ever an audit of all the murder, rape and pillage?

Collusion tells us about our institutions and their purpose. After 1987 - when the loyalist paramilitary organisations were beginning to contemplate peace - Britain re-armed, reinvigorated and refocused them, taking control through its proxies among the warlords, and prolonged the war. Their reputations as ruffians, religious maniacs and pumped-up thugs merely gilded the reputation reserved by the British as law-abiding peacemakers.

But by enlisting the Protestant militias as auxiliaries while presenting itself as a neutral arbitrator, Britain left itself vulnerable to exposure. It could not stop a father seeking justice for his son wherever he might find it - not from the UVF or Protestant politicians, but among the human-rights groups, in Dublin, in Washington and at the United Nations.

All these pressures are bearing down on Britain. It has been exposed not as peacemaker but as perpetrator, spreading terror and spilling blood; as the most powerful presence among the warlords. That is the national narrative we need to contemplate before we can consign collusion to the past.

· Beatrix Campbell is the author of a forthcoming book on the Good Friday agreement.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
conspiracy analyst
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 27 Sep 2005
Posts: 2279

PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 8:21 pm    Post subject: Abu Hamzas Reply with quote

house was right next to a government minister.
Every 'muslim' that is picked up nowadays has some connection with the Finsbury Park Mosque where Hamza 'prayed'...

Special Branch did robberies in Ireland in the early 1970's and blamed them on the Republicans.

Makes you think dunnit?

Collusion, coincidence, or just business as usual.

Take your pick.
The roadshow continues, undainted as if nothing happened in Ireland...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jason67
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 129
Location: SE London

PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bicnarok wrote:
They did a lot of False flag operations in N.Ireland mainly bumping off IRA folk in the name of the UFF, it was the ITT, dunno if any of you have heard of the special unit. A few ex army folk might have, I don´t know any in depth info, just what I overheard or heard from people when I was in.


I have a really good book at home that they tried to ban. Cant think of the title at just now but it was basically about a loyalist that was on the armys books, paid to kill IRA memebers.
I will get the title if anybodys interested.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rodin
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 09 Dec 2006
Posts: 2224
Location: UK

PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 10:32 pm    Post subject: Re: Abu Hamzas Reply with quote

[quote="conspirator"]house was right next to a government minister.
Every 'muslim' that is picked up nowadays has some connection with the Finsbury Park Mosque where Hamza 'prayed'[quote]

Could you elaborate, especially on the 'house was' bit?

TIA

_________________
Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mark Gobell
On Gardening Leave
On Gardening Leave


Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Posts: 4529

PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 11:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The main theme here for 9/11 Truth and for Irish Truth, whether, Republican, Loyalist, central or fringe, is to realise and publicise the unalterable fact that the British security services, special branch, police and judiciary are all involved in the planning, delivery and subsequent cover up of state sponsored terrorism.

This is the universal message that people must understand.

With full respect and in deference to those that have suffered; the tax funded, state sanctioned institutions of oppression, terrorism and death must be exposed for what they really are. Criminals and murderers. Gangsters and liars, enabled and enobled by a mirage of democracy and royal assent.

Juxtapose Catholics, Protestants, Muslims, Christians and Jews with Iraq, Afghanistan, Britain, Ireland, Palestine, America, Israel, and you end up with the same movie with different actors, all bringing out their dead on a stage not of our making.

We need not to be players in this drama anymore, for the parts we are assigned, are not our own. They are worn out, archaic relics of an old, corrupt and decrepit executive whose time has finally come.

To go.

_________________
The Medium is the Massage - Marshall McLuhan.


Last edited by Mark Gobell on Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:08 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rodin
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 09 Dec 2006
Posts: 2224
Location: UK

PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 11:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mark Gobell wrote:
The main theme here for 9/11 Truth and for Irish Truth, whether, Republican, Loyalist, central or fringe, is to realise and publicise the unalterable fact that the British security services, special branch, police and judiciary are all involved in the planning, delivery and subsequent cover up of state sponsored terrorism. This is the universal message that people must understand..


