WebCameron maneuvers to avoid 9/11 question

[scubadiver]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/diary/story/0,,1992724,00.html

[malcks]

we should keep this going every week untill we force him to say something.malcks

[Zabooka]

Thats what I am doing, voting up every question on 911 and 7/7.

[Stefan]

Beautiful!

The mention might have been tounge in cheek but it's still getting exposure of the issue out there.

Everyone should continue to vote for every 9/11 and 7/7 issue that arises.

[spiv]

I've put a question on today entitled "Illegal wars, hoax terrorism, lies and deception"

[Dogsmilk]

And it's an excellent question too, that.

[Fallious]

http://www.webcameron.org.uk/ask-david/

Whats the most talked about issue on the website of our future prime minister? By a huge margin, "911" with three times more discussion than any other subject on the site.

The Webcameron PR machine has completed another voting session for it's "Ask David" feature, covering the period of 15th Jan - 21st Jan. If Cameron keeps his panties on, we should expect short answers inside the week. The top five questions voted for are as follows..

- Chagos: a wrong to right?
- Your Involvement With The Secretive Bilderberg Group
- The Big Brother State
- Help for lower income candidates
- We deserve an independent inquirey into 7/7 The London Bombings

A very nice selection for him artfully fob off.

The new session has started from 22nd Jan - 28th Jan 07. So remember to pop by in the next six days to register your vote. The question list is still being populated, but there's a few goodies on there already. Vote for as many as you like, here's some of my favourites.

-"What is your opinion on the lies told by the US Government concerning the air quality at Ground Zero in the days after 9/11" (Definitely worth a vote!)

- "Will You Watch 9/11 Press For Truth?" (Amusingly the last question about this wasn't actually a question .

- "Official Inquiries, 7-7, 9-11" (Just so he knows the first two weeks weren't flukes)

- "Illegal wars, hoax terrorism, lies and deception"

- "MI5/6 funding of terrorism"

Go vote for as many as you can. If you haven't signed up yet, then go to it, we will be doing this for as long as Cameron thinks this is positive publicity for himself.

http://www.webcameron.org.uk/ask-david/

[Zabooka]

I have voted all up.

[Bongo]

WE ARE NEARLY THERE IN THE TOP 10... GET REGISTERED AND VOTING PEOPLE !!!

[Bongo]

I have noticed that too many 9/11 questions will divide the Voting... I have a feeling that just one 9/11 and one 7/7 question will get them into the top 5 every week... with any luck?

[SHERITON HOTEL]

How long before 'Lord Snooty' dumps this experiment like the shadow cabinet 'no tie' dress code directive?

[jason67]

[Bongo]

I know you can vote for 5... but surely from this site alone, we can get more than 39 votes. It takes nothing to register and you can be anonymous. So come on people... keep pounding away and get 9/11 to number 1 every week.

Ps... Official Inquiries, 7-7, 9-11 is now in at number 5... but only one vote away from being relegated...please vote now...

http://www.webcameron.org.uk/ask-david/

[jason67]

[malcks]

done, we have to keep this up every week dont let him of the hook!!malcks

[andyb]

Agreed, it takes not time at all and puts high profile pressure on the guy. 1200 odd registered here and only 39 votes?? there are some great questions there this week.

[ComfortablyNumb]

Can I suggest this campaign is added the the home page of this site. This is an ideal opportunity to push a major political figure (not my opinion) into a corner.

What ever he says it will get the message out to more people!

Regs,
Numb

[DrJazzz]

Great stuff... can I suggest though concentrating the fire, don't have too many different questions, otherwise they can say that there's a concerted trolling attack going and they might delete the lot - far better to just vote for the lead question IMHO.

[SHERITON HOTEL]

What specific 9/11 or 7/7 questions should we target webcameron with?

something like... did you see a 757 in the 9/11 CCTV security footage released by the Pentagon last year, YES OR NO???

[ComfortablyNumb]

[fixuplooksharp]

[quote="SHERITON HOTEL"]
What specific 9/11 or 7/7 questions should we target webcameron with?

something like... 'did you see a 757 in the 9/11 CCTV security footage released by the Pentagon last year, YES OR NO???[/quote]

heh. decent!

[marky 54]

do you think building seven looks like a controlled demoliton when it collapses?

do you think invading countries and killing innocent women and children by mistake or otherwise creates terrorism or prevents it?

does it make any sense to fight for our freedoms that tony blair is taking away? is tony blair a radiculists who hates our freedoms?

events through history have been proven to of been false flag operations, what steps do you take and will you take if you become primeminister to make sure such immoral events leading to the loss of innocent life never happens in this country?

just a few ideas to test his morals and honesty

[Serge]

Have you seen the NTSB flight data recorder animation released by this US Government agency?.

Have you seen pandoras black box 2?

[James O'Neill]

Serge: Yes, I have just viewed the simulation, or more accurately the video from Pilots for 9/11 Truth which is on an earlier posting on this board. I am amazed that there has been no reaction to this video clip. If the Pilots.org are correct in their presentation and interpretation of the NTSB simulation then the official account is blown even further out of the water. For example, the flight path could not have caused the damage to the light poles; the plane was to the left of the 9/11 Commission's simulation; and most importantly at the time the plane reached the Pentagon it was more than 400 feet above the Pentagon and could not possibly have ploughed into the Pentagon's wall as the official version claims. There were many other points in the video worth noting as well. What is now needed perhaps is for this video to be viewed by some experienced pilots for an opinion as to whether Pilots.org have done a fair job.
As with the WTC towers, it is the scientific data that will destroy the Bush crime family.

[aerosol]

This is where a decentralised, unstructured campaign fails.

A topic about standing at football matches has appeared from nowhere and tops the list with 97 votes - most likely because there has either been a co-ordinated effort or somebody has circumvented the anti-multiple vote system - and pushed the highest rated 9/11 question out of the top 5.
(n.b. In the time it took to type this (about four minutes) the football issue has received another 7 votes)

It is essential to keep the issue alive and to expect the participation any significant number of this forum's members would require the co-operation of forum moderators or administrators - likewise the signing of the number 10 petition.

It is possible for moderators and/or administrators on a phpBB forum to e-mail all members and having agreed a question or questions a link could be sent out making voting a simple click for anybody who has registered - itself a 60 second process.

No doubt there are some who will have conscientious objections to signing up or voting but if the time to stand up and be counted is not upon us it is already too late.

That this is not already happening exposes a huge flaw in the campaign. People who would seize the opportunity to co-ordinate such actions ought to have the necessary privileges to utilise the forum for just such a purpose.