Hear hear!

_________________
Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
jason67
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 129
Location: SE London

PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 11:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rodin wrote:
Mark Gobell wrote:
The main theme here for 9/11 Truth and for Irish Truth, whether, Republican, Loyalist, central or fringe, is to realise and publicise the unalterable fact that the British security services, special branch, police and judiciary are all involved in the planning, delivery and subsequent cover up of state sponsored terrorism. This is the universal message that people must understand..


Hear hear!


Yep, I second that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Larry O'Hara
Relentless Limpet Shill
Relentless Limpet Shill


Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 96
Location: depends

PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:00 am    Post subject: you don't get it, do you? Reply with quote

While all this was going on, Agents Shayler & Machon were fully, and unapologetically, implicated. Yet none of you dupes would dare raise that at one of your cult meetings, would you? Shayler/Machon boast about their involvement--how thankful for them they have infiltrated a bunch of naive idiots who will never put them on the spot.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
marky 54
Mega Poster
Mega Poster


Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293

PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 4:33 am    Post subject: Re: you don't get it, do you? Reply with quote

Larry O'Hara wrote:
While all this was going on, Agents Shayler & Machon were fully, and unapologetically, implicated. Yet none of you dupes would dare raise that at one of your cult meetings, would you? Shayler/Machon boast about their involvement--how thankful for them they have infiltrated a bunch of naive idiots who will never put them on the spot.


intresting how you call us a cult and idiots whilst admitting this type of stuff does happen ie false flag.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
marky 54
Mega Poster
Mega Poster


Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293

PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 6:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

would it not be the same as calling everyone stupid and insane for claiming ghosts exsist and then imply that they could exsist or say that id seen one. Confused
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mark Gobell
On Gardening Leave
On Gardening Leave


Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Posts: 4529

PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 8:21 am    Post subject: Re: you don't get it, do you? Reply with quote

Larry O'Hara wrote:
While all this was going on, Agents Shayler & Machon were fully, and unapologetically, implicated. Yet none of you dupes would dare raise that at one of your cult meetings, would you? Shayler/Machon boast about their involvement--how thankful for them they have infiltrated a bunch of naive idiots who will never put them on the spot.


Larry. Your axe must be honed to perfection by now and is clearly quite sharp.

Your assumptions about former MI5 officers being involved in the machinations of the murderous cabal they worked for cannot go unchallenged.

That is an issue for them to respond to and each of us to consider.

What I will challenge Larry, is your founding assumption about a group of people who post messages on the internet about a subject they consider to be extremely important, state sponsored murder, being a subject you have studied and written about in depth and for some years.

Why then do you see fit to categorise this loose, leaderless association of like minded folk as a cult ?

We have no doctrine, we have no leaders, we are a group of people, most of whom have never met each other. We have no guiding principles, we have no constitution other than a statement that calls for a new impartial investiagtion into 9/11.

As anyone can see, we often disagree. There are many on here who seek to divert our attention and cause division.

Not every poster on here has even signed that petition. Have you ?

You post here Larry, so does that make you part of the cult too ?

As for none of us dupes not daring to raise criticism of David Shayler and Annie Machon at our cult meetings, you are wrong. Entirely wrong. But then I understand why you are wrong because you haven't been to any of our cult meetings where this has happened have you ?

I have Larry. I've seen it and heard it first hand. Forceful objection to their presence and being given a platform.

Now, I'm not an expert in cults, perhaps you could enlighten me. Do they normally allow for public dissent like this ?

Finally Larry, nobody publishes a rule book here about who we should trust, that is a matter for individuals, using their judgement. These matters are discussed between members, posts are made in full view of all other members about the very subject.

Do the paying subscribers of your magazine and readers of your website, attendees at your meetings, constitute a cult ?

Are you working for the insecurity services Larry ?

How would anyone know ?

Should we trust you ?

Would you allow me to peek inside your bank account too ?

Perhaps you could explain, publicly, how David Shayler and Annie Machon could damage the issue of 9/11 Truth ?

If MI5 wanted my name and address or tap my phone, I don't think they need to contact ex spooks do they ?

If Dave and Annie suddenly change their mind in the future and publicly declare that 9/11 was not an inside job and they were wrong then the press will have a field day, the image of 9/11 Truth will be further marginalised for about five minutes in the minds of the great unthinking. Dave and Annie will disappear and 9/11 Truth will remain.

As far as I can see Larry, David and Annie attract audiences. They are both accomplished speakers and knowledgable about the subject. They are working to disseminate questions about 9/11 and are therefore acting as recruiting sergeants for the campaign.

We do need to encourage more public speakers to step forward so that our options are spread less thinly.

I'd be interested to read your response Larry and your thoughts on 9/11 and how we can move the campaign forward.

_________________
The Medium is the Massage - Marshall McLuhan.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PaulStott
Relentless Limpet Shill
Relentless Limpet Shill


Joined: 13 Jul 2006
Posts: 326
Location: All Power To The People, No More Power To The Pigs

PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 10:53 am    Post subject: Re: you don't get it, do you? Reply with quote

Larry O'Hara wrote:
While all this was going on, Agents Shayler & Machon were fully, and unapologetically, implicated. Yet none of you dupes would dare raise that at one of your cult meetings, would you? Shayler/Machon boast about their involvement--how thankful for them they have infiltrated a bunch of naive idiots who will never put them on the spot.


Indeed. To this should be added that Shayler sat at the North African desk at MI5 - he was utterly implicated in the "Covenant of Security".

Anything to say about that David? Annie?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
conspiracy analyst
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 27 Sep 2005
Posts: 2279

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 10:31 am    Post subject: Re: Abu Hamzas Reply with quote

[quote="rodin"][quote="conspirator"]house was right next to a government minister.
Every 'muslim' that is picked up nowadays has some connection with the Finsbury Park Mosque where Hamza 'prayed'
Quote:


Could you elaborate, especially on the 'house was' bit?

TIA


There are two houses under dispute. One Hamza allegedly bought and the one his wife lived in.

I remember reading that his next door neighbour was some person high up in the British government in a newspaper.

I dont have time to do the search but I have found this.

It illustrates that Hamza is what one would call a paid patsy, to run the 'muslim terror' line and that everyone who is ever picked up, like the 'shoebomber' and now the 'chappati flour' bombers are connected one way or another with the ...Finsbury Park Mosque and good ole Abu Hamza.

Nearly everything is connected one way or another with the security services, including many on this site.

http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=news_news&Number=2 93925126

There was an old criticism of the Russian that almost 1 in 5 people were working in one way or another for the KGB.

It appears this is now the western condition as well...

Happy searching Abu Hamza...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rodin
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 09 Dec 2006
Posts: 2224
Location: UK

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 11:43 am    Post subject: Re: you don't get it, do you? Reply with quote

Larry O'Hara wrote:
While all this was going on, Agents Shayler & Machon were fully, and unapologetically, implicated. Yet none of you dupes would dare raise that at one of your cult meetings, would you? Shayler/Machon boast about their involvement--how thankful for them they have infiltrated a bunch of naive idiots who will never put them on the spot.


My first post here waded right into Agent Shayler. I keep saying we must check out everyone. Especially 'leaders'. It is not bad form or netiquette - it is essential in the disinfo age that we all willingly submit to scrutiny.

There is a vast Masonic organisation out there, and I bet they are mobilised to keep a lid on the truth. It's for the best you see...

_________________
Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
rodin
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 09 Dec 2006
Posts: 2224
Location: UK

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 11:50 am    Post subject: Re: Abu Hamzas Reply with quote

[quote="conspirator"][quote="rodin"]
conspirator wrote:
house was right next to a government minister.
Every 'muslim' that is picked up nowadays has some connection with the Finsbury Park Mosque where Hamza 'prayed'
Quote:


Could you elaborate, especially on the 'house was' bit?

TIA


There are two houses under dispute. One Hamza allegedly bought and the one his wife lived in.

I remember reading that his next door neighbour was some person high up in the British government in a newspaper.

I dont have time to do the search but I have found this.

It illustrates that Hamza is what one would call a paid patsy, to run the 'muslim terror' line and that everyone who is ever picked up, like the 'shoebomber' and now the 'chappati flour' bombers are connected one way or another with the ...Finsbury Park Mosque and good ole Abu Hamza.

Nearly everything is connected one way or another with the security services, including many on this site.

http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=news_news&Number=2 93925126

There was an old criticism of the Russian that almost 1 in 5 people were working in one way or another for the KGB.

It appears this is now the western condition as well...

Happy searching Abu Hamza...


I always had him down for a cartoon villian...



Quote:
In London, one of his first jobs was as a nightclub bouncer. He married a British woman and decided to resume his studies at Brighton Polytechnic.

His marriage rapidly broke down, but he later remarried and had seven children.

One of Abu Hamza's first major engineering contracts took him to Sandhurst, the Royal Military Academy.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3752517.stm

You couldn't make it up...

_________________
Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
conspiracy analyst
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 27 Sep 2005
Posts: 2279

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:38 pm    Post subject: Was at Sandhurst... Reply with quote

which is the bastion of Army training for nearly all the dictators of the Western world like Idi Amin, was known to M15 and in contact with them for years, had nearly all his speeches vetted, had top lawyers defending him...

If this is all real, and Hamza is in prison, not sunning himself in some Ambassadors home in some Carribean island, then one can believe in so many coincidences in life which never actually materialise for anyone else but for such high profile characters...

If you can believe Hamza isn't a manufactured patsy, you can believe anything...

Shoebombers,
Chappatiflour bombers,
Fertilizer bombers.

The list is endless. What will they think of next?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mark Gobell
On Gardening Leave
On Gardening Leave


Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Posts: 4529

PostPosted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 10:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

How Britain created Ulster's murder gangs

by Neil Mackay

Global Research, January 28, 2007

Sunday Herald

http://sundayherald.com/analysis/analysis/display.var.1152814.0.0.php

Since the Sunday Herald was founded in 1999, it has led the way in exposing the “dirty war” in Northern Ireland. Today, we report on the most shocking revelations to date. Our investigations show that far from merely “turning” terrorists to work for the state, British military intelligency actually created loyalist murder gangs to operate as proxy assassins. They even cleared areas in which the gangs were operating of police and army, to allow them to carry out their hits and escape.

ON MONDAY, the world was stunned by the release of a report by Nuala O'Loan, the police ombudsman for Northern Ireland, which stated that Special Branch officers in Belfast had "colluded" with loyalist terrorists working for the British state as informers. According to O'Loan, police failed to stop these paramilitary gangs, part of the Ulster Volunteer Force (UVF) from killing an estimated 15 people in the 1990s. While this was seized upon by republicans as proof that security forces had aided a loyalist campaign of sectarian assassination, in reality O'Loan's findings barely scratched the surface of a 30-year history of criminality and murder orchestrated by the British army and the Ulster police.

HE INSISTS on being named only as "JB", a sick, ageing man, who fears that ill-health or a bullet from an assassin wishing to silence him will claim his life before he has the chance to tell the true story of his life and crimes. On Wednesday, JB passed a bundle of papers to the Sunday Herald, making up the bulk of his unpublished memoirs, which paint British military intelligence as a callous, murderous, criminal cabal. JB claims that he - and dozens of other members of the terrorist organisation, the Ulster Volunteer Force (UVF) - were trained and armed by military intelligence.

He also claims select UVF officers were ordered by military intelligence to carry out assassinations against both IRA figures and ordinary Catholics. Such soft targets as innocent men and women were pinpointed by military intelligence in order to psychologically undermine the nationalist population of Northern Ireland and cut the support base from beneath the Provisional IRA.

Martin Ingram, the false cover name for a former member of the covert British military intelligence outfit the Force Research Unit (FRU), has supported the claims made by JB. Ingram eventually turned whistleblower, disgusted at the deaths the FRU had caused by colluding with terrorists in Ulster. He later went on to write a book about the double agent Stakeknife - IRA operative Freddie Scappaticci - who had been "handled" by Ingram's FRU team and exposed by Sunday Herald investigators. Ingram says he is aware of JB's history, and believes his claims are "completely credible". Loyalist sources have also confirmed JB's credibility.

JB, who was convicted twice of terrorist offences, once in the 1970s and again in the early 1990s, says he carried out some 50 UVF operations sanctioned by his handlers in the Military Reconnaissance Force (MRF), the army team which gathered intelligence and ran agents in Ulster. He says he became a "killer, bomber, arsonist and robber". Of the 50 state-sanctioned operations he took part in, "not all were successful".Some, he says, "were aborted". So far he has refused to go into details of the actual murders he took part in on behalf of British military intelligence. Beyond admitting that killings took place, he will only talk about how the British army trained him as a terrorist proxy.

In JB's words, "military intelligence trained, armed and moulded squads of loyalists to put pressure on the IRA to abandon their campaign of bloodshed and carnage". JB was a young UVF member in the early 1970s when first approached by an MRF handler. JB says the military intelligence officer, whom he will name only as "Mike", told him that the then prime minister Edward Heath had sanctioned the "training of loyalists".Mike later added that "nobody, except at the very highest level of the British government and senior officers of the military" knew about the covert counter-insurgency operations.

Mike told JB that "London has ordered the war be taken to the IRA obviously this can't be done openly and must be done covertly. That's why we are looking for people like you ... We are enlisting men from all over the province to co-ordinate attacks, to convince the Catholic people that support for the Provos will only bring death and destruction to their own community."

As well as being trained in firearms at army barracks and firing ranges around Northern Ireland - primarily at Palace Barracks near Holywood in County Down - men like JB were also provided with intelligence on potential targets and given details about which targets to hit. JB knows of at least 30 loyalists who received similar training to him, but believes more than 120 could have been trained as proxy assassins. At times, he was given a British army uniform to provide him with cover while with his handlers. He even drank, on occasions, with his handlers in the Naafi - armed forces bars on military bases.

When proxies like JB were dispatched on a murder operation, military intelligence would impose an Out Of Bounds (OOB) order on the area in which the attack was to take place. In military terms, an OOB means an intelligence operation is under way and army and police are forbidden from entering the area. This gave loyalist murder gangs freedom to operate with impunity during such state-sanctioned attacks. At one stage, claims JB, Mike told him: "Mr Heath and the top brass have given the green light for this."

JB was trained by military intelligence, he says, in how to use a variety of hand-guns, machine guns and rifles, as well as bomb-making techniques. The UVF men working for military intelligence were also given consignments of guns and ammunition by handlers, sent on gruelling fitness courses and schooled in the arts of surveillance, counter-surveillance and intelligence gathering. Other classes included lectures on forensic science, how to avoid leaving incriminating evidence at the scene of crimes and how to steal cars for use in assassination operations.

JB also claims military intelligence instructed loyalists to plant explosives in a Catholic bar to make it look as if the IRA had accidentally set off the bomb. It was hoped such acts would drain Catholic support for republicans.

The bomb was planted in McGurk's Bar in Belfast on December 4, 1971. It killed 15 men, women and children. The immediate blame was indeed placed on the IRA. However, seven years after the bomb, a UVF man received 15 life sentences for the atrocity. JB says he was told about the planned bombing two weeks before the attack and was with his handler at the time it happened. He also claims he saw his handler take pot-shots at republican youths on the streets of Belfast around this time.

A captain in military intelligence spelt out the reasons for the army creating these secret counter-insurgency cells during one discussion with JB. He said: "This type of war can't be won by conventional means. The only solution is to implement a counter-operation, to counteract the violence of the enemy by heaping more violence on them That's why we've chosen men like you to instil trepidation and pandemonium among the Provos and their support base, the Catholic community We will match whatever they do, and outdo them."

In the weeks leading up to the events of Bloody Sunday in Derry, on January 30, 1972, in which the Paratroop Regiment killed 13 people taking part in a civil rights demonstration, JB was informed by his handlers that the British army had been ordered by the Cabinet "to use whatever force and tactics necessary to put these troublemakers down". JB "concludes there were plans for mass murder to be committed that day The Bloody Sunday massacre was sanctioned by the government and top military chiefs." JB is sure that there was a preconceived plan to open fire on the civil rights demonstrators, with the full knowledge this would cause civilian deaths. He believes military intelligence thought this would shake the IRA. Instead, the massacre was a huge boost to IRA support and recruitment.

The day before Bloody Sunday, JB was taken for a training session at Palace Barracks, where he was given a pep-talk by a major who praised him for "having the courage and loyalty to participate in covert actions against the common enemy". The major told JB: "We are hoping to provoke a confrontation with the IRA in Derry, and give them an example of what to expect in future attacks." JB was then offered the chance, he claims, to accompany his military handler, Mike, to Derry to watch the operation to contain the demonstration. Military intelligence sources today say events such as this would help forge a bond, or esprit de corps, between agent and handler.

JB was provided with a British army uniform, a gas mask, camouflage face-paint and a rifle as cover for the time he would spend in Derry with his handler. During the events, JB watched from a military intelligence observation post as soldiers opened fire on civilians. He also claims to have seen members of military intelligence shooting at, and hitting, unarmed civilians from the gun nest in the observation post.

Another killing carried out by loyalists and facilitated by military intelligence by the imposition of an OOB order took place in February 1972 when a bomb exploded in a pub killing, one Catholic man and injuring five others.

Trained proxies such as JB were often taken on "dummy run" assassination operations by handlers to ensure the OOB system wasworking. An OOB order would be given on a specific area of Belfast and JB and his team would enter the area, locate the home of a target, recce it and then leave. If they met with no security force patrols, they knew the OOB system was effective.

Mike at one time told JB: "We don't expect every time an ASU active service unit of the UVF goes out, they will kill somebody. The mere fact an attempt has been made and shots fired, even if they wound or miss altogether, is all part of the terror tactics." The policy was meant to "scare the *" out of Catholics. Mike also instructed JB on how to "extract information" from Catholics or republicans they kidnapped. The techniques were "gruesome", JB said. Mike made clear that torture should be used, and referred to the victims as "Taigs", a derogatory term for Catholics. Mike also advised on the best shot to use to dispatch a victim of a backstreet execution.

WHILE refusing to give a statement about the actual operations in which he took part, JB said he knew about a number of high-profile loyalist atrocities, sponsored by the MRF. These included the shooting of three members of the Miami Showband, a popular Irish group, in July 1975. The band's bus was flagged down by members of the UVF dressed in army uniforms at a fake military checkpoint. Another MRF-sponsored atrocity, says JB, was the Dublin and Monaghan bombings of May 17, 1974, which killed 33 people and injured 250.

JB lists a series of killings by loyalists which were facilitated by military intelligence putting out OOB orders on the location where the target lived, including the murder of a taxi driver, an eight-year-old girl, various men walking alone in Catholic areas and a Catholic woman in a bomb blast at public toilets in Lurgan. Referring to the last killing, JB says: "As long as it was a Catholic killed, fear would be creeping into Catholic minds - who would be next?'"

When UVF proxies were targeting republicans or IRA men, nearly all the intelligence used in planning hits came from the British army's intelligence wing.

Perhaps the most horrible of all hits facilitated by military intelligence, says JB, was one that involved the infamous Shankill Butchers murder gang. An OOB was put in place, allowing the UVF to put up an illegal roadblock at which they abducted a Catholic man and took him to the head of the Shankill Butchers - a UVF psychopath called Lenny Murphy. The gang tortured their victims for hours with knives before finally executing them. Sometimes the torture sessions took place in front of baying crowds in loyalist drinking dens. At least 19 people died at the hands of the gang. JB states: "I verify and confirm what I have written is a true and very accurate account of events."

_________________
The Medium is the Massage - Marshall McLuhan.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> General All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group